Family Court Judges' Decisions Regarding Post-Separation Care Arrangements for Young Children

References

• Amato, P. R., & Gilbreth, J. G. (1999). Non-resident fathers and children's wellbeing: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 557–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amato, P. R., Meyers, C. E., & Emery, R. E. (2009). Changes in non-resident father–child contact from 1976–2002. Family Relations, 58, 41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent–child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bowlby, R., & McIntosh, J. (2011). John Bowlby's legacy and meanings for the family law field: in conversation with Sir Richard Bowlby. Family Court Review, 49, 549–556.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Care of Children Act, No. 90. (2004). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2004/0090/latest/DLM317233.html
   Google Scholar
• Cashmore, J., & Parkinson, P. (2011). Parenting arrangements for young children: messages from research. Australian Journal of Family Law, 25, 236–257.
   Google Scholar
• Child Support Act, No. 142. (1991). Retrieved from http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1991/0142/latest/DLM253151.html
   Google Scholar
• Emery, R. E., Sbarra, D. A., & Grover, T. (2005). Divorce mediation: research and reflections. Family Court Review, 43, 22–37.
   Google Scholar
• Fabricius, W. V., Sokol, K. R., Diaz, P., & Braver, S, L. (2012). Parenting time, parent conflict, parent–child relationships, and children's physical health. In K. Kuehnle, & L. Drozd (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family courts (pp. 188–213). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Act. (2006).
   Google Scholar
• George, C., Solomon, J., & McIntosh, J. (2011). Divorce in the nursery: on infants and overnight care. Family Court Review, 49, 521–528.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, E. M., & Kelly, J. (2002). For better or for worse: Divorce reconsidered. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Hynan, D. J. (2012). Young children, attachment security, and parenting schedules. Family Court Review, 50, 471–480.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. (2009). Psychosocial adversity and resilience. In M. Rutter, D. V. M. Bishop, D. S. Pine, S. Scott, J. Stevenson, E. Taylor, & A. Thapar (Eds.), Rutter's child and adolescent psychiatry (pp. 377–391). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. B. (2004). Family mediation research: is there empirical support for the field? Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 22, 3–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. B. (2012). Risk and protective factors associated with child and adolescent adjustment following separation and divorce: Social science applications. In K. Kuehnle, & L. Drozd (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family courts (pp. 49–84). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. B., & Emery, R. E. (2003). Children's adjustment following divorce: risk and resilience perspectives. Family Relations, 52, 352–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. B., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decisions for young children. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 297–311.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. E. (2012). Critical analysis of research on parenting plans and children's well-being. In K. Kuehnle, & L. Drozd (Eds.), Parenting plan evaluations: Applied research for the family courts (pp. 214–243). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ludolph, P. (2012). The special issue on attachment: overreaching theory and data. Family Court Review, 50, 486–495.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, B. (2013). Mediation: 50 years of creative conflict. Family Court Review, 51, 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, J., Smyth, B., & Kelaher, M. (2010). Parenting arrangements post-separation: Patterns and developmental outcomes, Part II: Relationships between overnight care pattern and psycho-emotional development in infants and young children. Victoria, Australia: Family Transitions.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, J. E., Pruett, M. K., & Kelly, J.B. (2014). Parental separation and overnight care of young children, Part II: putting theory into practice. Family Court Review, 52, 256–262.
   Google Scholar
• Pruett, M. K., Ebling, R., & Insabella, G. (2004). Critical aspects of parenting plans for young children: interjecting data into the debate about overnights. Family Court Review, 42, 39–59.
   Google Scholar
• Pruett, M. K., McIntosh, J. E., & Kelly, J. B. (2014). Parental separation and overnight care of young children: consensus through theoretical and empirical integration: Part I. Family Court Review, 52, 240–255.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., & Rodgers, B. (2001). Children in changing families: Life after parental separation. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Salem, P., Sandler, I., & Wolchik, S. (2013). Taking stock of parenting education in the Family Courts: envisaging a public health approach. Family Court Review, 51, 131–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seymour, F., & Blackwell, S. (2011). Psychologists working within the Family Court. In F. Seymour, S. Blackwell, & J. Thorburn (Eds.), Psychology and the law in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 63–118). Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, B. (2004). Parent–child contact schedules after divorce. Family Matters, 69, 32–43.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, J., & George, C. (1999). The development of attachment in separated and divorced families: Effects of overnight visitation, parent and couple variables. Attachment and Human Development, 1, 2–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1990). Ratified in New Zealand in 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Tormello, S., Emery, R., Rowen, J., Potter, D., Ocker, B., & Xu, Y. (3013). Overnight custody arrangements, attachment, and adjustment among very young children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 871–885.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, A., & Smart, C. (2002). Facing family change: Children's circumstances, strategies and resources. Leeds, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Warshak, R. A. (2014). Social science and parenting plans for young children. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 46–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar