Proportion of complications in interpreter-absent and interpreter-present interviews

References

• Amado, B.G., Arce, R., Fariña, F., & Vilarino, M. (2016). Criteria-based content analysis (CBCA) reality criteria in adults: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16(2), 201–210. doi:10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B.M., Kashy, D.A., Kirkendol, S.E., Wyer, M.M., & Epstein, J.A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 979–995. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewens, S., Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Jo, E., & Fisher, R.P. (2016). The effect of interpreters on eliciting information, cues to deceit and rapport. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 21(2), 286–304. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R.P. (2010). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 25–38. doi:10.1348/135532509X441891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., Granhag, P.A., & Strömwall, L. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during interrogations. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 13, 213–227. doi:10.1080/10683160600750264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M.K. (1988). Reality monitoring: An experimental phenomenological approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(4), 390–394. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.117.4.390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M.K. (2006). Memory and reality. American Psychologist, 61(8), 760–771. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhnken, G., & Steller, M. (1988). The evaluation of the credibility of child witness statements in the German procedural system. In G. Davies & J. Drinkwater (Eds.), The child witness: Do the courts abuse children? (Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology, no. 13) (pp. 37–45). Leicester: British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Lakens, D. (2016). Power analysis for default Bayesian t-tests [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2016/01/power-analysis-for-default-bayesian-t.html
   Google Scholar
• Masip, J., Sporer, S., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2005). The detection of deception with the reality monitoring approach: A review of the empirical evidence. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 11, 99–122. doi:10.1080/10683160410001726356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahari, G. (2018). The applicability of the verifiability approach to the real world. In P. Rosenfeld (Ed.), Detecting concealed information and deception: Verbal, behavioral, and biological methods (pp. 329–350). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nahari, G., Ashkenazi, T., Fisher, R.P., Granhag, P.-A., Hershkowitz, I., Masip, J., … Vrij, A. (2019). Language of lies: Urgent issues and prospects in verbal lie detection research. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 24(1), 1–23. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruby, C.L., & Brigham, J.C. (1998). Can criteria-based content analysis distinguish between true and false statements of African-American speakers? Law and Human Behavior, 22(4), 369–388. doi:10.1023/A:1025766825429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Undeutsch, U. (1982). Statement reality analysis. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 27–56). Deventer: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Undeutsch, U. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. In J.C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 101–121). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Viezzi, M. (2012). Simultaneous and consecutive interpreting (non-conference settings). In C. Millan & F. Bartrina, (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of translation studies (pp. 377–388). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-based content analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(1), 3–41. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2016). Baselining as a lie detection method. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(6), 1112–1119. doi:10.1002/acp.3288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2019). Deception and truth detection when analysing nonverbal and verbal cues. Applied Cognitive Psychology (Psychology), 33, 160–167. doi:10.1002/acp.3457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Hope, L., & Fisher, R.P. (2014). Eliciting reliable information in investigative interviews. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 129–136. doi:10.1177/2372732214548592
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., & Leal, S. (in press). Complications travel. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Leal, S., Fisher, R.P., Mann, S., Dalton, G., Jo, E., … Houston, K. (2018). Sketching as a technique to elicit information and cues to deceit in interpreter-based interviews. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(2), 303–313. doi:10.1016/j.jrarmac.2017.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Leal, S., Fisher, R.P., Mann, S., Dalton, G., Jo, E., … Houston, K. (in press). Eliciting information and cues to deceit in interpreter-based interviews. Manuscript submitted for review.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Leal, S., Jupe, L., & Harvey, A. (2018). Within-subjects verbal lie detection measures: A comparison between total detail and proportion of complications. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 23(2), 265–279. doi:10.1111/lcrp.12126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Dalton, G., Jo, E., Shaboltas, A., Khaleeva, M., … Houston, K. (2017). Using the model statement to elicit information and cues to deceit in interpreter-based interviews. Acta Psychologica, 177, 44–53. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Fisher, R.P., Dalton, G., Jo, E., Shaboltas, A., … Houston, K. (2018). Using unexpected questions to elicit information and cues to deceit in interpreter-based interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(1), 94–104. doi:10.1002/acp.3382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., & Nahari, G. (2019). The verifiability approach. In J.J. Dickinson, N. Schreiber Compo, R.N. Carol, B.L. Schwartz & M.R. McCauley (Eds.), Evidence-based investigative interviewing. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar