Children as alibi witnesses: the effect of age and confidence on mock-juror decision making

References

• Ahern, E. C., Stolzenberg, S. N., & Lyon, T. D. (2015). Do Prosecutors use interview instructions or build rapport with child witnesses? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 33(4), 476–492. doi:10.1002/bsl
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, M., Jung, S., Sweeney, L., & Culhane, S. E. (2014). The impact of illegal alibi activities, corroborator involvement and corroborator certainty on mock juror perceptions. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 21(2), 191–204. doi:10.1080/13218719.2013.803275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almerigogna, J., Ost, J., Bull, R., & Akehurst, L. (2007). A state of high anxiety: How non-supportive interviewers can increase the suggestibility of child witnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(7), 963–974. doi:10.1002/acp.1311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, J., & Forth, A. E. (2014). Potential labelling effects: Influence of psychopathy diagnosis, defendant age, and defendant gender on mock jurors’ decisions. Psychology, Crime and Law, 20(2), 116–134. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2012.749473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulation: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23(1), 75–91. doi:10.1023/A:1022326807441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottoms, B., & Goodman, G. S. (1994). Perceptions of children's credibility in sexual assault cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(8), 702–732. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb00608.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradfield, A., & Wells, G. L. (2000). Perceived validity of eyewitness identification testimony: A test of five beggars criteria. Law and Human Behavior, 24(5), 581–594. doi:10/1023/A:1005523129437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, N., & Burke, A. (2002). Effects of testimonial inconsistencies and eyewitness confidence on mock-juror judgements. Law and Human Behavior, 26(3), 353–364. doi:10/1023/A:1015380522722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broomfield, K. A., Robinson, E. J., & Robinson, W. P. (2002). Children's understanding about white lies. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 47–46. doi:10.1348/026151002166316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruer, K., & Pozzulo, J. D. (2014). Influence of eyewitness age and recall error on mock juror decision-making. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19(2), 332–348. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruer, K. C., Price, H. L., & Dahl, L. C. (2016). When an alibi is not enough: Judgments of evidence needed to lay charges in a burglary case. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32(2), 94–104. doi:10.1007/s11896-016-9209-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhi, E. R., Goodson, P., & Neilands, B. T. (2008). Out of sight, not out of mind: Strategies for handling missing data. American Journal of Health Behavior, 32(1), 86–92. Retrieved from http://health.usf.edu/NR/rdonlyres/35AFE36F-18CA-40B1-A5EA-340EC08807CE/0/BuhiGoodsonNeilands2008.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, T. M., & Marion, S. B. (2012). Alibi witnesses. In B. Cutler (Ed.), Conviction of the innocent: Lessons from psychological research (pp. 239–256). Washington: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Castelli, P., Goodman, G. S., & Ghetti, S. (2005). Effects of interview style and witness age on perceptions of children's credibility in sexual abuse cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(2), 297–319. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02122.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., Crotteau-Huffman, M. L., Smith, E., & Loftus, E. F. (1994). Repeatedly thinking about non-events: Source misattributions among pre-schoolers. Consciousness and Cognition, 3, 388–407. doi:10.1006/ccog.1994.1022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, D. A., Price, H. L., & Gordon, H. M. (2010). Judicial decision-making in timely and delayed prosecutions of child sexual abuse in Canada: A study of honesty and cognitive ability in assessments of credibility. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 16(2), 177–199. doi:10.1037/a0019050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A., Quas, J. A., & Cleveland, K. C. (2014). The emotional child witness: Effects on juror decision-making. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 32(6), 813–828. doi:10.1002/bsl.2153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act (1996). section 6A(2).
   Google Scholar
• Culhane, S. E., & Hosch, H. M. (2004). An alibi witness' influence on mock jurors' verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(8), 1604–1616. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02789.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eye-witness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 14(2), 185–191. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01062972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Stuve, T. E. (1988). Jury decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12(1), 41–55. doi:10.1007/BF01064273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, L. C., & Price, H. L. (2012). He couldn't have done it, he was with me!: The impact of alibi witness age and relationship. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 475–481. doi:10.1002/acp.2821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M., Markus, K. A., Walters, S. B., Vorus, N., & Connors, B. (2005). Behavioural cues to deception vs. topic incriminating potential in criminal confessions. Law and Human Behaviour, 29(6), 683–704. doi:10.1007/s10979-005-7370-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dysart, J. E., & Strange, D. (2012). Beliefs about alibi investigations: A survey of law enforcement. Psychology, Crime and Law, 18(1), 11–25. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.562867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastwood, J., Snook, B., & Au, D. (2016). Safety in numbers: A policy-capturing study of the alibi assessment process. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 260–269. doi:10.1002/acp.3200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, A. D., & Lee, K. (2011). Verbal deception from late childhood to middle adolescence and its relation to executive functioning skills. Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1108–1116. doi:10.1037/a0023425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, A. D., & Lee, K. (2013). Emergence of lying in very young children. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 1958–1963. doi:10.1037/a0031409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, H. E. (2012). An investigation into deceptive alibi witness testimony (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, H. (2015). The effect of evidence timing and witness motivation upon juror evaluations of alibi witnesses and defendants. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23(4), 575–587. doi:10.1080/13218719.2015.1081317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flin, R., Boon, J., Knox, A., & Bull, R. (1992). The effect of a 5 month delay on children's and adults eyewitness memory. British Journal of Psychology, 83(3), 323–336. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02444.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golding, J. M., Dunlap, E., & Hodell, E. C. (2009). Jurors’ perceptions of children's eyewitness testimony. In B. L. Bottoms, C. J. Najdowski, & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Children as victims, witnesses, and offenders: Psychological science and the law (pp. 188–208). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golding, J. M., Stewart, T. L., Yozwiak, J. A., Djadali, Y., & Sanchez, R. P. (2000). The impact of DNA evidence in a child sexual abuse assault trial. Child Maltreatment, 5(4), 373–383. doi:10.1177/1077559500005004009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodman, G. S., Golding, J. M., Helgeson, V. S., Haith, M. M., & Michelli, J. (1987). When a child takes the stand: Jurors’ perceptions of children's eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 11(1), 27–40. doi:10.1007/BF01044837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, G. S., & Melinder, A. (2007). Child witness research and forensic interviews of young children: A review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12(1), 1–19. doi:10.1348/135532506X156620
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, G. S., Pyle-Taub, E., Jones, D. P. H., England, P., Port, L. P., Rudy, L., & Prado, L. (1992). Emotional effects of criminal court testimony on child sexual assault victims. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57, 1–42. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1166127?origin = &seq = 2#page_scan_tab_contents
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J., Cossins, A., & O'Brien, K. (2010). Enhancing the credibility of complainants in child sexual assault trials: The effect of expert evidence and judicial directions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28(6), 769–783. doi:10.1002/bsl.936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93–104. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosch, H. M., Culhane, S. E., Jolly, K. W., Chavez, R. M., & Shaw, L. H. (2011). Effects of an alibi witness's relationship to the defendant on mock jurors' judgements. Law and Human Behaviour, 35(2), 127–142. doi:10.1007/s10979-010-9225-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, C., & Ensor, R. (2005). Executive function and theory of mind in 2 year olds: A family affair? Developmental Neuropsychology, 28(2), 645–668. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2802_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S., & Wrightsman, L. (1985). The psychology of evidence and trial procedure. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Klemfuss, J. L., & Ceci, S. J. (2012). Legal and psychological perspectives on children's competence to testify in court. Developmental Review, 32, 268–286. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2012.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landström, S., & Granhag, P. A. (2010). In-court versus out-of-court testimonies: Children's experiences and adults’ assessments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 941–955. doi:10.1002/acp.1606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K. (2013). Little liars: Development of verbal deception in children. Child Development Perspectives, 7(2), 91–96. doi:10.1111/cdep.12023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leippe, M. R., & Romanczyk, A. (1987). Children on the witness stand: A communication/persuasion analysis of jurors’ reactions to child witnesses. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.), Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 155–177). New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• MacCoun, R. L., & Kerr, N. L. (1988). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors’ bias for leniency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 21–33. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marion, S. B., & Burke, T. M. (2013). False alibi corroboration: Witnesses lie for suspects who seem innocent, whether they like them or not. Law and Human Behavior, 37(2), 136–143. doi:10.1037/lhb0000021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliff, B. D., & Bull Kovera, M. (2012). Do jurors get what they expect? Traditional versus alternative forms of children's testimony. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(1), 27–47. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.613391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, M., & Parker, J. (2001). When will a child be believed? The impact of a victim's age and juror's gender on children's credibility and verdict in a sexual-abuse case. Child Abuse and Neglect, 25(4), 523–539. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00224-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure, K. A., Myers, J. J., & Keefauver, K. M. (2013). Witness vetting: What determines detectives’ perceptions of witness credibility? Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 10, 250–267. doi:10.1002/jip.1391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moston, S., & Engelberg, T. (1992). The effects of social support on children's eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6(1), 61–75. doi:10.1002/acp.2350060104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J. E. B., Redlich, A. D., Goodman, G. S., Prizmich, L. P., & Imwimkelried, E. (1999). Jurors’ perceptions of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 5(2), 388–419. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.5.2.388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, M. S., Christiansen, A., Bornstein, B. H., & Robicheaux, T. R. (2012). The effects of mock jurors' beliefs about eyewitness performance on trial judgments. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(1), 49–64. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.587815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe, P. A., & Bransgrove, J. (2007). Perceptions of witness credibility: Variations across age. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 318–331. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2007.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, P., Reddy, V., & Bull, R. (2000). Children's everyday deception and performance on false-belief tasks. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 297–317. doi:10.1348/026151000165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunez, N., Kehn, A., & Wright, D. (2011). When children are witnesses: The effects of context, age and gender on adults’ perceptions of cognitive ability and honesty. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 460–468. doi:10.1002/acp.1713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, E. (2013). “You don't expect me to believe that, do you?” Expectations influence recall and belief of alibi information. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(6), 1238–1247. doi:10.1111/jasp.12086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, E. A., & Wells, G. L. (2004). What makes a good alibi? A proposed taxonomy. Law and Human Behavior, 28(2), 157–176. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2010.505567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, M. A., Brewer, N., Weber, N., & Ambika, N. (2013). The confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification decisions: Effects of exposure duration, retention interval and divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19(1), 55–71. doi:10.1037/a0031602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penrod, S., & Cutler, B. (1995). Witness confidence and witness accuracy: Assessing their forensic relation. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 1(4), 817–845. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.1.4.817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. (2012). Children's autobiographical memories across the years: Forensic implications of childhood amnesia and eyewitness memory for stressful events. Developmental Review, 32(3), 287–306. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2012.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, G., Brace, N., & Kynan, S. (2002). The visual identification of suspects: Procedures and Practice ( Briefing Note 2/02). London: Home Office. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110220105210/http:/Rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/brf202.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pozzulo, J. D., & Balfour, J. (2006). Children's and adults’ eyewitness identification accuracy when a culprit changes his appearance: Comparing simultaneous and elimination lineup procedures. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11(1), 25–34. doi:10.1348/135532505X52626
   Google Scholar
• Pozzulo, J. D., & Dempsey, J. L. (2009a). Witness factors and their influence on jurors’ perceptions and verdicts. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(9), 923–934. doi:10.1177/0093854809338450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzulo, J. D., & Dempsey, J. (2009b). Could target-age explain identification accuracy differences between child and adult eyewitnesses? Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 16(1), 137–144. doi:10.1080/13218710802620414
   Google Scholar
• Pozzulo, J. D., Lemieux, J. M. T., Wells, E., & McCuaig, H. J. (2006). The influence of eyewitness identification decisions and age of witness on jurors’ verdicts and perceptions of reliability. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 12(6), 641–652. doi:10.1080/10683160500415539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, H. L., & Dahl, L. C. (2014). Order and strength matter for evaluation of alibi and eyewitness evidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 143–150. doi:10.1002/acp.2983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, H. L., & Dahl, L. C. (2017). Investigator sensitivity to alibi witness inconsistency after a long delay. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 35(1), 60–64. doi:10.1002/bsl.2276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quas, J. J., Goodman, G. S., Bidrose, S., Pipe, M. E., Craw, S., & Ablin, D. (1999). Emotion and memory: Children's long term remembering, forgetting and suggestibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72(4), 235–270. doi:10.1006/jecp.1999.2491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, J. (2014). The influence of eyewitness age, type of descriptor inconsistencies, and familiarity with defendant on mock jurors’ perceptions of eyewitness testimony (Master's thesis). Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Retrieved from https://curve.carleton.ca/system/files/edt/243e5d26-a711-46d4-9fe7-09d55f2e584b/etd_pdf/9b1cdd3b34b8cdfffcab750fd619198/reed-theinfluenceofeyewitnessagetypeofdescriptor.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rennie, D. A. C., Bull, R., & Diamond, A. (2004). Executive functioning in pre-Schoolers: Reducing the inhibitory demands of the dimensional change card sort task. Developmental Neuropsychology, 26(1), 423–443. doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2601_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, D. F., Dunning, D., Toglia, M. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1990). The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors’ perception of the child witness. Law and Human Behavior, 14(1), 5–23. doi:10.1007/BF01055786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, D. F., Jurden, F. H., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Keeney, J. M. (2003). Applications and limitations of a two-factor model of child witness credibility. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(2), 418–430. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01903.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. S., III., & McClure, K. A. (1996). Repeated post event questioning can lead to elevated levels of eyewitness confidence. Law and Human Behavior, 20(2), 629–653. doi:10.1007/BF01499235
   Google Scholar
• Talwar, V., & Crossman, A. M. (2012). From little white lies to filthy liars: The evolution of honesty and deception in young children. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 40(2), 139–179. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-386491-8.00004-9
   Google Scholar
• Talwar, V., Gordon, H., & Lee, K. (2007). Lying in the elementary school: Verbal deception and its relation to second-order belief understanding. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 804–810. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talwar, V., & Lee, K. (2002). The development of lying to conceal a transgression: Children's control of expressive behavior during verbal deception. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 436–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talwar, V., & Lee, K. (2008). Social and cognitive correlates of children's lying behavior. Child Development, 79(4), 866–881. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01164.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talwar, V., Lee, K., Bala, N., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2006). Adults’ judgements of children's coached reports. Law and Human Behavior, 30(5), 561–570. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9038-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turtle, J., & Burke, T. (2001, June). Where were you on the night of…? Memory and other evidence to support alibis in criminal investigations and trials. Paper presented at the biennial meeting for the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Cited in Burke, T. M., Turtle, J. W., & Olson, E. A. ( 2007). Alibis in Criminal Investigations and Trials. In M. P. Toglia, R. D. Read, D. F. Ross, & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology, volume 1, memory for events (pp. 157–174). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vredeveldt, A., & Sauer, J. (2015). Effects of eye closure on confidence-accuracy relations in eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(1), 51–58. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Wheatcroft, J. M., Wagstaff, G. F., & Manarin, B. (2015). The influence of delay and item difficulty in criminal justice systems on eyewitness confidence and accuracy. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research, 1, 1–9. Retrieved from http://www.lifescienceglobal.com/pms/index.php/ijhssr/article/view/2891/1695
   Google Scholar
• Wright, D. B., Memon, A., Skagerberg, E. M., & Gabbert, F. (2009). When eyewitnesses talk. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 174–178. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01631.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuj, D., Palmer, M. A., & Kemps, E. (2015). Cigarette cravings impair mock jurors’ recall of trial evidence. Psychology, Crime and Law, 21(5), 413–414. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2014.989168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar