1,910
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Does similarity in work-family related attitudes improve relationship quality? Evidence from Sweden

&
Pages 822-840 | Received 13 Feb 2019, Accepted 17 Apr 2020, Published online: 07 May 2020

References

  • Alford, J. R., Hatemi, P. K., Hibbing, J. R., Martin, N. G., & Eaves, L. J. (2011). The politics of mate choice. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381611000016
  • Andersson, G. (2002). Children’s experience of family disruption and family formation: Evidence from 16 FFS countries. Demographic Research, 7(7), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2002.7.7
  • Argyle, M., & Furnham, A. (1983). Sources of satisfaction and conflict in long-term relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45(3), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.2307/351654
  • Arranz Becker, O. (2012). Effects of similarity of life goals, values, and personality on relationship satisfaction and stability: Findings from a two-wave panel study. Personal Relationships, 20(3), 443–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01417.x
  • Becker, G. S. (1981). A Treatise of the Family. Harvard University Press.
  • Bernasco, W. (1994). Coupled Careers: The effects of Spouse’s resources on success at Work. Thesis publishers.
  • Bernasco, W., de Graaf, P. M., & Ultee, W. C. (1998). Effects of spouse's resources on occupational attainment in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 14(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a018225
  • Blackwell, D. L. (1998). Marital Homogamy in the United States: The influence of individual and paternal education. Social Science Research, 27(2), 159–188. https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1998.0618
  • Block, J. H., Block, J., & Morrison, A. (1981). Parental agreement-disagreement on child-rearing orientations and gender-related personality correlates in children. Child Development, 52(3), 965–974. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129101
  • Booth, A., & White, L. (1980). Thinking about divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42(3), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.2307/351904
  • Brines, J., & Joyner, K. (1999). The Ties that Bind: Principles of Cohesion in Cohabitation and Marriage. American Sociological Review, 64(3), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657490
  • Caspi, A., Herbener, E. S., & Ozer, D. J. (1992). Shared experiences and the similarity of personalities: A longitudinal study of married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.281
  • Crohan, S. E. (1992). Marital Happiness and Spousal Consensus on beliefs about Marital Conflict: A Longitudinal Investigation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407592091005
  • Davis, S. N., & Greenstein, T. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115920
  • Dribe, M., & Nystedt, P. (2013). Educational assortative mating and gender-specific earnings: Sweden 1990-2005. Demography, 50(4), 1197–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-012-0188-7
  • Dribe, M., & Stanfors, M. (2010). Family life in power couples: Continued childbearing and union stability among the educational elite in Sweden, 1991-2005. Demographic Research, 23, 847–878. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.30
  • Duvander, A.-Z. (2000). Marriage choice and earnings. A study of how spouses’ relative resources influence their income development. In Duvander, A-Z. Couples in Sweden. Studies on Family and Work, Swedish Institute of Social Research Dissertation Series 46, Stockholm University.
  • Eeckhaut, M. C., Van de Putte, B., Gerris, J. R., & Vermulst, A. A. (2011). Analysing the effect of educational differences between partners: A methodological/theoretical comparison. European Sociological Review, 29(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcr040
  • Feng, D., & Baker, L. (1994). Spouse similarity in attitudes, personality, and psychological well-being. Behavior Genetics, 24(4), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067537
  • Finnäs, F. (1997). Social integration, heterogeneity, and divorce: the case of the Swedish-speaking population in Finland. Acta Sociologica, 40(3), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939704000303
  • Gaunt, R. (2006). Couple similarity and marital satisfaction: Are similar spouses happier? Journal of Personality, 74(5), 1401–1420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00414.x
  • Gigy, I., & Kelly, J. B. (1993). Reasons for divorce. Perspectives of divorcing men and women. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 18(1-2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v18n01_08
  • Gonzaga, G. C. (2010). Assortative mating, convergence and satisfaction in married couples. Personal Relationships, 17(4), 634–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01309.x
  • Heaton, T. B., & Pratt, E. L. (1990). The effects of religious homogamy on marital satisfaction and stability. Journal of Family Issues, 11(2), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251390011002005
  • Henz, U., & Jonsson, J. O. (2003). Who Marries Whom in Sweden? In H.-P. Blossfeld, & A. Timm (Eds.), Who marries whom? Educational systems as marriage markets in modern societies (pp. 235–266). Kluwer.
  • Hill, M. S. (1988). Marital stability and spouses’ shared time. A multidisciplinary hypothesis. Journal of Family Issues, 9(4), 427–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251388009004001
  • Hohmann-Marriott, B. (2006). Shared beliefs and the union stability of married and cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(4), 1015–1028. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00310.x
  • Janssen, J. P. G. (2002). Do opposites attract divorce? Dimensions of mixed marriage and the risk of divorce in the Netherlands [Doctoral Dissertation]. Department of Sociology, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Kalmijn, M. (1991). Shifting boundaries: Trends in religious and educational homogamy. American Sociological Review, 56(6), 786–800. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096256
  • Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.395
  • Kalmijn, M. (2005). Attitude alignment in marriage and cohabitation: The case of sex-role attitudes. Personal Relationships, 12(4), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2005.00129.x
  • Keizer, R., & Komter, A. (2015). Are “Equals” happier than “less Equals”? A couple analysis of similarity and well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(4), 954–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12194
  • Kippen, R., Chapman, B., Yu, P., & Lounkaew, K. (2013). What’s love got to do with it? Homogamy and dyadic approaches to understanding marital instability. Journal of Population Research, 30(3), 213–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-013-9108-y
  • Kraft, K., & Neimann, S. (2009). Impact of Educational and Religious Homogamy on Marital Stability. IZA Discussion paper No. 4491. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn.
  • Levinger, G., & Breedlove, J. (1966). Interpersonal attraction and agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3(4), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023029
  • Lewis, R. A., & Spanier, G. B. (1979). Theorizing about the quality and stability of marriage. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 1) (pp. 268–294). Free Press.
  • Luo, S. (2009). Partner selection and relationship satisfaction in early dating couples: The role of couple similarity. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(2), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.012
  • Lye, D. N., & Biblarz, T. J. (1993). The effects of attitudes toward family life and gender roles on marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 14(2), 157–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251393014002002
  • Lyngstad, T. H. (2004). The impact of parents’ and spouses’ education on divorce rates in Norway. Demographic Research, 10(5), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2004.10.5
  • Mäenpää, E., & Jalovaara, M. (2013). The effects of homogamy in socio-economic background and education on the transition from cohabitation to marriage. Acta Sociologica, 56(3), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699312474385
  • Oláh, L., & Bernhardt, E. (2008). Sweden: Combining childbearing and gender equality. Demographic Research, 19, 1105–1144. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.28
  • Price, R. A., & Vandenberg, S. G. (1979). Spouse similarity in American and Swedish couples. Behavior Genetics, 10(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067319
  • Raymo, J. M., & Xie, Y. (2000). Temporal and regional variation in the strength of educational homogamy. American Sociological Review, 65(5), 773–781. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657546
  • Ruppanner, L., Brandén, M., & Turunen, J. (2017). Does unequal housework lead to divorce? Evidence from Sweden. Sociology, 52(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516674664
  • Shimanoff, S. (2009). Gender role Theory. In S. W. Littlejohn, & K. A. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Communication Theory (pp. 433–436). Sage Publications.
  • Snyder, E. C. (1964). Attitudes: A study of homogamy and marital selectivity. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 26(3), 332–336. https://doi.org/10.2307/349465
  • Statistics Sweden. (2017). Tid mellan barnen – hur lång tid väntar föräldrar innan de får sitt andra barn? Demografiska rapporter 2017:2.
  • The Swedish Trade Union Confederation. (2017). Lönerapport 2017. Löner och löneutveckling år 1913–2016. https://www.lo.se/home/lo/res.nsf/vRes/lo_fakta_1366027478784_lonerapport2017_pdf/$File/Lonerapport2017.pdf. Accessed 2020-03-10.
  • White, S. G., & Hatcher, C. (1984). Couple complementarity and similarity: A review of the literature. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 12(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926188408250155