1,884
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Women’s work–life balance strategies in academia

ORCID Icon
Pages 1139-1157 | Received 28 Jan 2020, Accepted 06 Jul 2020, Published online: 04 Aug 2020

References

  • Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499
  • Acker, S., & Armenti, C. (2004). Sleepless in academia. Gender and Education, 16(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954025032000170309
  • Anthias, F., & Yuval-Davis, N. (1983). Contextualizing feminism – gender, ethnic and class divisions. Feminist Review, 15(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1983.33
  • Bagilhole, B. (1994). Being different is a very difficult row to hoe: Survival strategies of women academics. In S. Davies, C. Lubelska, & J. Quinn (Eds.), Changing the subject: Women in higher education (pp. 15–28). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315095899-3
  • Ballón, E. G., Chavez, C., Gomez, S. T., & Posey, S. M. (2006). Are you oppressed if you don’t think you are? Defining and defending prosperity among working-class students in a public university. Women’s Studies, 35(6), 595–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/00497870600809806
  • Benschop, Y., & Brouns, M. (2003). Crumbling Ivory Towers: Academic Organizing and its gender effects. Gender, Work and Organization, 10(2), 194–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.t01-1-00011
  • Bianchi, S. M., Sayer, L. C., Milkie, M. A., & Robinson, J. P. (2012). Housework: Who did, does or will do it, and How much does it matter? Social Forces, 91(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sos120
  • Blagojević, M. (2009). Knowledge production at the semiperiphery: A gender perspective. Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja.
  • Blagojević Hughson, M. (2015). Sutra je bilo juče: prilog društvenoj istoriji žena u drugoj polovini 20. veka u Jugoslaviji. Zavod za ravnopravnost polova.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
  • Brah, A., & Phoenix, A. (2004). Ain’t I A woman? Revisiting intersectionality. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 5(3), 75–86.
  • Carastathis, A. (2014). The concept of intersectionality in feminist theory. Philosophy Compass, 9(5), 304–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12129
  • Cohen, P. (1988). The Perversions of Inheritance: Studies in the making of multi-racist Britain. In P. Cohen & B. H. Bains (Eds.), Multi-racist Britain. Youth questions. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19399-8_2
  • Côté, S. (2011). How social class shapes thoughts and actions in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 43–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2011.09.004
  • Cotteril, P., & Letherby, G. (2005). Women in higher education: Issues and challenges. Women’s Studies International Forum, 28(2), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2005.04.001
  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(2), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
  • Davila, E. R., & Aviles, A. M. (2018). Afro-Puerto Rican primas: Identity, pedagogy, and solidarity. In S. A. Shelton, J. E. Flynn, & T. J. Grosland (Eds.), Feminism and intersectionality in academia (pp. 117–130). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  • Davis, K. (2014). Intersectionality as a Critical Methodology. In N. Lykke (Ed.), Writing academic texts differently: Intersectional feminist methodologies and the playful art of writing (pp. 17–29). Routledge.
  • Dickson, M. (2019). Academic motherhood in the United Arab Emirates. Gender, Place & Culture, 26, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2018.1555143
  • Dubois-Shaik, F., & Fusulier, B. (2017). Understanding gender inequality and the role of the work/family interface in contemporary academia: An introduction. European Educational Research Journal, 16(2–3), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117701143
  • Esterberg, K. (2001). Qualitative methods in social research. W. Ross MacDonald School Resource Services Library.
  • European Commission. (2004). Waste of talents: turning private struggles into a public issue. Women and science in the ENWISE countries.
  • Fairweather, J. S. (2002). The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision making. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2002.11777129
  • Forster, N. (2001). Case study of women academics’ views on equal Opportunities, career prospects and work-family conflicts in a UK university. Career Development International, 6(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430110381016
  • Franken, M. (2009). Teaching intersectionality: Putting gender at the centre. Centre for Gender Studies, Stockholm University.
  • Gachago, D. (2018). Lessons on humility: White women’s racial allyship in academia. In S. Shelton, J. Flynn, & T. Grosland (Eds.), Feminism and intersectionality in academia (pp. 131–144). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hays, S. (1998). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press.
  • Huopalainen, A. S., & Satama, S. T. (2001). Mothers and researchers in the making: Negotiating ‘new’motherhood within the ‘new’academia. Human Relations, 72(1), 98–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718764571
  • Jašarević, S. (2012). Fleksibilizacija rada – rešenje ili zabluda? Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, vol. XLVI(4), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns46-2991
  • Jenkins, K. (2014). ‘That's not philosophy’: Feminism, academia and the double bind. Journal of Gender Studies, 23(3), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2014.909720
  • Jirón-King, S. (2005). La estudiante caminante: My motherwork is here, My otherwork is there. Parenting and professing: Balancing family work with an academic career. Vanderbilt University Press.
  • Kandiyoti, D. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender and Society, 2(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124388002003004
  • Kóczé, A., & Popa, R. M. (2009). Missing intersectionality: Race/ethnicity, gender, and class in current research and policies on Romani women in Europe. Center for Policy Studies Working Papers.
  • Lendák-Kabók, K. (2016). Az interszekcionalitás vajdasági vonatkozásai. Létünk, XLVI(4), 73–87. ETO: 50(497.113)+316.423.6:316.346.2-055.2
  • Lendák-Kabók, K. (2019a). Status of women form national minorities in the Serbian Higher Education System – Focus on Women from the Hungarian National Minority [Doctoral dissertation, University of Novi Sad].
  • Lendák-Kabók, K. (2019b). Etnicitet i rod: (ne)vidljive predrasude u akademskoj zajednici u Srbiji. In D. Vujadinović, & Z. Antonijević (Eds.), Rodna ravnopravnost u visokom obrazovanju: koncepti, prakse i izazovi (pp. 173–185). Akademska knjiga.
  • Leonard, P., Malina, D., Davies, S., Lubelska, C., & Quinn, J. (1994). Caught between Two Worlds: Mothers as academics. In S. Davies, C. Lubelska, & J. Quinn (Eds.), Changing the subject: Women in higher education (pp. 29–41). Taylor and Francis.
  • Lykke, N. (2013). Feminist studies: A guide to intersectional theory, methodology and writing. Routledge.
  • MacQueen, K. M., McLellan, E., Kay, K., & Milstein, B. (2009). Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. CAM Journal, 10(2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X980100020301
  • Murray, R. (2013). ‘It’s not a Hobby’: Reconceptualizing the place of writing in academic work. Higher Education, 66(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9591-7
  • O’Brien, K. R., & Hapgood, K. P. (2012). The academic Jungle: Ecosystem Modelling Reveals Why women are Driven Out of research. Oikos, 121(7), 999–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20601.x
  • Perista, H., & Perista, P. (2014). Mapping the population, careers, mobilities and impacts of advanced degree graduates in the social sciences and humanities (POCARIM). The impact of partnering, parenting and other caring responsibilities on SSH work and careers, policy report, 12. CESIS and the University of Salford.
  • Ponterotto, J. G. (1990). Racial/ethnic minority and women students in higher education: A status report. New Directions for Student Services (52), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.37119905206
  • Reay, D., Davies, J., David, M., & Ball, J. S. (2001). Choices of degree or degrees of choice? Class, ‘race’and the higher education choice process. Sociology, 35(4), 855–874. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0038038501008550
  • Regnö, K. (2017). Challenges to feminist solidarity in the era of new public management. In R. Thwaites, & A. Pressland (Eds.), Being an early career feminist academic (pp. 169–194). Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rhoads, S. E., & Rhoads, C. H. (2012). Gender roles and Infant/toddler care: Male and female professors on the tenure track. Journal of Social, Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology, 6(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099227
  • Sakaluk, L., Breitkreuz, R., & Eastlick Kushner, K. (2019). It all comes out in the wash: Family policy, ideology and the pathway to contemporary mothering. Journal of Family Studies, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2019.1705875
  • Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage publications.
  • Sallee, M., Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2016). Can anyone have it all? Gendered views on parenting and academic careers. Innovative Higher Education, 41(3), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-015-9345-4
  • Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, 2011. (2012). Census of population, households and dwellings in the Republic of Serbia. Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia.
  • Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2012). Academic motherhood: How faculty manage work and family. Rutgers.
  • Yuval-Davis, N. (1996). Women and the biological reproduction of “The nation”. Women’s Studies International Forum, 19(I/2), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(95)00075-5
  • Žarkov, D. (2015). On intellectual labour and neoliberalism in academia – Or, in praise of reviewers. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 22(3), 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506815591920

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.