References
- Aarons, N.M., & Powell, M.B. (2003). Issues related to the interviewer’s ability to elicit reports of abuse from children with an intellectual disability: A review. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 14(3), 257–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2003.12036266
- Aarons, N.M., Powell, M.B., & Browne, J. (2004). Police perceptions of interviews involving children with intellectual disabilities: A qualitative inquiry. Policing and Society, 14(3), 269–278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1043946042000241848
- Akehurst, L., Köhnken, G., & Höfer, E. (2001). Content credibility of accounts derived from live and video presentations. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6(1), 65–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/135532501168208
- Almerigogna, J., Ost, J., Bull, R., & Akehurst, L. (2007). A state of high anxiety: How unsupportive interviewers can increase the suggestibility of child witnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(7), 963–974. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1311
- Amado, B.G., Arce, R., & Fariña, F. (2015). Undeutsch hypothesis and criteria based content analysis: A meta-analytic review. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 7(1), 3–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.11.002
- Amado, B.G., Arce, R., Fariña, F., & Vilariño, M. (2016). Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) reality criteria in adults: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology: IJCHP, 16(2), 201–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2016.01.002
- Bond, C.F., & DePaulo, B.M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review: Review, 10(3), 214–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2A
- Brown, D.A., & Lewis, C.N. (2013). Competence is in the Eye of the Beholder: Perceptions of intellectually disabled child witnesses. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 60(1), 3–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2013.757132
- Brown, D., Lewis, C., Stephens, E., & Lamb, M.E. (2017). Interviewers’ approaches to questioning vulnerable child witnesses: The influences of developmental level versus intellectual disability status. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22(2), 332–349. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12104
- Bruck, M. (1998). The trials and tribulations of a novice expert witness. In S. J. Ceci & H. Hembrooke (Eds.), Expert witnesses in child abuse case: What can and should be said in court (pp. 85–104). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Bull, R. (2010). The investigative interviewing of children and other vulnerable witnesses: Psychological research and working/professional practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 5–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/014466509X440160
- Bull, R., & Corran, E. (2002). Interviewing child witnesses: Past and future. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 4(4), 315–322. doi:https://doi.org/10.1350/ijps.4.4.315.10872
- Ceci, S.J., & Huffman, M.L. (1997). How suggestible are preschool children? Cognitive and social factors. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(7), 948–958. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199707000-00017
- Ceci, S.J., Loftus, E.F., Leichtman, M.D., & Bruck, M. (1994). The possible role of source misattributions in the creation of false beliefs among preschoolers. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 42(4), 304–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149408409361
- Chahal, K., & Cassidy, T. (1994). Deception and its detection in children: A study of adult accuracy. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1(3), 237–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169508411959
- Clarke, C., & Milne, R. (2001). National evaluation of the PEACE investigative interviewing course. Police Research Award Scheme. London: Home Office
- Clarke, C., Milne, B., & Bull, R. (2011). Interviewing suspects of crime: the impact of PEACE training, supervision and the presence of a legal advisor. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(2), 149–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.144
- Crossman, A.M., & Lewis, M. (2006). Adults’ ability to detect children’s lying. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 24(5), 703–715. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.731
- Dando, C.J., & Bull, R. (2011). Maximising opportunities to detect verbal deception: Training police officers to interview tactically. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(2), 189–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.145
- Dror, I.E. (2016). A Hierarchy of Expert Performance. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5 (2), 121–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.03.001
- Dror, I.E. (2017). Human expert performance in forensic decision making: Seven Different Sources of Bias. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 49 (5), 541–547. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2017.1281348
- Dror, I.E. (2018). Biases in forensic experts. Science (New York, N.Y.), 360 (6386), 243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat8443
- Dror, I.E., Champod, C., Langenburg, G., Charlton, D., Hunt, H., & Rosenthal, R. (2011). Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: Inter- and intra-expert consistency and the effect of a ‘target’ comparison. Forensic Science International, 208(1–3), 10–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.10.013
- Dror, I.E., & Cole, S.A. (2010) The vision in “blind” justice: Expert perception, judgment, and visual cognition in forensic pattern recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 161–167. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.2.161
- Dror, I.E., & Hampikian, G. (2011). Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation. Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 51(4), 204–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2011.08.004
- Dror, I.E., & Murrie, D.C. (2018). A hierarchy of expert performance applied to forensic psychological assessments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24 (1), 11–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000140
- Dror, I.E., & Rosenthal, R. (2008). Meta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of forensic experts. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 53(4), 900–903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00762.x
- Dror, I.E., Thompson, W.C., Meissner, C.A., Kornfield, I., Krane, D., Saks, M., & Risinger, M. (2015). Context management toolbox: A linear sequential unmasking (LSU) approach for minimizing cognitive bias in forensic decision making. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 60(4), 1111–1112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12805
- Edelstein, R.S., Luten, T.L., Ekman, P., & Goodman, G.S. (2006). Detecting lies in children and adults. Law and Human Behavior, 30(1), 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9031-2
- Everson, M.D., & Sandoval, J.M. (2011). Forensic child sexual abuse evaluations: Assessing subjectivity and bias in professional judgements. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35(4), 287–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.01.001
- Finlayson, L.M., & Koocher, G.P. (1991). Professional judgement and child abuse reporting in sexual abuse cases. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22(6), 464–472. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.22.6.464
- Fisher, R.P., & Geiselman, R.E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
- Forensic Science Regulator (2015). Cognitive bias effects relevant to forensic science examinations: Guidance. Birmingham, UK: The Forensic Science Regulator. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/510147/217_FSR-G-217_Cognitive_bias_appendix.pdf
- Gagnon, K., & Cyr, M. (2017). Sexual abuse and preschoolers: Forensic details in regard of question types. Child Abuse & Neglect, 67, 109–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.02.022
- Herman, S. (2009). Forensic child sexual abuse evaluations: Accuracy, ethics, and admissibility. In K. Kuehnle, & M. Connell (Eds.), The evaluation of childsexual abuse allegations: A comprehensive guide to assessment and testimony (pp. 247–266). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
- Herman, S. (2010). The role of corroborative evidence in child sexual abuse evaluations. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7(3), 189–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.122
- Hershkowitz, I., Fisher, S., Lamb, M.E., & Horowitz, D. (2007). Improving credibility assessment in child sexual abuse allegations: The role of the NICHD investigative interview protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(2), 99–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.09.005
- Home Office. (1992). Memorandum of good practice on video recorded interviews with children for criminal proceedings. London. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
- Horner, T.M., Guyer, M.J., & Kalter, N.M. (1993a). Clinical expertise and the assessment of child sexual abuse. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32(5), 925–931. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-199309000-00006
- Horner, T.M., Guyer, M.J., & Kalter, N.M. (1993b). The biases of child sexual abuse experts: Believing is seeing. The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 21(3), 281–292.
- Hritz, A.C., Royer, C.E., Helm, R.K., Burd, K.A., Ojeda, K., & Ceci, S.J. (2015). Children’s suggestibility research: Things to know before interviewing a child. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 25(1), 3–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apj.2014.09.002
- Jackson, H., & Nuttall, R. (1993). Clinician responses to sexual abuse allegations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 17(1), 127–143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(93)90013-U
- Jackson, H., & Nuttall, R. L. (1997). Childhood abuse: Effects on clinicians’ personal and professional lives. Sage Publications, Inc.
- Köhnken, G. (2004). Statement Validity Analysis and the detection of the truth. In P. A. Granhag & L. A. Strömwall (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 41–63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511490071.0
- Lamb, M.E., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P.W. (2008). Tell me what happened. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
- Lamb, M.E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P.W., & Horowitz, D. (2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: a review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(11–12), 1201–1231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021
- La Rooy, D., Brubacher, S.P., Aromäki-Stratos, A., Cyr, M., Hershkowitz, I., Korkman, J., … Lamb, M.E. (2015). The NICHD Protocol: A review of an internationally-used evidence-based tool for training child forensic interviewers. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, 1(2), 76–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-01-2015-0001
- Leach, A.M., Talwar, V., Lee, K., Bala, N., & Lindsay, R.C.L. (2004). “Intuitive” lie detection of children’s deception by law enforcement officials and university students. Law and Human Behavior, 28(6), 661–685. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-004-0793-0
- Logan, C. (2018). Forensic clinical interviewing: Toward best practice. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 17(4), 297–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2018.1519615
- MacDonald, S., Snook, B., & Milne, R. (2017). Witness interview training: A field evaluation. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32(1), 77–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9197-6
- Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers’ ability to detect suspects’ lies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 137–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.137
- McAuliff, B.D., & Arter, J.L. (2016). Adversarial allegiance: The devil is in the evidence details, not just on the witness stand. Law and Human Behavior, 40(5), 524–535. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000198
- Melkman, E.P., Hershkowitz, I., & Zur, R. (2017). Credibility assessment in child sexual abuse investigations: A descriptive analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 67, 76–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.01.027
- Ministry of Justice (2011). Achieving best evidence in criminal proceedings: Guidance on interviewing victims and witnesses, and guidance on using special measures. London, UK: Ministry of Justice.
- Murrie, D.C., & Boccaccini, M.T. (2015). Adversarial allegiance among expert witnesses. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 11(1), 37–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121714
- Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Johnson, J. T., & Janke, C. (2008). Does interrater (dis) agreement on Psychopathy Checklist scores in sexually violent predator trials suggest partisan allegiance in forensic evaluations? Law and Human Behavior, 32(4), 352–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-007-9097-5
- Murrie, D.C., Boccaccini, M.T., Turner, D.B., Meeks, M., Woods, C., & Tussey, C. (2009). Rater (dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15(1), 19–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014897
- Nathanson, R., & Platt, M.D. (2005). Attorneys’ perceptions of child witnesses with mental retardation. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 33(1), 5–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/009318530503300102
- National Academy of Science (2009). Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/228091.pdf
- National Commission on Forensic Science. (2015). Ensuring that forensic analysis is based upon task-relevant information. https://www.justice.gov/ncfs/file/818196/download
- Newlin, C., Steele, L.C., Chamberlin, A., Anderson, J., Kenniston, J., Russell, A., … Vaughan-Eden, V. (2015). Child forensic interviewing: Best practices (pp. 1–20).
- Novo, M., & Seijo, D. (2010). Judicial judgement-making and legal criteria of testimonial credibility. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 2(2), 91–115.
- Orbach, Y., & Pipe, M.E. (2011). Investigating substantive issues. In M.E. Lamb, D.J. La Rooy, L.C. Malloy, & C. Katz (Eds.), Children’s testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice (pp. 147–163). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
- Peled, M., Iarocci, G., & Connolly, D.A. (2004). Eyewitness testimony and perceived credibility of youth with mild intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research: JIDR, 48(Pt 7), 699–703. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00559.x
- Pipe, M.E., Lamb, M.E., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P.W. (2004). Recent research on children’s testimony about experienced and witnessed events. Developmental Review, 24(4), 440–468. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2004.08.006
- President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2016). Report to the President: Forensic science in the criminal courts. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President of the United States.
- Read, J., Powell, M., Kebbell, M., Milne, B., & Steinberg, R. (2014). Evaluating police interviewing practices with suspects in child-sexual abuse cases. Policing and Society, 24(5), 523–544. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2013.784297
- Roma, P., Martini, P.S., Sabatello, U., Tatarelli, R., & Ferracuti, S. (2011). Validity of criteria-based content analysis (CBCA) at trial in free-narrative interviews. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35(8), 613–620. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.04.004
- Rosenthal, R. (1995). State of New Jersey v Margaret Kelly Michaels: An overview. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1(2), 246–271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.1.2.246
- Steller, M., & Böhm, C. (2006). Cincuenta años de jurisprudencia del Tribunal Federal Supremo alemán sobre la psicología del testimonio. Balance y perspectiva [Fifty years of the German Federal Court jurisprudence on forensic psychology. In T. Fabian, C. Böhm, & J. Romero (Eds.), Nuevos caminos y conceptos en la psicología jurídica (pp. 53–67). Münster, Germany: LIT Verlag.
- Steller, M., & Köhnken, G. (1989). Criteria-based content analysis. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 217–245). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
- Steller, M., Wellerhaus, P., & Wolf, T. (1988, June). Empirical validation of criteria based content analysis. Paper presented at NATO Advanced Study Institute on Credibility Assessment, Maratea, Italy.
- Stobbs, G., & Kebbell, M.R. (2003). Jurors’ perception of witnesses with intellectual disabilities and the influence of expert evidence. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16(2), 107–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3148.2003.00151.x
- Strömwall, L. A., Granhag, P. A., & Landström, S. (2007). Children’s prepared and unprepared lies: can adults see through their strategies?. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 457–471. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1288
- Teoh, Y.S., & Lamb, M.E. (2013). Interviewer demeanor in forensic interviews of children. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19(2), 145–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2011.614610
- Tye, M.J.C., Henderson, S.A., & Honts, C.R. (1995, January). Evaluating children’s testimonies: CBCA and lay subjects. Paper presented at meeting of CRIME CON: International Internet Conference on Crime and Criminal Justice, Little Rock, AR.
- Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
- Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Brown, L., & Mann, S. (2006). Detecting lies in young children, adolescents and adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(9), 1225–1237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1278
- Vrij, A., Granhag, P.A., & Porter, S. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 11(3), 89–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100610390861
- Vrij, A., Hope, L., & Fisher, R.P. (2014). Eliciting reliable information in investigative interviews. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 129–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214548592
- Ulery, B.T., Hicklin, R.A., Buscaglia, J., & Roberts, M.A. (2012). Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners. PLoS One, 7(3), e32800. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032800
- Walsh, D. (2010). Towards a framework for interviewing suspects of fraud (Doctoral dissertation, Leister University, Leister, UK).
- Walsh, D., & Bull, R. (2015). Interviewing suspects: examining the association between skills, questioning, evidence disclosure, and interview outcomes. Psychology, Crime & Law, 21(7), 661–680. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1028544
- Walsh, D., King, M., & Griffiths, A. (2017). Evaluating interviews which search for the truth with suspects: But are investigators’ self-assessments of their own skills truthful ones? Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(7), 647–665. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1296149
- Welle, I., Berclaz, M., Lacasa, M.J., & Niveau, G. (2016). A call to improve the validity of criterion-based content analysis (CBCA): Results from a field-based study including 60 children’s statements of sexual abuse. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 43, 111–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2016.08.001
- Westcott, H.L., Davies, G.M., & Clifford, B.R. (2007). Adults’ perceptions of children’s videotaped truthful and deceptive statements. Children & Society, 5(2), 123–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.1991.tb00378.x
- Wright, R., & Powell, M.B. (2007). What makes a good investigative interviewer of children?: A comparison of police officers’ and experts’ perceptions. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 30(1), 21–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510710725604
- Yuille, J.C. (1988). The systematic assessment of children’s testimony. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 29(3), 247–262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0079769
- Zajac, R., Garry, M., London, K., Goodyear-Smith, F., & Hayne, H. (2013). Misconceptions about childhood sexual abuse and child witnesses: Implications for psychological experts in the courtroom. Memory (Hove, England), 21(5), 608–617. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.778287
- Zapf, P.A., & Dror, I.E. (2017). Understanding and mitigating bias in forensic evaluation: Lessons from forensic science. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 16(3), 227–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2017.1317302