Initial safety evaluation of Enterococcus faecium LBB.E81

References

• Franz C, Van Belkum M, Holzapfel W, et al. Diversity of enterococcal bacteriocins and their grouping in a new classification scheme. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2007;31(3):293–310.,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlivak P, Odraska J, Ferencik M, et al. One-year application of probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium M-74 decreases serum cholesterol levels. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2005;106:67–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanic Z, Micetic Turk D, Burja S, et al. Influence of a combination of probiotics on bacterial infections in very low birthweight newborns. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015;127(S5):210–215. doi: 10.1007/s00508-015-0845-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vimont A, Fernandez B, Hammami R, et al. Bacteriocin-Producing Enterococcus faecium LCW 44: a high potential probiotic candidate from raw camel milk. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:865.doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednorz C, Guenther S, Oelgeschläger K, et al. Feeding the probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain NCIMB 10415 to piglets specifically reduces the number of Escherichia coli pathotypes that adhere to the gut mucosa. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(24):7896–7904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukegawa S, Ihara Y, Yuge K, et al. Effects of oral administration of heat-killed Enterococcus faecium strain NHRD IHARA in post-weaning piglets. Anim Sci J. 2014;85(4):454–460.,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee S, Scorza A, Lappin M. Effect of the probiotic Enterococcus faecium SF68 on presence of diarrhea in cats and dogs housed in an animal shelter. J Vet Intern Med. 2011;25(4):856–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountzouris K, Tsirtsikos P, Kalamara E, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of a probiotic containing lactobacillus, bifidobacterium, enterococcus, and pediococcus strains in promoting broiler performance and modulating cecal microflora composition and metabolic activities. Poultr Sci. 2007;86(2):309–317. doi: 10.1093/ps/86.2.309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao G, Zeng X, Chen A, et al. Effects of a probiotic, Enterococcus faecium, on growth performance, intestinal morphology, immune response, and cecal microflora in broiler chickens challenged with Escherichia coli K88. Poultr Sci. 2013;92(11):2949–2955. doi: 10.3382/ps.2013-03366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spera RV, Farber BF. Multiply-resistant Enterococcus faecium. JAMA. 1992;268(18):2563–2564. doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03490180095033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison D, Woodford N, Cookson B. Enterococci as emerging pathogens of humans. J Appl Microbiol. 1997;83(S1):89S–99S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franz C, Huch M, Abriouel H, et al. Enterococci as probiotics and their implications in food safety. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011;151(2):125–140.,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsoumanis K, Allende A, Alvarez‐Ordóñez A, et al. Update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 12: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2020. EFS2. 2020;18(7). doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6174
   Google Scholar
• Spera R, Farber B. Multidrug-resistant Enterococcus faecium. An untreatable nosocomial pathogen. Drugs. 1994;48(5):678–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adhikari L. High-level aminoglycoside resistance and reduced susceptibility to vancomycin in nosocomial enterococci. J Global Infect Dis. 2010;2(3):231–235. Doi: 10.4103/0974-777X.68534
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller W, Munita J, Arias C. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in enterococci. Expert Rev anti Infect Ther. 2014;12(10):1221–1236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meena S, Mohapatra S, Sood S, et al. Revisiting Nitrofurantoin for Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(6):DC19–DC22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naruka H, Chand A, Chauhan P, et al. Detection of various virulence factors in high level aminoglycoside resistance and vancomycin resistant enterococci isolates of uropathogenic Enterococci. Int J Res Med Sci. 2019;7(5):1740.doi:10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20191668
   Google Scholar
• EUCAST, The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 10.0, 2020. http://www.eucast.org.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP). Guidance on the assessment of bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobials of human and veterinary importance. EFSA Journal. 2012a;10(6):2740.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton T, Gasson M. Molecular Screening of Enterococcus virulence determinants and potential for genetic exchange between food and medical isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(4):1628–1635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanchi H, Mottawea W, Sebei K, et al. The Genus Enterococcus: Between Probiotic Potential and Safety Concerns—An Update. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1791., doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01791
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP). Guidance on the safety assessment of Enterococcus faecium in animal nutrition. EFSA Journal. 2012b;10(5):2682.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolami M, Faludi A, Batlouni M. Evaluation of the effects of a new fermented milk product (Gaio) on primary hypercholesterolemia. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999;53(2):97–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzapfel W, Arini A, Aeschbacher M, et al. Enterococcus faecium SF68 as a model for efficacy and safety evaluation of pharmaceutical probiotics. Benef Microbes. 2018;9(3):375–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noh C, Kim B, Hong G, et al. Effects of the Administration of Probiotics on Fecal Microbiota Diversity and Composition in Healthy Individuals. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;24(3):452–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU. Register of feed additives pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. Annex I, List of additives (Released 05.08.2020); 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience. 2012;1(1):18, doi:10.1186/2047-217X-1-18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(14):2068–2069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zankari E, Hasman H, Cosentino S, et al. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(11):2640–2644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcock B, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, et al. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1):D517–D525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joensen K, Scheutz F, Lund O, et al. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for routine typing, surveillance, and outbreak detection of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(5):1501–1510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, et al. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol. 2000;7(1-2):203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osei Sekyere J. Genomic insights into nitrofurantoin resistance mechanisms and epidemiology in clinical Enterobacteriaceae. Future Sci Oa. 2018;4(5):FSO293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guay D. An update on the role of nitrofurans in the management of urinary tract infections. Drugs. 2001;61(3):353–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassir N, Rolain J, Brouqui P. A new strategy to fight antimicrobial resistance: the revival of old antibiotics. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wennersten CB, Moellering RC. Jr, 1980. Mechanism of resistance to penicillin-aminoglycoside synergism in Streptococcus faecium. p. 710–712. In J.D. Nelson and C. Grassi (ed.) Current chemotherapy and infectious disease,. ASM, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Costa Y, Galimand M, Leclercq R, et al. Characterization of the chromosomal aac(6')-Ii gene specific for Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37(9):1896–1903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliopoulos G, Wennersten C, Zighelboim-Daum S, et al. High-level resistance to gentamicin in clinical isolates of Streptococcus (Enterococcus) faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988;32(10):1528–1532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh K, Malathum K, Murray B. Disruption of an Enterococcus faecium species-specific gene, a homologue of acquired macrolide resistance genes of staphylococci, is associated with an increase in macrolide susceptibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45(1):263–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner G, Hildebrandt B, Witte W, et al. The Newly described msrc gene is not equally distributed among all isolates of Enterococcus faecium. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45(12):3672–3673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishioka T, Ogawa W, Kuroda T, et al. Gene cloning and characterization of EfmA, a multidrug efflux pump, from Enterococcus faecium. Biol Pharm Bull. 2009;32(3):483–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips-Jones M, Harding S. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) nanomachines-mechanisms for fluoroquinolone and glycopeptide recognition, efflux and/or deactivation. Biophys Rev. 2018;10(2):347–362.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nallapareddy SR, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. Clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecium exhibit strain-specific collagen binding mediated by Acm, a new member of the MSCRAMM family . Mol Microbiol. 2003;47(6):1733–1747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam M, Seemann T, Tobias N, et al. Comparative analysis of the complete genome of an epidemic hospital sequence type 203 clone of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. BMC Genomics. 2013;14(1):595
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qin X, Galloway-Peña J, Sillanpaa J, et al. Complete genome sequence of Enterococcus faecium strain TX16 and comparative genomic analysis of Enterococcus faecium genomes. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12(1):135,
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kopit L, Kim E, Siezen R, et al. Safety of the Surrogate microorganism Enterococcus faecium NRRL B-2354 for use in thermal process validation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(6):1899–1909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh K, Coque T, Weinstock G, et al. In vivo testing of an Enterococcus faecalis efaA mutant and use of efaA homologs for species identification. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1998;21(4):323–331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lowe AM, Lambert PA, Smith AW. Cloning of an Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis antigen: homology with adhesins from some oral streptococci. Infect Immun. 1995;63(2):703–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannu L, Paba A, Daga E, et al. Comparison of the incidence of virulence determinants and antibiotic resistance between Enterococcus faecium strains of dairy, animal and clinical origin. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;88(2-3):291–304. doi:10.1016/S0168-1605(03)00191-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivedi K, Cupakova S, Karpiskova R. Virulence factors and antibiotic resistance in enterococci isolated from food-stuffs. Vet Med. 2011;56(No. 7):352–357. doi:10.17221/1584-VETMED
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billström H, Sullivan Å, Lund B. P1689 in P1460 – P1884. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2006;12:S481–S634.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhardwaj A, Gupta H, Kapila S, et al. Safety assessment and evaluation of probiotic potential of bacteriocinogenic Enterococcus faecium KH 24 strain under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010;141(3):156–164. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar