On Being an Expert Witness: It's not about you

References

• Boccaccini , M. T. 2002 . What do we really know about witness preparation? . Behavioral Sciences and the Law , 20 : 161 – 189 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaccini , M. T. and Brodsky , S. L. 2002 . Believability of expert and lay witnesses: Implications for trial consultation . Professional Psychology: Research and Practice , 33 : 384 – 386 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodsky , S. L. 1999 . The expert expert witness: More maxims and guidelines for testifying in court , Washington, DC : American Psychological Association .
   Google Scholar
• Brodsky , S. L. 2004 . Coping with cross-examination and other pathways to effective testimony , Washington, DC : American Psychological Association .
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan , A. 2006 . Psychiatric evidence on the ultimate issue . Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law , 34 : 14 – 21 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Champagne , A. , Shuman , D. W. and Whitaker , E. 1991 . An empirical examination of the use of expert witnesses in American courts . Jurimetrics Journal , 31 : 375 – 392 .
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists . 1991 . Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology . Law and Human Behavior , 15 : 655 – 665 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper , J. , Bennett , E. A. and Sukel , H. L. 1996 . Complex scientific testimony: How do jurors make decisions? . Law and Human Behavior , 20 : 379 – 394 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper , J. and Neuhaus , I. M. 2000 . The ‘hired gun’ effect: Assessing the effect of pay, frequency of testifying, and credentials on the perception of expert testimony . Law and Human Behavior , 24 : 149 – 171 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 1993 . Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc 113 S. Ct. 2786
   Google Scholar
• Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE). 703
   Google Scholar
• Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE). 702
   Google Scholar
• Frye v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1923) 293 F. 1013
   Google Scholar
• General Electric Co. v. Joiner (1997) 522 U.S. 136
   Google Scholar
• Gutheil , T. G. , Hauser , M. , White , M. S. , Spruiell , G. and Strasburger , L. H. 2003 . “The whole truth” versus “the admissible truth”: An ethics dilemma for expert witnesses . Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law , 31 : 422 – 427 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan , M. 1997 . Whores of the court: The fraud of psychiatric testimony and the rape of American justice , New York : Harper Collins .
   Google Scholar
• Krauss , D. and Sales , B. 1999 . The problem of helpfulness in applying Daubert to expert testimony: Child custody determinations in family law as an exemplar . Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 5 : 78 – 99 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael (1999) 526 U.S. 137
   Google Scholar
• Melton , G. B. 1999 . Due care, not prohibition of expert opinions . Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice , 6 : 335 – 338 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melton , G. B. , Petrila , J. , Poythress , N. and Slobogin , C. 2007 . Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers , 3rd ed. , New York : Guilford Press .
   Google Scholar
• O'Barr , W. M. 1982 . Linguistic evidence: Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom , Academic : New York .
   Google Scholar
• Redding , R. E. , Floyd , M. Y. and Hawk , G. L. 2001 . What judges and lawyers think about the testimony of mental health experts: A survey of the courts and bar . Behavioral Sciences and the Law , 19 : 583 – 594 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobogin , C. 1989 . The ‘ultimate issue’ issue . Behavioral Sciences and the Law , 7 : 259 – 266 .
   Google Scholar
• Slovenko , R. 2006 . Commentary: Deceptions to the rule on ultimate issue testimony . Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law , 34 : 22 – 25 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tillbrook , C. , Mumley , D. and Grisso , T. 2003 . Avoiding expert opinions on the ultimate issue legal question: The case for integrity . Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice , 3 : 77 – 87 .
   Google Scholar