Comparative transcriptome analysis of two varieties of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to identify candidate drought resistance genes

References

• Chen J, Zhang X, Jing R, et al. Cloning and genetic diversity analysis of a new P5CS gene from common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2010;120(7):1–16. doi: 10.1007/s00122-010-1263-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones PG, Thornton PK. The potential impacts of climate change on maize production in Africa and Latin America in 2055. Global Environ Change. 2003;13(1):51–59. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00090-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortés A, This D, Chavarro C, et al. Nucleotide diversity patterns at the drought-related DREB2 encoding genes in wild and cultivated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2012;125(5):1069–1085. doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1896-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghipour O. Response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to exogenous application of salicylic acid (SA) under water stress conditions. Adv Environ Biol. 2012;6:1160–1168.
   Google Scholar
• Wu L, Chang Y, Wang L, et al. The aquaporin gene PvXIP1;2 conferring drought resistance identified by GWAS at seedling stage in common bean. Theor Appl Genet. 2022;135(2):485–500. doi: 10.1007/s00122-021-03978-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polania JA, Salazar-Chavarría V, Gonzalez-Lemes I, et al. Contrasting Phaseolus crop water use patterns and stomatal dynamics in response to terminal drought. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:894657. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.894657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong X, Zhu H, Hao X, et al. Genome-wide identification of common bean PvLTP family genes and expression profiling analysis in response to drought stress. Genes. 2022;13(12):2394. doi: 10.3390/genes13122394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao HB, Chu LY, Jaleel CA, et al. Understanding water deficit stress-induced changes in the basic metabolism of higher plants-biotechnologically and sustainably improving agriculture and the ecoenvironment in arid regions of the globe. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2009;29(2):131–151. doi: 10.1080/07388550902869792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh SP. Broadening the genetic base of common bean cultivars. Crop Sci. 2001;41(6):1659–1675. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2001.1659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsek M, Comlekcioglu N, Ozturk I. The effects of the regulated deficit irrigation on yield and some yield components of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under semiarid conditions. African J Biotechnol. 2011;10:4057–4064.
   Google Scholar
• Lizana C, Wentworth M, Martinez JP, et al. Differential adaptation of two varieties of common bean to abiotic stress I. Effects of drought on yield and photosynthesis. J Exp Bot. 2006;57(3):685–697. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erj062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papathanasiou F, Ninou E, Mylonas I, et al. The evaluation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes under water stress based on physiological and agronomic parameters. Plants. 2022;11(18):2432. doi: 10.3390/plants11182432.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi M, Song M, Zhang M, et al. Long-distance control of the scion by the rootstock under drought stress as revealed by transcriptome sequencing and mobile mRNA identification. Hort Res. 2022;9:uhab033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun M, Huang D, Zhang A, et al. Transcriptome analysis of heat stress and drought stress in pearl millet based on pacbio full-length transcriptome sequencing. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02530-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghodke P, Khandagale K, Thangasamy A, et al. Comparative transcriptome analyses in contrasting onion (Allium cepa L.) genotypes for drought stress. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0237457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou R, Yu X, Zhao T, et al. Physiological analysis and transcriptome sequencing reveal the effects of combined cold and drought on tomato leaf. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1982-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou D, Xing GM, Zheng SW. Screening of drought-resistant varieties of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Shanxi Agricult Sci. 2020;48(1):15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Yan W, Guohua MI, Amp CF, et al. Genotypic difference in nitrogen efficiency of five maize inbred lines as affected by nitrate levels. Chin J Appl Environ Biol. 2002;8:361–365.
   Google Scholar
• van Delden SH, Nazarideljou MJ, Marcelis LFM. Nutrient solutions for Arabidopsis thaliana: a study on nutrient solution composition in hydroponics systems. Plant Methods. 2020;16:72. doi: 10.1186/s13007-020-00606-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannopolitis CN, Ries SK. Superoxide dismutases: i. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 1977;59(2):309–314. doi: 10.1104/pp.59.2.309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickel KS, Cunningham B. Improved peroxidase assay method using leuco 2,3′,6-trichloroindophenol and application to comparative measurements of peroxidatic catalysis. Anal Biochem. 1969;27(2):292–299. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(69)90035-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Metho Enzym. 1984;105:121–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metwally A, Finkemeier I, Georgi M, Georgi., et al. Salicylic acid alleviates the cadmium toxicity in barley seedlings. Plant Physiol. 2003;132(1):272–281., doi: 10.1104/pp.102.018457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder JC, Desborough SL. Rapid estimation of potato tuber total protein content with Coomassie brilliant blue G-250. Theor Appl Genet. 1978;52(3):135–139. doi: 10.1007/BF00264747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buysse JAN, Merckx R. An improved colorimetric method to quantify sugar content of plant tissue. J Exp Bot. 1993;44(10):1627–1629. doi: 10.1093/jxb/44.10.1627.
   Google Scholar
• Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39(1):205–207. doi: 10.1007/BF00018060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Zhang H, Liu Z, et al. Comparative transcriptome sequencing and de novo analysis of Vaccinium corymbosum during fruit and color development. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0866-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang J, Qin Q, Pan J, et al. Transcriptome analysis in roots and leaves of wheat seedlings in response to low-phosphorus stress. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):19802. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56451-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanehisa M, Araki M, Goto S, et al. KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:D480–484. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao X, Cai T, Olyarchuk JG, et al. Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary. Bioinformat. 2005;21(19):3787–3793. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti430.
   Google Scholar
• Bu D, Luo H, Huo P, et al. KOBAS-i: intelligent prioritization and exploratory visualization of biological functions for gene enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W317–W325. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamimuzzaman M, Vodkin L. Identification of soybean seed developmental stage-specific and tissue-specific miRNA targets by degradome sequencing. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:310. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimares CM, Stone LF, Peloso M, et al. Common bean genotypes under water stress. Revista Brasileira De Engenharia Agrícola E Ambiental. 2011;15:649–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Wang L, Li L, et al. De novo assembly of the common bean transcriptome using short reads for the discovery of drought-responsive genes. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e109262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rama Reddy N, Ragimasalawada M, Sabbavarapu M, et al. Detection and validation of stay-green QTL in postrainy sorghum involving widely adapted cultivar, M35-1 and a popular stay-green genotype B35. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1):909. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-909.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mir MA, John R, Alyemeni MN, et al. Jasmonic acid ameliorates alkaline stress by improving growth performance, ascorbate glutathione cycle and glyoxylase system in maize seedlings. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):2831. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21097-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farnese FS, Oliveira JA, Paiva EAS, et al. The involvement of nitric oxide in integration of plant physiological and ultrastructural adjustments in response to arsenic. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:516. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma XF, Yu T, Wang LH, et al. Effects of water deficit at seedling stage on maize root development and anatomical structure. Chin J Appl Ecol. 2010;21:1731–1736.
   Google Scholar
• Wang QM. Effects of drought stress on protective enzymes activities and membrane lipid peroxidation in leaves of soybean seedlings. J Agro-Environ Sci. 2006;25:918–921.
   Google Scholar
• Khakwani AA, Dennett M, Khan NU, et al. Stomatal and chlorophyll limitations of wheat cultivars subjected to water stress at booting and anthesis stage. Pakistan J Bot. 2013;45:1925–1932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mafakheri A, Siosemardeh A, Bahramnejad B, et al. Effect of drought stress on yield, proline and chlorophyll contents in three chickpea cultivars. Australian J Crop Sci. 2010;4:580–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng C, Yun KY, Ressom HW, et al. An early response regulatory cluster induced by low temperature and hydrogen peroxide in seedlings of chilling-tolerant japonica rice. BMC Genomics. 2007;8(1):1–18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jehle AK, Lipschis M, Albert M, et al. The receptor-like protein ReMAX of Arabidopsis detects the microbe-associated molecular pattern eMax from Xanthomonas. Plant Cell. 2013;25(6):2330–2340. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.110833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorena P, Meirav LM, Silvia S, et al. Tomato prenylated RAB acceptor protein 1 modulates trafficking and degradation of the pattern recognition receptor LeEIX2, affecting the innate immune response. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:257–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar M, Sharfman M, Ron M, et al. BAK1 is required for the attenuation of ethylene-inducing xylanase (EIX)-induced defense responses by the decoy receptor LeEix1. Plant J. 2010;63(5):791–800. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04282.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ron M, Avni A. The receptor for the fungal elicitor ethylene-inducing xylanase is a member of a resistance-like gene family in tomato. Plant Cell. 2004;16(6):1604–1615. doi: 10.1105/tpc.022475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur S, Kumar A, Thakur S, et al. Antioxidant, antiproliferative and apoptosis-inducing efficacy of fractions from cassia fistula L. leaves. Antioxidants. 2020;9(2):173–181. doi: 10.3390/antiox9020173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G, Zhang C, Huang B. Transcriptome analysis and histopathological observations of Geloina erosa gills upon Cr (VI) exposure. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020;231:108706. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2020.108706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia X, Zhu Y, Zhang R, et al. Ionomic and metabolomic analyses reveal the resistance response mechanism to saline-alkali stress in Malus halliana seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;147:77–90. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ras J, Van Ophem PW, Reijnders WN, et al. Isolation, sequencing, and mutagenesis of the gene encoding NAD-and gluthathione dependent. J Bacteriol. 1995;177(1):247–251. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.1.247-251.1995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber RD, Rott MA, Donohue TJ. Characterization of a glutathione-dependent formaldehyde dehydrogenase from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol. 1996;178(5):1386–1393. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.5.1386-1393.1996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao T, Zhang Z, Liu X, et al. Physiological and transcriptome analyses of the effects of exogenous dopamine on drought tolerance in apple. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;148:260–272. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.01.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubrovina AS, Aleynova OA, Ogneva ZV, et al. The effect of abiotic stress conditions on expression of calmodulin (CaM) and Calmodulin-Like (CML) genes in Wild-Growing grapevine Vitis amurensis. Plants. 2019;8(12):602–620. doi: 10.3390/plants8120602.
   Google Scholar
• Dong Y, Guan M, Wang L, et al. Transcriptome analysis of low-temperature-induced breaking of garlic aerial bulb dormancy. Int J Genomics. 2019;2019:9140572. doi: 10.1155/2019/9140572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Wu F, Wang S, et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals defense responses against soft rot in Chinese cabbage. Hortic Res. 2019;6:68. doi: 10.1038/s41438-019-0149-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrego-Benjumea A, Carter A, Tucker JR, et al. Genome-Wide analysis of gene expression provides new insights into waterlogging responses in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plants. 2020;9(2):240–252. doi: 10.3390/plants9020240.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Luo S, Hameed S, et al. Integrated mRNA and miRNA transcriptome analysis reveals a regulatory network for tuber expansion in Chinese yam (Dioscorea opposita). BMC Genomics. 2020;21(1):117–135. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6492-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran AD, Cho K, Han O. Rice peroxygenase catalyzes lipoxygenase-dependent regiospecific epoxidation of lipid peroxides in the response to abiotic stressors. Bioorg Chem. 2023;131:106285. doi: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2022.106285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao D, Wang Y, Feng C, et al. Overexpression of MsGH3.5 inhibits shoot and root development through the auxin and cytokinin pathways in apple plants. Plant J. 2020;103(1):166–183. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng S, Yue R, Tao S, et al. Genome-wide identification, expression analysis of auxin-responsive GH3 family genes in maize (Zea mays L.) under abiotic stresses. J Integr Plant Biol. 2015;57(9):783–795. doi: 10.1111/jipb.12327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou X, Long J, Zhao K, et al. Overexpressing GH3.1 and GH3.1L reduces susceptibility to Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri by repressing auxin signaling in citrus (citrus sinensis osbeck). PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0220017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao Du NW, Fu J, Wang S, et al. A GH3 family member, OsGH3-2, modulates auxin and abscisic acid levels and differentially affects drought and cold tolerance in rice. J Exp Bot. 2012;63(18):6467–6480. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan Z, Fei L, Shan N, et al. Identification and expression analysis of Gretchen hagen 3 (GH3) in kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) during postharvest process. Plants. 2019;8(11):473–486. doi: 10.3390/plants8110473.
   Google Scholar