References
- Appleby, S. C., & Kassin, S. M. (2016). When self-report trumps science: Effects of confessions, DNA and prosecutorial theories on perceptions of guilt. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 22(2), 127–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000080
- Berman, G. L., Narby, D. J., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). Effects of inconsistent eyewitness statements on mock-jurors’ evaluations of the eyewitness, perceptions of defendant culpability and verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 19(1), 79–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499074
- Bornstein, B. H., & Greene, E. (2011). Jury decision making: Implications for and from psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 63–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410397282
- Drizin, S. A., & Leo, R. A. (2004). The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review, 82(3), 891–1008. https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol82/iss3/3/
- Garrett, B. L. (2011). False confessions. Litigation, 37(4, Revision), 54–58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23075545
- Henderson, K. S., & Levett, L. M. (2016). Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence? Law and Human Behavior, 40(6), 638–649. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000204
- Holt, G. A., & Palmer, M. A. (2020). The variable influence of confession inconsistencies: How factual errors (but not contradictions) reduce belief in suspect guilt. Applied Cognitive Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3757
- Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2013). Criminal interrogation and confessions (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
- Innocence Project. (n.d.). False confessions & recording of custodial interrogations. https://www.innocenceproject.org/causes/false-confessions-admissions/
- Jones, E. E., Bandy, A. D., & Palmer, P. G., Jr., (2019). ‘I did it, but not like that’: Effects of factually incorrect confessions on juror judgments. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 26(4), 553–570. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1519467
- Kassin, S. M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60(3), 215–228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.215
- Kassin, S. M. (2012). Why confessions trump innocence. American Psychologist, 67(6), 431–445. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028212
- Kassin, S. M., & Kiechel, K. L. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science, 7(3), 125–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00344.x
- Kassin, S. M., & Neumann, K. (1997). On the power of confession evidence: An experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Law and Human Behavior, 21(5), 469–484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024871622490
- Kassin, S. M., & Sukel, H. (1997). Coerced confessions and the jury: An experimental test of the ‘harmless error’ rule. Law and Human Behavior, 21(1), 27–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024814009769
- Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28(2), 107–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034225
- Leippe, M. R., Eisenstadt, D., Rauch, S. M., & Seib, H. M. (2004). Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors’ need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 524–541. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.524
- Leo, R. A., & Drizin, S. A. (2010). The three errors: Pathways to false confession and wrongful conviction. In G. D. Lassiter & C. A. Meissner (Eds.), Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations (pp. 9–30). American Psychological Association. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/12085-001
- Leo, R. A., & Ofshe, R. J. (1997). The social psychology of police interrogation: The theory and classification of true and false confessions. Studies in Law, Politics and Society, 16, 189–251. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1141368
- Leo, R. A., & Ofshe, R. J. (1998). The consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88(2), 429–496. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1144288
- MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 593–614. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
- Malloy, L. C., & Lamb, M. E. (2010). Biases in judging victims and suspects whose statements are inconsistent. Law and Human Behavior, 34(1), 46–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9211-y
- Palmer, M. A., Button, L., Barnett, E., & Brewer, N. (2016). Inconsistencies undermine the credibility of confession evidence. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 21(1), 161–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12048
- Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 242–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.242
- Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 189–206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.189
- Reeder, G. D., Vonk, R., Ronk, M. J., Ham, J., & Lawrence, M. (2004). Dispositional attribution: Multiple inferences about motive-related traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 530–544. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.530
- Russano, M. B., Meissner, C. A., Narchet, F. M., & Kassin, S. M. (2005). Investigating true and false confessions within a novel experimental paradigm. Psychological Science, 16(6), 481–486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01560.x
- Sauer, J. D., Palmer, M. A., & Brewer, N. (2017). Mock-juror evaluations of traditional and ratings-based eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 41(4), 375–384. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000235
- Sommers, S. R., & Kassin, S. M. (2001). On the many impacts of inadmissible testimony: Selective compliance, need for cognition, and the overcorrection bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(10), 1368–1377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012710012
- Tenney, E. R., MacCoun, R. J., Spellman, B. A., & Hastie, R. (2007). Calibration trumps confidence as a basis for witness credibility. Psychological Science, 18(1), 46–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.111/j.1467-9280.2007.01847.x
- Woestehoff, S. A., & Meissner, C. A. (2016). Juror sensitivity to false confession risk factors: Dispositional vs. situational attributions for a confession. Law and Human Behavior, 40(5), 564–579. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000201