Making Generative Artificial Intelligence a Public Problem. Seeing Publics and Sociotechnical Problem-Making in Three Scenes of AI Failure

REFERENCES

• Adut, Ari. 2018. Reign of Appearances: The Misery and Splendor of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• AIAAIC. n.d. “About the AIAAIC Repository.” Accessed January 20, 2024. https://www.aiaaic.org/aiaaic-repository/about-the-aiaaic-repository.
   Google Scholar
• Ames, Morgan G. 2019. The Charisma Machine: The Life, Death, and Legacy of One Laptop per Child. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ananny, Mike. 2018. Networked Press Freedom: Creating Infrastructures for a Public Right to Hear. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ananny, Mike. 2023. “Making Mistakes: Constructing Algorithmic Errors to Understand Sociotechnical Power.” Osiris 38: 223–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barassi, Veronica, Antje Scharenberg, Marie Poux-Berthe, and Rahi Patra. 2022. “AI Errors and the Profiling of Humans: Mapping the Debate in European News Media.” The Human Error Project. St.Gallen: University of St.Gallen. https://thehumanerrorproject.ch/
   Google Scholar
• Barassi, Veronica, Antje Scharenberg, Marie Poux-Berthe, Rahi Patra, and Philip Di Salvo. 2023. “From ChatGPT to Crime: How Journalists Are Shaping the Debate Around AI Errors.” European Journalism Observatory. https://en.ejo.ch/specialist-journalism/from-chatgpt-to-crime-how-journalists-are-shaping-the-debate-around-ai-errors.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, Andrew. 2013. Material Politics: Disputes Along the Pipeline. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, Andrew. 2021. “What Is an Environmental Problem?” Theory, Culture & Society 38 (2): 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276420958043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Kim Björn, Felix M. Simon, and Christopher Crum. 2023. “Policies in Parallel? A Comparative Study of Journalistic AI Policies in 52 Global News Organisations.” Oxford Internet Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, Emily M., Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. 2021. “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?” In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. Virtual Event: Association for Computing Machinery. https://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.1145/3442188.
   Google Scholar
• Bouk, Dan. 2015. How Our Days Became Numbered: Risk and the Rise of the Statistical Individual. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouk, Dan. 2022. Democracy's Data. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, Geoffrey C. 2005. Memory Practices in the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, Axel. 2023. “From “The” Public Sphere to a Network of Publics: Towards an Empirically Founded Model of Contemporary Public Communication Spaces.” Communication Theory 33 (2–3): 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, Michael. 1998. “The Extended Case Method.” Sociological Theory 16 (1): 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/0735-2751.00040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burema, Dafna, Nicole Debowski-Weimann, Alexander von Janowski, Jil Grabowski, Mihai Maftei, Mattis Jacobs, Patrick van der Smagt, and Djalel Benbouzid. 2023. “A Sector-Based Approach to AI Ethics: Understanding Ethical Issues of AI-Related Incidents Within Their Sectoral Context.” In Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 705–714. Montreal: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M., and R. Evans. 2002. “The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience.” Social Studies of Science 32: 235–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, Kate. 2016. “Can an Algorithm Be Agonistic? Ten Scenes from Life in Calculated Publics.” Science, Technology & Human Values 41 (1): 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915589635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, Kate. 2021. Atlas of AI. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Culp, Andrew. 2022. A Guerrilla Guide to Refusal. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Czernuszenko, Martha. 2020 “Where in the World Is AI?” Medium. Accessed January 20, 2024. https://towardsdatascience.com/where-in-the-world-is-ai-map-80c8678cc80f.
   Google Scholar
• Dandurand, Guillaume, Fenwick McKelvey, and Jonathan Roberge. 2023. “Freezing Out: Legacy Media's Shaping of AI as a Cold Controversy.” Big Data & Society 10 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231219242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 1954. The Public and Its Problems. New York: Swallow Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, Carl. 2012. Adversarial Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elish, Madeleine Clare. 2019. “Moral Crumple Zones: Cautionary Tales in Human-Robot Interaction.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 5: 40–60. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2019.260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engstrom, David Freeman, and Amit Haim. 2023. “Regulating Government AI and the Challenge of Sociotechnical Design.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 19: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120522-091626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feffer, Michael, Nikolas Martelaro, and Hoda Heidari. 2023. “The AI Incident Database as an Educational Tool to Raise Awareness of AI Harms: A Classroom Exploration of Efficacy, Limitations, & Future Improvements.” In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization, Article 3. Boston, MA: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Renate, and Otfried Jarren. 2024. “The Platformization of the Public Sphere and its Challenge to Democracy.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 50 (1): 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537231203535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishkin, James S. 2009. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25/26: 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240.
   Google Scholar
• Fridman, M., R. Krøvel, and F. Palumbo. 2023. “How (Not to) Run and AI Project in Investigative Journalism.” Journalism Practice: 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2253797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, Lewis A, and Risto Kunelius. 2023. “The Public Sphere and Contemporary Lifeworld: Reconstruction in the Context of Systemic Crises.” Communication Theory 33 (2-3): 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebru, Timnit, Emily M. Bender, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Margaret Mitchell. 2023. “Statement from the Listed Authors of Stochastic Parrots on the ‘AI Pause’ Letter.” DAIR Institute. https://www.dair-institute.org/blog/letter-statement-March2023/.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, Tarleton. 2014. “The Relevance of Algorithms.” In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, edited by Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo Boczkowski, and Kirsten A. Foot, 167–194. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, Tarleton. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gitelman, Lisa, ed. 2013. “Raw Data” is an Oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gusfield, Joseph R. 1984. The Culture of Public Problems: Drink-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez Lopez, Marisela, Colin Porlezza, Glenda Cooper, Stephann Makri, Andrew MacFarlane, and Sondess Missaoui. 2022. “A Question of Design: Strategies for Embedding AI-Driven Tools Into Journalistic Work Routines.” Digital Journalism 11 (3): 484–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2043759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jurgen. 2022. “Reflections and Hypotheses on a Further Structural Transformation of the Political Public Sphere.” Theory, Culture & Society 39 (4): 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221112341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, Philipp, Andreas Engel, and Marco Mauer. 2023. “Regulating ChatGPT and Other Large Generative AI Models.” In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 1112–1123. Chicago, IL, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Helberger, Natali, and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2023. “ChatGPT and the AI Act.” Internet Policy Review 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.1.1682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igo, Sarah. 2007. The Averaged American: Surveys, Citizens, and the Making of a Mass Public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Sarah J, and Daniel Kreiss. 2023. “Recentering Power: Conceptualizing Counterpublics and Defensive Publics.” Communication Theory 33 (2-3): 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, Benjamin N. 2023. “Machine Learning and the Politics of Synthetic Data.” Big Data & Society 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221145372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2015. “Future Imperfect: Science, Technology, and the Imaginations of Modernity.” In Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, edited by Sheila Jasanoff, and Sang-Hyun Kim, 1–33. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2016. The Ethics of Invention: Technology and the Human Future. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Jia, Chenyan, Martin J. Riedl, and Samuel Woolley. 2024. “Promises and Perils of Automated Journalism: Algorithms, Experimentation, and “Teachers of Machines” in China and the United States.” Journalism Studies 25 (1): 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2289881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, Andreas, and Ralph Schroeder. 2023. “Artificial Intelligence and the Public Arena.” Communication Theory 33 (2–3): 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelty, Chris. 2008. Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelty, Chris. 2020. The Participant: A Century of Participation in Four Stories. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Kermode, Lachlan, Jan Freyberg, Alican Akturk, Robert Trafford, Denis Kochetkov, Rafael Pardinas, Eyal Weizman, and Julien Cornebise. 2020. Objects of Violence: Synthetic Data for Practical ML in Human Rights Investigations. arXiv:2004.01030 [cs.CV]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.01030
   Google Scholar
• Kieslich, Kimon, Nicholas Diakopoulos, and Natali Helberger. 2023. “Anticipating Impacts: Using Large-Scale Scenario Writing to Explore Diverse Implications of Generative AI in the News Environment.” arXiv:2310.06361 [cs.CY]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.06361
   Google Scholar
• Klimeš, David. 2022. ““Hi, Folks!” Attention Populism as a Strategy for Dominating the Dissonant Information Environment.” Javnost - The Public 29 (4): 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2022.2147773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LeDantec, Christopher A. 2016. Designing Publics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• LeDantec, Christopher A., and Carl DiSalvo. 2013. “Infrastructuring and the Formation of Publics in Participatory Design.” Social Studies of Science 43: 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712471581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Seth C., Amy Kristin Sanders, and Casey Carmody. 2019. “Libel by Algorithm? Automated Journalism and the Threat of Legal Liability.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 96 (1): 60–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018755983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Cindy Kaiying, and Steven J. Jackson. 2023. “From Bias to Repair: Error as a Site of Collaboration and Negotiation in Applied Data Science Work.” Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact 7 (CSCW1): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579607.
   Google Scholar
• Manovich, Lev. 2000. “Database as a Genre of New Media.” AI & Society 14: 176–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205448.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, Noortje. 2010. “Front-Staging Nonhumans: Publicity as a Constraint on the Political Activity of Things.” In Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life, edited by B. Braun, and S. J. Whatmore, 177–210. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, Noortje. 2012. Material Participation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, Noortje. 2018. “Why We Can't Have Our Facts Back.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 4: 423–443. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2018.188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, Noortje. 2023. “How to Turn Politics Around: Things, the Earth, Ecology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 48 (5): 973–998. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439231190884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattern, Shannon. 2015. “Mission Control: A History of the Urban Dashboard.” Places Journal. https://placesjournal.org/article/mission-control-a-history-of-the-urban-dashboard/
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, Sean. 2021. Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Database. Palo Alto, CA, February 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Merken, Sara. 2023. “New York Lawyers Sanctioned for Using Fake ChatGPT Cases in Legal Brief.” Reuters, June 26. https://www.reuters.com/legal/new-york-lawyers-sanctioned-using-fake-chatgpt-cases-legal-brief-2023-06-22/
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, Rahul. 2014. “Interfacing Data Destinations and Visualizations: A History of Database Literacy.” New Media & Society 16 (1): 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813495184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napoli, Philip M. 2019. Social Media and the Public Interest. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Alondra. 2024. “The Right Way to Regulate AI.” Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/right-way-regulate-artificial-intelligence-alondra-nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Nishal, Sachita, and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2023. Envisioning the Applications and Implications of Generative AI for News Media. Paper presented at the CHI ‘23 Generative AI and HCI Workshop, Hamburg, Germany, April 23–28.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2024. “OECD AI Incidents Monitor: Methodology and Disclosures.” Accessed January 27, 2024. https://oecd.ai/en/incidents-methodology.
   Google Scholar
• Ojala, Markus, and Leena Ripatti-Torniainen. 2023. “Where Is the Public of ‘Networked Publics’? A Critical Analysis of the Theoretical Limitations of Online Publics Research.” European Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231231210207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paúl, María Luisa. 2023. “A Brazilian City Passed a Law about Water Meters. ChatGPT Wrote It.” Washington Post.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, John Durham. 1995. “Historical Tensions in the Concept of Public Opinion.” In Public Opinion and the Communication of Consent, edited by Theodore L. Glasser, and Charles T. Salmon, 3–32. New York: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, Jo, Aphra Kerr, Stephen Cory Robinson, Rosanna Fanni, Valerie Eveline Steinkogler, Stefania Milan, and Giulia Zampedri. 2023. “Governing Artificial Intelligence in the Media and Communications Sector.” Internet Policy Review 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.1.1683. 
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinch, Trevor J., and Wiebe E. Bijker. 1984. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other.” Social Studies of Science 14 (3): 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantin, Jean-Christophe, Carl Lagoze, Paul N Edwards, and Christian Sandvig. 2018. “Infrastructure Studies Meet Platform Studies in the Age of Google and Facebook.” New Media & Society 20 (1): 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raley, Rita, and Jennifer Rhee. 2023. “Critical AI: A Field in Formation.” American Literature 95 (2): 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1215/00029831-10575021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberge, Jonathan, and Michael Castelle, eds. 2021. The Cultural Life of Machine Learning: An Incursion into Critical AI Studies. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56286-1_2.
   Google Scholar
• Roberge, Jonathan, Marius Senneville, and Kevin Morin. 2020. “How to Translate Artificial Intelligence? Myths and Justifications in Public Discourse.” Big Data & Society 7 (1): 2053951720919968. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720919968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, Rowena, Anais Resseguier, and Nicole Santiago. 2023. “When Artificial Intelligence Fails: The Emerging Role of Incident Databases.” Public Governance, Administration and Finances Law Review 8 (2): 17–28. https://doi.org/10.53116/pgaflr.7030.
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, Charles T., and Theodore L. Glasser. 1995. “The Politics of Polling and the Limits of Consent.” In Public Opinion and the Communication of Consent, edited by Theodore L. Glasser, and Charles T. Salmon, 437–458. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savransky, Martin. 2021. “Problems All the Way Down.” Theory, Culture & Society 38 (2): 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276420966389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, Rebecca. 2021. “Glitch.” In Uncertain Archives: Critical Keywords for Big Data, edited by Nanna Bonde Thylstrup, Daniela Agostinho, Annie Ring, Catherine D’Ignazio, and Kristin Veel, 259–269. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneier, Bruce, and Nathan Sanders. 2023. “The A.I. Wars Have Three Factions, and They All Crave Power.” New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, Michael. 2010. “Political Observatories, Databases and News in the Emerging Ecology of Public Information.” Daedalus 139 (2): 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed.2010.139.2.100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaver, Nick. 2017. “Algorithms as Culture.” Big Data & Society 4 (2): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717738104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Felix M. 2022. “Uneasy Bedfellows: AI in the News, Platform Companies and the Issue of Journalistic Autonomy.” Digital Journalism 10 (10): 1832–1854. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2063150.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Felix M. 2023. “Escape Me If You Can: How AI Reshapes News Organisations’ Dependency on Platform Companies.” Digital Journalism 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2287464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smuha, Nathalie A. 2021. “Beyond the Individual: Governing AI’s Societal Harm.” Internet Policy Review 10 (3). https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.3.1574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Splichal, Slavko. 2021. “The Public Sphere in the Twilight Zone of Publicness.” European Journal of Communication 37 (2): 198–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211061490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Splichal, Slavko. 2022a. Datafication of Public Opinion and the Public Sphere. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Splichal, Slavko. 2022b. “In Data We (Don't) Trust: The Public Adrift in Data-Driven Public Opinion Models.” Big Data & Society 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221097319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, Catherine R. 2002. “Rethinking the Black Public Sphere: An Alternative Vocabulary for Multiple Public Spheres.” Communication Theory 12 (4): 446–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00278.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, Jeff C., and Stephen L. Dorton. 2023. “Exploring Trust with the AI Incident Database.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 67 (1): 489–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231198084.
   Google Scholar
• Steinhoff, James. 2022. “Toward a Political Economy of Synthetic Data: A Data-Intensive Capitalism that Is not a Surveillance Capitalism?” New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221099217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, Lucy. 2023. “The Uncontroversial ‘Thingness’ of AI.” Big Data & Society 10 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231206794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turri, Violet, and Rachel Dzombak. 2023. “Why We Need to Know More: Exploring the State of AI Incident Documentation Practices.” In Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 576–583. Montreal: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Urueña, Sergio. 2022. “Anticipation and Modal Power: Opening Up and Closing Down the Momentum of Sociotechnical Systems.” Social Studies of Science 52 (5): 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221111469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, Pranshu. 2023. “How an AI-Written Star Wars Story Created Chaos at Gizmodo.” The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/07/08/gizmodo-ai-errors-star-wars/.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schnitzler, Antina. 2016. Democracy's Infrastructure: Techno-Politics and Protest After Apartheid. Princeton, NJ: Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin. 2019. Emotions, Media and Politics. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, Michael. 2002. “Publics and Counterpublics.” Public Culture 14 (1): 49–90. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-14-1-49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, Mengyi, and Zhixuan Zhou. 2023, January 3–6. “AI Ethics Issues in Real World: Evidence from AI Incident Database.” In Proceedings of the 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4923–4934. Maui, Hawaii, January 3-6.
   Google Scholar
• Wessler, Hartmut. 2018. Habermas and the Media. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Ytre-Arne, Brita, and Hallvard Moe. 2021. “Folk Theories of Algorithms: Understanding Digital Irritation.” Media, Culture & Society 43 (5): 807–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720972314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar