Investigating the Impact of Delayed Administration on the Efficacy of the Self-Administered Interview

References

• Ayers, M., & Reder, L. (1998). A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: predictions from an activation-based memory model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 1–21. doi: 10.3758/bf03209454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C., Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Robinson, M. (2008). Eliciting person descriptions from eyewitnesses: a survey of police perceptions of eyewitness performance and reported use of interview techniques. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 529–560. doi: 10.1080/09541440701728474
   Google Scholar
• Centofanti, A. T., & Reece, J. (2006). The cognitive interview and its effect on misleading postevent information. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12, 669–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrobak, Q. M., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2012). The misinformation effect. In A. M. Ridley, F. Gabbert and D. J. La Rooy (Eds.), Suggestibility in legal contexts (pp. 21–44). Oxford: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbesen, E. B., & Rienick, G. B. (1998). Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 745–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmes, D. G., Kantowitz, B. H., & Roediger, H. L. (2012). Research methods in psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., & Fisher, R. (2009). Protecting eyewitness evidence: examining the efficacy of a self-administered interview tool. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 298–307. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9146-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Hope, L., Fisher, R. P., & Jamieson, K. (2012). Protecting against misleading post-event information with a self-administered interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 568–575. doi: 10.1002/acp.2828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: can eyewitnesses influence each other's memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 533–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., Cohen, G., Holland, H., & Surtes, L. (1986). Eyewitness responses to leading and misleading questions under the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 14, 31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, M., Koriat, A., & Pansky, A. (2005). Strategic regulation of grain size in memory reporting over time. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 505–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, L., Gabbert, F., & Fisher, R. P. (2011). From laboratory to the street: capturing witness memory using the Self-Administered Interview. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 16, 211–226. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02015.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S. D., Allen, B. P., Chan, J. C. K., & Dahl, L. C. (2004). Eyewitness suggestibility and source similarity: intrusions of details from one event into memory reports of another event. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 96–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, 12, 361–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., & Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGaugh, J. L., & Roozendaal, B. (2002). Role of adrenal stress hormones in forming lasting memories in the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 205–210. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00306-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Zaragoza, M., Clifford, B., & Kidd, L. (2010). Inoculation or antidote? The effects of cognitive interview timing on false memory for fabricated events. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 105–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odinot, G., & Wolters, G. (2006). Repeated recall, retention interval and the accuracy-confidence relation in eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 973–985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H. M., & Kemp, R. I. (2006). Comparing methods of encountering post-event information: the power of co-witness suggestion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1083–1099. doi: 10.1002/acp.1261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H. M., Kemp, R. I., & Forgas, J. P. (2009). Co-witnesses, confederates, and conformity: the effects of discussion and delay on eyewitness memory. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16, 112–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H. M., Kemp, R., & Ng, J. (2011). Combating co-witness contamination: Attempting to decrease the negative effects of discussion on eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 43–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paz-Alonso, P. M., & Goodman, G. S. (2008). Trauma and memory: effects of post-event misinformation, retrieval order, and retention interval. Memory, 16, 58–75. doi: 10.1080/09658210701363146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter, D. L. (1999). The seven sins of memory: insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist, 54, 182–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A. M., & Holliday, R. E. (2005). Police perceptions of older adults. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 211–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaragoza, M., Belli, R., & Payment, K. (2006). Misinformation effects and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory. In M. Garry & H. Hayne (Eds.), Do justice and let the sky fall: Elizabeth F. Loftus and her contributions to science, law, and academic freedom (pp. 35–65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar