Advanced search
Publication Cover
Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment Volume 29, 2015 - Issue 6
Submit an article Journal homepage
2,043
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles; Agriculture and Environmental Biotechnology

The stakeholders’ point of view about the impact of recreational and tourism activities on natural protected area: a case study from Kure Mountains National Park, Turkey

Nur BelkayaliFaculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Landscape Architecture, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, TurkeyCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
&
Merve Damla KesimoğluFaculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Engineering, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, TurkeyView further author information
Pages 1092-1103 | Received 29 May 2015, Accepted 09 Jul 2015, Published online: 26 Aug 2015

References

  • Gül A, Akten M. Recreational carrying capacity in protected natural areas and conceptual approaches. Protected Natural Areas Symposium; 2005 Sep 8–10; Isparta, Turkey.
  • Ananda J, Herath G. The use of analytic hierarchy process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning. For Policy Econ. 2003;5:13–26.
  • Yavuz S. Determination of effective factors in teachers car preferences with the analytic hierarchy process. DPUJSS. 2012;32(2):29–46.
  • Anonymous. Kure Mountains National Park ecosystem-based forest management functional plan preparation project. Ankara (Turkey): TR Ministry of Forestry and Water Management, GEF and UNDP, Middle East Forestry Project and Consultancy Trading Co.; 2011. p. 7.
  • Anonymous. Kure Mountains National Park long term development plan planning report. Ankara (Turkey): TR Ministry of Forestry and Water Management, General Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks; 2012. p.1–2.
  • Kalem S. Hot spots for nature conservation. Nat Geogr Turkiye. 2005;2:24–36.
  • Kure Mountains National Park Animals [Internet]. Turkey; 2014 [cited 2014 May 15] Available from: http://www.kdmp.gov.tr/alt_detay_3-en.asp?id=10&alt_id=19&id_son=28.
  • Kure Mountains National Park History and Culture [Internet]. Turkey; 2014 [cited 2014 May 15]. Available from: http://www.kdmp.gov.tr/alt_detay_2-en.asp?id=10&alt_id=18.
  • Kure Mountains National Park and buffer area rapid field assessment, final report. Ançeo Ltd. GEF-supported “Enhancing Forest Protected Areas Management Project” Ministry of Environment and Forestry, UNDP Turkey and WWF Turkey. Ankara, Turkey; 2010.
  • Kure Mountains National Park Received Pan parks certificate [Internet]. Turkey; 2014 [cited 2014 May 15]. Available from: http://www.kdmp.gov.tr/haber_detay_en.asp?haid=163.
  • Turker N, Ozturk S. Perceptions of residents towards the impacts of tourism in the Kure Mountains National Park, Turkey. Int J Business Soc Sci. 2013;4:45–56.
  • Newsome D, Moore SA, Dowling RK. Natural area tourism: ecology, impacts and management. Cleveland: Channel View Publications; 2002.
  • Uzun S, Müderrisoğlu H, Kaya LG. Ecological impacts of recreational activities in natural areas. I. Recreation Studies Congress; 2012 Apr 12–15; Kemer, Antalya, Turkey. p. 791–809.
  • Peterson GL, Driver BL, Brown PJ. The benefits and costs of recreation: dollars and sense. In: Johnson RL, Johnson GV, editors. Economic valuation of natural resources: issues, theories and applications. Boulder (CO): Westview Press; 1990. p. 7–24.
  • Demir C. Adverse environmental impacts of tourism and recreation activities: an application on national parks in Turkey. J Dokuz Eylul Univ Fac Econ Admin Sci. 2002;17(2):93–117.
  • Turkish Address Based Population Registration System datas for Bartın [Internet]. Turkey; 2013 [cited 2014 May 19]. Available from: http://www.bartin.gov.tr/nufus-ve-idari-durum.
  • Turkish Address Based Population Registration System datas for Kastamonu [Internet]. Turkey; 2013 [cited 2014 May 03]. Available from: http://kastamonu.gov.tr/nufus.asp.
  • Yazıcıoğlu Y, Erdoğan S. SPSS applied research methods. Ankara: Detail Publishing; 2004. p. 74.
  • Varis O. The analysis of preferences in complex environmental judgments-a focus on the analytic hierarchy process. J Environ Manage. 1989;28:283–294.
  • Saaty TL. Fundamentals of decision making and priorty theory. Pittsburgh (PA): RWS Publications; 2000. p. 6.
  • Peters M, Zelewski S. Pitfalls in the application of analytic hierarchy process to performance measurement. Manage Decision. 2008;46(7):1039–1051.
  • Eroğlu E, Lorcu F. Data envelopment analytic hierarchy process with digital decision making. Istanbul Univ Fac Bus Admin Bus J. 2007;36(2):30–53.
  • Scholl A, Manthey L, Helm R. Solving multi attribute design problems with analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis: an empirical comparison. Eur J Oper Res. 2005;164(3):760–777.
  • Adıgüzel O, Çetintürk İ, Er O. Determining the customer preferences to hospitality industry with analytic hierarchy process method. Suleyman Demirel Univ Vis J. 2009;1(1):17–35.
  • Özgörmüş E, Mutlu Ö, Güner H. Staff selection with Fuzzy AHP. Istanbul Commerce University V. National Production Research Symposium; 2005 Nov; Istanbul, Turkey. p. 111–115.
  • Yaralıoğlu K. Analytic hierarchy process in performance evaluation. J Dokuz Eylul Univ Fac Econ Admin Sci. 2001;16(1):129–142.
  • Saaty TL, Vargas LG. Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Norwell (MA): Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2001.
  • Saaty TL. Decision making with dependence and feedback, the analytic network process. 2nd ed. Pittsburgh (PA): RWS Publications; 2001.
  • Kangas J. An approach to public participation in strategic forest management planning. For Ecol Manage. 1994;70:75–88.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.