Graphic family sculpting as a visual projective data-collection method: an example of South African female adolescents

References

• Abrahams, J., & Ingram N. (2013). The chameleon habitus: Exploring local students’ negotiations of multiple fields. Sociological Research Online, 18(4), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beilin, R. (2005). Photo-elicitation and the agricultural landscape: “Seeing” and “telling” about farming, community and place. Visual Studies, 20(1), 56–68.
   Google Scholar
• Blackbeard, D., & Lindegger, G. (2015). The value of participatory visual methods in young masculinity research. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 165, 85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Boddy, C. (2005). Projective techniques in market research: Valueless subjectivity or insightful reality? International Journal of Market Research, 47(3), 239–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, A., Pole, C., & Mizen, P. (2001). Picture this: Researching child workers. Sociology, 35, 501–518.
   Google Scholar
• Botma, Y., Greeff, M., Maluadzi, F. M., & Wright, S. C. D. (2010). Research in health Sciences. Cape Town, SA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (2009). Creative visual methods in media research: Possibilities, problems and proposals. Media, Culture and Society, 31, 633–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler-Kisber, L., & Poldma, T. (2010). The power of visual approaches in qualitative inquiry: The use of collage making and concept mapping in experiential research. Journal of Research Practice, 6(2). Retrieved May 16, 2016, from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/197/196
   Google Scholar
• Cade, B. W. (1982). Some uses of metaphor. Australian Journal of Family Therapy, 3(3), 135–140.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, C. A., & Theron, L. (2011). With pictures and words I can show you: Cartoon portray resilient migrant teenagers’ journeys. In L. Theron, C. Mitchell, A. Smith, & J. Stuart (Eds.), Picturing research: Drawing as visual methodology (pp. 205–217). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., & Groenbaek, M. (2006). Taking positions in the organization. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, P. F., & Dollinger, S. J. (2007). College students’ alcohol-related problems: An autophotographic approach. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 51(2), 8–25.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2011). Breaking methodological boundaries? Exploring visual, participatory methods with adults and young children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 19(3), 321–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2001). Listening to young children: The mosaic approach. Wiltshire: National Children’s Bureau.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, M. (2002). Approaches to analyses in visual anthropology. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 35–60). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). The case for participation as tyranny. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The new tyranny? (pp. 1–15). London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deacon, S. A. (2000). Creativity within qualitative research on families: New ideas for old methods. The Qualitative Report, 4(3 + 4). Retrieved November 15, 2016, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4-3/deacon.html
   Google Scholar
• De Lange, N., Mitchell, C., & Stuart, J. (2008). Putting people in the picture: Visual methodologies for social change. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• De Vos, A. S. (2015). Research at grass roots: A primer for the caring profession. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
   Google Scholar
• Donoghue, S. (2000). Projective techniques in consumer research. Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences, 28, 47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, H., Riley, S., Archer, L., & Gleeson, K. (2005). Editorial. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(3), 187–198.
   Google Scholar
• Gabb, J. (2008). Researching intimacy in families. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gabb, J. (2009). Researching family relationships: A qualitative mixed methods approach. Methodological Innovations Online, 4(2), 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gabb, J., & Singh, R. (2015). The uses of emotion maps in research and clinical practice with families and couples: Methodological innovation and critical inquiry. Family Process, 54(1), 185–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M. (2008). “Power is not an evil”: Rethinking power in participatory methods. Children’s Geographies, 6(2), 137–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauntlett, D. (2007). Creative explorations: New approaches to identities and audiences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2002). Practices of seeing visual analysis: An ethnomethodological approach. In T. van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 157–182). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Govender, E. M., & Reddy, S. (2011). Drawing the bigger picture: Giving voice to HIV-positive children. In L. Theron, C. Mitchell, A. Smith, & J. Stuart (Eds.), Picturing research: Drawing as visual methodology (pp. 191–204). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M. (2004). Understanding illness: Using drawings as a research method. Qualitative Health Research, 14(2), 272–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurevitch, Z. D. (1988). The other side of dialogue: On making the other strange and the experiences of otherness. American Journal of Sociology, 93(5), 1179–1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, K. M., & Jacobs, P. (1993). The use of photography to explore the meaning of health among adolescents with cancer. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 16, 155–164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardy, K. V., & Laszloffy, T. (1995). The cultural genogram: Key to training cultural competent family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21(3), 227–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M., Laybourn, A., & Borland, M. (1996). Engaging with primary-aged children about their emotions and well-being: Methodological considerations. Children and Society, 10(1), 129–144.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. A. (2011). A child’s right to participation: Photovoice as methodology for documenting the experiences of children living in Kenyan orphanages. Visual Anthropology Review, 27(2), 141–161.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, G. A., Pfister, A. E., & Vindrola-Padros, C. (2012). Drawings photos, and performances: Using visual methods with children. Visual Anthropology Review, 28(2), 164–178.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G. (1966). The spirit in man, art and literature. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Kaomea, J. (2003). Reading erasures and making the familiar strange: Defamiliarising methods for research in formerly colonized and historically oppressed communities. Educational Researcher, 32(2), 14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, K. S., & Hyle, A. E. (2004). Drawing out emotions: The use of participant-produced drawings in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Research, 4(3), 361–382.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, C., Fleury, J., Perez, A., Ainsworth, B., & Vaughan, L. (2009). Using visual methods to uncover context. Advancing Qualitative Methods, 18, 428–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesby, M. (2005). Retheorizing empowerment-through-participation as a performance in space: Beyond tyranny to transformation. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(4), 2037–2065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsten, D. K., Van Lellyveld, V., & Venter, C. A. (2006). Perceptions that patients diagnosed with borderline personality disorder have of their families. South African Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 319–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koen, V., Van Eeden, C., & Rothmann, S. (2012). An exploration of families’ psychosocial well-being in a South African context. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 22(3), 343–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koen, V., Van Eeden, C., & Venter, C. (2011). African females’ experience of parenting and sense of well-being. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 21(2), 197–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lomax, H., Fink, J., Singh, N., & High, C. (2011). The politics of performance: Methodological challenges of researching children’s experiences of childhood through the lens of participatory video. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(3), 231–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, S., & Kolb, B. (2009). Involving the public through participatory visual research methods. Health Expectations, 12, 262–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttrell, W., & Chalfen, R. (2010). Lifting up voices of participatory visual research. Visual Studies, 25(3), 197–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, N., & Lea, S. J. (2005). Through the looking glass: Considering the challenges visual methodologies raise for qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(3), 213–225.
   Google Scholar
• Mannay, D. (2010). Making the familiar strange: Can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qualitative Research, 10(1), 91–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannay, D. (2013). “Who put that on there … why why why?” Power games and participatory techniques of visual data production. Visual Studies, 28(2), 136–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchetti-Mercer, M. C., & Cleaver, G. (2000). Genograms and family sculpting: An aid to cross-cultural understanding in the training of psychology students in South Africa. The Counseling Psychologist, 28, 61–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGoldrick, M., Gerson, R., & Petry, S. (2008). Genograms: Assessment and intervention. London: WWW Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, M. (1995). Visual anthropology in a discipline of words. In P. Hockings (Ed.), Principles of visual anthropology (pp. 1–10). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Minuchin, S. (1975). Families and family therapy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C., Theron, L., Stuart, J., Smith, A., & Campbell, Z. (2011). Drawing as research method. In L. Theron, C. Mitchell, A. Smith, & J. Stuart (Eds.), Picturing research: Drawing as visual methodology (pp. 19–36). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Murstein, B. I., & Pryer, R. S. (1959). The concept of projection: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 56(5), 353–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musello, C. (1980). Studying the Home Mode: An exploration of family photography and visual communication. Studies in Visual Communication, 3(1), 38–51.
   Google Scholar
• Packard, J. (2008). “I’m gonna show you what it’s really like out here”: The power and limitation of participatory methods. Visual Studies, 23(1), 63–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp, P. (1982). Staging reciprocal metaphors in a couples group. Family Process, 21, 453–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papp, P., Scheinkman, M., & Malpas, J. (2013). Breaking the mould: Sculpting impasses in couples therapy. Family Process, 52(1), 33–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rober, P. (2009). Relational drawings in couple therapy. Family Process, 48(1), 117–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, V. (2008). The Mmogo-method: Discovering symbolic community interactions. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 18(4), 659–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, V. (2012). The Mmogo-Method: An exploration of experiences through visual projections. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9(3), 249–261.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, V., & Ferreira, L. (2008). Expressive art in cross-cultural group supervision: Applying the Mmogo-Method. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 18(4), 581–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D. (2000). Analysis of moving images. In M. W. Bauer, & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound (pp. 246–262). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2010). Doing family photography: The domestic, the public and the politics of sentiment. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2014). On the relation between “visual research methods” and contemporary visual culture. The Sociological Review, 62, 24–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satir, V. (1972). Peoplemaking. Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. (1989). Visual ethnography: Using photography in qualitative research. Qualitative Sociology, 12(2), 119–154.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. L., & Stevens-Smith, P. (1992). Basic techniques in marriage and family counseling therapy. Ann-Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrman, A. (2005). Video recording as an interaction: Participant observation of children’s everyday life. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(3), 241–255.
   Google Scholar
• Terre Blanche, M., Durrheim, K., & Painter, D. (2006). Research in practice: Applied methods for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Cape Town, SA: University of Cape Town Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theron, L., Geyer, S., Strydom, H., & Delport, R. (2010). Visual methodology to build a resilient “communitas”. Education as Change, 14(S1), S85–S101.
   Google Scholar
• Theron, L., Mitchell, C., Smith, A., & Staurt, J (Eds.). (2011). Picturing research: Drawing as visual methodology. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Venter, C. A. (1993). Graphic family sculpting as a technique in family therapy. Social Work Practitioner-Researcher, 6(2), 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Vindrola-Padros, C. (2012). The everyday lives of children with cancer in Argentina: Going beyond the disease and treatment. Children & Society, 26(6), 430–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V., Lucey, J., & Melody, J. (2001). Growing up girl: Psychosocial explorations of gender and class. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. (1999). Photovoice: A participatory action research strategy applied to women’s health. Journal of Women’s Health, 8(2), 185–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zartler, U., & Richter, R. (2014). My family through the lens. Photo interviews with children and sensitive aspects of family life. Children & Society, 28, 42–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar