“Hi, Folks!” Attention Populism as a Strategy for Dominating the Dissonant Information Environment

REFERENCES

• Adam, Silke, and Michaela Maier. 2010. “Personalization of Politics: A Critical Review and Agenda for Research.” Annals of the International Communication Association 34 (1): 213–257. doi:10.1080/23808985.2010.11679101.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, Tjitske. 2011. “Friend or Foe? Right-Wing Populism and the Popular Press in Britain and the Netherlands.” Journalism 12 (8): 931–945. doi:10.1177/1464884911415972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertazzi, Daniele, and Duncan McDonnell. 2008. Twenty-First Century Populism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bene, Marton. 2016. “Go Viral on the Facebook! Interactions between Candidates and Followers on Facebook During the Hungarian General Election Campaign of 2014.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (4): 513–529. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2016.1198411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. Lance, and Barbara Pfetsch. 2018. “Rethinking Political Communication in a Time of Disrupted Public Spheres.” Journal of Communication 68 (2): 243–253. doi:10.1093/joc/jqx017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, Michael. 2020. “What Do We Know About Civil Society and Regime Change Thirty Years After 1989?” East European Politics 36 (3): 341–362. doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1787160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, Hans-Georg. 1994. Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bischof, Daniel, and Roman Senninger. 2017. “Simple Politics for the People? Complexity in Campaign Messages and Political Knowledge.” European Journal of Political Research 57 (2): 473–495. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumler, Jay G. 2015. “Core Theories of Political Communication: Foundational and Freshly Minted.” Communication Theory 25 (4): 426–438. doi:10.1111/comt.12077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumler, Jay G., and Dennis Kavanagh. 1999. “The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features.” Political Communication 16 (3): 209–230. doi:10.1080/105846099198596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casero-Ripollés, Andreu, Ramón A. Feenstra, and Simon Tormey. 2016. “Old and New Media Logics in an Electoral Campaign.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 21 (3): 378–397. doi:10.1177/1940161216645340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, Andrew, and Jennifer Stromer-Galley. 2016. “Digital Media, Power, and Democracy in Parties and Election Campaigns.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 21 (3): 283–293. doi:10.1177/1940161216646731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutts, David, and Tim Haughton. 2020. “Winning Votes and Influencing People: Campaigning in Central and Eastern Europe.” East European Politics 37 (2): 239–266. doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1767076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert Alan. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dijck, José, Thomas Poell, and Martijn Waal. 2018. The Platform Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engesser, Sven, Nicole Ernst, Frank Esser, and Florin Büchel. 2016. “Populism and Social Media: How Politicians Spread a Fragmented Ideology.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (8): 1109–1126. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2016.1207697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engesser, Sven, Nayla Fawzi, and Anders Olof Larsson. 2017. “Populist Online Communication: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (9): 1279–1292. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1328525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enli, Gunn Sara, and Eli Skogerbø. 2013. “Personalized Campaigns in Party-Centred Politics.” Information, Communication & Society 16 (5): 757–774. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2013.782330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enyedi, Zsolt. 2020. “Right-Wing Authoritarian Innovations in Central and Eastern Europe.” East European Politics 36 (3): 363–377. doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1787162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, Nicole, Sven Engesser, Florin Büchel, Sina Blassnig, and Frank Esser. 2017. “Extreme Parties and Populism: An Analysis of Facebook and Twitter Across Six Countries.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (2): 1–18. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1329333.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, Frank, and Jesper Strömbäck. 2014. Mediatization of Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, Norman. 2013. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Groshek, Jacob, and Karolina Koc-Michalska. 2017. “Helping Populism Win? Social Media Use, Filter Bubbles, and Support for Populist Presidential Candidates in the 2016 US Election Campaign.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (9): 1389–1407. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1329334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, Michael, and Desirée Schmuck. 2017. “It’s Us Against Them: A Comparative Experiment on the Effects of Populist Messages Communicated via Social Media.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (9): 1425–1444. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1328523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, Seán, and Milada Anna Vachudova. 2018. “Understanding the Illiberal Turn: Democratic Backsliding in the Czech Republic.” East European Politics 34 (3): 276–296. doi:10.1080/21599165.2018.1493457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havlík, Vlastimil. 2019. “Technocratic Populism and Political Illiberalism in Central Europe.” Problems of Post-Communism 66 (6): 369–384. doi:10.1080/10758216.2019.1580590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herkman, Juha. 2015. “The Life Cycle Model and Press Coverage of Nordic Populist Parties.” Journalism Studies 18 (4): 430–448. doi:10.1080/1461670x.2015.1066231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ionescu, Ghiţa, and Ernest Gellner. 1969. Populism. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, Andreas. 2015. “Twitter Use in Election Campaigns: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13 (1): 72–91. doi:10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltwasser, Cristobal Rovira, and Pierre Ostiguy. 2017. The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Tobias R., and Katharina Kleinen-von Königslöw. 2018. “Pseudo-Discursive, Mobilizing, Emotional, and Entertaining: Identifying Four Successful Communication Styles of Political Actors on Social Media During the 2015 Swiss National Elections.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 15 (4): 358–377. doi:10.1080/19331681.2018.1510355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Seongcheol. 2020. “Between Illiberalism and Hyper-Neoliberalism: Competing Populist Discourses in the Czech Republic.” European Politics and Society 21 (5): 618–633. doi:10.1080/23745118.2020.1709368.
   Google Scholar
• Kotisova, Johana, and Lenka W. Císařová. 2021. “‘I Know Which Devil I Write For’: Two Types of Autonomy among Czech Journalists Remaining in and Leaving the Prime Minister’s Newspapers.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 28 (1): 238–256. doi:10.1177/19401612211045229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krämer, Benjamin. 2017. “Populist Online Practices: The Function of the Internet in Right-Wing Populism.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (9): 1293–1309. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2017.1328520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanham, Richard A. 2006. The Economics of Attention. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, Manon, Sanne Kruikemeier, and Sophie Lecheler. 2019. “Personalization of Politics on Facebook: Examining the Content and Effects of Professional, Emotional and Private Self-Personalization.” Information, Communication & Society 23 (10): 1481–1498. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2019.1581244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naxera, Vladimír, and Ondřej Stulík. 2022. “‘I Will Handle It Personally’: The Neo-Patrimonial Rhetoric of the Czech Prime Minister in the Times of COVID-19.” Journal of Contemporary European Studies 30 (3): 474–486. doi:10.1080/14782804.2021.1911789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, Barbara. 2018. “Dissonant and Disconnected Public Spheres as Challenge for Political Communication Research.” Javnost - The Public 25 (1–2): 59–65. doi:10.1080/13183222.2018.1423942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, Andrew. 2018. “Czech Billionaires as Politicians.” Problems of Post-Communism 66 (6): 434–444. doi:10.1080/10758216.2018.1490652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stier, Sebastian, Arnim Bleier, Haiko Lietz, and Markus Strohmaier. 2018. “Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter.” Political Communication 35 (1): 50–74. doi:10.4324/9780429202483-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachudova, Milada. 2020. “Ethnopopulism and Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe.” East European Politics 36 (3): 318–340. doi:10.1080/21599165.2020.1787163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, Peter, Jesper Strömbäck, Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Claes de Vreese, Jörg Matthes, David Hopmann, et al. 2017. “Political Communication in a High-Choice Media Environment: A Challenge for Democracy?” Annals of the International Communication Association 41 (1): 3–27. doi:10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, James G. 2016. The Marketplace of Attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weyland, Kurt. 2001. “Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics.” Comparative Politics 34 (1): 1–22. doi:10.2307/422412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zielonka, Jan, and Jacques Rupnik. 2020. “From Revolution to ‘Counter-Revolution’: Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe 30 Years On.” Europe-Asia Studies 72 (6): 1073–1099. doi:10.1080/09668136.2020.1784394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulli, Diana. 2017. “Capitalizing on the Look: Insights into the Glance, Attention Economy, and Instagram.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 35 (2): 137–150. doi:10.1080/15295036.2017.1394582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar