Participation as a Pastime: Political Discussion in a Queer Community Online

REFERENCES

• Aksoy, Asu, and Kevin Robins. 2003. “The Enlargement of Meaning: Social Demand in a Transnational Context.” Gazette: the International Journal for Communication Studies 65 (4–5): 365–388.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, Erik. 2013. “Det politiska rummet. Villkor för situationspolitisk socialisation i en nätgemenskap av och för ungdomar” [The Politcal Room. Conditions for Situational Political Socialisation in an Online Community for Youth”]. PhD diss., Örebro Studies in Education 36.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, Hannah. (1958) 1998. The Human Condition. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, John Edward. 2007. “Virtual Citizens or Dream Consumers: Looking for Civic Community on Gay.com.” In Queer Online. Media Technology & Sexuality, edited by K. O'Riordan and D. J. Phillips, 197–216. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, Nico. 2011. Media and Participation. A Site of Ideological-Democratic Struggle. Bristol: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, Nico. 2014. “‘Fuck the Clowns from Greece !!’ Fantasies of Participation and Agency in YouTube Comments on a Cypriot Problem Documentary.” Information Communication and Society 17 (8): 1001–1016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, Peter. 1995. Television and the Public Sphere—Citizenship, Democracy and the Media. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, Peter. 2009. Media and Political Engagement. Citizens, Communication, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, Peter, and Claudia Alvares. 2013. “Political Participation in an Age of Mediatisation. Towards a New Research Agenda.” Javnost—The Public 20 (2): 47–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 1927. The Public and its Problems. Athens: Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, John S. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond; Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elgesem, Dag. 2002. “What is Special about the Ethical Issues in Online Research?” Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3): 195–203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Esaiasson, Peter, and Anders Westholm. 2006. Deltagandets mekanismer: det politiska engagemangets orsaker och konsekvenser [The Mechanisms of Participation: The Causes And Consequences of Political Engagement]. Malmö: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, John. 1991. Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fornäs, Johan, and Charis Xinaris. 2013. “Mediated Identity Formation. Current Trends in Research and Society.” Javnost—The Public 20 (2): 11–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. (1988) 1994. “The Political Technology of Individuals.” In Power—Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984 volume 3, edited by James D. Faubion, 403–417. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Todd. 2009. “What's Wife Swap Got to Do with It? Talking Politics in the Net-Based Public Sphere.” PhD diss., Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, Larry. 2007. “Foreword.” In Queer Online. Media Technology & Sexuality, edited by K. O'Riordan and D. J. Phillips, vii–x. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. (1962) 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Kommunikativt handlande. Texter om språk, rationalitet och samhälle [Communicative Action. Texts About Language, Rationality and Society]. 2nd ed. Göteborg: Daidalos.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Cheryl. 2005. The Trouble with Passion: Political Theory Beyond the Reign of Reason. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hermes. Joke. 2005. Re-reading Popular Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hermes, Joke. 2006. “Hidden Debates: Rethinking the Relationship Between Popular Culture and The Public Sphere.” Javnost—The Public 13 (4): 27–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, Bonnie. 1993. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacka, Elizabeth. 2003. “‘Democracy as Defeat’—The Impotence of Arguments for Public Service Broadcasting.” Television & New Media 4 (2): 177–191.
   Google Scholar
• Karppinen, Kari. 2013. “Uses of Democratic Theory in Media and Communication Studies.” Observatorio (OBS*) Journal 7 (3): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, Robert. 2011. Netnografi [Netnography]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and the Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• McGuigan, Jim. 2005. “The Cultural Public Sphere.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 8 (4): 427–443.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, Evgeny. 2011. The Net Delusion: How Not to Liberate the World. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pariser, Eli. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, John Durham. 1993. “Distrust of Representation: Habermas on the Public Sphere.” Media, Culture and Society 15 (4): 541–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirky, Clay. 2009. Here Comes Everybody: How Change Happen when People Come Together. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Street, John. 1997. Politics and Popular Culture. Philadephia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, Anders. 2010. “Young Men, ICTs and Sports. Fan Cultures and Civic Cultures.” In Young People ICTs and Democracy: Theories, Policies, Identities and Websites, edited by T. Olsson and P. Dahlgren, 211–230. Göteborg: Nordicom.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, Jakob. 2014. Sociala Medier och Politiskt deltagande i Sverige. Det digitala deltagandets drivkrafter [Social Media and Political Participation in Sweden. The Rationalities of Digital Participation]. Stockholm: .SE.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, Jakob, Christina Neumayer, Alexander Banfield-Mumb, and Judith Schossböck. 2015. “Identity Negotiation in Activist Participation Online.” Communication, Culture & Critique 8 (1): 142–162.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, John. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Zoonen, Lisbeth. 2005. Entertaining the Citizen: When Politics and Popular Culture Converge. Lanmham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, Sidney, and Norman Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, Magdalena, and Diana Mutz. 2009. “Online Groups and Political Discourse. Do Online Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement?” Journal of Communication 59 (1): 40–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, Scott. 2012. “From ‘Third Place’ to ‘Third Space’: Everyday Political Talk in Non-political Online Spaces.” Javnost—The Public 19 (3): 5–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar