Involving civil society in preventing ill treatment in detention: maximising OPCAT’s opportunity for Australia

Australian cases

Australian legislation

• Certain Children by their Litigation Guardian Sister Marie Brigid Arthur v Minister for Families and Children 2016 VSC 796 (21 December 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities 2006 (Vic).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT).
   Google Scholar
• Inspector of Correctional Services Act 2017 (ACT).
   Google Scholar
• Inspector of Correctional Services Act 2017 (ACT) Explanatory Statement.
   Google Scholar
• Official Visitor Bill 2012 (no 2) (ACT) Explanatory Statement.
   Google Scholar

International legal materials

• African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Robben Island Guidelines for the Prohibition and Prevention of Torture, Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe, European Prison Rules, 11 January 2006, Rec(2006)2.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT), CPT Standards, 8 March 2011, CPT/Inf/E(2002)1–Rev.2011.
   Google Scholar
• European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 1 February 1989, ETS No 126.
   Google Scholar
• Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Principles and Best Practices on the Protection of Persons Deprived of Liberty in the Americas, 13 March 2008, Res 1/08.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). 2018b. Preventing torture: The role of national preventive mechanisms [Online]. www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/OPCAT/NPM/NPM_Guide.pdf (accessed October 7, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) (2000) CESCR general comment No 14: The right to the highest attainable standard of health (Art 12), 11 August 2000, E/C.12/2000/4.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (SPT), Visit to Hungary Undertaken from 21 to 30 March 2017: Observations and Recommendations Addressed to the National Preventive Mechanism, 8 December 2017, CAT/OP/HUN/R.2.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (SPT), Guidelines on National Preventive Mechanisms, 9 December 2010, CAT/OP/12/5.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, OPCAT Depository Notification – Australia. 21 December 2017. C.N.786.2017.TREATIES-IV.9.b. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CN/2017/CN.786.2017-Eng.pdf (accessed October 5, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules), 17 December 2015, UN Doc A/RES/70/175, annex.
   Google Scholar

