Brewing yeast viability measured using a novel fluorescent dye and image cytometer

References

• Van Zandycke S, Siddique R, Smart KA. The role of the membrane in predicting yeast quality. Tech Q. 2003;3:169–173.
   Google Scholar
• Capece A, Romaniello R, Siesto G, et al. Conventional and non-conventional yeasts in beer production. Fermentation. 2018;4:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Layfield J. Characterization of synchronous cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for use in brewery fermentation [dissertation]. Raleigh (NC): North Carolina State University; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kregiel D, Berlovska J. Evaluation of yeast cell vitality using different fluorescent dyes. Food Chem Biotechnol. 2009;73:5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Boulton C, Quain D. Brewing yeast and fermentation. Oxford (UK): Blackwell Science; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson K, Bhat A, Carvell J. Comparison of a new digital imaging technique for yeast cell counting and viability assessments with traditional methods. J Inst Brew. 2015;121:231–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddart M. Cell viability assays: introduction. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;740:1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Society of Brewing Chemists. Methods of analysis. 9th ed. St. Paul: ASBC; 2004. Yeast-3A yeast stains, -4 microscopic yeast cell counting, -6 yeast viability by slide culture.
   Google Scholar
• Chan LL, Kuksin D, Laverty DJ, et al. Morphological observation and analysis using automated image cytometry for the comparison of trypan blue and fluorescence-based viability detection method. Cytotechnology. 2015;67:461–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luarasi L, Troja R, Pinguli L. The relationship between yeast viability and concentration in the fermentation process of wort for beer production. Eur J Biotechnol Genet Eng. 2016;3:83–86.
   Google Scholar
• Kwolek-Mirek M, Zadrag-Tecza R. Comparison of methods used for assessing the viability and vitality of yeast cells. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014;14:1068–1079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart GG. The yeast handbook: brewing and distilling yeasts. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. Chapter 8, Yeast viability and vitality; p. 147–165.
   Google Scholar
• Menacher F, Rubner M, Berndl S, et al. Thiazole orange and Cy3: improvement of fluorecent DNA probes with use of short range electron transfer. J Org Chem. 2008;73:4263–4266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabnis RW. Handbook of biological dyes and stains. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Louis KS, Siegel AC. Cell viability analysis using trypan blue: manual and automated methods. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;740:7–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tholudur AL, Giron K, Alam T, et al. Comparing automated and manual cell counts for cell culture applications. BioProcess Int. 2006;4:28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Cadena-Harrera DC, De Lara JE, Ibanez N, et al. Validation of three viable-cell counting methods: Manual, semi-automated and automated. Biotechnol Rep. 2015;7:9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd RA, Gunasekera ST, Attfield VP, et al. A flow-cytometric method for determination of yeast viability and cell number in a brewery. FEMS Yeast Res. 2003;3:11–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhauteghem D, Demeyere K, Callaert N, et al. Flow cytometry is a powerful tool for assessment of the viability of fungal conidia in metalworking fluids. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83:e00938–e00917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan LL, Zhong X, Qiu J, et al. Cellometer vision as an alternative to flow cytometry for cell cycle analysis, mitochondrial potential, and immunophenotyping. Cytometry Part A. 2011;79A:507–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan LL, Lai N, Wang E, et al. A rapid detection method for apoptosis and necrosis measurement using the Cellometer imaging cytometry. Apoptosis. 2011;16:1295–1303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan LL, Wilkinson AR, Paradis BD, et al. Rapid image-based cytometry for comparison of fluorescent viability staining methods. J Fluoresc. 2012;22:1301–1311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan LL, Kury A, Wilkinson A, et al. Novel image cytometric method for detection of physiological and metabolic changes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;39:1615–1623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong D, Lee G, Jung NC, et al. Fast automated yeast cell counting algorithm using bright-field and fluorescence microscopic images. Biol Proced Online.. 2013;15:13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan L. Identify & resolve manual cell counting errors through automation [Internet]. Lawrence (MA): Nexcelom Bioscience; 2019 Jan 24 [cited 2019 Feb 16]. Available from: https://www.nexcelom.com/identify-resolve-manual-cell-counting-errors-through-automation/
   Google Scholar
• Layfield JB, Sheppard JD. What brewers should know about viability, vitality, and overall brewing fitness: a minireview. MBAA TQ. 2015;52:132–140.
   Google Scholar
• Laverty DJ, Kury AL, Kuksin D, et al. Automated quantification of budding Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a novel image cytometry method. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;40:581–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldi S, Driscoll D, Kuksin D, et al. Image-based cytometric analysis of fluorescent viability and vitality staining methods for ale and lager fermentation yeast. J Am Soc Brew Chem. 2014;72:253–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panichkitkosolkul W. Confidence intervals for the coefficient of variation in a normal distribution with a known population mean. J Probab Stat. 2013;324940.
   Google Scholar
• Chan LL, Lyettefi EJ, Pirani A, et al. Direct concentration and viability measurement of yeast in corn mash using a novel imaging cytometry method. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;38:1109–1115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan LL, Smith T, Kuksin D, et al. A high-throughput AO/PI-based cell concentration and viability detection method using the Celigo image cytometry. Cytotechnology. 2016;68:2015–2025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak J, Basarova G, Teixeira JA, et al. Monitoring of brewing yeast propagation under aerobic and anaerobic conditions employing flow cytometry. J Inst Brew. 2007;113:249–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar