Entrepreneurial path dependency in labour market regions: a longitudinal panel study of related and unrelated variety

References

• Aarstad, J., Kvitastein, O. A., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2016a). Related and unrelated variety as regional drivers of enterprise productivity and innovation: A multilevel study. Research Policy, 45(4), 844–856. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarstad, J., Kvitastein, O. A., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2016b). Related and unrelated variety in a tourism context. Annals of Tourism Research, 57, 254–256. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarstad, J., Kvitastein, O. A., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2019). Location decisions of enterprise R&D investments as a function of related and unrelated regional industry structures: A multilevel study. Papers in Regional Science, 98(2), 779–797. doi: 10.1111/pirs.12366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99(394), 116–131. doi: 10.2307/2234208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. (1990). Positive feedbacks in the economy. Scientific American, 262(2), 92–99. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0290-92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attaran, M. (1986). Industrial diversity and economic performance in U.S. Areas. The Annals of Regional Science, 20(2), 44–54. doi: 10.1007/BF01287240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Frenken, K. (2006). Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 273–302. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbi022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., & Iammarino, S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85(3), 289–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R., Minondo, A., & Navarro, M. (2013). The emergence of new industries at the regional level in Spain: A proximity approach based on product relatedness. Economic Geography, 89(1), 29–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01170.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke, T. (2015). Entrepreneurship and path dependency in regional development. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 27(3-4), 202–218. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2015.1030457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, W., & Rasbash, J. (2004). Multilevel modelling. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 459–478). US: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Castaldi, C., & Dosi, G. (2006). The grip of history and the scope for novelty: Some results and open questions on path dependence in economic processes. In A. Wimmer & R. Kössler (Eds.), Understanding change: Models, methodologies and metaphors (pp. 99–128). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Castaldi, C., Frenken, K., & Los, B. (2015). Related variety, unrelated variety and technological breakthroughs: An analysis of US state-level patenting. Regional Studies, 49(5), 767–781. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.940305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Content, J., & Frenken, K. (2016). Related variety and economic development: A literature review. European Planning Studies, 24(12), 2097–2112. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1246517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1987). Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin, 102(3), 414–417. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.102.3.414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75(2), 232–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, P. A. (2001). Path dependence, its critics and the quest for ‘historical economics’. In P. Garrouste & S. Ioannides (Eds.), Evolution and path dependence in economic Ideas (pp. 15–40). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fredin, S. (2016). Breaking the cognitive dimension of local path dependence: An entrepreneurial perspective. Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography, 98(3), 239–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697. doi: 10.1080/00343400601120296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjelsvik, M., & Aarstad, J. (2017). Entrepreneurial industry structures and financial institutions as agents for path dependence in Southwest Norway: The role of the macroeconomic environment. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 406–424. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1226786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Jakobsen, S.-E. (2017). New path development between innovation systems and individual actors. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 355–370. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1268570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., & Trippl, M. (2016). Path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis. In M. Parrilli, R. Fitjar, & A. Rodriguez-Pose (Eds.), Innovation drivers and regional innovation Strategies (pp. 66–84). New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquemin, A. P., & Berry, C. H. (1979). Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 27, 359–369. doi: 10.2307/2097958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogler, D. F., & Whittle, A. (2018). The geography of knowledge creation: Technological relatedness and regional smart specialization strategies. In A. Paasi, J. Harrison, & M. Jones (Eds.), Handbook on the geographies of regions and territories (pp. 153–168). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499. doi:10.2307/2937739 doi: 10.1086/261763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2010). Roepke lecture in economic geography—rethinking regional path dependence: Beyond lock-in to evolution. Economic Geography, 86(1), 1–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01056.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (2006). Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography, 6(4), 395–437. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbl012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minosse, C., Calcaterra, S., Abbate, I., Selleri, M., Zaniratti, M. S., & Capobianchi, M. R. (2006). Possible compartmentalization of hepatitis C viral replication in the genital tract of HIV-1-coinfected women. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 194(11), 1529–1536. doi: 10.1086/508889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth Paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01121.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417–1426. doi: 10.2307/1911408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673–690. doi: 10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2017). Small business and entrepreneurship: Their role in economic and social development. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29(1-2), 1–3. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2016.1255438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rypestøl, J. O., & Aarstad, J. (2018). Entrepreneurial innovativeness and growth ambitions in thick vs. Thin regional innovation systems. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(5-6), 639–661. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2018.1444104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saviotti, P. P., & Frenken, K. (2008). Export variety and the economic performance of countries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 18(2), 201–218. doi: 10.1007/s00191-007-0081-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A., & Storper, M. (2003). Regions, globalization, development. Regional Studies, 37(6-7), 579–593. doi: 10.1080/0034340032000108697a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E. (1948a). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(October), 623–656. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E. (1948b). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(July), 379–423. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A. B. (2011). Multilevel analysis. In M. Lovric (Ed.), International encyclopedia of statistical science (pp. 879–882). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• StataCorp. (2017). Version 15. College Station: TX StataCorp LP.
   Google Scholar
• Tavassoli, S., & Carbonara, N. (2014). The role of knowledge variety and intensity for regional innovation. Small Business Economics, 43(2), 493–509. doi: 10.1007/s11187-014-9547-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Waerden, B. L. (1953). Order tests for the two-sample problem and their power. Indagationes Mathematicae, 15(series A), 303–316. doi: 10.1016/S1385-7258(53)50039-3
   Google Scholar
• Wixe, S. (2015). The impact of spatial externalities: Skills, education and plant productivity. Regional Studies, 49(12), 2053–2069. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2014.891729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar