A study of the kinetics and the effect of trace elements on mixed anaerobic fermentative biogas production by ternary quadratic general rotary unitized design

References

• Dorado AD, Husni S, Pascual G, et al. Inventory and treatment of compost maturation emissions in a municipal solid waste treatment facility. Waste Manage. 2014;34:344–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier S, Oliveira LB. Economic feasibility of energy recovery from solid waste in the light of Brazil's waste policy: the case of Rio de Janeiro. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev. 2014;35:484–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wani KA, Mamta, Rao RJ. Bioconversion of garden waste, kitchen waste and cow dung into value-added products using earthworm Eisenia fetida. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2013;20:149–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ro KS, Hunt PG, Jackson MA, et al. Co-pyrolysis of swine manure with agricultural plastic waste: laboratory-scale study. Waste Manage. 2014;34:1520–1528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie S, Lawlor PG, Frost JP, et al. Effect of pig manure to grass silage ratio on methane production in batch anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and grass silage. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:5728–5733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang KY, Lin YX, Lu CH, et al. Gasification of rice straw in an updraft gasifier using water purification sludge containing Fe/Mn as a catalyst. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2013;38:12318–12324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo LF, Gil MV, Otero M, et al. Gasification of rice straw in a fluidized-bed gasifier for syngas application in close-coupled boiler-gasifier systems. Bioresour Technol. 2012;109:206–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Külcü R, Yaldiz O. The composting of agricultural wastes and the new parameter for the assessment of the process. Ecol Eng. 2014;69:220–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhamidimarri SMR, Pandey SP. Aerobic thermophilic composting of piggery solid wastes. Water Sci Technol. 1996;33:89–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petric I, Helić A, Avdić EA. Evolution of process parameters and determination of kinetics for co-composting of organic fraction of municipal solid waste with poultry manure. Bioresour Technol. 2012;117:107–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu CM, Wu SY, Chu CY, et al. Biohydrogen production from rice straw hydrolyzate in a continuously external circulating bioreactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2014;39:19317–19322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šulc J, Štojdl J, Richter M, et al. Biomass waste gasification – can be the two stage process suitable for tar reduction and power generation? Waste Manage. 2012;32:692–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopčić N, Domanovac MV, Kučić D, et al. Evaluation of laboratory-scale in-vessel co-composting of tobacco and apple waste. Waste Manage. 2014;34:323–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia A, Cheng J, Ding LK, et al. Enhancement of energy production efficiency from mixed biomass of Chlorella pyrenoidosa and cassava starch through combined hydrogen fermentation and methanogenesis. Appl Energy. 2014;120:23–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corro G, Paniagua L, Pal U, et al. Generation of biogas from coffee-pulp and cow-dung co-digestion: infrared studies of postcombustion emissions. Energy Convers Manage. 2013;74:471–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantozzi F, Buratti C. Biogas production from different substrates in an experimental continuously stirred tank reactor anaerobic digester. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:5783–5789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li YQ, Zhang RH, He YF, et al. Anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and corn stover in batch and continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR). Bioresour Technol. 2014;156:342–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusuf MOL, Ify NL. The effect of waste paper on the kinetics of biogas yield from the co-digestion of cow dung and water hyacinth. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35:1345–1351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachaiyasit S, Stuckey DC. Effect of low temperatures on the performance of an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). J Chem Technol Biot. 1997;69:276–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takashima M, Speece RE. Mineral nutrient requirements for high-rate methane fermentation of acetate at low SRT. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1989;61:1645–1650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin JAS, Wase DAJ, Forster CF. Effects of nutrient limitation on the anaerobic upflow sludge blanket reactor. Enzyme Microb Tech. 1990;12:877–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekert G, Konheiser U, Piechulla K, et al. Nickel requirement and factor F430 content of methanogenic bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1981;148:459–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thauer RK. Biochemistry of methanogenesis: a tribute to Marjory Stephenson. Microbiology. 1998;144:2377–2406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thauer RK, Kaster AK, Goenrich M, et al. Hydrogenases from methanogenic archaea, nickel, a novel cofactor, and H2 storage. Annu Rev Bioche. 2010;79:507–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pobeheim H, Munk B, Lindorfer H, et al. Impact of nickel and cobalt on biogas production and process stability during semi-continuous anaerobic fermentation of a model substrate for maize silage. Water Res. 2011;45:781–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson J, Yekta SS, Sundberg C, et al. Bioavailability of cobalt and nickel during anaerobic digestion of sulfur-rich stillage for biogas formation. Appl Energy. 2013;112:473–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiang H, Lang D, Li Y. High-solid mesophilic methane fermentation of food waste with an emphasis on iron, cobalt, and nickel requirements. Bioresour Technol. 2012; 103:21–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang XP, Niu MF, Wang SY, et al. Anaerobic fermentation conditions of mixed corn straw and pig excreta in North China. Chin J Ecol. 2011;30(1):126–130.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang ZH, Hu SB, Ma W, et al. Experiment on co-fermentation and anaerobic fermentation of livestock manure and wheat straw. Agr Res Arid Areas. 2010;28(6):87–90.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang CL, Li YB, Bu DS, et al. Biogas yield and its relations with the duration and temperature of mixed anaerobic fermentation of livestock dungs and wheat straw. Chin J Appl Eco. 2008;19(8):1817–1822.
   Google Scholar
• Liu DJ. Experiment on biogas fermentation with different proportion of corn straw mixed with cow dung. China Biogas. 2009;27(4):13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rao M, Singh S, Singh A, et al. Bioenergy conversion studies of the organic fraction of MSW: assessment of ultimate bioenergy production potential of municipal garbage. Appl Energy. 2000;66:75–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafle GK, Kim SH. Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure for biogas production, batch and continuous operation. Appl Energy. 2013;103:61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafle GK, Kim SH, Sung KI. Ensiling of fish industry waste for biogas production, a lab scale evaluation of biochemical methane potential (BMP) and kinetics. Bioresour Technol. 2013;127:326–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Soil physicochemical properties analysis. 1st ed. China: Institute of Soil Science; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• American Public Health Association. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington (DC): Public Health Association; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Peng YZ, Zhang SJ, Wang SY. Heavy-metal ions in the biological treatment of municipal landfill leachate. Tech Equip Environ Pollut Control. 2006;7(1):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan D, Tandon SM. Response of a cattle dung methane fermentation to nickel. Biol Waste. 1987;22(4):261–268.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley NV, Davies M, Hurst T. The effect of increased nickel ion concentrations on microbial populations in the anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Water Res. 1982;16(6):963–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takashima N, Speece RE. Mineral requirements for methane fermentation. Crit Rev Env Sci Technol. 1990;19(5):465–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heo NH, Park SC, Kang H. Effects of mixture ratio and hydraulic retention time on single-stage anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge. J Environ Sci Health. 2004;39(7):1739–1756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma SL, Liu H, Yan Q. Effect of Fe2+ concentration on the enzymes during methane production from Taihu blue algae by anaerobic digestion. J Food Sci Biotechnol. 2011;30(2):306–310.
   Google Scholar