Principle and application of plant mutagenesis in crop improvement: a review

References

• Novak FJ, Brunner H. Plant breeding: induced mutation technology for crop improvement. IAEA Bull. 1992;4:25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Shu QY, Forster BP, Nakagawa H. Principles and applications of plant mutation breeding. In: Shu QY, Forster BP, Nakagawa H, editors. Plant mutation breeding and biotechnology. Wallingford: CABI; 2012. p. 301–325.
   Google Scholar
• Kharkwal MC. A brief history of plant mutagenesis. In: Shu QY, Forster BP, Nakagawa H, editors. Plant mutation breeding and biotechnology. Wallingford: CABI; 2012. p. 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lönnig WE. Mutation breeding, evolution, and the law of recurrent variation. Recent Res Dev Genetics Breeding. 2005;2:45–70.
   Google Scholar
• Ahloowalia BS, Maluszynski M. Induced mutations – a new paradigm in plant breeding. Euphytica. 2001;118(2):167–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broertjes C, Van Harten AM. Applied mutation breeding for vegetatively propagated crops. Vol.12, Developments in crop science. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publ.; 1988. p. 197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Chai M, Ho YW, Liew KW, et al. Biotechnology and in vitro mutagenesis for banana improvement. In: Jain SM, Swennen R, editors. Banana improvement: cellular, molecular biology, and induced mutations. Enfield (NH): Science Publishers, Inc.; 2004. p. 59–77.
   Google Scholar
• Predieri S. Mutation induction and tissue culture in improving fruits. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture. 2000;64(2–3):185–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo E, Nakayama M, Kameari N, et al. Red–purple flower due to delphinidin 3,5–diglucoside, a novel pigment for Cyclamen spp., generated by ion-beam irradiation. Plant Biotechnol. 2009;26(5):565–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensz RA. ‘Ray Ruby’ grapefruit, a mutant of ‘Ruby Red’, with redder flesh and peel color. J Rio Grande Valley Horticultural Society. 1978;32:39–41.
   Google Scholar
• Pathirana R. Plant mutation breeding in agriculture. In: Hemming D, editor. Plant sciences reviews 2011. Cambridge: CABI; 2012. p. 107–125.
   Google Scholar
• Roychowdhury R, Tah J. Mutagenesis–a potential approach for crop improvement. In: Hakeem KR, Ahmad P, Ozturk M, editors. Crop improvement: new approaches and modern techniques. New York (NY): Springer; 2013. p. 149–187.
   Google Scholar
• Kharkwal MC, Shu QY. The role of induced mutations in world food security. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2009. p. 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Forster BP, Shu QY. Plant mutagenesis in crop improvement: basic terms and applications. In: Shu QY, Forster BP, Nakagawa H, editors. Plant mutation breeding and biotechnology. Wallingford: CABI; 2012. p. 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Mba C. Induced mutations unleash the potentials of plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Agronomy. 2013;3(1);200–231.
   Google Scholar
• Van Harten AM. Mutation breeding: theory and practical applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Stadler LJ. Some genetic effects of X–rays in plants. J Heredity. 1930;2:3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Acquaah G. Principles of plant genetics and breeding. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Oldach KH. Mutagenesis. In: Pratap A, Kumar J, editors. Biology and breeding of food legumes. Wallingford: CABI; 2011. p. 208–219.
   Google Scholar
• Nencheva D. In vitro propagation of Chrysanthemum. In: Jain SM, Sergio O, editors. Protocols for in vitro propagation of ornamental plants. Humana Press; 2010. p. 177–185.
   Google Scholar
• Leitāo JM. Chemical mutagenesis. In: Shu QY, Forster BP, Nakagawa H, editors. Plant mutation breeding and biotechnology. Wallingford: CABI; 2012. p. 135–158.
   Google Scholar
• Mba C, Afza R, Bado S, et al. Induced mutagenesis in plants using physical and chemical agents. In: Davey MR, Anthony P, editors. Plant cell culture: essential methods. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2010. p. 111–130.
   Google Scholar
• Wani MR, Kozgar MI, Tomlekova N, et al. Mutation breeding: a novel technique for genetic improvement of pulse crops particularly Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). In: Parvaiz A, Wani MR, Azooz MM, Lam-son PT, editors. Improvement of crops in the era of climatic changes. New York (NY): Springer; 2014. p. 217–248.
   Google Scholar
• Mba C, Afza R, Shu QY. Mutagenic radiations: X–rays, ionizing particles and ultraviolet. In: Shu QY, Forster BP, Nakagawa H, editors. Plant mutation breeding and biotechnology. Wallingford: CABI; 2012. p. 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Mahadevappa M, Ikehashi H, Coffman WR, et al. Improvement of native rice for earliness though induced mutagenesis. Oryza. 1983;20(1):40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Khin TN. Rice mutation breeding for varietal improvement in Myanmar. Plant Mutation Rep. 2006;1:34–36.
   Google Scholar
• Amano E. Use of induced mutants in rice breeding in Japan. Plant Mutation Rep. 2006;1(1):21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Altenbung E. The artificial production of mutations by ultraviolent light. Am Naturalist. 1934;68:491–507.
   Google Scholar
• Naito K, Kusaba M, Shikazono N, et al. Transmissible and nontransmissible mutations induced by irradiating Arabidopsis thaliana pollen with γ–rays and carbon ions. Genetics. 2005;169(2):881–889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi H, Nagatomi S, Morishita T, et al. Mutation induced with ion-beam irradiation in rose. Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res. 2003;206:561–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe H. Significance and expectations of ion beam breeding. Gamma Field Symposia. 2001;40:15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Shikazono N, Yokota Y, Kitamura S, et al. Mutation rate and novel tt mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana induced by carbon ions. Genetics. 2003;163:1449–1455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura A, Nomitzu T, Furukani N, et al. Ray florets colour and shape mutants induced by 12C5+ ion beam irradiation in chrysanthemum. Scientia Horticulturae. 2010;123:558–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abe T, Matsuyama T, Sekido S, et al. Chlorophyll-deficient mutants of rice demonstrated the deletion of a DNA fragment by heavy–ion irradiation. J Radiat Res. 2002;43(Suppl):S157–S161.
   Google Scholar
• Bughio HR, Asad MA, Odhano IA, et al. Sustainable rice production through the use of mutation breeding. Pakistan J Bot. 2007;39:2457–2461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maluszynski M, Szarejko I, Bhatia CR, et al. Methodologies for generating variability. In: Ceccarelli S, Guimar EP, Weltzien E, editors. Plant breeding and farmer participation. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO); 2009. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i1070e/i1070e00.htm
   Google Scholar
• IAEA. IAEA mutant database. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; c2015 [accessed July 2015]. Available from: http://mvd.iaea.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw LD, Padgette SR, Kimball SL, et al. Perspectives on glyphosate resistance. Weed Technol. 1997;11:189–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldach KH, Peck DM, Cheong J, et al. Identification of a chemically induced point mutation mediating herbicide tolerance in annual medics (Medicago spp.). Annals Bot. 2008;101:997–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roychowdhury R, Bandyopadhyay A, Dalal T, et al. Biometrical analysis for some agro-economic characters in M1 generation of Dianthus caryophyllus. Plant Arch. 2011;11(2):989–994.
   Google Scholar
• Roychowdhury R, Datta S, Gupta P, et al. Analysis of genetic parameters on mutant populations of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) after ethyl methane sulphonate treatment. Not Sci Biol. 2012;4(1):137–143.
   Google Scholar
• Ahloowalia BS, Maluszynski M, Nichterlein K. Global impact of mutation-derived varieties. Euphytica. 2004;135:187–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maluszynski M, Gustafson P, Maluszynska J, et al. Advanced breeding for germplasm enhancement and yield improvement. In: Minas KP, Frank JD, Edward MH, editors. Yield gap and productivity decline in rice production. Rome: FAO; 2001. p. 191–224.
   Google Scholar
• Peiris R, Wickramasinghe TK, Indrasena SP. M 127–A promising tomato variety developed through induced mutation technique. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2008. p. 379–380.
   Google Scholar
• Liu L, Shi S, Wu J, et al. Mutation induction and in vitro screening for stem rot resistant/tolerant materials with oxalic acid in rape (Brassica napus L.). Chinese J Oil Crop Sci. 2003;25(1):5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Haq MA, Sadiq M, Hassan M. ‘CM 98’ (CM31–1/85) – a very high yielding disease resistant mutant variety of chickpea. Int Chickpea Pigeonpea Newsletter. 1999;6: 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Haq MA, Sadiq M, Hassan M. CM88 – a multiple disease resistant chickpea mutant variety. Mutat Breed Newsletter. 2001;45:5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Luzi-Kihupi A, Shao-Mwalyego F, Zakayo JA, et al. Mwangaza – a new early maturing, RYMV resistant rice mutant released in the United Republic of Tanzania. Plant Mutat Rep. 2008;2(1):13–5.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal RMS, Chaudhry MB, Aslam M, et al. Economic and agricultural impact of mutation breeding in cotton in Pakistan–a review. Plant mutation breeding for crop improvement. Vol. 1. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); 1991. p. 187–201.
   Google Scholar
• Pathirana R, Weerasena LA, Bandara P. Development and release of gamma ray induced sesame mutant ANK–S2 in Sri Lanka. Trop Agric Res Extension. 2000;3(1):19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Pathirana R. Gamma-ray-induced field tolerance to phytophthora blight in sesame. Plant Breeding. 1992;108:314–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiruki S, Onek LA, Limo M. Azide-based mutagenesis suppresses Striga hermonthica seed germination and parasitism on maize varieties. Afr J Biotechnol. 2006;5(10):866–870.
   Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, H. Induced mutations in plant breeding and biological researches in Japan. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2009. p. 48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Patnaik D, Chaudhary D, Rao GJN. Genetic improvement of long grain aromatic rices through mutation approach. Plant Mutation Rep. 2006;1(1):11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Rutger JN. Thirty years of induction, evaluation, and integration of useful mutants in rice genetics and breeding. Plant Mutation Rep. 2006;1(2):4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Oladosu Y, Rafii MY, Abdullah N, et al. Genetic variability and selection criteria in rice mutant lines as revealed by quantitative traits [Internet]. Scientific World J. 2014;2014:190531. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/190531.
   Google Scholar
• Rutger JN, Peterson MI, Hu CH. Registration of Calrose 76 rice. Crop Sci. 1976;17:978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster KW, Rutger JN. Inheritance of semidwarfism in rice Oryza sativa L. Genetics. 1978;88:559–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soldatov KI, Kalaidzhan AA. Production of dwarf and semidwarf mutant forms of sunflower. Khimicheskii Mutagenez i Problemy Selektsii. Moscow: Nauka; 1991. p. 208–212. Russian.
   Google Scholar
• Ismachin M, Sobrizal A. Significant contribution of mutation techniques to rice breeding in Indonesia. Plant Mutation Rep. 2006;1:18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamad O, Mohd. Nazir B, Alias I, et al. Development of improved rice varieties through the use of induced mutations in Malaysia. Plant Mutation Rep. 2006;1:27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Haq MA. Development of mutant varieties of crop plants at NIAB and the impact on agricultural production in Pakistan. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2009. p. 61–64.
   Google Scholar
• Oladosu Y, Rafii MY, Abdullah N, et al. Genetic variability and diversity of mutant rice revealed by quantitative traits and molecular markers. Agrociencia. 2015;49(3):249–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutger JN, Bryant RJ. Registration of aromatic se rice germplasm. Crop Sci. 2004;44(1):363–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal JP, Tomer AK. Genetic enhancement of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) for drought tolerance through induced mutations. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2009. p. 151–154.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlekova NB. Induced mutagenesis for crop improvement in Bulgaria. Plant Mutation Rep. 2010;2(2): 4–27.
   Google Scholar
• Cheema AA. Mutation breeding for rice improvement in Pakistan: achievements and impact. Plant Mutation Rep. 2006;1:36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Balooch AW, Soomro AM, Naqvi MH, et al. Sustainable enhancement of rice (Oryza sativa L.) production through the use of mutation breeding. Plant Mutat Rep. 2006;1:40–42.
   Google Scholar
• Tran DQ, Dao TTB, Nguyen HD, et al. Rice mutation breeding in Institute of Agricultural Genetics, Viet Nam. Plant Mutation Rep. 2006;1:47–49.
   Google Scholar
• Do KT, Dao MS, Hung PQ, et al. Rice mutation improvement for short duration, high yield and tolerance to adverse conditions in Mekong Delta of Viet Nam. Plant Mutation Rep. 2006;1:49–51.
   Google Scholar
• González MC, Pérez N, Cristo E, et al. Development of salinity-tolerant rice varieties using biotechnological and nuclear techniques. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2009. p. 138–140.
   Google Scholar
• Moustafa RAK. Development of salt–tolerant high–yielding barley lines via crossing between a mutant induced by EMS and a local cultivar. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2009. p. 148–150.
   Google Scholar
• Suprasanna P, Patade VY, Vaidya ER, et al. Radiation induced in vitro mutagenesis, selection for salt tolerance and characterization in sugarcane. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2009. p. 145–147.
   Google Scholar
• Fehr WR, Hammond EG. U.S. Patent No. 6,133,509. Washington (DC): U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond EG, Fehr WR. Registration of A5 germplasm line of soybean. Crop Sci. 1983;23:192–193.
   Google Scholar
• Patil A, Taware SP, Rao VS. Development of a high oleic soybean mutant and its stability across the environments. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2009. p. 200–202.
   Google Scholar
• Landge SP, Barve YY, Gupta RK, et al. Development of B. napus canola quality varieties suitable for Indian agro-climatic conditions by induced mutations. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2009. p. 322–326.
   Google Scholar
• D'Souza SF, Reddy KS, Badigannavar AM, et al. Mutation breeding in oilseeds and grain legumes in India: accomplishments and socio-economic impact. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2009. p. 55–57.
