‘Ordinary’ and ‘diverse’ families. A case study of family discourses by Finnish early childhood education and care administrators

References

• Allen, K. R., Lloys, S. A., & Few, A. L. (2009). Reclaiming feminist theory, method, and praxis for family studies. In S. A. Lloyd & A. L. Few (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 3–17). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, M. (2002). Memories of mother: Counter-narratives of early maternal influence. Narrative Inquiry, 12(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.12.1.04and
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antaki, C. (2008). Discourse analysis and conversation analysis. In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, & J. Brannen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social research methods (pp. 431–446). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtson, V. L., Biblarz, T. J., & Roberts, R. E. L. (2002). How families still matter: A longitudinal study of youth in two generations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. R. (1988). Ideological dilemmas. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, V. (2002). New times: New families. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carsten, J. (2000). Introduction: Cultures of relatedness. In J. Carsten (Ed.), Cultures of relatedness: New approaches to the study of kinship (pp. 1–36). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, D. (2001). Representing the family. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, D. (2012). A sociology of family life. Change and diversity in intimate relations. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dermott, E. & Seymour, J. (Eds.). (2011). Displaying families. A new concept for the sociology of family life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eerola, P., Alasuutari, M., Karila, K., Kuukka, A., & Siippainen, A. (2020). Rationalizing early childhood education and care in the local context: A case study of Finnish municipalities. In K. Repo, M. Alasuutari, K. Karila, & J. Lammi-Taskula (Eds.), The policies of childcare and early childhood education: Does equal access matter? (pp. 152–171). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788117753.00015
   Google Scholar
• Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507072284
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, H. (1998). Perheen ja lapsen tähden - etnografia kahdesta lastensuojelun asiantuntijakulttuurista [For family and child – An ethnographic study on two expert cultures in child welfare services]. Lastensuojelun Keskusliitto.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, H. (2005). Case Finland – Family in the context of individual rights and social citizenship. In B. Adams & J. Trost (Eds.), Handbook of world families (pp. 262–283). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, H., & Nätkin, R. (2016). Families in the future: Stories of Finnish students. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 47(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.47.1.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahan, L. (2018). Separated same-sex parents: Troubling the same-sex parented family. Sociological Research Online, 23(1), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418754699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, P. J. (2017). Introducing discourse analysis: From grammar to society. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P., & Handford, M. (Eds.). (2013). The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy. Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R. (2009). Mediated intimacy and postfeminism: A discourse analytic examination of sex and relationships advice in a women’s magazine. Discourse & Communication, 3(4), 345–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481309343870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (1990). What is family? Mountain view. Mayfield Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Heaphy, B. (2011). Critical relational displays. In E. Dermott & J. Seymour (Eds.), Displaying families: A new concept for the sociology of family life (pp. 19–38). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Homanen, R. (2013). Doing pregnancy, the unborn, and the maternity healthcare institution. Tampere University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jallinoja, R. (1997). Moderni säädyllisyys. Aviosuhteen vapaudet ja sidokset [Modern decency. Freedoms and bonds in the marital relationship]. Gaudeamus.
   Google Scholar
• Jallinoja, R. (2006). Perheen vastaisku [Family strikes back]. Gaudeamus.
   Google Scholar
• Jamiesson, L. (2011). Intimacy as a concept: Explaining social change in the context of globalisation or another form of ethnocentricism? Sociological Research Online, 16(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karila, K. (2012). A Nordic perspective on early childhood education and care policy. European Journal of Education, 47(4), 584–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, T., Anttonen, A., & Sipilä, J. (2003). Social care in Finland: Stronger and weaker forms of universalism. In A. Anttonen, J. Baldock, & J. Sipilä (Eds.), The young, the old, and the state: Social care systems in five industrial (pp. 25–54). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lahad, K., Sabar, K., & Sabar Ben Yehoshua, N. (2018). Doing and displaying gendered boundary work among blended families in Israel. Sociology, 52(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516677220
   Google Scholar
• Lahti, A. (2019). Bisexuality in relationships: A queer psychosocial approach. University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Leira, A. (2002). Working parents and the welfare state: Family change and policy reforms in Scandinavia. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• May, V. (2011). Introducing a sociology of personal life. In V. May (Ed.), Sociology of personal life (pp. 1–10). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• May, V. (2013). Connecting self to the society. Belonging in a changing world. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. (2013). Child and family policy in Finland. Brochures of the Ministry of Social Affairs and health. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/69916/URN_ISBN_978-952-00-3378-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (1996). Family connections. An introduction to family studies. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moring, A. (2013). Oudot perheet: Normeja ja ihanteita 2000-luvun Suomessa [Strange families: Norms and ideals in the 21th century Finland]. University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Nikander, P. (2008). Working with transcripts and translated data. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5(3), 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880802314346
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Doing better for families. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2018). Education at glance 2018. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Onnismaa, E.-L. (2010). Lapsi, lapsuus ja perhe varhaiskasvatusasiakirjoissa 1967–1999 [Child, childhood and family in early education documents 1967–1999]. University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1955). The American family: Its relations to personality and to the social structure. In T. Parsons & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Family, socializations and interaction process (pp. 3–33). The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raento, P., & Husso, K. (2001). Cultural diversity in Finland. Fennia, 180(1-2), 151–164. https://fennia.journal.fi/article/view/3773/3564
   Google Scholar
• Rantalaiho, M. (2010). Rationalities of cash-for-childcare: The Nordic case. In J. Sipilä, K. Repo, & T. Rissanen (Eds.), Cash-for-childcare: The consequences for caring mothers (pp. 109–142). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ribbens McCarthy, J., Hooper, C.-A., & Gillies, V. (2013). Troubling normalities and normal family troubles: Diversities, experiences and tensions. In J. Ribbens McCarthy, C.-A. Hooper, & V. Gillies (Eds.), Family troubles? Exploring changes and challenges in the family lives of children and young people (pp. 1–21). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saukkonen, P., & Pyykkönen, M. (2008). Cultural policy and cultural diversity in Finland. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 14(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630701856518
   Google Scholar
• Seppälä, T., Nykänen, T., Koikkalainen, S., Mikkonen, E., & Rainio, M. (2020). In-between space/time: Affective exceptionality during the ‘refugee crisis’ in northern Finland. Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 10(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.2478/njmr-2019-0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sihvonen, E. (2020). From family policy to parenting support: Parenting-related anxiety in Finnish family support projects. University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, C. (2007). Personal life. New directions in sociological thinking. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (1993). The Standard North American family. SNAF as an ideological code. Journal of Family Issues, 14(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X93014001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. (2017). Number of families grows more slowly than earlier. Retrieved March 31, 2020, from https://www.stat.fi/til/perh/2016/perh_2016_2017-05-26_tie_001_en.html
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. (2020a). Family. Retrieved March 31, 2020, from https://www.stat.fi/meta/kas/perhe_en.html
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. (2020b). Persons with foreign background. Retrieved March 31, 2020, from https://www.stat.fi/tup/maahanmuutto/maahanmuuttajat-vaestossa/ulkomaalaistaustaiset_en.html
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. (2020c). Number of families with small children has fallen by almost one fifth in the 2010s. Retrieved February March 1, 2021, from https://www.stat.fi/til/perh/2019/perh_2019_2020-05-22_tie_001_en.html
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. (1984). Studies in the theory of ideology. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Umbach, C. (2004). On the notion of contrast in information structure and discourse structure. Journal of Semantics, 21(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/21.2.155
   Google Scholar
• Valiquette-Tessier, S.-E., Vandette, M.-P., & Gosselin, J. (2016). Is family structure a cue for stereotyping? A systematic review of stereotypes and parenthood. Journal of Family Studies, 22(2), 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2015.1049955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. (2011). Introduction: The study of discourse. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 1–7). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. (2018). Migrant family display: A strategy for achieving recognition and validation in the host country. Sociological Research Online, 23(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780417747286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, J., & Mason, W. (2018). Walking the walk: Changing familial forms, government policy and everyday social work practice in England. Social Policy and Society, 17(4), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746418000209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesilova, K. (2009). Ydinperheen politikka [Policy of the nuclear family]. Gaudeamus.
   Google Scholar