‘We also need to exist somehow’ – families negotiating everyday ethics during Covid-19 in Denmark

References

• Andersen, N. C. H. (2017). Under samme tag som svigermor. Analysenotat. Kommunernes Landsforening.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, P. B., Høeg, A. L. T. N., Christensen, H. R., Jacobsen, B. A., Kühle, L., & la Cour, P. (2021). Befolkningens reaktion på COVID-19 set i lyset af aviser og andre medier. Artikel 2. Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift, 72(72), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.7146/rt.vi72.126499
   Google Scholar
• Bille, M., & Thelle, M. (2020). Byen, smitten og den delelige krop. Jordens Folk, 56(2), 6–16.
   Google Scholar
• Carsten, J. (2000). Cultures of relatedness. New approaches to the study of kinship. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carsten, J. (2003). After kinship. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clemensen, N., Dannesboe, K. I., Jørgensen, N. J., Winther, I. W., & Kousholt, D. (2021). Skemaer for en nedlukket hverdag. Dansk Pædagogisk Tidsskrift, 2, 9–30.
   Google Scholar
• Damsholt, T. (2020). Times of Corona. Investigating the temporalities of everyday life during lockdown. Ethnologia Europaea, 50(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.16995/ee.3020
   Google Scholar
• Danmarks Radio. (2020). Medieudviklingen 2020. file:///C:/Users/au230616/Downloads/medieudviklingen_2020_v2_53f01f21.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Das, V. (2012). Ordinary ethics. In D. Fassier (Ed.), A companion to moral anthropology (pp. 133–149). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Das, V. (2015). What does ordinary ethics look like? In M. Lambek, V. Das, D. Fassin, & W. Keane (Eds.), Four lectures on ethics. Anthropological perspectives (pp. 53–125). HAU Books.
   Google Scholar
• DeVault, M. L. (1994). Feeding the family. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, S. T., Prieur, A., Rosenlund, L., & Skjøtt-Larsen, J. (Eds.). (2012). Det skjulte klassesamfund. Århus Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gillis, J. (1997). A world of their own making. Myth, ritual, and the quest for family values. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gullestad, M. (2002). Invisible fences: Egalitarianism, nationalism and racism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hank, K., & Buber, I. (2009). Grandparents caring for their grandchildren. Findings from the 2004 survey of health, ageing, and retirement in Europe. Journal of Family Issues, 30(1), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X08322627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannerz, U. (2003). Being there … and there … and there! Reflections on multi-site ethnography. Ethnography, 4(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/14661381030042003
   Google Scholar
• Herlofson, K., & Hagestad, G. O. (2012). Transformations in the role of grandparents across welfare states. Contemporary Grandparenting, 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781847429681.003.0002
   Google Scholar
• Hjálmsdóttir, A., & Bjarnadóttir, V. S. (2021). ‘I have turned into a foreman here at home’. Families and work-life balance in times of COVID-19 in a gender equality paradise. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(1), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2021). Looking at the ‘field’ through a Zoom lens. Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. Qualitative Research, 22(3), 387–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. (2013). The wherewithal of life. Ethics, migration, and the question of well-being. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, B. A., Kühle, L., & Christensen, H. R. (2021). Tillid under COVID-19. Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift, 72(72), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.7146/rt.vi72.126504
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, F., Bor, A., Lindholt, M. F., & Petersen, M. B. (2021). Public support for government responses against Covid-19. Assessing levels and predictors in eight Western democracies during 2020. West European Politics, 44(5-6), 1129–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1925821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laidlaw, J. (2002). For an anthropology of ethics and freedom (the Malinowski Memorial Lecture, 2001). Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 8(2), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambek, M. (2010). Ordinary ethics. Anthropology, language and action. Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambek, M. (2015). On the immanence of the ethical. A response to Michael Lempert, ‘no ordinary ethics’. Anthropological Theory, 15(2), 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499615576628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, C. (2016). Time for good parenthood. A study of intercountry adoption assessment. In A. Sparrman, A. Westerling, J. Lind, & K. I. Dannesboe (Eds.), Doing good parenthood. Ideals and practices of parental involvement (pp. 17–27). Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lindholt, M. F., Jørgensen, F., Bor, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2021). Public acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines. Cross-national evidence on levels and individual-level predictors using observational data. BMJ Open, 11(6), 1–12. Public acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines: cross-national evidence on levels and individual-level predictors using observational data | BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfgren, O. (1996). The great Christmas quarrel. On the moral economy of family rituals. In J. Frykman & O. Löfgren (Eds.), Forces of habit. Exploring everyday culture (pp. 103–118). Lund University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (1996). Food, the body and the self. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Marker, S. L. (2020). Ordet ‘samfundssind’ betyder ikke noget konkret – derfor kan det alligevel betyde så meget. Article on the webside Videnskab.dk, posted March 29th 2020. Retrieved January 24, 2022. Ordet ‘samfundssind’ betyder ikke noget konkret – derfor kan det alligevel betyde så meget (videnskab.dk).
   Google Scholar
• Mattingly, C., & Throop, J. (2018). The anthropology of ethics and morality. Annual Review of Anthropology, 47(1), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050129
   Google Scholar
• Mogensen, H. O., & Olwig, K. F. (2013). Familie og slægtskab. Antropologiske perspektiver. Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (1996). Family connections. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (2011). Rethinking family practices. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, A. C. E., & Skarpenes, O. (2021). Coping with COVID-19. Dugnad: A case of the moral premise of the Norwegian welfare state. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 42(3/4), 262–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, L. H., Roepstorff, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2022). Hvad kan vi lære om kriseadfærd fra corona-pandemien? HOPE report. Aaarhus Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Ochs, E., & Kremer-Sadlik, T. (2007). Introduction: Morality as family practice. Discourse and Society, 18(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padhan, R., & Prabheesh, K. P. (2021). The economics of COVID-19 pandemic. A survey. Economic Analysis and Policy, 70, 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. F., & la Cour, P. (2021). Livsmening, krise og optimisme under COVID-19-epidemiens første nedlukning. Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift, 72(72), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.7146/rt.vi72.126502
   Google Scholar
• Podjed, D. (2021). Renewal of ethnography in the time of the COVID-19 crisis. Sociologija I Prostor, 267–283. https://doi.org/10.5673/sip.59.0.10
   Google Scholar
• Regeringen. (2020). Covid-19 Press conference at the Danish Parliament, October 23rd 2020. Pressemøde om COVID-19 i Statsministeriet fredag 23. oktober kl. 18.30 - Regeringen.dk.
   Google Scholar
• Sáenz, R., & Sparks, C. (2020). The inequities of job loss and recovery amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Carsey Research, 120, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, S. (2020). Corona in Denmark. Germans in, Swedes out … Blogpost posted May 25th 2020. Retrieved January 24th 2022. Corona in Denmark: Germans in, Swedes out … | Max Planck Institut für ethnologische Forschung (mpg.de).
   Google Scholar
• Schneider-Kamp, A. (2022). COVID-19 hesitance in Denmark and Russia. A qualitative typology at the nexus of agency and health capital. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 2, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100116
   Google Scholar
• Schultz Jørgensen, P. (2020). Opdragelse til livsmod og bæredygtighed, København, Kristeligt Dagblad.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, C. (2007). Personal life. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, C., & Neale, B. (1999). Family fragments. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strong, T., Trnka, S., & Wynn, L. L. (2021). ‘L’ENFER, C’EST LES AUTRES’. Proximity as an ethical problem during COVID-19. Cultural Anthropology, 36(3), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca36.3.01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Danish Language Council. (2020). Samfundssind, nødundervisning og knækbrød – DSN Posted May 2020. Retrieved from January 24, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T. (2007). Barnløses billeder af rigtige familier. In L. Andersen & P. O. Christiansen (Eds.), En rigtig familie. Mellem Nye og gamle idealer (pp. 67–88). C.A. Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• TV2 Nyheder. (2022). Dagens vaccinationstal: Stort overblik opdateret hver dag klokken 14 - TV 2. Retrieved January 24, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Uddin, M. (2021). Addressing work-life balance challenges of working women during COVID-19 in Bangladesh. International Social Science Journal, 71(239-240), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/issj.12267
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vigh, H. (2008). Crisis and chronicity. Anthropological perspectives on continuous conflict and decline. Ethnos. Journal of Anthropology, 73, 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840801927509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, S., Alber, E., & van der Geest, S. (2008). Generations in Africa. Connections and conflicts. LIT Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Winther, I. W., Kousholt, D., Clemensen, N., Dannesboe, K. I., & Jordt Jørgensen, N. Det er som at vente på et tog, der bliver ved med at være forsinket”: Coronatid fra et ungeperspektiv. Nordiske Udkast - Tidsskrift for kritisk samfundsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Winther, I. W., Palludan, C., Gulløv, E., & Rehder, M. M. (2015). Siblings. Practical and sensitive relations. Aarhus University.
   Google Scholar
• Zigon, J., & Throop, C. J. (2014). Moral experience: Introduction. Ethos, 42(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/etho.12035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar