626
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Challenges in Determining How Dynamic Risk Factors Manifest in Incarcerated Sexual Offenders

, &

References

  • Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52, 7–27.
  • Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. (2011). Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) Model: Does adding the Good Lives Model contribute to effective crime prevention? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(7), 735–755.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.
  • Daffern, M. (2010). A structured cognitive behavioural approach to the assessment and treatment of violent offenders using offence paralleling behaviour. In M. Daffern, L. Jones & J. Shine (Eds.), Offence paralleling behaviour: A case formulation approach to offender assessment and intervention (pp. 105–120). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
  • Daffern, M., Jones, L., Howells, K., Shine, J., Mikton, C., & Tunbridge, V. (2007). Refining the definition of offence paralleling behaviour. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 17, 265–273.
  • de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., & de Spa, E. (2011). Protective factors for violence risk in forensic psychiatric patients: a retrospective validation study of the SAPROF. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 178–186. doi:10.1080/14999013.2011.600232
  • Gordon, A., & Wong, S. (2009). The offence analogue and offence reduction behaviour rating guide. Unpublished user manual.
  • Gordon, A., & Wong, S. (2010). Offence analogue behaviours as indicators of criminogenic need and treatment progress in custodial settings. In M. Daffern, L. Jones, & J. Shine (Eds.), Offence paralleling behaviour: A case formulation approach to offender assessment and intervention (pp. 171–183). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
  • Hanson, R., & Harris, A. (2001). A structured approach to evaluating change among sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 105–122.
  • Hart, S., Kropp, P., Laws, D., Klaver, J., Logan, C., & Watt, K. (2003). The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP). Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University, Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute.
  • Jones, L. (1997). Developing models for managing treatment integrity and efficacy in a prison based TC: The Max Glatt Centre. In E. Cullen, L. Jones, & R. Woodward (Eds.), Therapeutic communities for offenders (pp. 121–157). Chichester: Wiley.
  • Jones, L. (2010). History of the offence paralleling behaviour construct and related concepts. In M. Daffern, L. Jones, & J. Shine (Eds.), Offence paralleling behaviour: A case formulation approach to offender assessment and intervention (pp. 3–23). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
  • Liamputtong, P. (2012). Qualitative research methods (Fourth ed.). Australia: Oxford University Press Australia.
  • Mann, R., Hanson, R., & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191–217.
  • Mann, R., Thornton, D., Wakama, S., Dyson, M., & Atkinson, D. (2010). Applying the concept of offence paralleling behaviour to sex offender assessment in secure settings. In M. Daffern, L. Jones, & J. Shine (Eds.), Offence paralleling behaviour: A case formulation approach to offender assessment and intervention (pp. 121–135). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
  • Markovic, M. (2006). Analyzing qualitative data: health care experiences of women with gynecological cancer. Field Methods, 18, 413–429.
  • McDougall, C., Clarke, D., & Woodward, R. (1995). Application of operational psychology to assessment of inmates. Psychology, Crime and Law, 2, 85–99.
  • Miller, H. (2006). A dynamic assessment of offender risk, needs, and strengths in a sample of pre-release general offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 24, 767–782.
  • Mooney, J., & Daffern, M. (2013). The offence analogue and offence reduction behaviour rating guide as a supplement to violence risk assessment in incarcerated offenders. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 12, 255–264. doi:10.1080/14999013.2013.867421
  • Olver, M., & Wong, S. (2011). A comparison of static and dynamic assessment of sexual offender risk and need in a treatment context. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 113–126.
  • Olver, M., Wong, S., Nicholaichuk, T., & Gordon, A. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological Assessment, 19, 318–329.
  • Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal, 320, 114–116.
  • Rogers, R. (2000). The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 595–605.
  • Sheldrick, C. (1999). Practitioner review: the assessment and management of risk in adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 507–518.
  • Simourd, D., & Hoge, R. (2000). Criminal psychopathy: a risk-and-need perspective. Criminal Justice ad Behavior, 27, 256–272.
  • Thornton, D. (2002). Constructing and testing a framework for dynamic risk assessment. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 139–153.
  • Webster, C., Müller-Isberner, R., & Fransson, G. (2002). Violence risk assessment: Using structured clinical guides professionally. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1, 185–193.
  • Wong, S., Olver, M., Nicholaichuk, T., & Gordon, A. (2003). The Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender Version (VRS-SO). Regional Psychiatric Centre and University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.