Other references

• ACT Government. 2018. Improved health model of care at the Alexander Maconochie Centre [Online]. www.cmd.act.gov.au/open_government/inform/act_government_media_releases/rattenbury/2018/improved-health-model-of-care-at-the-alexander-maconochie-centre (accessed October 5, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Association for the Prevention of Torture (APT). 2008a. Civil society and national preventive mechanisms under the optional protocol to the convention against torture. Geneva: APT.
   Google Scholar
• Association for the Prevention of Torture (APT). 2008b. Role of civil society in preparation of SPT visits, APT briefing note 2. Geneva: APT.
   Google Scholar
• Association for the Prevention of Torture (APT). 2012. The global forum on the OPCAT – preventing torture, upholding dignity: From pledges to actions, outcome report. Geneva: APT.
   Google Scholar
• Association for the Prevention of Torture (APT). 2016. Putting prevention into practice – 10 years on: The optional protocol to the UN convention against torture. Geneva: APT.
   Google Scholar
• Association for the Prevention of Torture (APT). 2018. ‘Panama: Civil society meets to discuss best ways to support NPM establishment’ [Online]. https://apt.ch/en/news_on_prevention (accessed October 5, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Australia OPCAT Network (AON). 2017. Joint submission to the Australian Human Rights Commission Consultation: OPCAT and Civil Society 21 July.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2017. 4517.0 - Prisoners in Australia [Online]. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/4517.0 (accessed October 5, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Australian Capital Territory Human Rights Commission (ACTHRC). 2014. Human rights audit on the conditions of detention of women at the alexander maconochie centre: A report by the ACT human rights and discrimination commissioner. Canberra: ACTHRC.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2015. Address to launch Australia’s UNHRC candidacy 2018-20, Speech, 19 October [Online]. https://foreignminister.gov.au/speeches/Pages/2015/jb_sp_151019.aspx (accessed October 5, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2017. Candidature of Australia to the human rights council, 2018-2020, voluntary pledges and commitments pursuant to general assembly resolution 60/251, 24 July 2017, A/72/212.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC). 2016. Children’s Rights Report 2016, National Children’s Commissioner. Sydney : AHRC.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC). 2017. OPCAT in Australia – Interim Report to the Commonwealth Attorney-General AHRC, Sydney
   Google Scholar
• Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC). 2018a. ‘OPCAT consultation page [Online] https://www.humanrights.gov.au/opcat-consultation-page (accessed October 5, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC). 2018b. OPCAT in Australia - consultation paper: Stage 2. Sydney: AHRC.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Senate. 2018. Estimates. Legal and constitutional affairs legislation committee, May 23 2018 [Online]. http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/ (accessed October 5, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Austrian Ombudsman Board. 2018. Human rights advisory council [Online]. http://volksanwaltschaft.gv.at/en/preventive-human-rights-monitoring/human-rights-advisory-council (accessed October 5, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Birk, M., G. Zach, D. Long, R. Murray, and W. Suntinger. 2015. Enhancing impact of national preventive mechanisms: Strengthening the follow-up on NPM Recommendations in the EU: Strategic development, current practices and the way forward. Vienna: Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights. [Online]. https://www.univie.ac.at/bimtor/dateien/NPM_Study_final.pdf (accessed October 5, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G., P. Day, and R. Walker. 2002. The evaluation of public service inspection: A theoretical framework. Urban Studies 39(7): 1197–212. doi:10.1080/00420980220135563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandis, G. 2017. The Australian government OPCAT announcement Speech to DFAT NGO Forum on Human Rights at the National Museum, Canberra, 9 February
   Google Scholar
• Care Quality Commission (CQC). 2018. How we involve you. [Online] https://www.cqc.org.uk/get-involved/how-we-involve-you/how-we-involve-you (accessed September 5, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Caruana, S. 2018. Enhancing best practice inspection methodologies for oversight bodies with an Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture focus, Report to the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust of Australia – Showcasing learning from Greece, Switzerland, Norway, Denmark, UK, Malta and New Zealand’ Steven Cauruana.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, R., and L. Handley. 2016. Does torture prevention work? Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corrections Victoria. 2018. Standard guidelines for corrections in Australia. [Online] www.corrections.vic.gov.au/utility/publications+manuals+and+statistics/standard+guidelines+for+corrections+in+australia (accessed October 7, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Corrective Services Ministers’ Conference. 2012. Standard Guidelines for Corrections in Australia. (rev).
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, A. 2009. A human rights approach to prison management. 2nd ed. London: International Centre for Prison Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Parliamentary Ombudsman (DPO). 2009. The OPCAT tasks: General principles. Copenhagen: Office of Danish Parliamentary Ombudsman.
   Google Scholar
• Debeljak, J. 2015. The rights of prisoners under the Victorian Charter: A critical analysis of the jurisprudence on the treatment of prisoners and conditions of detention. University of New South Wales Law Journal 38(4): 1332–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disabled People’s Organisations Australia. 2018. Position Paper: Disability Inclusive National Preventive Mechanism (NPM), 11 May
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, B. 2015. Petition calls for Australia to ratify UN protocol against torture in detention. The Guardian, 24 December, [Online]. www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/dec/24/petition-calls-for-australia-to-ratify-un-protocol-against-torture-in-detention (accessed October 7, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Eggington, D., and A. Walters. 2017. Imagery or inertia? The ratification of the optional protocol to the convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in response to Don Dale. Indigenous Law Bulletin 8(29): 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Fitz-Gibbon, K. 2018. The treatment of Australian children in detention: A human rights law analysis of media coverage in the wake of abuses at the Don Dale detention centre. University of New South Wales Law Journal 5: 100–29.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, R., and N. Morgan. 2008. Implementing the Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture: Options for Australia. Report prepared for Australian Human Rights Commission, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP). 2017. Men’s prison expectations [Online] https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprisons/our-expectations/prison-expectations/ (accessed October 7, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Law Centre. 2014. Torture and cruel treatment in Australia: Joint NGO report to the United Nations Committee against torture [Online]. http://www.naclc.org.au/resources/CAT_NGO_Report_Australia_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Law Centre. 2015. Australia’s 2nd Universal periodic review: Joint NGO submission on behalf of the Australian NGO coalition [Online] www.hrlc.org.au/news/upr (accessed October 7, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC). 2017. Explainer: Children should not be held in adult prisons, 31 January [Online] www.hrlc.org.au/news/2017/1/31/explainer-children-should-not-be-held-in-adult-prisons (accessed October 7, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Lea, M., F. Beaupert, N. Bevan, D. Celermajer, P. Gooding, R. Minty, E. Phillips, et al. 2018. A disability aware approach to torture prevention? Australian OPCAT ratification and improved protections for people with disability. Australian Journal of Human Rights 24(1): 70–96. doi:10.1080/1323238X.2018.1441611
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, O. 2012. Detention and disability. Presentation to the Preventing torture in closed environments' conference at the Castan Centre for Human Rights Law, Faculty of Law, Monash University, February 20–21, in Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Lines, R. 2008. The right to health of prisoners in international human rights law. International Journal of Prisoner Health 4(1): 3–53. doi:10.1080/17449200701862145
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mckay, A. 2017. Article 10 (1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and Australian Prisons. Australian Journal of Human Rights 23, no. 3: 368–89.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, N. 2016. What’s the point of independent inspections and reviews of custodial services? Presentation at Australia OPCAT Network and ACT Human Rights Commission OPCAT Roundtable, 30 November, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, R. 2008. National preventive mechanisms under the optional protocol to the torture convention: One size does not fit all. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 26(4): 485–516. doi:10.1177/016934410802600402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, R. 2012. Challenges and good practices of NPMs operating in different organizational structures. Briefing Paper. Human Rights Implementation Centre, University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor, B. 2010. Monitoring and oversight of human rights in closed environments: Proceedings of a roundtable,ed. J. Debeljak, I. Dussuyer, and S. Thomas. Monash University Chambers, Melbourne, November 29.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Ombudsman. 2017. An equal voice. Ombudsman Quarterly Review 21: 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Parliamentary Ombudsman. 2018. The Parliamentary Ombudsman Annual report for 2017 as National Preventive Mechanism against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). 2016. Ninth annual report of the subcommittee on prevention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. CAT/C/57/4, Fifty-seventh session, 22 March 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). 2018a. The OPCAT special fund [Online]. www.ohchr.org/en/hrbodies/opcat/pages/specialfund.aspx (accessed October 7, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). 2018b. Preventing torture: The role of national preventive mechanisms: A practical guide. New York and Geneva: Professional Training Series 21.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). 2018c. What are human rights [Online]. www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Pages/WhatareHumanRights.aspx (accessed October 7, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Olivier, A., and M. Narvaez. 2009. OPCAT challenges and the way forward: The ratification and implementation of the optional protocol to the UN convention against torture. Essex Human Rights Review 6, no. 1: 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). 2011. Memorandum of understanding, signed by the Ombudsman of the Kyrgyz Republic, OSCE Centre in Bishkek and the NGO Kylym Shamy, Bishkek 7 June [Online]. www.osce.org/bishkek/78517 (accessed October 7, 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Ploton, V. 2015. The OPCAT special fund: A new resource for torture prevention? Journal of Human Rights Practice 7, no. 1: 153–165.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, V. 2010. The role of citizens and non-profit advocacy organisations in providing oversight. Pace Law Review 30, no. 5: 1529–1534.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2017. The United Nations convention against corruption. In Handbook on anti-corruption measures in Prison,Criminal Justice Handbook Series.
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Ombudsman. 2017. Implementing OPCAT in Victoria: report and inspection of the Dame Phyllis Frost Centre. Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• White, M. 2016. He Ara Tika – A pathway forward: The scope and role of the optional protocol to the convention against Torture (OPCAT) in relation to aged care and disability residences and facilities. New Zealand: New Zealand Human Rights Commission.
   Google Scholar