Control of biogas production process by enzymatic and fluorescent image analysis

References

• Gaida D, Wolf C, Bongards M. Feed control of anaerobic digestion processes for renewable energy production: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;68:869–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkiteshwaran K, Bocher B, Maki J, et al. Relating anaerobic digestion microbial community and process function. Microbio Insights. 2015;8(S2):37–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Komilis D, Barrena R, Grando RL, et al. A state of the art literature review on anaerobic digestion of food waste: influential operating parameters on methane yield. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2017;16(2):347–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziemiński K, Frąc M. Methane fermentation process as anaerobic digestion of biomass: transformations, stages and microorganisms. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11(18):4127–4139.
   Google Scholar
• Lambrecht J, Cichocki N, Hübschmann T, et al. Flow cytometric quantification, sorting and sequencing of methanogenic archaea based on F420 autofluorescence. Microb Cell Fact. 2017; [cited 2017 Nov 17];16:180. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-017-0793-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotidis, IA, Karakashev D, Angelidaki I. The dominant acetate degradation pathway/methanogenic composition in full-scale anaerobic digesters operating under different ammonia levels. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2014;11(7):2087–2094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero-Güiza MS, Vila J, Mata-Alvarez J, et al. The role of additives on anaerobic digestion: a review. Renew and Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;58:1486–1499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Wang H, Qiu Y, et al. Microbial characteristics in anaerobic digestion process of food waste for methane production–A review. Biores Tech. 2018;248(Pt A):29–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Vrieze, Raort L, Roume H, et al. The full-scale anaerobic digestion microbiome is represented by specific marker populations. Water Res. 2016;104:101–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casida LE. Microbial metabolic activity in soil as measured by dehydrogenase determinations. Appl and Environ Microbiol. 1977;34(6):630–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caravelli A, Giannuzzi L, Zaritzky N. Effect of chlorine on filamentous microorganisms present in activated sludge as evaluated by respirometry and INT-dehydrogenase activity. Water Res. 2004;38(9):2395–2405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruden CL, et al. 5-Cyano-2, 3-ditolyl tetrazolium chloride (CTC) reduction in a mesophilic anaerobic digester: measuring redox behavior, differentiating abiotic reduction, and comparing FISH response as an activity indicator. J of microbiol methods. 2003;52(1):59–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerardi M. The microbiology of anaerobic digesters. New Jersey: (NJ): Wiley; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Bitton G. Wastewater microbiology. 4th ed. New Jerswy: (NJ): Wiley; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Costa JC, Mesquita DP, Amaral AL, et al. Quantitative image analysis for the characterization of microbial aggregates in biological wastewater treatment: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2013;20(9):5887–5912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Public Health Association. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewaters. Washington (D.C.): American Public Health Association; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lenhard G. Die Dehydrogenaseaktivität des Bodens als Maß für die Mikroorganismentätigkeit im Boden [The dehydrogenase activity of the soil as a measure of the microorganism activity]. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 1956;73(1):1–11. German.
   Google Scholar
• Lenhard G, Nourse LD, Schwarz HM. The measurement of dehydrogenase activity of activated sludges. Advances in Water Pollution Research. In: Jaag O, Baars JK, Pearson EA, editors. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference. Aug 1964; Tokyo, Japan. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1965. p. 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Kochetov GA. [Manual on enzymology]. Moscow: (Russian): High School; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Daims H, Lücker S, Wagner M. daime, a novel image analysis program for microbial ecology and biofilm research. Environ Microbiol. 2006;8:200–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lamos Chernicharo CA. Anaerobic reactors. New Delhi: IWA Publishing; 2007. ( Biological wastewater treatment series; Vol. 4.)
   Google Scholar
• Howell JA. The distribution of phosphorus in sediment and water downstream from a sewage treatment works. Biosci Horiz Int J Student Res. 2010;3(2):113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Rajeshwari KV, Balakrishnan M, Kansal A, et al. State-of-the-art of anaerobic digestion technology for industrial wastewater treatment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2000;4:135–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiland P. Biogas production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85:849–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasimi SMD, Idris A, Chuah TG, et al. The effect of C:N:P ratio, volatile fatty acids and Na+ levels on the performance of an anaerobic treatment of fresh leachate from municipal solid waste transfer station. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009;8(18):4572–4581.
   Google Scholar
• Kamali M, Gameiro T, Costa MEV, et al. Anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper mill wastes–An overview of the developments and improvement opportunities. Chem Eng J. 2016;298:162–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng J. Biomass to renewable energy processes. New York (NY): Taylor & Francis; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ortner M, Drosg B, Stoyanova E, et al. Industrial residues for biomethane production. In: Korres N, O'Kiley P, Benzie AH, et al., editors. Bioenergy production by anaerobic digestion: using agricultural biomass and organic wastes. Oxon (OX): Routledge; 2013. p. 111–136.
   Google Scholar
• Lili M, Biró G, Sulyok E, et al. Novel approach on the basis of FOS/TAC method. In: International symposia ‘risk factors for environment and food safety’ & ‘natural resources and sustainable development’ & ‘50 years of agriculture researche in Oradea’. 2011 Nov 4–5; Oradea, Romania. Oradea (Romania): University of Oradea, Faculty of Environmental Protection; 2011. p. 802–807.
   Google Scholar