   Google Scholar
• Mondal S, Badigannavar AM, D'Souza SF. Induced variability for fatty acid profile and molecular characterization of high oleate mutant in cultivated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Breeding. 2011;130(2):242–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaveri SB, Nadaf HL. Induced mutagenesis for oil quality enhancement in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2009. p. 191–194.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández–Martínez JM, Pérez–Vich B, Velasco L. Mutation breeding for oil quality improvement in sunflower. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2009. p. 177–181.
   Google Scholar
• Yathaputanon C, Kumsueb B, Malipan A, et al. Protein content in high-protein soybean mutants in Thailand. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2009. p. 195–196.
   Google Scholar
• Ceballos H, Sanchez T, Denyer K, et al. Induction and identification of a small-granule, high-amylose mutant in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). J Agr Food Chem. 2008;56(16):7215–7222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landau-Ellis D, Pantalone VR. Marker-assisted backcrossing to incorporate two low phytate alleles into the Tennessee soybean cultivar 5601T. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2009. p. 316–318.
   Google Scholar
• Bregitzer P, Raboy V, Obert DE, et al. Registration of ‘Clearwater’ low-phytate hulless spring barley. J Plant Regist. 2008;2(1):1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Liu X, Wu D, et al. Recent progress of rice mutation breeding and germplasm enhancement in China. Plant Mutation Rep. 2006;1(1):4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hamid MA, Azad MAK, Howlidar MAR. Development of three varieties of groundnut with improved quantitative and qualitative traits through induced mutation. Plant Mutation Rep. 2006;1(2):14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Shu Q, Wu D, Xia Y. The most widely cultivated rice variety ‘Zhefu 802’ in China and its geneology. MBNL. 1997;43:3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Qiu S, Zheng J, et al. Generation of new rice cultivars from mature pollen treated with Gamma–radiation. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2009. p. 231–234.
   Google Scholar
• Ro PV, At DH. Improvement of traditional local varieties through induced mutations using nuclear techniques. In: Quy TD, Dong NH, Thanh LD, Quyen NHM, Truc PD, Ro PV, editors. Seminar on Methodology for Plant Mutation Breeding for Quality: Effective use of physical/chemical Mutagens, Oct 9–13; Hanoi: Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, JERI; 2000. p. 90–94.
   Google Scholar
• Badawi AT. Yield gap and productivity decline in rice production in Egypt. Yield gap and productivity decline in rice production. Expert consultation. Proceedings; 2000 Sep 5–7; Rome. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia CR. Economic impact of mutant varieties in India. Plant Mutation Breed Crop Improvement. 1991;1:33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Linqing W. Induced mutation for crop improvement in China; a review. Plant mutation breeding for crop improvement. Vol. 1. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); 1991. p. 9–32.
   Google Scholar
• Nakagawa H. Mutation breeding, status quo and future. Techno Innovation. 2008;68:6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti SN. Mutation breeding in India with particular reference to PNR rice varieties. J Nucl Agric Biol. 1995;24:73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Vinh MQ, Thinh DK, Bang DT, et al. Current status and research directions of induced mutation application to seed crops improvement in Vietnam. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation; 2009. p. 341–345.
   Google Scholar
• Do KT. Socio-economic impacts of mutant rice varieties in Southern Vietnam. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation; 2009 p. 65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Rutger JN. The induced SD1 mutant and other useful mutant genes in modern rice varieties. In: Shu QY, editor. Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Proceedings of an International Joint FAO/IAEA Symposium. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation; 2009. p. 44–47.
   Google Scholar
• Awan MA. Use of induced mutations for crop improvement in Pakistan. Plant mutation breeding for crop improvement. Vol. 1. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); 1991. p. 67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hadzim K, Othman O, Ajimilah NH. Height reduction of mutant Mahsuri and identification of Q34. Teknol Padi. 1994;10:17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Azlan S, Alias I, Saad A, et al. Performance of potential mutant lines of MR 180. In: Sivaprasagam, editor. Modern rice farming. Proceedings of International Rice Conference Serdang, Malaysia: MARDI; 2004. p. 293–296.
   Google Scholar
• Phang FK, Darman WA, Othman O. Commercial production of high quality rice - The MRQ 50 rice estate in Rompin, Pahang. In: Sivaprasagam, et al. editor. Modern rice farming. Proceedings of International Rice Conference Serdang; Malaysia. MARDI; 2004. p. 251–259.
   Google Scholar
• Bouma J, Ohnoutka Z. Importance and application of the mutant ‘Diamant’ in spring barley breeding. Plant mutation breeding for crop improvement. Vol. 1. Vienna: IAEA; 1991. p. 127–133.
   Google Scholar
• Wei W, Bilsborrow P, Hooley P, et al. Variation between two near isogenic barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivars in expression of the B subunit of the vacuolar ARPase in response to salinity. Hereditas. 2001;135:227–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster BP. Mutation genetics of salt tolerance in barley: an assessment of Golden Promise and other semi-dwarf mutants. Euphytica. 2001;120:317–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar