Morphological characterization and phylogenetic analysis of aeroterrestrial Vischeria/Eustigmatos strains with industrial potential

References

• Mata TM, Martins AA, Caetano NS. Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2010;14:217–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen H-W, Hu I-C, Chen C-Y, et al. Microalgae-based biorefinery-from biofuels to natural products. Bioresour Technol. 2013;135:166–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudimu O, Rybalka N, Bauersachs T, et al. Biotechnological screening of microalgal and cyanobacterial strains for biogas production and antibacterial and antifungal effects. Metabolites. 2014;4:373–393.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matos J, Cardoso C, Bandarra NM, et al. Microalgae as healthy ingredients for functional food: a review. Food Funct. 2017;8:2672–2685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathasivam RI, Ki J-S. A review of the biological activities of microalgal carotenoids and their potential use in healthcare and cosmetic industries. Marine Drugs. 2018;16:1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongiovani N, Sanchez-Puerta MV, Popovich C, et al. Molecular and phylogenetic identification of an oil-producing strain of Nanochloropsis oceanica (Eustigmatophyceae) isolated from the south-western Atlantic coast (Argentina). Rev Biol Mar Oceanogr. 2014;49:615–623.
   Google Scholar
• Chikkaswamy BK, Paramanik RC. Molecular distinction of algae using molecular marker. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2016;5:485–489.
   Google Scholar
• Minhas AK, Hodgson P, Barrow CJ, et al. The isolation and identification of new microalgal strains producing oil and carotenoid simultaneously with biofuel potential. Bioresour Technol. 2016;211:556–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkie C, Edmundson SJ, Duncan JG. Indigenous algae for local bioresource production: Phycoprospecting. Energy Sustain Dev. 2011;15:365–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suriya GN, Gaurav K, Sivaji S, et al. Isolation, identification and outdoor cultivation of thermophilic freshwater microalgae Coelastrella sp. FI69 in bubble column reactor for the application of biofuel production. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2018;14:357–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreimer G, Kawai H, Muller DG, et al. Reflective properties of the stigma in male gametes of Ectocarpus siliculosus (Phaeophyceae) studied by confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Phycol. 1991;27:268–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakrys B, Milanowski R, Empel J, et al. Two different species of Euglena. E. geniculata and E. myxocylindracea (Euglenophyceae), are virtually genetically and morphologically identical. J Phycol. 2002;38:1190–1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferroni L, Baldisserotto C, Fasulo MP, et al. Adaptive modifications of the photosynthetic apparatus in Euglena gracilis Klebs exposed to manganese excess. Protoplasma. 2004;224:167–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Škaloud P, Radochová B. Confocal microscopy of the green-algal chloroplast. Czech Phycol. 2004;4:183–190.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherill K, Lambiris I, Pickett-Heaps JD, et al. Plastid division in Mallomonas (Synurophyceae, Heterokonta). J Phycol. 2007;43:535–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang CQ, Leasi F, Obertegger U, et al. The widely used small subunit 18S rDNA molecule greatly underestimates true diversity in biodiversity surveys of the meiofauna. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:1208–16212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groendahl S, Kahlert M, Fink P. The best of both worlds: A combined approach for analyzing microalgal diversity via metabarcoding and morphology-based methods. PLOS One. 2017;12:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanger F, Coulson AR. A rapid method for determining sequences in DNA by primed synthesis with DNA polymerase. J Mol Biol. 1975;94:441–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977;74:5463–5467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KM, Park J-H, Bhattacharya D, et al. Applications of next-generation sequencing to unravelling the evolutionary history of algae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:333–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medlin LK. Molecular techniques for identification and characterization of marine biodiversity. Ann Mar Biol Res. 2016;3:1015–1023.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen JR, Shubert LE. Algae in soils. Nova Hedwigia. 2001;123:297–306.
   Google Scholar
• Uzunov B, Stoyneva MP, Gärtner G. Review of the studies on aero-terrestrial cyanoprokaryotes and algae in Bulgaria with a Checklist of the recorded species. I. Phytol Balc. 2007;13:65–73.
   Google Scholar
• Gärtner G, Stoyneva MP, Mancheva AD, et al. A new method in collection and cultivation of aerophytic and endolithic algae. Ber Nat Med Verreins Innsbruck. 2010;96:27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Gärtner G, Uzunov BA, Dimitrova PH, et al. Review of the studies of aeroterrestrial algae along the Bulgarian Black Sea coast (1890–2017) with special attention to the newly described and threatened species. Acta Zool Bulg. 2018;11:53–55.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen RA, Brett RW, Potter D, et al. Phylogeny of the Eustigmatophyceae based upon 18S rDNA, with emphasis on Nanochloropsis. Protist. 1998;149:171–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krienitz L, Hepperle D, Stich H-B, et al. Nannochloropsis limnetica (Eustigmatophyceae), a new species of picoplankton from freshwater. Phycologia. 2000;35:219–227.
   Google Scholar
• Radakovits R, Jinkerson RE, Fuerstenberg SI, et al. Draft genome sequence and genetic transformation of the oleaginous alga Nannochloropis gaditana. Nat Commun. 2012; [cited 2018 Nov 14] 3:686. DOI:10.1038/ncomms1688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieler A, Wu G, Tsai C-H, et al. Genome, functional gene annotation, and nuclear transformation of the heterokont oleaginous alga Nannochloropsis oceanica CCMP1779. PLоS Genet. 2012;[cited 2018 Nov 14]8:e1003064. [25 p.]. DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1003064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corteggiani Carpinelli E, Telatin A, Vitulo N, et al. Chromosome scale genome assembly and transcriptome profiling of Nannochloropsis gaditana in nitrogen depletion. Mol Plant. 2014;7:323–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Ning K, Li J, et al. Nannochloropsis genomes reveal evolution of microalgal oleaginous traits. Plos Genet..[cited 2014; Jan 9]; 10:e1004094. [10 p.]. DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawley MW, Jameson I, Fawley KP. The phylogeny of the genus Nannochloropsis (Monodopsidaceae, Eustigmatophyceae), with descriptions of N. australis sp. nov. and Microchloropsis gen. nov. Phycologia. 2015;54:545–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegewald E, Padisák J, Friedl T. Pseudotetraëdriella kamillae: taxonomy and ecology of a new member of the algal class Eustigmatophyceae (Stramenopiles). Hydrobiologia. 2007;586:107–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior SW, Fawley MW, Fawley KP. DNA sequence analysis of freshwater Eustigmatophyceae, a potential source of essential fatty acids. J Ark Acad Sci. 2009;63:139–144.
   Google Scholar
• Přibyl P, Eliás M, Cepák V, et al. Zoosporogenesis, morphology, ultrastructure, pigment composition, and phylogenetic position of Trachydiscus minutus (Eustigmatophyceae, Heterokontophyta). J Phycol. 2012;48:231–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawley K, Eliáš M, Fawley M. The diversity and phylogeny of commercially important algal class Eustigmatophyceae, including the new clade Goniochloridales. J Appl Phycol. 2014;26:1773–1782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawley M, Fawley K. Rediscovery of Tetraëdriella subglobosa Pascher, a member of the Eustigmatophyceae. Fottea. 2017;17:96–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibberd DJ. Notes on taxonomy and nomenclature on the algal classes Eustigmatophyceae and Tribophyceae (synonym Xanthophyceae). Bot J Linn Soc. 1981;82:93–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettl H, Gärtner G. Syllabus der Boden-, Luft- und Flechtenalgen. Sttutgart: Gustav Fischer; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Ettl H, Gärtner G. Syllabus der Boden-, Luft- und Flechtenalgen. 2. Auflage. Berlin: Springer Spectrum; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hofbauer KW. 2015. Class Eustigmatophyceae. In: Frey W, editor. Syllabus of plant families, 13th ed., A. Engler’s Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, 2/1 Photautotrophic eukaryotic algae. Stuttgart: Gebr. Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung; 2015. p. 109–117.
   Google Scholar
• Ott DW, Oldham-Ott CK, Rybalka N, et al. Xanthophyte, eustigmatophyte and raphidophyte algae. In: Wehr JD, Sheath RG, Kociolek JP, editors. Freshwater algae of North America, 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2015. p. 483–534.
   Google Scholar
• Elias M, Amaral R, Fawley KP, et al. Eustigmatophyceae. In: Archibald JM, Simpson JM, Alastair GB, et al. editors. Handbook of the protists. Cham: Springer International publishing AG; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ševčíková T, Klimeš V, Zbránková V, et al. A comparative analysis of mitochondrial genomes in Eustigmatophyte algae. Genome Biol Evol. 2016;8:705–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trzcińska M, Pawlik-Skowrońska B, Krokowski D, et al. Genetic and morpholofical characteristics of two ecotypes of Eustigmatos calaminaris sp. n. (Eustigmatophyceae) inhabiting Zn- and Pb-loaded calamine mine spoils. Fottea. 2014;14:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rampen SW, Datema M, Rodrigo-Gámiz M, et al. Sources and proxy potential of long chain alkyl diols in lacustrine environments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2014;144:59–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton TA, Melkonian M, Andersen RA. Algal biodiversity. Phycologia. 1996; 35:308–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margulis L, Chapman A. Kingdoms and domains. 4th ed. An illustrated guide to the Phyla of life on Earth. [place unknown]: Elsevier; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Stoyneva-Gärtner MP, Stoykova P, Uzunov B, et al. Carotenoids in six aeroterrestrial strains from Vischeria/Eustigmatos group: updating the pigment pattern of Eustigmatophyceae. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2019; Forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramasamy D, Mishra AK, Lagier J-C, et al. A polyphasic strategy incorporating genomic data for the taxonomic description of novel bacterial species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:384–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das S, Dash HR, Mangwani N, et al. Understanding molecular identification and polyphasic taxonomic approaches for genetic relatedness and phylogenetic relationships of microorganisms. J Microbiol Meth. 2014;103:80–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandamme P, Pot B, Gillis M, et al. Polyphasic taxonomy, a consensus approach to bacterial systematics. Microbiol Rev. 1996;60:407–438.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zapomělová E, Jezberová J, Hrouzek P, et al. Polyphasic characterization of three strains of anabaena reniformis and aphanizomenon aphanizomenoides (cyanobacteria) and their reclassification to Sphaerospermum gen. nov. (incl. anabaena kisseleviana)(1). J Phycol. 2009;45:1363–1373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustaka-Gouni M, Kormas KA, Polykarpou P, et al. Polyphasic evaluation of Aphanizomenon issatschenkoi and Raphidiopsis mediterranea in a Mediterranean lake. J Plankt Res. 2010;32:927–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapomělová E, Skácelová Pumann P, et al. Biogeographically interesting planktonic Nostocales (Cyanobacteria) in the Czech Republic and their polyphasic evaluation resulting in taxonomic revisions of Anabaena bergii Ostenfeld 1908 (Chrysosporum gen. nov.) and A. tenericaulis Nygaard 1949 (Dolichospermum tenericaule comb. nova). Hydrobiologia. 2012;698:353–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komarek J, Kaštovský J, Mareš J, et al. Taxonomic classification of cyanoprokaryotes (cyanobacterial genera) 2014, using a polyphasic approach. Preslia. 2014;86:295–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rott E, Pentecost A, Mareš J. 2018. Introduction: recent developments in cyanobacterial research with special reference to aquatic habitats, molecular ecology and phylogenetic taxonomy. Hydrobiologia. 2018;811:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilera A, Gómez EB, Kaštovský J, et al. The polyphasic analysis of two native Raphidiopsis isolates supports the unification of the genera Raphidiopsis and Cylindrospermopsis (Nostocales, Cyanobacteria). Phycologia. 2018;57:130–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pröschold T, Leliaert F. Systematics of the green algae: conflict of classic and modern approaches. In: Brodie J, Lewis JM, editors. Unravelling the algae: the past, present, and future of algal systematics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2007. p. 123–153.
   Google Scholar
• Škaloud P. Polyphasic approaches in the taxonomy of green aerophytic algae [dissertation]. Prague: Charles University; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kawasaki Y, Nakada T, Tomita M. Taxonomic revision of oil‐producing green algae, Chlorococcum oleofaciens (Volvocales, Chlorophyceae), and its relatives. J Phycol. 2015;51:1000–1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saber AA, Fučíková K, McManus HA, et al. Novel green algal isolates from the Egyptian hyper-arid desert oases: a polyphasic approach with a description of Pharao desertorum gen. et sp. nov. (Chlorophyceae, Chlorophyta) ). J Phycol. 2018;54:342–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzunov BA. Aeroterrestrial algae from Pirin Mountain (Bulgaria) [dissertation]. Innsbruck: University of Innsbruck; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mancheva AD. [Investigation of aerophytic algae from the natural landmark Belogradchik rocks] [dissertation]. Sofia (Bulgaria): Sofia University “St Kliment Ohridski”; 2013. Bulgarian.
   Google Scholar
• Stoyneva MP. Contribution to the knowledge on the biodiversity of hydro- and aerobiontic prokaryotic and eukaryotic algae in Bulgaria [D.Sc.thesis]. Sofia: Sofia University “St Kliment Ohridski”; 2014. Bulgarian.
   Google Scholar
• Ott D, Oldham-Ott CK. Eustigmatophyceae, Raphidophyceae, and Tribophyceae. In: Wehr JD, Sheath RG, editors. Freshwater algae of North America. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 2003. p. 423–469.
   Google Scholar
• Kryvenda A, Rybalka N, Wolf M, et al. Species distinctions between closely related strains of Eustigmatophyceae (Stramenopiles) emphasizing ITS2 sequence-structure data: Eustigmatos and Vischeria. Eur J Phycol. 2018; [cited 2018 Sep 06] [22p.]; DOI:10.180/09670262.2018.1475015
   Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, et al. MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:1596–1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascher A. Heterokonten. Leipzig: Akad. Verlagsges; 1939.
   Google Scholar
• Neustupa J, Němcová Y. Morphological and taxonomical study of three terrestrial eustigmatophyceans species. Nova Hedwigia. 2001;123:373–386.
   Google Scholar
• Yang EC, Boo GH, Kim HJ, et al. Supermatrix data highlight the phylogenetic relationships of photosynthetic stramenopiles. Protist. 2012;163:217–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muratova KR. [Life cycle and zoosporogenenis of the microscopic alga Eustigmatos polyphem (Pitchmann) Hibberd (Eustigmatophyta)], [dissertation]. UFA: Bashkir State Pedagogik University; 2012.Russian.
   Google Scholar
• Hibberd D. J., et al. Phylum Eustigmatophyta. In: Margulis L, Corliss JO, Melkonian M, editors. Handbook of protoctista. Boston (MA): Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 1990. p. 326–333.
   Google Scholar
• Safiullina LM. 2009. [The morphological variability of the soil algae Eustigmatos magnus (B. Petersen) Hibberd (Eustigmatophyta) under the influence of environmental factors] [dissertation]. UFA: Bashkir State Pedagogical University; 2009. Russian.
   Google Scholar
• Vischer W. Heterokonten aus alpinen Böden, speziell dem schweizerischen Nationalpark. Ergebn. wiss. Unters. Sweiz. Nationalpark, N. F. 1945;1:477–512.
   Google Scholar