2,782
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Effect of mobile phone usage duration during pregnancy on the general motor movements of infants

, & ORCID Icon
Pages 57-67 | Received 05 Jan 2022, Accepted 21 Feb 2022, Published online: 22 Mar 2022

References

  • Deshmukh PS, Nasare N, Megha K, et al. Cognitive impairment and neurogenotoxic effects in rats exposed to low-intensity microwave radiation. Int J Toxicol. 2015;34(3):284–290.
  • Lai H. 2018. A summary of recent literature (2007–2017) on neurological effects of radiofrequency radiation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Kalafatakis F, Bekiaridis-Moschou D, Gkioka E, et al. Mobile phone use for 5 minutes can cause significant memory impairment in humans. Hell J Nucl Med. 2017; 20:146–154.
  • Misek J, Belyaev I, Jakusova V, et al. Heart rate variability affected by radiofrequency electromagnetic field in adolescent students. Bioelectromagnetics. 2018;39(4):277–288.
  • Baby NM, Koshy G, Mathew A. The effect of electromagnetic radiation due to mobile phone use on thyroid function in medical students studying in a medical college in South India. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2017;21(6):797–802.
  • El-Gohary OA, Said MAA. Effect of electromagnetic waves from mobile phone on immune status of male rats: possible protective role of vitamin D. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2017;95(2):151–156.
  • Sırav B, Seyhan N. Effects of GSM modulated radio-frequency electromagnetic radiation on permeability of blood–brain barrier in male & female rats. J Chem Neuroanat. 2016; 75:123–127.
  • Narayanan SN, Kumar RS, Potu BK, et al. Spatial memory performance of Wistar rats exposed to mobile phone. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(3):231–234.
  • Kim JH, Kim HJ, Yu DH, et al. Changes in numbers and size of synaptic vesicles of cortical neurons induced by exposure to 835 MHz radiofrequency-electromagnetic field. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186416.
  • Hussein S, El-Saba AA, Galal MK. Biochemical and histological studies on adverse effects of mobile phone radiation on rat’s brain. J Chem Neuroanat. 2016; 78:10–19.
  • Bektas H, Dasdag S. Effect of radiofrequencies emitted from mobile phones and Wi-FI on pregnancy. J Int Dent Med Res. 2017; 10:1084–1095.
  • Dasdag S, Akdag MZ, Erdal ME, et al. Effects of 2.4 GHz radiofrequency radiation emitted from Wi-Fi equipment on microRNA expression in brain tissue. Int J Radiat Biol. 2015a;91(7):555–561.
  • Dasdag S, Akdag MZ, Erdal ME, et al. Long term and excessive use of 900 MHz radiofrequency radiation alter microRNA expression in brain. Int J Radiat Biol. 2015b;91(4):306–311.
  • Heynick LN, Merritt JH. Radiofrequency fields and teratogenesis. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003;Suppl 6:S174–S86.
  • Boileau N, Margueritte F, Gauthier T, et al. Mobile phone use during pregnancy: Which association with fetal growth? J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020;49(8):101852.
  • Zarei S, Vahab M, Oryadi-Zanjani M, et al. Mother’s exposure to electromagnetic fields before and during pregnancy is associated with risk of speech problems in offspring. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2019;9(1):61–68.
  • Bahreyni Toossi MH, Sadeghnia HR, Mohammad Mahdizadeh Feyzabadi M, et al. Exposure to mobile phone (900–1800 MHz) during pregnancy: tissue oxidative stress after childbirth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(10):1298–1303.
  • Haghani M, Shabani M, Moazzami K. Maternal mobile phone exposure adversely affects the electrophysiological properties of Purkinje neurons in rat offspring. Neuroscience. 2013; 250:588–598.
  • Einspieler C, Prayer D, Prechtl HF. Fetal behaviour: a neurodevelopmental approach. Clin Developmental Medicine 189. London: Mac Keith Press; 2012.
  • Porro M, Fontana C, Giannì ML, et al. Early detection of general movements trajectories in very low birth weight infants. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–7.
  • Einspieler C, Peharz R, Marschik PB. Fidgety movements–tiny in appearance, but huge in impact. J Pediatr. 2016; 92:64–70.
  • Ferrari F, Frassoldati R, Berardi A, et al. The ontogeny of fidgety movements from 4 to 20 weeks post-term age in healthy full-term infants . Early Hum Dev. 2016; 103:219–224.
  • Tekerlek H, Mutlu A, Inal-Ince D, et al. Motor repertoire is age-inadequate in infants with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Res. 2021;89(5):1291–1296.
  • Fjørtoft T, Brandal M, Brubakk A, et al. Maternal alcohol and drug use during pregnancy affects the motor behaviour and general movements of infants aged 3–4 months. Early Hum Dev. 2020; 151:105171.
  • Örtqvist M, Einspieler C, Marschik PB, et al. Movements and posture in infants born extremely preterm in comparison to term-born controls. Early Hum Dev. 2021; 154:105304.
  • Bektas H. 5G and health concerns. In: Everekoğlu C, editor. Research & Reviews in Health Sciences. Ankara: Gece Publishing. 2021. 261–292.
  • Aldad TS, Gan G, Gao X-B, et al. Fetal radiofrequency radiation exposure from 800–1900 mhz-rated cellular telephones affects neurodevelopment and behavior in mice. Sci Rep. 2012; 2:312–318.
  • Aït-Aïssa S, Billaudel B, De Gannes FP, et al. In situ detection of gliosis and apoptosis in the brains of young rats exposed in utero to a Wi-Fi signal. C R Phys. 2010;11(9-10):592–601.
  • Odaci E, Bas O, Kaplan S. Effects of prenatal exposure to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field on the dentate gyrus of rats: a stereological and histopathological study. Brain Res. 2008;1238:224–229.
  • Bas O, Odaci E, Mollaoglu H, et al. Chronic prenatal exposure to the 900 megahertz electromagnetic field induces pyramidal cell loss in the hippocampus of newborn rats. Toxicol Ind Health. 2009;25(6):377–384.
  • Baş O, Sönmez OF, Aslan A, et al. Pyramidal cell loss in the cornu ammonis of 32-day-old female rats following exposure to a 900 megahertz electromagnetic field during prenatal days 13–21. NeuroQuantology. 2013;11(4):591–599.
  • Finnie JW, Cai Z, Blumbergs PC, et al. Expression of the immediate early gene, c-fos, in fetal brain after whole of gestation exposure of pregnant mice to global system for mobile communication microwaves. Pathology. 2006;38(4):333–335.
  • Bornhausen M, Scheingraber H. Prenatal exposure to 900 MHz, cell-phone electromagnetic fields had no effect on operant-behavior performances of adult rats. Bioelectromagnetics. 2000;21(8):566–574.
  • Vrijheid M, Martinez D, Forns J, et al. Brief report: Prenatal exposure to cell phone use and neurodevelopment at 14 months. Epidemiology. 2010; 21(2):259–262.
  • Kane RC. A possible association between fetal/neonatal exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation and the increased incidence of autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Med Hypotheses. 2004;62(2):195–197.
  • Sudan M, Kheifets L, Arah O, et al. Prenatal and postnatal cell phone exposures and headaches in children. Open Pediatr Med J. 2012;6(2012):46–52.
  • Divan HA, Kheifets L, Obel C, et al. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Epidemiology. 2008; 19(4):523–529.
  • Sudan M, Birks LE, Aurrekoetxea JJ, et al. Maternal cell phone use during pregnancy and child cognition at age 5 years in 3 birth cohorts. Environ Int. 2018; 120:155–162.
  • Petitdant N, Lecomte A, Robidel F, et al. Alteration of adaptive behaviors of progeny after maternal mobile phone exposure. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018;25(11):10894–10903.
  • Divan HA, Kheifets L, Olsen J. Prenatal cell phone use and developmental milestone delays among infants. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011; 37(4):341–348.
  • Tsarna E, Reedijk M, Birks LE, et al. Associations of maternal cell-phone use during pregnancy with pregnancy duration and fetal growth in 4 birth cohorts. Am J Epidemiol. 2019;188(7):1270–1280.
  • Einspieler C, Bos AF, Krieber-Tomantschger M, et al. Cerebral palsy: early markers of clinical phenotype and functional outcome. J Clin Med. 2019; 8(10):1616.
  • Fjørtoft T, Evensen KAI, Øberg GK, et al. High prevalence of abnormal motor repertoire at 3 months corrected age in extremely preterm infants. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2016;20(2):236–242.
  • Fjørtoft T, Grunewaldt KH, Løhaugen GCC, et al. Assessment of motor behaviour in high-risk-infants at 3 months predicts motor and cognitive outcomes in 10 years old children. Early Hum Dev. 2013;89(10):787–793.