In vitro evaluation of surface cleaning methods in two different implant defect angulations: a pilot study

References

• Tomasi C, Wennström J, Berglundh T. Longevity of teeth and implants – a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35(s1):23–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trullenque-Eriksson A, Guisado M. B. Retrospective long-term evaluation of dental implants in totally and partially edentulous patients: part II: periimplant disease. Implant Dent. 2015;24:217–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drago C, Carpentieri J. Treatment of maxillary jaws with dental implants: guidelines for treatment. J Prosthodont. 2011;20(5):336–347.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Renvert S, Persson GR, Pirih FQ, et al. Peri-implant health, peri-implant mucositis, and peri-implantitis: case definitions and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl 1):S304–S312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buser D, Janner SF, Wittneben JG, et al. 10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(6):839–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matuliene G, Studer R, Lang N, et al. Significance of periodontal risk assessment in the recurrence of periodontitis and tooth loss. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37(2):191–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitz-Mayfield LJ. Peri-implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:292–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcuac O, Berglundh T. Composition of human peri-implantitis and periodontitis lesions. J Dent Res. 2014;93(11):1083–1088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajishengallis G. Immunomicrobial pathogenesis of periodontitis: keystones, pathobionts, and host response. Trends Immunol. 2014;35(1):3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mombelli A, Lang NP. Microbial aspects of implant dentistry. Periodontol 2000. 1994;4:74–80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Lang NP. Comparative biology of chronic and aggressive periodontitis vs. peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000. 2010;53:167–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renvert S, Roos-Jansåker AM, Claffey N. Non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a literature review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(8 Suppl):305–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renvert S, Polyzois IN. Clinical approaches to treat peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000. 2015;68(1):369–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindhe J, Meyle J; Group D of European Workshop on Periodontology. Peri-implant diseases: consensus report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35(8 Suppl):282–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keim D, Nickles K, Dannewitz B, et al. In vitro efficacy of three different implant surface decontamination methods in three different defect configurations. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2019;30:550–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neta T, Takada K, Hirasawa M. Low-cariogenicity of trehalose as a substrate. J Dent. 2000;28(8):571–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse AB, Akakpo DL, Maamar R, et al. Trehalose powder for subgingival air-polishing during periodontal maintenance therapy: a randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2019;90(3):263–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahrmann P, Ronay V, Sener B, Jung RE, et al. Cleaning potential of glycine air-flow application in an in vitro peri-implantitis model. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2013;24(6):666–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronay V, Merlini A, Attin T, et al. In vitro cleaning potential of three implant debridement methods. Simulation of the non-surgical approach. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2017;28(2):151–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahrmann P, Ronay V, Hofer D, Attin T, et al. In vitro cleaning potential of three different implant debridement methods. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2015;26(3):314–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Mombelli A. The therapy of peri-implantitis: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(Suppl):325–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo K-T, Khoury F, Keeve PL, et al. Implant surface decontamination by surgical treatment of periimplantitis: a literature review. Implant Dent. 2019;28(2):173–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renvert S, Hirooka H, Polyzois I, et al. Diagnosis and non-surgical treatment of peri-implant diseases and maintenance care of patients with dental implants–Consensus report of working group 3. Int Dent J. 2019;69:12–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figuero E, Graziani F, Sanz I, et al. Management of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000. 2014;66(1):255–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellado-Valero A, Buitrago-Vera P, Solá-Ruiz MF, et al. Decontamination of dental implant surface in peri-implantitis treatment: a literature review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013;18(6):e869–e876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramani K, Wismeijer D. Decontamination of titanium implant surface and re-osseointegration to treat peri-implantitis: a literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2012;27:1043–1954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suárez-López Del Amo F, Yu S-H, Wang H-L. Non-surgical therapy for peri-implant diseases: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2016;9:e13.
   Google Scholar
• John G, Sahm N, Becker J, et al. Nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis using an air-abrasive device or mechanical debridement and local application of chlorhexidine. Twelve-month follow-up of a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study. Clin Oral Invest. 2015;19(8):1807–1814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupi S, Granati M, Butera A, et al. Air-abrasive debridement with glycine powder versus manual debridement and chlorhexidine administration for the maintenance of peri-implant health status: a six-month randomized clinical trial. Int J Dent Hygiene. 2017;15(4):287–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji YJ, Tang ZH, Wang R, et al. Effect of glycine powder air-polishing as an adjunct in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: a pilot clinical trial. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2014;25(6):683–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renvert S, Lindahl C, Roos Jansåker AM, et al. Treatment of peri-implantitis using an Er: YAG laser or an air‐abrasive device: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(1):65–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandana K, Dalvi P, Nagpal D. Management of peri-implant infections. J Int Clin Dent Res Organ. 2015;7(3):160.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar T, Gowd MS, Ranjan R, et al. Peri-implantitis: a concern for implant failure. IJOCRWEB. 2016;4(3):204–206.,
   Google Scholar
• Mailoa J, Lin GH, Chan HL, et al. Clinical outcomes of using lasers for peri-implantitis surface detoxification: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2014;85(9):1194–1202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamel MS, Khosa A, Tawse-Smith A, et al. The use of laser therapy for dental implant surface decontamination: a narrative review of in vitro studies. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(6):1977–1985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz F, Sculean A, Rothamel D, et al. Clinical evaluation of an Er:YAG laser for nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a pilot study. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2004;16(1):44–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholami GA, Karamlou M, Fekrazad R, et al. Comparison of the effects of Er, Cr: YSGG laser and super-saturated citric acid on the debridement of contaminated implant surfaces. J Lasers Med Sci. 2018;9(4):254–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakki SS, Tatar G, Dundar N, et al. The effect of different cleaning methods on the surface and temperature of failed titanium implants: an in vitro study. Lasers Med Sci. 2017;32(3):563–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moharrami M, Perrotti V, Iaculli F, et al. Effects of air abrasive decontamination on titanium surfaces: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(2):398–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei MC, Tran C, Meredith N, et al. Effectiveness of implant surface debridement using particle beams at differing air pressures. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2017;3(4):148–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsubara VH, Leong BW, Leong MJ, et al. Cleaning potential of different air abrasive powders and their impact on implant surface roughness. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22(1):96–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochis A, Fini M, Carrassi A, et al. Effect of air polishing with glycine powder on titanium abutment surfaces. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2013;24(8):904–909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz F, Ferrari D, Popovski K, et al. Influence of different air-abrasive powders on cell viability at biologically contaminated titanium dental implants surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009;88(1):83–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tastepe CS, Liu Y, Visscher CM, et al. Cleaning and modification of intraorally contaminated titanium discs with calcium phosphate powder abrasive treatment. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2013;24:1238–1246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmage P, Kahili F, Nergiz I, et al. Cleaning effectiveness of implant prophylaxis instruments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(2):331–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrke SA, Boligon J, Shibli JA. Evaluation of the cleaning and alterations in titanium surfaces with different mechanical instruments using an artificial calculus. Infection. 2014;2:4.
   Google Scholar
• Schmage P, Thielemann J, Nergiz I, et al. Effects of 10 cleaning instruments on four different implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2012;27:308–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntrouka VI, Slot DE, Louropoulou A, et al. The effect of chemotherapeutic agents on contaminated titanium surfaces: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(7):681–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar