453
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Academic Papers

Components of sustainability of entrepreneurial ecosystems in knowledge-intensive enterprises: the application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

, , &
Pages 288-306 | Received 21 May 2018, Accepted 11 Sep 2019, Published online: 09 Oct 2019

References

  • Agarwal, R., & Audretsch, D. B. (2001). Does entry size matter? The impact of the life cycle and technology on firm survival. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 49(1), 21–43. doi: 10.1111/1467-6451.00136
  • Aliabadi, V., Ataei, P., & Movahedi, R. (2016). The effect of strategic thinking and social capital on recognition of entrepreneurial opportunities among rural youths (Case study: Kangavar County). Journal of Research and Rural Planning, 5(2), 95–110. doi: 10.22067/jrrp.v5i2.46072
  • Amolo, J., & Migiro, S. O. (2015). An entrepreneurial flair development: The role of anecosystem. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 13(2), 494–505.
  • Arruda, C., Nogueira, V. S., Cozzi, A., & Costa, V. (2015). The Brazilian entrepreneurial ecosystem of startups: An analysis of entrepreneurship determinants in Brazil and the perceptions around the Brazilian regulatory framework. In R. Lèbre La Rovere, L. de Magalhães Ozório, & L. de Jesus Melo (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in BRICS: Policy and research to support entrepreneurs (pp. 9–26). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Asa, R. A., & Navneel, S. P. (2014). Analysis on the factors that determine sustainable growth of small firms in Namibia. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 1(1), 5–11. doi: 10.18775/ijmsba.1849-5664-5419.2014.11.1001
  • Benzazoua, A., & Bouazza, O. (2015). Establishing the factors affecting the growth of small and medium-sized enterprises in Algeria. American International Journal of Social Science, 4(2), 101–121.
  • Bhat, S. A., & Kumar, A. (2018). An integrated fuzzy approach for prioritizing supply chain complexity drivers of an Indian mining equipment manufacturer by Kavilal, E. G., Venkatesan, S. P., Kumar, K. D. H., [Resour. Policy 51 (2017) 204–218]: Suggested modification. Resources Policy, 57, 278–280. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.01.003
  • Böheim, R., Stiglbauer, A., & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2009). On the persistence of job creation in old and new firms. Economics Letters, 105(1), 17–19. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2009.05.003
  • Cefis, E., & Marsili, O. (2005). A matter of life and death: Innovation and firm survival. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(6), 1167–1192.
  • Çelen, A., & Yalçın, N. (2012). Performance assessment of Turkish electricity distribution utilities: An application of combined FAHP/TOPSIS/DEA methodology to incorporate quality of service. Utilities Policy, 23, 59–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jup.2012.05.003
  • Chamoli, S. (2015). Hybrid FAHP (fuzzy analytical hierarchy process)-FTOPSIS (fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity of an ideal solution) approach for performance evaluation of the V down perforated baffle roughened rectangular channel. Energy, 84, 432–442. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.007
  • Cho, J., & Lee, J. (2013). Development of a new technology product evaluation model for assessing commercialization opportunities using Delphi method and fuzzy AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(13), 5314–5330. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.03.038
  • Chou, S.-Y., Chang, Y.-H., & Shen, C.-Y. (2008). A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1), 132–145. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.006
  • Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1002/bse.428
  • Cressy, R. (2006). Why do most firms die young? Small Business Economics, 26(2), 103–116. doi: 10.1007/s11187-004-7813-9
  • Dahshan, M. E., Tolba, A. H., & Badreldin, T. (2012). Enabling entrepreneurship in Egypt: Toward a sustainable dynamic model. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 7(2), 83–106. doi: 10.1162/INOV_a_00130
  • Dutta, V. (2012). Land use dynamics and Peri-urban growth characteristics: Reflections on master plan and urban suitability from a Sprawling North Indian City. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 3(2), 277–301. doi: 10.1177/0975425312473226
  • Ertuğrul, İ, & Karakaşoğlu, N. (2009). Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 702–715. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.10.014
  • Etzkowitz, H. (2006). The Entrepreneurial University and the Triple Helix as a Development Paradigm. Paper presented at the Launching a Program to Transform University -Industry-Government Relations in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Fallah Haghighi, N., Hajihoseini, H., Ramezanpour Nargesi, G., & Bijani, M. (2018). Gap analysis of current and desired states of entrepreneurship development components in the field of ICTs in Iran. Technology in Society, 54, 101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.03.003
  • Feldman, M., Francis, J., & Bercovitz, J. (2005). Creating a cluster while building a firm: Entrepreneurs and the formation of industrial Clusters. Regional Studies, 39(1), 129–141. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320888
  • Fuerlinger, G., Fandl, U., & Funke, T. (2015). The role of the state in the entrepreneurship ecosystem: Insights from Germany. Triple Helix, 2(1), 3. doi: 10.1186/s40604-014-0015-9
  • Gorman, G. G., & McCarthy, S. (2006). Business development support and knowledge-based businesses. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 131–143. doi: 10.1007/s10961-005-5026-2
