Material subjects and vital objects — prefiguring property and rights for an entangled world

References

• Alexander G and Peñalver E (2009) (eds) Property and Community Oxford University Press, New York
   Google Scholar
• Arnold C (2002) ‘The reconstitution of property: property as a web of interests’ 26 Harvard Environmental Law Review 281–364
   Google Scholar
• Aston R and Davies M (2013) ‘Property in the world: on collective hosting and the ‘ownership’ of communal goods’ 17 Law/Text/Culture 211–39
   Google Scholar
• Barad K (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina
   Google Scholar
• Beasley C and Bacchi C (2007) ‘Envisaging a new politics for an ethical future: beyond trust, care, and generosity — towards an ethic of ‘social flesh’’ 8 Feminist Theory 279–98
   Google Scholar
• Beasley C and Bacchi C (2012) ‘Making politics fleshly: the ethic of social flesh’ in A Bletsas and C Beasley (eds) Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic Interventions and Exchanges Adelaide University Press, Adelaide
   Google Scholar
• Bennett J (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina
   Google Scholar
• Bentham J (1931) Theory of Legislation Kegan Paul, London
   Google Scholar
• Bhandar B (2015) ‘Critical legal studies and the politics of property’ in S Bright and S Blandy (eds) Researching Property Law Palgrave Macmillan, London
   Google Scholar
• Blomley N (2010) ‘Cuts, flows, and the geographies of property’ 7 Law, Culture and the Humanities 203–16
   Google Scholar
• Blomley N (2013) ‘Performing property: making the world’ 26 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23–48
   Google Scholar
• Brown B (2001) ‘Thing theory’ 28 Critical Inquiry 1–22
   Google Scholar
• Bryan B (2000) ‘Property as ontology: on Aboriginal and English understandings of ownership’ 13 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 3–31
   Google Scholar
• Burdon P (2015) Earth Jurisprudence: Private Property and the Environment Routledge, Abingdon
   Google Scholar
• Calverley D (2006) ‘Android science and animal rights, does an analogy exist?’ 18 Connection Science 403–17
   Google Scholar
• Cohen M (1927) ‘Property and sovereignty’ 13 Cornell Law Quarterly 8–30
   Google Scholar
• Coole D and Frost S (2010) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina
   Google Scholar
• Cooper D (2014) Everyday Utopias: The Conceptual Life of Promising Spaces Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina
   Google Scholar
• Cooper D (2015) ‘Bringing the state up conceptually: forging a body politics through anti-gay Christian refusal’ 16 Feminist Theory 87–107
   Google Scholar
• Cornell D (2009) ‘uBuntu, pluralism and the responsibility of legal academics to the new South Africa’ 20 Law and Critique 43–58
   Google Scholar
• Craig C J, Turcotte J and Coombe R (2011) ‘What's feminist about open access? A relational approach to copyright in the academy’ 1(1) feminists@law
   Google Scholar
• Dangelo K (1989) ‘How much of you do you really own? A property right in identity’ 37 Cleveland State Law Review 499–524
   Google Scholar
• Davies M (1999) ‘Queer persons, queer property: self-ownership and beyond’ (1999) 8 Social and Legal Studies 327
   Google Scholar
• Davies M (2007) ‘Beyond unity’ in V Munro and C Stychin (eds) Sexuality and the Law: Feminist Engagements Routledge-Cavendish, Abingdon
   Google Scholar
• Davies M and Naffine N (2001) Are Persons Property? Legal Debates about Property and Personality Ashgate, Aldershot
   Google Scholar
• de Grazia M, Quilligan M and Stallybrass P (1996) ‘Introduction’ in M de Grazia, M Quilligan and P Stallybrass (eds) Subject and Object in Renaissance Culture Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
   Google Scholar
• Elliott T (1994) ‘Making strange what had appeared familiar’ 77 The Monist 424
   Google Scholar
• Francione G (2004) ‘Animals — property or persons?’ in C Sunstein and M Nussbaum (eds) Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions Oxford University Press, New York
   Google Scholar
• Freyfogle E (1989) ‘Context and accommodation in modern property law’ 41 Stanford Law Review 1529–56
   Google Scholar
• Freyfogle E (2006) ‘Goodbye to the public-private divide’ 36 Environmental Law Journal 7–24
   Google Scholar
• Frow J (2001) ‘A pebble, a camera, a man who turns into a telegraph pole’ 28 Critical Inquiry 270–85
   Google Scholar
• Graham M (2008) ‘Some thoughts about the philosophical underpinnings of Aboriginal worldviews’ 45 Australian Humanities Review 181–94
   Google Scholar
• Graham N (2011) Lawscape: Property, Environment, Law Routledge, Abingdon
   Google Scholar
• Grear A (2011) ‘The vulnerable living order: human rights and the environment in a critical and philosophical perspective’ 2 Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 23–44
   Google Scholar
• Haraway D (1988) ‘Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’ 14 Feminist Studies 575
   Google Scholar
• Haraway D (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature Routledge, New York
   Google Scholar
• Haraway D (2003) The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago
   Google Scholar
• Harding S (1986) The Science Question in Feminism Open University Press, Milton Keynes
   Google Scholar
• Harvey D (2011) ‘The future of the commons’ 109 Radical History Review 101–07
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger M (1962) Being and Time trans J Macquarie and E Robinson, Basil Blackwell, Oxford
   Google Scholar
• Hodder I (2012) Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things Wiley-Blackwell, Maiden
   Google Scholar
• Holder J and Flessas T (2008) ‘Emerging commons’ 17 Social and Legal Studies 299–310
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson A (2014) ‘The Whanganui River as a legal person’ 39(3) Alternative Law Journal 179–82
   Google Scholar
• Kant I (1988) ‘Foundations of the metaphysics of morals’ in L W Beck (ed) Kant: A Selection Macmillan, London
   Google Scholar
• Keenan S (2015) Subversive Property: Law and the Production of Spaces of Belonging Routledge, Abingdon
   Google Scholar
• Latour B (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory Oxford University Press, Oxford
   Google Scholar
• Law J and Hassard J (eds) (1999) Actor Network Theory and After Blackwell Publishers, Oxford
   Google Scholar
• Law J and Urry J (2004) ‘Enacting the social’ 33 Economy and Society 390–410
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd G (1984) The Man of Reason: ‘Male’ and ‘Female’ in Western Philosophy Methuen, London
   Google Scholar
• Malafouris L (2013) How Things Shape the Mind MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo W (2014) ‘From ‘human rights’ to ‘life rights’’ in C Douzinas and C Gearty (eds) The Meaning of Rights: The Philosophy and Social Theory of Human Rights Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
   Google Scholar
• Milun K (2011) The Political Uncommons: The Cross Cultural Logic of the Global Commons Ashgate, Farnham
   Google Scholar
• Morrow K (2011) ‘Ontological vulnerability: a viable alternative lens through which to view human/environmental relations’ 2 Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 1–4
   Google Scholar
• Naffine N (2009) Law's Meaning of Life: Philosophy, Religion, Darwin and the Legal Person Hart Publishing, Oxford
   Google Scholar
• Nedelsky J (1990) ‘Law, boundaries, and the bounded self’ 30 Representations 162–89
   Google Scholar
• Neimanis A (2014) ‘Alongside the right to water, a posthumanist feminist imaginary’ 5 Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 5–24
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom E (1999) ‘Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges’ 284 Science 278–82
   Google Scholar
• Page J (2010) ‘Common property and the age of Aquarius’ 19 Griffith Law Review 172–96
   Google Scholar
• Pateman C (1988) The Sexual Contract Polity, Cambridge
   Google Scholar
• Phillips A (2011) ‘If s my body and I'll do what I like with it: bodies as objects and property’ 39 Political Theory 724–48
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood V (1993) Feminism and the Mastery of Nature Routledge, London
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood V (2002) Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason Routledge, London
   Google Scholar
• Pottage A and Mundy M (2004) (eds) Anthropology and the Constitution of the Social: Making Persons and Things Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
   Google Scholar
• Radin M (1993) Reinterpreting Property Chicago University Press, Chicago
   Google Scholar
• Rassam A Y (1999) ‘Contemporary forms of slavery and the evolution of the prohibition of slavery and the slave trade under customary international law’ 39 Virginia Journal of International Law 303–52
   Google Scholar
• Schiermer B (2011) ‘Quasi-objects, cult objects, and fashion objects: on two types of fetishism on display in modern culture’ 28 Theory, Culture, and Society 81–102
   Google Scholar
• Serres M (2007) The Parasite trans L Schehr, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
   Google Scholar
• Singer J W (2000) Entitlement: The Paradoxes of Property Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut
   Google Scholar
• Tomas N (2011) ‘Maori concepts of rangatiratanga, kaitiakitanga, the environment, and property rights’ in D Grinlinton and P Taylor (eds) Property Rights and Sustainability: The Evolution of Property Rights to Meet Ecological Challenges Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden
   Google Scholar
• Weir J (2008) ‘Connectivity’ 45 Australian Humanities Review 153–64
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler M (2014) ‘Martin Heidegger’ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
   Google Scholar
• Williams P (1987) ‘Alchemical notes: reconstructing ideals from deconstructed rights 22 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 401–33
   Google Scholar