1,510
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article; Agriculture and Environmental Biotechnology

Genetic variation of some hawthorn species based on phenotypic characteristics and RAPD marker

, &
Pages 247-253 | Received 22 Jun 2015, Accepted 16 Nov 2015, Published online: 15 Dec 2015

References

  • Kumar D, Arya V, Bhat ZA, et al. The genus Crataegus: chemical and pharmacological perspectives. Br J Pharmacogn. 2012;22:1187–1200.
  • Judd WS, Campbell CS, Kellogg EA, et al. Plant systematic – a phylogenetic approach. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates; 1999.
  • Christensen KI. Revision of Crataegus sect. Crataegus and nothosect. Crataeguineae (Rosaceae-Maloideae) in the Old World. Syst Bot Monograms. 1992;35: 1–199. doi:10.2307/25027810.
  • Albarouki E, Peterson A. Molecular and morphological characterization of Crataegus L. species (Rosaceae) in southern Syria. Bot J Linn Soc. 2007;153:255–263.
  • Byatt JI. Hybridisation between Crataegus monogyna; Jacq. and C. laevigata (Poiret) DC in south-eastern England. Watsonia. 1975;10:253–264.
  • Depypere L, Mijnsbrugge KV, De Cock K, et al. Indigenous species of Crataegus (Rosaceae-Maloideae) in Flanders (Belgium). An explorative morphometric study. Belg J Bot. 2006;139(2):139–152.
  • Dickinson TA, Campbell CS. Population structure and reproductive ecology in the Maloideae (Rosaceae). Syst Bot. 1991;16:350–362.
  • Krawczyk U, Pteri G, Kery A. HPLC analysis of procyanidins in Crataegus extract. Arch Pharmazie. 1991;324:97–99.
  • Dirr MA. Manual of woody landscape plants: their identification, ornamental, characteristics, culture: propagation and uses. Champaign (IL): Stipes Publishing; 1998.
  • Archak S, Gaikwad AB, Gautam D, et al. Comparative assessment of DNA fingerprinting techniques (RAPD, ISSR and AFLP) for genetic analysis of cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) accessions of India. Genome. 2003;46:362–369.
  • Rahmani MS, Shabanian N, Khadivi-Khub A, et al. Population structure and genotypic variation of Crataegus pontica inferred by molecular markers. Gene. 2015;572:123–129.
  • Norusis M. SPSS professional statistics 6.1. Chicago (IL): SPSS; 1994.
  • Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron. 2001;4:1–9.
  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull. 1987;19:11–15.
  • Rohlf FJ. NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2. 1. Setauket (NY): Exeter Software; 2000.
  • Smith, JSC, Chin ECL, Shu H, et al. An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): comparisons with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor Appl Genet. 1997;95:163–173.
  • Dickinson TA. Topodeme differentiation in Ontario taxa of Crataegus (Rosaceae: Maloideae) leaf morphometric evidence. Can J Bot. 1986;64:2738–2747.
  • Smith PG, Phipps JB. Studies in Crataegus (Rosaceae, Maloideae) IX. Short-leaf heteroblasty in Crataegus crus-galli sensu lato. Can J Bot. 1984;62:1775–1780.
  • Ercisli S. A short review of the fruit germplasm resources of Turkey. Genetic Resour Crop Evol. 2004;51:419–435.
  • Asma BM, Birhanlı O. Selection studies of wild growing hawthorns around Malatya. IV. Turkish National Horticultural Symposium; 2003 Sep 8–12; Antalya, Turkey.
  • Balta MF, Celik F, Turkoglu N, et al. Some fruit traits of hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) genetic resources from Malatya, Turkey. Res J Agric Biol Sci. 2006;2:531–536.
  • Turkoglu N, Kazankaya A, Sensoy RI. Pomological characteristics of hawthorn species found in Van Region. J Agric Sci. 2005;15:17–21.
  • Yanar M, Ercisli S, Yilmaz KU, et al. Morphological and chemical diversity among hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) genotypes from Turkey. Scientific Res Essays. 2011;6(1):35–38.
  • Phipps JB. A review of hybridization in north American hawthorns – another look at ‘the Crataegus problem’. Ann Missouri Botanical Garden. 2005;92:113–126.
  • Lippert W. Crataegus. In: Hegi G, Conert HJ, Scholz H, editors., Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. Band 4. Angiospermae-dicotyledones 2.-(3). 2nd ed. Berlin: Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag; 1995. p. 426–445.
  • Grant V. Plant speciation. New York (NY): Columbia University Press; 1981. Chapter 24, Factors promoting polyploidy; p. 307–323.
  • Núñez-Colín, CA, Nieto-Ángel R, Barrientos-Priego AF, et al. Variability of three regional sources of germplasm of tejocote (Crataegus spp.) from central and southern Mexico. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2008;55:1159–1165.
  • Ferrazzini D, Monteleone I, Belletti P. Small-scale genetic diversity in one seed hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna Jaq.). Eur J For Res. 2008;127:407–414.
  • Dickinson TA, Lo E, Talent N. Polyploidy, reproductive biology, and Rosaceae: understanding evolution and making classifications. Plant Syst Evol. 2007;266:59–78.
  • Ganino T, Beghe D, Alenti S, et al. RAPD and SSR markers for characterization and identification of ancient cultivars of Olea europaea L. in the Emilia region, Northern Italy. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2007;54:1531–1540.
  • Taamalli W, Geuna F, Banth R, et al. Agronomic and molecular analyses for the characterization of accessions in Tunisian olive germplasm collections. Electron J Biotechnol. 2006;9:467–481.
  • Dai H, Guo X, Zhang Y, et al. Application of random amplified polymorphic DNA and inter-simple sequence repeat markers in the genus Crataegus. Ann Appl Biol. 2008;154:175–181.
  • Serçe S, Şimşek O, Toplu C, et al. Relationships among Crataegus accessions sampled from Hatay, Turkey, as assessed by fruit characteristics and RAPD. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2011;58:933–942.
  • Yilmaz KU, Yanar M, Ercisli S, et al. Genetic relationships among some hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) species and genotypes. Biochem Gen. 2010;48:873–878.