Protectionism vs. Non-Interventionism: Two Approaches to Media Diversity in Commercial Terrestrial Television Regulation

REFERENCES

• Benson, Rodney. 2009. “What Makes News More Multiperspectival? A Field Analysis.” Poetics 37 (5): 402–418. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, Christian E., Gregory F. Lowe, and Anker B. Lund. 2014. “A Market Failure Perspective on Value Creation in PSM.” In The Value of Public Service Media, edited by G. F. Lowe, and F. Martin, 105–126. Gothenburg: Nordicom.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Allan. 2005. “Sweden: The Digital Threat to Cultural Sovereignty.” In Digital Terrestrial Television in Europe, edited by A. Brown, and R. G. Picard, 189–206. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Coase, Ronald H. 1966. “The Economics of Broadcasting and Government Policy.” The American Economic Review 55 (1/2): 440–447.
   Google Scholar
• Donders, Karen. 2011. Public Service Media and Policy in Europe. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Donders, Karen, and Tim Raats. 2015. “From Public Service Media Organisations to De-centralised Public Service for the Media Sector: A Comparative Analysis of Opportunities and Disadvantages.” Javnost: The Public 22 (2): 145–163. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2015.1041227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, Gillian. 2002. Understanding Media Economics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Enli, Gunn, Moe Hallvard, Vilde S. Sundet, and Trine Syvertsen. 2013. “From Fear of Television to Fear for Television: Five Political Debates About New Technologies.” Media History 19 (2): 213–227. doi: 10.1080/13688804.2013.791420
   Google Scholar
• Entman, Robert M., and Steven S. Wildman. 1992. “Reconciling Economic and Non-economic Perspectives on Media Policy: Transcending the ‘Marketplace of Ideas’.” Journal of Communication 42 (1): 5–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00765.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, Des. 2015. “Media Policy Fetishism.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 32 (2): 96–111. doi: 10.1080/15295036.2015.1024139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentzkow, Matthew, and Jesse M. Shapiro. 2008. “Competition and Truth in the Market for News.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 22 (2): 133–154. doi: 10.1257/jep.22.2.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, Daniel C., and Paolo Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems. Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz, Robert B. 2005. “On Media Concentration and the Diversity Question.” The Information Society 21 (3): 181–204. doi: 10.1080/01972240490951908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iosifidis, Petros. 1999. “Diversity Versus Concentration in the Deregulated Mass Media Domain.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 76 (1): 152–162. doi: 10.1177/107769909907600111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KKD. 2017. Kunngjøring: Kommersiell allmennkringkasting [Announcement: Commercial Public Service Broadcasting]. Oslo: The Ministry of Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, Anker B. 2016. “A Stakeholder Approach to Media Governance.” In Managing Media Firms and Industries, edited by G. F. Lowe, and C. Brown, 103–120. Heidelberg: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, Anker B., and Christian E. Berg. 2009. “Denmark, Sweden and Norway: Television Diversity by Duopolistic Competition and Co-regulation.” International Communication Gazette 71 (1–2): 19–37. doi: 10.1177/1748048508097928
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, Christopher, and Monica Ariño. 2005. “From Analogue to Digital.” In Digital Terrestrial Television in Europe, edited by A. Brown, and R. G. Picard, 3–32. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McManus, John H. 1994. Market-driven Journalism: Let the Citizen Beware? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, Denis. 1992. Media Performance: Mass Communication and the Public Interest. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McQuail, Denis. 2003. Media Accountability and Freedom of Publication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• medianorway. 2017a. TV-kanalenes seertall per år [Market Shares Norwegian TV Channels]. Accessed September 20, 2017. http://medienorge.uib.no/statistikk/medium/tv/219.
   Google Scholar
• medianorway. 2017b. Programprofil for norske TV-kanaler [Content Profiles of Norwegian TV Channels]. Accessed September 20, 2017. http://medienorge.uib.no/statistikk/medium/tv/136.
   Google Scholar
• Napoli, Philip M. 2015. “Social Media and the Public Interest: Governance of News Platforms in the Realm of Individual and Algorithmic Gatekeepers.” Telecommunications Policy 39 (9): 751–760. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2014.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näränen, Pertti. 2005. “European Regulation of Digital Television.” In Digital Terrestrial Television in Europe, edited by A. Brown, and R. G. Picard, 33–50. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Nordicom. 2017. Media Statistics. Accessed August 29, 2017. http://nordicom.gu.se/en/statistics-facts/media-statistics.
   Google Scholar
• NOU 1995:3. Mangfold i Media: Om eierkonsentrasjon i massemedia [Media Pluralism: Ownership Concentration in the Mass Media]. Oslo: The Ministry of Culture.
   Google Scholar
• NOU 1999:26. Konvergens: Sammensmeltning av tele-,data-og mediesektorene [Convergence: The Merging of Telecom, Computer and Media Sectors]. Oslo: The Ministry of Culture.
   Google Scholar
• NOU 2017:7. Det norske mediemangfoldet: En styrket mediepolitikk for borgerne [Norwegian Media Diversity: A Strengthened Media Policy for Citizens]. Oslo: The Ministry of Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, Jonas. 2015. The Nordic Media Market 2015. Gothenburg: Nordicom, University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, Jonas, and Ulrika Facht. 2017. Ad Wars: Digital Challenges for Ad-Financed News Media in the Nordic Countries. Gothenburg: Nordicom, University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Picard, Robert G. 2016. “Isolated and Particularised: The State of Contemporary Media and Communications Policy Research.” Javnost—The Public 23 (2): 135–152. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2016.1162991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickard, Victor. 2014. “The Great Evasion: Confronting Market Failure in American Media Policy.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 31 (2): 153–159. doi: 10.1080/15295036.2014.919404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prop. 1996/97:67. Digitala TV-sändningar [Government Bill 1996/97:76 Digital TV Broadcasts]. Stockholm: The Swedish Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• RiksTV. 2017. Kanalliste [List of Channels]. Accessed September 13, 2017. https://www.rikstv.no/produkter/kanalliste/.
   Google Scholar
• Sanz, Esteve. 2012. “Statistical, Ecosystems and Competitiveness Analysis of the Media and Content Industries: European Television in the New Media Landscape.” European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Accessed October 12, 2017. ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/EURdoc/JRC76569.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sihvonen, Mikko. 2016. “Children’s Television: A Comparative Analysis of Offers on Free-to-Air Television in the United Kingdom and Finland.” In Private Television in Western Europe: Content, Markets, Policies, edited by K. Donders, C. Pauwels, and J. Loisen, 105–122. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sjøvaag, Helle. 2012. “Regulating Commercial Public Service Broadcasting: A Case Study of the Marketization of Norwegian Media Policy”. International Journal of Cultural Policy 18 (2): 223–237.
   Google Scholar
• Sjøvaag, Helle. 2016. “Media Diversity and the Global Superplayers: Operationalising Pluralism for a Digital Media Market.” Journal of Media Business Studies 13 (3): 170–186.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 1999:30. Yttrandefriheten och konkurrensen [The Freedom of Speech and the Competition]. Stockholm: Norstedts.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 1999:55. Konvergens och förändring [Convergence and Change]. Stockholm: Fakta info direkt.
   Google Scholar
• SOU 2003:109. Must carry: delbetänkande av Radio- och TV-lagsutredningen [Must Carry: Report Presented by the Radio and TV Law Commission]. Stockholm: Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, Peter O. 1952. “Program Patterns and Preferences, and the Workability of Competition in Radio Broadcasting.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 66 (2): 194–223. doi: 10.2307/1882942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storsul, Tanja, and Trine Syvertsen. 2007. “The Impact of Convergence on European Television Policy: Pressure for Change—Forces of Stability.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies 13 (3): 275–291. doi: 10.1177/1354856507079177
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Broadcasting Authority. 2014. Tillstånd marksänd tv (mars 2014). Beslutsbilaga 41 [Licenses, Broadcast TV (March 2014). License Supplement No 41]. Stockholm: Swedish Broadcasting Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Broadcasting Authority. 2016. Svenskt medieutbud 2015 [Swedish Media Content 2015]. Stockholm: Swedish Broadcasting Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Broadcasting Authority. 2017a. Medieutveckling 2017: Medieekonomi [Media Development 2017: Media Economics]. Stockholm: Swedish Broadcasting Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Broadcasting Authority. 2017b. Sända TV [To Broadcast TV]. Accessed September 13, 2017. https://www.mprt.se/sv/att-sanda/tv/
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Radio and TV Authority. 2008. Tillstånd att sända marksänd TV för TV 4 AB. Bilaga 30 [License to Broadcast Terrestrial TV for TV4 AB. Supplement No 30]. Stockholm: Swedish Radio and TV Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Syvertsen, Trine, Gunn Enli, Ole J. Mjøs, and Moe Hallvard. 2014. The Media Welfare State. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• White Paper 44 (2002–2003). Om digital bakkenett for fjernsyn [On Digital Terrestrial Television]. Oslo: The Ministry of Culture and Church Affairs.
   Google Scholar