Enzyme activities in soils under heavy metal pollution: a case study from the surroundings of a non-ferrous metal plant in Bulgaria

References

• De Vries W, Groenenberg JE, Lofts E, et al. Chapter 8. Critical loads of heavy metals for soils. In: Alloway B, editor. Heavy metals in soils. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013. p. 22.
   Google Scholar
• Cui Y, Wang X, Wang X, et al. Evaluation methods of heavy metal pollution in soils based on enzyme activities: a review. Soil Ecol Lett. 2021;3(3):169–177.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Kim MS, Kim JG, et al. Use of soil enzymes as indicators for contaminated soil monitoring and sustainable management. Sustainability. 2020;12(19):8209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns RG, Deforest JL, Marxsen J, et al. Soil enzymes in a changing environment: current knowledge and future directions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013;58:216–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aponte H, Meli P, Butler B, et al. Meta-analysis of heavy metal effects on soil enzyme activities. Sci Total Environ. 2020;737:139744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tejada M, Moreno JL, Hernandez MT, et al. Soil amendments with organic wastes reduce the toxicity of nickel to soil enzyme activities. Eur J Soil Biol. 2008;44(1):129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megharaj M, Avudainayagam S, Naidu R. Toxicity of hexavalent chromium and its reduction by bacteria isolated from soil contaminated with tannery waste. Curr Microbiol. 2003;47(1):51–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljerf L, AlMasri N. A gateway to metal resistance: bacterial response to heavy metal toxicity in the biological environment. Ann Adv Chem. 2018;2:032–044.
   Google Scholar
• Jadoon S, Malik A. DNA damage by heavy metals in animals and human beings: an overview. Biochem Pharmacol. 2017;6(3):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Stasinos S, Nasopoulou C, Tsikrika C, et al. The bioaccumulation and physiological effects of heavy metals in carrots, onions, and potatoes and dietary implications for Cr and Ni: a review. J Food Sci. 2014;79:765–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Yang F, Yang Y, et al. A proposal of “core enzyme” bioindicator in long-term Pb-Zn ore pollution areas based on topsoil property analysis. Environ Pollut. 2016;213:760–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagmann DF, Goodey NM, Mathieu C, et al. Effect of metal contamination on microbial enzymatic activity in soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 2015;91:291–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palov DD, Aleksova MR, Nikolova RN, et al. Relationships between soil microbial activity, bacterial diversity and abiotic factors along the heavy metal contamination gradient. Ecol. 2020;3:31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Karaca A, Cetin SC, Turgay OC, et al. Chapter 11. Effects of heavy metals on soil enzyme activities. In: Sherameti I, Varma A, editors. Soil biology. Vol. 19. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2010. p. 237–262.
   Google Scholar
• Dick RP, Pankhurst CE. In: Double BM, Gupta VVSR, editors. Biological indicators of soil health. Soil enzyme activities as integrative indicators of soil health. New York: CAB INTERNATIONAL; 1997. p. 121–156.
   Google Scholar
• Sinsabaugh RL. Phenol oxidase, peroxidase and organic matter dynamics of soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010;42(3):391–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolova R, Petkova M, Dinev N, et al. Correlation between bacterial abundance, soil properties and heavy metal contamination in the area of non-ferrous metal processing plant. BioRisk. 2022;17:19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kachinsky N. Mechanical and micro-aggregate composition of soil, methods for its study. Moscow: AN USSR; 1958. p. 193.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, He F, Zhang X, et al. Heavy metal pollution decreases microbial abundance, diversity and activity within particle-size fraction of a paddy soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2014;87(1):161–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney DR, Nelson DW. Chapter 33. Nitrogen-inorganic forms. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney D, editors. Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Agronomy Monograph 9. 2nd ed. Madison (WI): ASA, SSSA; 1982. p. 643–698.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen SR. Chapter 24. Phosphorus. In: Page L, Miller RH, Keeney D, editors. Methods of soil analysis, part 2. 2nd ed. Agronomy Monograph 9. Madison (WI): ASA, SSSA; 1982. p. 1040–1042.
   Google Scholar
• Friedel JK, Mölter K, Fischer WR. Comparison and improvement of methods for determining soil dehydrogenase activity by using triphenyl tetrazolium chloride and iodonitrotetrazolium chloride. Biol Fert Soils. 1994;18(4):291–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eivazi F, Tabatabai MA. Glucosidases and galactosidases in soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 1988;20(5):601–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandeler E, Gerber H. Short-term assay of soil urease activity using colorimetric determination of ammonium. Biol Fert Soils. 1988;6(1):68–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM. Use of p-nitrophenylphosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem. 1969;1(4):301–307.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM. Arylsulfatase activity of soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1970;34(2):225–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Shi Z, Zhu Y. Assessment and mapping of environmental quality in agricultural soils of Zhejiang province, China. J Environ Sci. 2007;19(1):50–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paz-Ferreiro J, Gascó G, Gutiérrez B, et al. Soil biochemical activities and the geometric mean of enzyme activities after application of sewage sludge and sewage sludge biochar to soil. Biol Fertil Soils. 2012;48(5):511–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. Past: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001;4(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Dong M, Cao Y, et al. Comparisons of soil properties, enzyme activities and microbial communities in heavy metal contaminated bulk and rhizosphere soils of Robinia pseudoacacia L. in the Northern foot of qinling Mountain. Forests. 2017;8(11):430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogunsola O, Adeniyi O, Adedokun V. Chapter 14. Soil management and conservation: an approach to mitigate and ameliorate soil contamination. In: Larramendy M, Soloneski S, editors. Soil contamination – threats and sustainable solutions. London: IntechOpen; 2020. p. 245–258.
   Google Scholar
• Duan C, Fang L, Yang C, et al. Reveal the response of enzyme activities to heavy metals through in situ zymography. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;156:106–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang N, He XD, Gao YB, et al. Pedogenic carbonate and soil dehydrogenase activity in response to soil organic matter in Artemisia ordosica community. Pedosphere. 2010;20(2):229–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenarova A, Radeva G. Effects of copper and zinc on soil microbial enzymes. Comptes Rendus de l ‘Academie Bulg des Sci. 2010;63:105–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humberto A, Wence H, Clare C, et al. Alteration of enzyme activities and functional diversity of a soil contaminated with copper and arsenic. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020;192:110264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury N, Rasid MM. Heavy metal concentrations and its impact on soil microbial and enzyme activities in agricultural lands around ship yards in Chattogram Bangladesh. Soil Sci Annu. 2021;72(2):135994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolińska A, Stępniewska Z. Chapter 8. Dehydrogenase activity in the soil environment. In: canuto RA, editor. Dehydrogenases. London: IntechOpen; 2012. p. 183–210.
   Google Scholar
• Agnelli A, Ascher J, Corti G, et al. Distribution of microbial communities in a Forest soil profile investigated by microbial biomass, soil respiration and DGGE of total and extracellular DNA. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2004;36(5):859–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levyk V, Maryskevych O, Brzezińska M, et al. Dehydrogenase activity of technogenic soils of former sulphur mines (Yvaoriv and Nemyriv, Ukraine). Int Agrophys. 2007;21:255260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolińska A, Bennicelli R. Dehydrogenase activity response to soil reoxidation process described as varied condition of water potential, air porosity and oxygen availability. Pol J Environ. Stud. 2010;19:651657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldrian P. Microbial enzyme-catalyzed processes in soils and their analysis. Plant Soil Environ. 2009;55(9):370–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndabankulu K, Egbewale SO, Tsvuura Z, et al. Soil microbes and associated extracellular enzymes largely impact nutrient bioavailability in acidic and nutrient poor grassland ecosystem soils. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):12601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narendrula-Kotha R, Nkongolo KK. Changes in enzymatic activities in metal contaminated and reclaimed lands in Northern Ontario (Canada). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2017;140:241–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner BL, Hopkins DW, Haygarth PM, et al. β-Glucosidase activity in pasture soils. Appl Soil Ecol. 2002;20(2):157–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinojosa MB, García-Ruíz R, Viñegla B, et al. Microbiological rates and enzyme activities as indicators of functionality in soils affected by the aznalcóllar toxic spill. Soil Biol Biochem. 2004;36(10):1637–1644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong Y, Tang G, Wang M, et al. Direct fermentation of amorphous cellulose to ethanol by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae coexpressing trichoderma viride EG3 and BGL1. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2014;60(5):198–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-de-Cossio-Diaz J, Vazquez A. A physical model of cell metabolism. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):8349.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bueis T, Turrión MB, Bravo F, et al. Factors determining enzyme activities in soils under pinus halepensis and Pinus sylvestris plantations in Spain: a basis for establishing sustainable Forest management strategies. Ann For Sci. 2018;75(1):34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandziora-Ciupa M, Nadgórska-Socha A, Barczyk G. The influence of heavy metals on biological soil quality assessments in the Vaccinium myrtillus L. rhizosphere under different field conditions. Ecotoxicology. 2021;30(2):292–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boteva S, Kenarova A, Georgieva S, et al. The resistance and resilience of soil enzymes after the application of fungicide azoxystrobin to loamy sand soil. Ecol. 2020;3:185–194.
   Google Scholar
• Klose S, Moore JM, Tabatabai MA. Arylsulfatase activity of microbial biomass in soils as affected by cropping systems. Biol Fertil Soils. 1999;29(1):46–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang H, Lee D. Inhibition of extracellular enzyme ­activities in a forest soil by additions of inorganic ­nitrogen. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2005;36(15-16):2129–2135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelovičová L, Lodenius M, Tulisalo E, et al. Effect of heavy metals on soil enzyme activity at different field conditions in Middle Spis Mining Area (Slovakia). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2014;93(6):670–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doelman P, Haanstra L. Short- and long-term effects of heavy metals on phosphatase activity in soils: an ecological dose-response model approach. Biol Fert Soils. 1989;8(3):235–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renella G, Ortigoza ALR, Landi L, et al. Additive effects of copper and zinc on cadmium toxicity on phosphatase activities and ATP content of soil as estimated by the ecological dose (ED50). Soil Biol Biochem. 2003;35(9):1203–1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahsha M, Nadimi-Goki M, Fornasier F, et al. Microbial enzymes as an early warning management tool for monitoring mining site soils. Catena. 2017;148:40–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar