External Knowledge Accession and Innovation Speed in the Small and Medium Sized Enterprise (SME)

References

• Abernathy, W., & Utterback, J. 1978. Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80(7): 41-47.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, P. S., McDonald, D. & MacDonald, F. 1992. Strategic management of technical functions. Sloan Management Review, 33(3): 19-37.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, A., Krapfel, R., Jr., & LaBahn, D. 1995. Product innovativeness and entry strategy: Impact on cycle time and break-even time. Journal Product Innovation Management, 12: 54-69.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida, P., Dokko, G., & Rosenkopf, L. 2003. Startup size and the mechanisms of external learning: Increasing opportunity and decreasing ability. Research Policy, 32: 301-315.
   Google Scholar
• Ashkenas, R., Ulrich, D., Jick, T. & Kerr. S. 1995. Boundaryless Organization: Breaking the Chains of Organizational Structure, Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, C. I. 1938. The functions of the executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bendor-Samuel, P. 2000. Turning lead into gold: The demystification of outsourcing. Provo, UT: Executive Excellence Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. 1998. The economics of small business finance: The roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22: 873-897.
   Google Scholar
• Bierly, P., & Chakrabarti, A. K. 1996. Technological learning, strategic flexibility, and new product development in the pharmaceutical industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43: 368-380.
   Google Scholar
• Birchall, D., Chanaron, J., & Soderquist, K. 1996. Managing innovation in SMEs: A comparison of companies in the UK, France, and Portugal. International Journal of Technology Management, 12: 291-305.
   Google Scholar
• Bimbaum-More, P. H. 1990. Competing with technology in 8-bit microprocessors. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 1: 1-13.
   Google Scholar
• Bleeke, J., & Ernst, D. 1995. Is your strategic alliance really a sale? Harvard Business Review, 73(1): 97-105.
   Google Scholar
• Burgelman, R., & Maidique, M. 1988. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Capell, P. 1995. Small companies dominate growth. American Demographics, 17(10): 17-18.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, S. A. 2003. Knowledge managing and knowledge management systems in inter- organizational networks. Knowledge and Process Management, 10: 194-206.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, C. 1996. Intrapreneurship in Small Businesses: An Exploratory Study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(1): 5-20.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, A. K. 1974. Role of product champion in innovation. California Management Review, 17(2): 58-62.
   Google Scholar
• Chanaron, J. 1991. Innovation. Technologique et Developpement Economique. Cours d’Economie Appliquee, Universite Pierre Mendes, Grenoble, France.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, K., & Fujimoto, T. 1991. Product development performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, K. B. 1989. What strategy can do for technology. Harvard Business Review, 67(6): 94-98.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G. 1984. How new product strategies impact on performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1: 5-18.
   Google Scholar
• Cragg, P. B., & King, M. 1988. Organizational characteristics and small firms’ performance. American Journal of Small Business, 13(2): 49-65.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, C. M. 1992. The hidden costs of accelerated product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9: 188-199.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Das, T. K., & Rahman, N. 2001. Partner misbehaviour in strategic alliances: Guidelines for effective deterrence. Journal of General Management, 27(1): 43-70.
   Google Scholar
• Dhawan, R. 2001. Firm size and productivity differential: Theory and evidence from a panel of US firms. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 44(3): 269-293.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, G. W., & Mohr, L. B. 1976. Conceptual issues in the study of innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 700-714.
   Google Scholar
• Doz, L. Y. & Hamel, G. 1998. Alliance Advantage. HBS Press, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Drihlon, G., & Estime, E. 1993. Technology watch and the small firm. OECD
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H., & Nobeoka, K. 2000. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 345-367.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, T., Magee, J., Rousel, P., & Saad, K. 1990. Managing technology as a business strategy. Sloan Management Review, 31(3): 73-78.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, D. 2000. Inter-organizational knowledge outsourcing: What permits small Taiwanese firms to compete in the computer industry? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 17: 223-255.
   Google Scholar
• Fusfeld, A. 1989. Formulating technology strategies to meet the global challenges of the 1990s. International Journal of Technology Management, 4(6): 601-6I2.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoshal, S., & Westney, D. E. 1991. Organizing competitor analysis systems. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 17-31.
   Google Scholar
• Goes, J. B., & Park, S. H. 1997. Interorganizational links and innovation: The case of hospital services. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 673-696.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. 2004. A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 41 : 61-84.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. 1992. Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering, and manufacturing- a comparison between two new product teams. Management Science, 38(3): 360-374.
   Google Scholar
• Guimaraes, T., & Liska, K. 1993. Empirically assessing the effectiveness of mechanisms and activities used for organization innovation. Frontier of Entrepreneurship Research: 41-57. Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. K., & Souder, W. E. 1998. Key drivers of reduced cycle time. Research Technology Management, 41(4): 38-43.
   Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J. 1993. Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Inter-organizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14: 371-385.
   Google Scholar
• Hagedoorn, J., & Schakenraad, J. 1994. The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 291-309.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, G. 1991. Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 83-103.
   Google Scholar
• Harms, J. 1990. Are you a marketing oriented company? Small Business Reports, 15: 20-24.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, X., Soutar, G., & Brown, A. 2002. New product development processes in small and medium-sized enterprises: Some Australian evidence. Journal of Small Business Management, 40: 27-42.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, A. B., & Goodwin, J. R. 1986. Perceived causes of success in small business. American Journal of Small Business, 11(2): 41-10.
   Google Scholar
• Inkpen, A. C., & Crossan, M. M. 1995. Believing is seeing: Joint ventures and organization learning. Journal of Management Studies, 32: 595-618.
   Google Scholar
• Jonash, R. S. 1996. Strategic technology leveraging: Making outsourcing work for you. Research Technology Management, 39(2): 19-25.
   Google Scholar
• Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. 2002. Alliance capability, stock market response, and long-term alliance success: The role of the alliance function. Strategic Management Journal, 23: 747-767.
   Google Scholar
• Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. 2000. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 217-237.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R., & Allen, T. J. 1982. Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D project groups. R&D Management, 12: 7-19.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, E. H., & Bierly, P. E. 2002. Is faster really better? An empirical test of the implications of innovation speed. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49: 2-12.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, E. H., & Chakrabarti, A. K. 1996. Innovation speed: A conceptual model of context, antecedents, and outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 21: 1143-1191.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, E. H., Bierly, P. E., & Gopalakrishnan, S. 2000. Internal vs. external learning in product development: Effects on speed, costs and competitive advantage. R&D Management, 30: 213-223.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, E. H., & A. K. Chakrabarti 1999. Speeding up the pace of new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16: 231-247.
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, E. H., Bierly, P. E., & Gopalakrishnan, S. 2001. Vasa-Syndrome: Insights from a 17th Century New Product Disaster. Academy of Management Executive, 15(3): 80-91.
   Google Scholar
• Khalil, T., & Bayraktar, B. 1994. Management of technology IV-The creation of wealth. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Management of Technology, Miami, Fla., February 27-March 4, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kimzey, C. H., & Kurokawa, S. 2002. Technology outsourcing in the U.S. and Japan. Research Technology Management, 45(4): 36-42.
   Google Scholar
• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3: 383-397.
   Google Scholar
• Loh, L., & Venkatraman, N. 1992. Determinants of information technology outsourcing: A cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(1): 7-24.
   Google Scholar
• Lukas, B. A., & Ferrell, O. C. 2000. The effect of market orientation on product innovation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28: 239-247.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. 1988. The Speed and Cost of Industrial Innovation in Japan and the United States: External vs. Internal Technology. Management Science, 34: 1157-1169.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. 1999. Designing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, E. F., & Barczak, G. 1991. Speeding up new product development, The effects of leadership style and source of technology. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8: 203-211.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1973. The Nature of Managerial Work. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Moustakas, C. 1994. Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): 77-92.
   Google Scholar
• Murmann, P. A. 1994. Expected development time reductions in the German mechanical engineering industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11: 236-252.
   Google Scholar
• Narula, R., & Hagedoorn, J. 1999. Innovating through strategic alliances: Moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements. Technovation, 19(5): 283-294.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5: 14-37.
   Google Scholar
• Notrargiacomo, R. C. 2001. Experts explore accelerating breakthrough innovations. PDMA Visions, 25(3). Retrieved from: >http://www.pdma.orglvisions/jul01/innovations.html.<
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 1997. Globalization and small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Oviatt, B., & McDougall, P. 1994. Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25 (1): 45-64.
   Google Scholar
• Parkhe, A. 1991. Interfinn diversity, organization learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies, 22: 579-601.
   Google Scholar
• Pavitt, K. 1990. What we know about the strategic management of technology. California Management Review, 32(3): 17-26.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, C., Meredith, G. G., & Cunnington, H. J. 1988. Relationship between small business growth and personnel. Journal of Small Business Management, 26(2): 76-79.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, S. C. 2001. The relationship between written business plans and the failure of small businesses in the U.S. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(3): 201-208.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., & D.W. Organ 1986. Self-reporting in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4): 531-544.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 1990. Competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. 1998. Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review, 40(3): 228-240.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., Koput, K., & Smith-Doerr, L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116-145.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, J. B. 2000. Outsourcing innovation: The new engine of growth. Sloan Management Review, 41(4): 13-28.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, R. 1981. Innovation and firm size: a case for dynamic complementarity; or, is small really so beautiful? Industrial Innovation and public Policy. London: Frances Pinter Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, R. 1983. Innovation and firm size: A case for dynamic complementary; or, is small so beautiful? Journal of General Management, 8(3): 5-25.
   Google Scholar
• Sakakibara, M., & Barnstetter, L. 2003. Measuring the impact of US research consortia. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(2/3): 51-69.
   Google Scholar
• Sawhney, M., & Prandelli, E. 2000. Communities of creation: Managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets. California Management Review, 42(4): 24-54.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. 1998. Information rules. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simonin, B. L. 1999. Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 595-623.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. G., & Reinertsen, D. G. 1995. Developing products in half the time. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. G., & Reinertsen, D. G. 1992. Shortening the product development cycle. Research Technology Management, 35(3): 44-49.
   Google Scholar
• Souder, W. E. & Chakrabarti, A. K. 1980. Managing the coordination of marketing and R&D in the innovation process. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, 15: 135-150.
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, T. E. 2000. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 791-811.
   Google Scholar
• McGarvey, R. 2001. We’re #1 -Not: Why playing second fiddle to an industry leader may be music to your ears. Entrepreneur, January.
   Google Scholar
• Timmons, J. 1994. New venture creation. 4th edition. Burr Ridge, IL: Irvin.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 1993. Small and medium-sized transnational corporations: Role, impact and policy implications. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Uttal, B. 1987. Speeding new ideas to market. Fortune, March 2: 62-66.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H. 1986. Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32: 590-607.
   Google Scholar
• Vesey, J. T. 1991. The new competitors: they think in terms of speed-to-market. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2): 23-33.
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. 1988. The sources of innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. B. 1992. Creating project development plans to focus product development. Harvard Business Review, 70(2): 70-82.
   Google Scholar
• Wind, J., & Mahajan, V. 1997. Issues and opportunities in new product development: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1): 1-12.
   Google Scholar
• Wynarczyk, P. 1997. The economic success of UK innovative small firms. Paper presented at the 42nd World Conference of International Council for Small Business, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Young, G., Sapienza, H., & Baumer, D. 2003. The influence of flexibility in buyer-seller relationships on the productivity of knowledge. Journal of Business Research, 56: 443-451.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., & George, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27: 185-203.
   Google Scholar