  • Goswami, K., Mitchell J. R., & Bhagavatula, S. (2018). Accelerator expertise: Understanding the intermediary role of accelerators in the development of the Bangalore entrepreneurial ecosystem. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 117–150. doi: 10.1002/sej.1281
  • Groth, O. J., Esposito, M., & Tse, T. (2015). What Europe needs is an innovation-driven entrepreneurship ecosystem: Introducing EDIE. Thunderbird International Business Review, 57(4), 263–269. doi: 10.1002/tie.21709
  • Gul, M., Guven, B., & Guneri, A. F. (2018). A new fine-kinney-based risk assessment framework using FAHP-FVIKOR incorporation. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 53, 3–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.08.014
  • Hosseininia, G., Ataei, P., & Yaghoubi Farani, A. (2017). An assessment of students’ entrepreneurial skills and characteristics and the impact on their entrepreneurial intention: A case of maharat applied science centers. Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 19(73), 25–44. doi: 10.22047/ijee.2017.61340.1408
  • Hu, A. H., Hsu, C.-W., Kuo, T.-C., & Wu, W.-C. (2009). Risk evaluation of green components to hazardous substance using FMEA and FAHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3, Part 2), 7142–7147. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.031
  • Im, K., & Cho, H. (2013). A systematic approach for developing a new business model using morphological analysis and integrated fuzzy approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(11), 4463–4477. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.01.042
  • Isenberg, D. J. (2010). The big idea: How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 40–50.
  • Isenberg, D. J. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs, Dublin, 12 May.
  • Ishizaka, A. (2014). Comparison of fuzzy logic, AHP, FAHP and hybrid fuzzy AHP for new supplier selection and its performance analysis. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 9(1–2), 1–22. doi: 10.1504/ijism.2014.064353
  • Kane, T. (2010). The importance of startups in job creation and job destruction. Kauffman Foundation Research Series: Firm Formation and Economic Growth.
  • Kong, F., & Liu, H. (2005). Applying fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to evaluate success factors of E-commerance. International Journal of Information and Systems Sciences, 1(3–4), 406–412.
  • Larimian, T., Zarabadi, Z. S. S., & Sadeghi, A. (2013). Developing a fuzzy AHP model to evaluate environmental sustainability from the perspective of secured by design scheme—a case study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 7, 25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2012.10.001
  • Li, L., Shi, Z.-H., Yin, W., Zhu, D., Ng, S. L., Cai, C.-F., & Lei, A. L. (2009). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to eco-environmental vulnerability assessment for the danjiangkou reservoir area, China. Ecological Modelling, 220(23), 3439–3447. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.09.005
  • Lin, H.-F., Lee, H.-S., & Wang, D. W. (2009). Evaluation of factors influencing knowledge sharing based on a fuzzy AHP approach. Journal of Information Science, 35(1), 25–44. doi: 10.1177/0165551508091310
  • Liu, L., Zhou, W.-a., & Song, J.-d. (2009). Quantitative and qualitative research on service quality evaluation system in NGN. The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications, 16(5), 71–77. doi:10.1016/S1005-8885(08)60271-X
  • Lu, J., Zhang, G., & Ruan, D. (2007). Multi-objective group decision making: Methods, software and applications with fuzzy set techniques. London: Imperial College Press.
  • Macuzić, I., Tadić, D., Aleksić, A., & Stefanović, M. (2016). A two step fuzzy model for the assessment and ranking of organizational resilience factors in the process industry. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 40, 122–130. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.12.013
  • Mahjouri, M., Ishak, M. B., Torabian, A., Manaf, L. A., & Halimoon, N. (2017). The application of a hybrid model for identifying and ranking indicators for assessing the sustainability of wastewater treatment systems. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 10, 21–37. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2016.09.006
  • Malecki, E. J. (2018). Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography Compass, 12(3), e12359. doi: 10.1111/gec3.12359
  • Mandic, K., Delibasic, B., Knezevic, S., & Benkovic, S. (2014). Analysis of the financial parameters of Serbian banks through the application of the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods. Economic Modelling, 43, 30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.036
  • Mansuri, S., Vazifeh, Z., & Yusefi tabas, H. (2017). Prioritizing the effective factors in the development of knowledge-based companies of Kerman. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 10(2), 319–338. doi: 10.22059/jed.2017.230257.652181
  • Modak, M., Pathak, K., & Ghosh, K. K. (2017). Performance evaluation of outsourcing decision using a BSC and fuzzy AHP approach: A case of the Indian coal mining organization. Resources Policy, 52, 181–191. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.03.002
  • Moore, J. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.
  • Mousivand, M., Safaei Shakib, A., Ataei, P., & Abdolmaleki, B. (2016). Analyzing effect of psychological capital components on identifying entrepreneurial opportunities of agriculture Jahad organization staffs of Hamedan Province. Quarterly Journal of Economic Growth and Development Research, 6(23), 55–64.
  • Neck, H. M., Meyer, G. D., Cohen, B., & Corbett, A. C. (2004). An entrepreneurial system view of new venture creation. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 190–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2004.00105.x
  • Neumeyer, X., & Santos, S. C. (2018). Sustainable business models, venture typologies, and entrepreneurial ecosystems: A social network perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4565–4579. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.216
  • Nezarat, H., Sereshki, F., & Ataei, M. (2015). Ranking of geological risks in mechanized tunneling by using fuzzy Analytical hierarchy process (FAHP). Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 50, 358–364. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2015.07.019
  • Obasan, K. (2014). The impact of business environment on the survival of small scale businesses in Nigeria. International Journal of Management and Business Research, 4(3), 165–170.
  • OECD. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship, OECD leed programme. Netherlands: The Hague.
  • OECD. (2015). New approaches to SME and entrepreneurship financing: Broadening the range of instruments. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Overholm, H. (2015). Collectively created opportunities in emerging ecosystems: The case of solar service ventures. Technovation, 39–40, 14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2014.01.008
  • Pistrui, D., Blessing, J., & Mekemson, K. (2008). Building an entrepreneurial engineering ecosystem for future generations: The kern entrepreneurship education network. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Pittsburgh.
  • Prakash, A., Agarwal, A., & Kumar, A. (2018). Risk assessment in automobile supply chain. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(2, Part 1), 3571–3580. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.606
  • Regasa, G. D. (2015). External factors affecting firm growth: Evidence from small scale manufacturing firms in Tigray Regional State of Ethiopia. International Journal of Management and Business Research, 5(4), 279–286.
  • Roberts, E. B., & Eesley, C. E. (2011). Entrepreneurial impact: The role of MIT. Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 7(1–2), 1–149. doi: 10.1561/0300000030
  • Roundy, P. T., Bradshaw, M., & Brockman, B. K. (2018). The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach. Journal of Business Research, 86, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.032
  • Roundy, P. T., Brockman, B. K., & Bradshaw, M. (2017). The resilience of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 8, 99–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2017.08.002
  • Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2012). Models, methods, concepts & applications of the analytic hierarchy process. New York: Springer.
  • Salimzadeh, P., Courvisanos, J., & Ravi Nayak, R. (2013). Sustainability in small and medium sized enterprises in regional Australia: A framework of analysis. Paper presented at the 26th Annual SEAANZ Conference Proceedings Small Enterprise Association, Australia and New Zealand.
  • Sarma, S., & Sunny, S. A. (2017). Civic entrepreneurial ecosystems: Smart city emergence in Kansas City. Business Horizons, 60(6), 843–853. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2017.07.010
  • Scaringella, L., & Radziwon, A. (2017). Innovation, entrepreneurial, knowledge, and business ecosystems: Old wine in new bottles? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.023
  • Shieh, L.-F., Chang, T.-H., Fu, H.-P., Lin, S.-W., & Chen, Y.-Y. (2014). Analyzing the factors that affect the adoption of mobile services in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 87, 80–88. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.11.004
  • Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72. doi: 10.1111/etap.12167
  • Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2018). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 151–168. doi: 10.1002/sej.1268
  • Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.
  • Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2016). Entrepreneurial ecosystems. In R. Blackburn, D. D. Clercq, J. Heinonen, & Z. Wang (Eds.), Handbook for entrepreneurship and small business (pp. 1–15). London: Sage.
  • Suresh, J., & Ramraj, R. (2012). Entrepreneurial ecosystem: Case study on the influence of environmental factors on entrepreneurial success. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(16), 95–101.
  • Vasconcelos Gomes, L. A. d., Salerno, M. S., Phaal, R., & Probert, D. R. (2018). How entrepreneurs manage collective uncertainties in innovation ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 164–185. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.016
  • Wang, Y.-M., & Chin, K.-S. (2011). Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A logarithmic fuzzy preference programming methodology. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 52(4), 541–553. doi: 10.1016/j.ijar.2010.12.004
  • Yadav, H. C., Jain, R., Shukla, S., & Mishra, P. K. (2012). Prioritized aestheticattributes of product: A fuzzy-AHP approach. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 4(4), 1281–1291.
  • Yadegaridehkordi, E., Nizam Bin Md Nasir, M. H., Fazmidar Binti Mohd Noor, N., Shuib, L., & Badie, N. (2018). Predicting the adoption of cloud-based technology using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and structural equation modelling approaches. Applied Soft Computing, 66, 77–89. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.12.051
  • Yaghoubi Farani, A., Karimi, S., Izadi, N., & Ataei, P. (2019). Effect of virtual social networks on entrepreneurial behavior of agricultural students. Applied Economics, 51(21), 2326–2335.
  • Yalcin, N., Bayrakdaroglu, A., & Kahraman, C. (2012). Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 350–364. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.024

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.