Defining the family: the role of personal values and personal acquaintance

References

• Allen, K. R., Fine, M. A., & Demo, D. H. (2000). An overview of family diversity: Controversies, questions, and values. In D. H. Demo., K. R. Allen., & M. A. Fine (Eds.), Handbook of family diversity (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Perseus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bala, N. (1994). The evolving Canadian definition of the family: Towards a pluralistic and functional approach. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 8, 293–318. doi:10.1093/lawfam/8.3.293
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baunach, D. M., Burgess, E. O., & Muse, C. S. (2009). Southern (dis)comforts: Sexual prejudice and social contact with gay men and lesbians in the South. Sociological Spectrum, 30, 30–64. doi:10.1080/02732170903340893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B. (2012). Determinants of public support for same sex marriage: Generational cohorts, social contact, and shifting attitudes. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24, 524–533. doi:10.1093/ijpor/eds002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). Moral politicking: Public attitudes toward gay marriage in an election context. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 14, 186–211. doi:10.1177/1940161208330905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B., & Scheufele, D. A. (2011). New voters, new outlook? Predispositions, social networks, and the changing politics of gay civil rights. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 324–345. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00771.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckers, T., Siegers, P., & Kuntz, A. (2012). Congruence and performance of value concepts in social research. Survey Research Methods, 6, 13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernat, M., & Vesico, T. K. (2004). Values and prejudice. In C. S. Crandall & M. Schaller (Eds.), Social psychology of prejudice: Historical and contemporary issues (pp. 191–216). Lawrence, KS: Lewinian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bystrov, E. (2012). Religion, demography and attitudes toward civil marriage in Israel 1969–2009. Current Sociology, 60, 751–770. doi:10.1177/0011392112456389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B. E., & Wolley, S. R. (2008). Marriage and family therapists' attitudes toward marriage. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 7, 321–336.
   Google Scholar
• Central Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Families and households in Israel: Data on the occasion of family day. Retrieved from http://www.cbs.gov.il/reader/newhodaot/hodaa_template.html?hodaa=201311027
   Google Scholar
• Cook, K. (2014). The family: What is it, how do we study it and why? Journal of Family Studies, 20(1), 2–4. doi:10.5172/jfs.2014.20.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coontz, S. (2000). Reflections on family diversity: Past and present. In P. H. Demo, K. R. Allen, & M. A. Fine (Eds.), Handbook of family diversity (pp. 15–32). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, G. B., & Melton, E.N. (2013). The moderating effects of contact with lesbian and gay friends on the relationships among religious fundamentalism, sexism, and sexual prejudice. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 401–408. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.648029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, A. D. (2007). Mail and internet surveys. New Jersey, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kawakami, K. (2003). Intergroup contact: The past, present, and the future. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(1), 5–21. doi:10.1177/1368430203006001009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erera, P. I. (2002). Family diversity: Continuity and change in the contemporary family. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fogiel-Bijaoui, S. (1999). Families in Israel: Postfeminism, feminism and the state. In D. N. Izraeli, A. Friedman, H. Dahan-Kalev, S. Fogiel-Bijaoui, H. Herzog, M. Hasan, & H. Naveh (Eds.), Sex, gender, politics: Women in Israel (pp. 107–167). Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuhad. ( Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Fogiel-Bijaoui, S. (2002). Familism, postmodernity and the state: The case of Israel. Journal of Israeli History, 21(1–2), 38–62. doi:10.1080/13531040212331295852
   Google Scholar
• Fogiel-Bijaoui, S. (2013). What did you mean by the word “family”?: A look at the family institution today. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Masters program in research of child and youth culture. Tel-Aviv, Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Fogiel-Bijaoui, S., & Rutlinger-Reiner, R. (2013). Rethinking the family in Israel. Israel Studies Review, 28, vii–xii.
   Google Scholar
• Gavriel-Fried, B., & Shilo, G. (in press). The perception of family in Israel and the US: Similarities and differences.
   Google Scholar
• Gavriel-Fried, B., Shilo, G., & Cohen, O. (2014). How do social workers define the concept of family? British Journal of Social Work, 44, 992–1010. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcs176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubernskaya, Z. (2010). Changing attitudes toward marriage and children in six countries. Sociological Perspectives, 53, 179–200. doi:10.1525/sop.2010.53.2.179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, S. R. (2008). What is family diversity? Objective and interpretive approaches. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 1407–1425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitlin, S., & Piliavin, J. A. (2004). Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 359–393. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollekim, R., Slaatten, H., & Anderssen, N. (2012). A nationwide study of Norwegian beliefs about same-sex marriage and lesbian and gay parenthood. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 9, 15–30. doi:10.1007/s13178-011-0049-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtzman, M. (2008). Defining family: Young adults’ perceptions of the parent-child bond. Journal of Family Communication, 8, 167–185. doi:10.1080/15267430701856887
   Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn, A. W., & Daalmans, J. (2009). Nonresponse in the recruitment of an internet panel based on probability sampling. Survey Research Methods, 3, 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics. (2009). Households and families in Israel. Jerusalem, Israel: Central Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Kaha, S. M. (2000). Reproducing Jews: A cultural account of assisted conception in Israel. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knafo, A., & Spinath, F. M. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on girls’ and boys’ gender-typed and gender neutral values. Developmental Psychology, 47, 726–731. doi:10.1037/a0021910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavee, Y., & Katz, R. (2003). The family in Israel: Between tradition and modernity. Marriage and Family Review, 35, 193–217. doi:10.1300/J002v35n01_11
   Google Scholar
• Merz, E.-M., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2012). The attitude toward voluntary childlessness in Europe: Cultural and institutional explanations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 587–600. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00972.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2011). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, B., Bolzendahl, C., Geist, C., & Steelman, L.C. (2010). Counted out: Same-sex relations and Americans ’ definitions of family. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, I., & Peleg, N. (2007). Israeli family report. Tel-Aviv: New Family Association. ( Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Sagiv, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (1995). Value priorities and readiness for out-group social contact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 437–448. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–69). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated values systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 1–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and applications. Revue Française de Sociologie, 47, 1–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (2010). Basic values: How they motivates and inhibit prosocial behavior. In M. Mikulinser, & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 221–241). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Towards a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550–562. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., … Konty, M. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663–688. doi:10.1037/a0029393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542. doi:10.1177/0022022101032005001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(1), 92–116. doi:10.1177/0022022195261007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shilo, G., Gavriel-Fried, B., & Cohen, O. (in press). Do same-sex relationships count as family? The effects of personal characteristics, values, and contact on social workers’ definitions of same-sex relationships. Journal of Social Work.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. J., Axelton, A. M., & Saucier, D. A. (2009). The effect of contact on sexual prejudice: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 61, 178–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, J. P., Sawyerr, O. O., & Oke, A. (2008). Demographics, individual value structures, and diversity attitudes in the United Kingdom. Journal of Change Management, 8(2), 147–170. doi:10.1080/14697010701799445
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, K. T. (2001). Understanding the relationship between religiosity and marriage: An investigation of the immediate and longitudinal effects of religiosity on newlywed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 610–626. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.15.4.610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, A. (1985). Reciprocal influences of family and religion in a changing world. Journal of Marriage and Family, 47, 381–94. doi:10.2307/352138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, A. (1989). Changing attitudes toward family issues in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 51, 873–893. doi:10.2307/353202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Hill, D.H. (1992). Reciprocal affects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 628–651. doi:10.1086/230051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1009–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trent, K., & South, S.J. (1992). Sociodemographic status, parental background, childhood family structure, and attitudes toward family formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 427–439. doi:10.2307/353074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triger, Z. (2012). Freedom from religion in Israel: Civil marriages and cohabitation of Jews enter the rabbinical courts. Israel Studies Review, 27(2), 1–17. doi:10.3167/isr.2012.270202
   Google Scholar
• Welzel, C. (2010). How selfish are self-expression values? A civicness test. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 152–174. doi:10.1177/0022022109354378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar