Assessment of the genetic diversity and population structure of Sophora tonkinensis in South China by AFLP markers

References

• Boozari M, Soltani S, Iranshahi M. Biologically active prenylated flavonoids from the genus Sophora and their structure-activity relationship—a review. Phytother Res. 2019;33(3):546–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Xia C, Chen L, et al. Phytochemical information and biological activities of quinolizidine alkaloids in Sophora: a comprehensive review. CDT. 2019;20(1):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding P, Chen D. Isoprenylated flavonoids from the roots and rhizomes of Sophora tonkinensis. HCA. 2006;89(1):103–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang B, Nong D, Huang X, et al. Resources investigation report on Chinese Materia Medica Sophora tonkinensis (in Chinese). Mod Chin Med. 2014;16:740–744.
   Google Scholar
• Yao SC, Lin ZZ, Lan ZZ, et al. Analysis on the suitable climatic factors of Sophora tonkinensis Gapnep in Guangxi (in Chinese). Chin J Agrometeorol. 2013;34(6):673–677.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuura N, Iinuma M, Tanaka T. Phylogenetic analysis in genus Euchresta based on secondary metabolites. Biochem Systemat Ecol. 1994;22(6):621–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang M, Deng S, Han Q, et al. Hypoglycemic activity and the potential mechanism of the flavonoid rich extract from Sophora tonkinensis Gagnep. in KK-Ay mice. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan QM, Zhang GJ, Huang RZ, et al. Cytisine-type alkaloids and flavonoids from the rhizomes of Sophora tonkinensis. J Asian Nat Prod Res. 2016;18(5):429–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Deng S, Huang M, et al. Chemical constituents from Sophora tonkinensis and their glucose transporter 4 translocation activities. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2017;27(6):1463–1466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang DY, Jiang XH. Mating system evolution, resource allocation, and genetic diversity in plants. Acta Phytoecol Sin. 2001;25:130–143.
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhary V, Kumar M, Sharma S, et al. Assessment of genetic diversity and population structure in gladiolus (Gladiolus hybridus Hort.) by ISSR markers. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2018;24(3):493–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu WD, Liu WH, Sun M, et al. Genetic diversity and structure of Elymus tangutorum accessions from western China as unraveled by AFLP markers. Hereditas. 2019;156:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarini HN, Jafari H, Ramandi HD, et al. A comparative assessment of DNA fingerprinting assays of ISSR and RAPD markers for molecular diversity of Saffron and other Crocus spp. in Iran. Nucleus. 2019;62(1):39–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashope BK, Herselman L, Labuschagne MT. Genetic diversity among South African cactus pear genebank accessions using AFLP markers. Bradleya. 2011;29(29):103–114.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira AFP, Ruas PM, Ruas CDF, et al. Genetic diversity, population structure and genetic parameters of fruit traits in Capsicum Chinese. Sci Hortic. 2018; 236:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng YQ, Fan LL, Mao FY, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of a protected species: Polygala tenuifolia Willd. C R Biol. 2018;341(3):152–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen P, Coopman R, Huys G, et al. Evaluation of the DNA fingerprinting method AFLP as a new tool in bacterial taxonomy. Microbiology. 1996;142(7):1881–1893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, et al. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23(21):4407–4414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peakall ROD, Smouse PE. Genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes. 2006;6(1):288–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peakall ROD, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(19):2537–2539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Notes. 2007;7(4):574–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(8):2611–2620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA. CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(14):1801–1806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg NA. distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Notes. 2003;4(1):137–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. In: R package version 2.5-6. 2019. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/vignettes/decision-vegan.pdf. Accessed 19 Mar 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hijmans RJ. geosphere: Spherical Trigonometry. In: R package version 1.5-10. 2019. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/geosphere/geosphere.pdf. Accessed 19 Mar 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hamrick JL, Godt MJW, Sherman-Broyles SL. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forest. 1992;6(1–4):95–124.
   Google Scholar
• Loveless MD, Hamrick JL. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1984;15(1):65–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wang IJ, Summers K. Genetic structure is correlated with phenotypic divergence rather than geographic isolation in the highly polymorphic strawberry poison-dart frog. Mol Ecol. 2010;19(3):447–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright S. Isolation by distance. Genetics. 1943;28(2):114–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar