1,059
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Implementing OPCAT through prison monitoring: the relevance of rehabilitation

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

Domestic legislation

International legal material

  • Committee against Torture, General Comment 2 Implementation of article 2 by States parties 24 January 2008 CAT/C/GC/2.
  • Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 26 June 1987, 1465 UNTS 85
  • Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 3 May 2008, 2515 UNTS 3
  • Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights), 4 November 1950, ETS 5
  • Human Rights Committee, General Comment 21, Article 10 Humane Treatment of Persons Deprived of Their Liberty, 10 April 1992, UN Doc HRI/GEN/1/Rev.1 at 33
  • Inter-American Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture, 9 December 1985, OAS Treaty Series No 67. http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/treaties/a-51.html (accessed February 11, 2019)
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16 December 1966, 999 UNTS 171
  • Le Contrôleur général des lieux de privation de liberté (Controller-General for Places of Deprivation of Liberty). 2016. Annual Report [Online]. https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/OPCAT/NPM/AnnualReportFrance2016_EN.pdf. (accessed February 11, 2019)
  • National Preventive Mechanism (NPM). 2017. Human rights scoping; Expectations: criteria for assessing the treatment of prisoners and conditions in prisons [Online]. www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprisons/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2017/07/Human-rights-scoping-FINAL.pdf (accessed October 7, 2018)
  • National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) Members [Online]. www.nationalpreventivemechanism.org.uk/members/ (accessed August 20, 2018)
  • National Preventive Mechanism (NPM). 2018. Monitoring Places of Detention: Eighth Annual Report of the United Kingdom’s National Preventive Mechanism 1 April 2016-31 March 2017 HM Inspectorate of Prisons, London
  • National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) Norway. 2018. The Norwegian NPM’s submission to the UN Committee Against Torture’s 63rd session – Information regarding the Norwegian Government’s implementation of the Convention [Online]. https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CAT/Shared%20Documents/NOR/INT_CAT_INP_NOR_30711_E.pdf (accessed February 11, 2019)
  • Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, 22 June 2006, A/RES/57/199
  • The United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the ‘Nelson Mandela Rules’), 17 December 2015, GA res 70/175 annex
  • UN Committee Against Torture (CAT), First Annual Report of the Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading treatment or Punishment (February 2007-March 2008), 14 May 2008, UN Doc CAT/C/40/2
  • UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2018. Preventing Torture: Practical Guide Professional Training Series No. 21 The Role of National Preventive Mechanisms, UN Doc HR/P/PT/21
  • UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (SPT). 2008. First Annual Report of the Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading treatment or Punishment (February 2007-March 2008), 14 May 2008, UN Doc CAT/C/40/2
  • UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (SPT). 2010. Guidelines on national preventive mechanisms, 9 December 2010, UN Doc CAT/OP/12/5
  • UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. 2016a. Visit to Romania undertaken from 3 to 12 May 2016: observations and recommendations addressed to the State party Report of the Subcommittee, 8 March 2018, UN Doc CAT/OP/ROU/1
  • UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. 2016b. Report on the visit made by the Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment to Italy, 23 September 2016, UN Doc CAT/OP/ITA/1

Other References

  • Armytage, P., and J. Ogloff. 2017. Youth justice review and strategy: Meeting needs and reducing offending. Melbourne: Victorian Government.
  • Association for the Prevention of Torture (APT) (2006) Establishment & designation of NPMs [Online]. www.apt.ch/en/resources/guide-to-the-establishment-designation-of-npms/ (accessed August 20, 2018]
  • Association for the Prevention of Torture (APT). 2010. Optional Protocol to the UN convention against torture implementation manual [Online]. www.apt.ch/content/files_res/opcat-manual-english-revised2010.pdf (accessed August 20, 2018).
  • Association for the Prevention of Torture (APT). List of Designated NPM by regions & countries [Online]. https://apt.ch/en/list-of-designated-npm-by-regions-and-countries/ (accessed March 19, 2019).
  • Borzycki, M., and E. Baldry. 2003. Promoting integration: The provision of prisoner post-release services. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice no. 262.  Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
  • Commission for Children and Young People, 2017. The same four walls: Inquiry into the use of isolation, separation and lockdowns in the Victorian youth justice system. Melbourne: Commission for Children and Young People.
  • Cooke, D.J. 1991. Violence in prisons: The influence of regime factors. The Howard Journal 20, no. 2: 95–109. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2311.1991.tb00700.x.
  • Corrective Services Ministers’ Conference. (2012). Standard Guidelines for Corrections in Australia. Australia: Corrective Services Ministers’ Conference.
  • Dirkzwager, A.J.E., and C. Kruttschnitt. 2012. Prisoners’ perceptions of correctional officers’ behaviour in English and Dutch prisons. Journal of Criminal Justice 40: 404–12. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.06.004.
  • Edwards, A. 2008. The optional protocol to the convention against torture and the detention of refugees. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 57: 789–825.
  • Feely, M.M., and J. Simon. 1992. The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology 30: 449–71. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.x.
  • Fletcher, A. 2017. Information for OHCHR on ‘Human Rights in the administration of justice, including juvenile justice’. Melbourne: Monash University Castan Centre for Human Rights Law.
  • Garland, D. 1996. The limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society. British Journal of Criminology 36: 445–71. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a014105.
  • Garland, D. 2001. The culture of control:Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hardwick, N. 2013. HMP/YOI Feltham – Violent and unsafe [Online]. www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprisons/media/press-releases/2013/07/hmpyoi-feltham-violent-and-unsafe/ (accessed October 7, 2018)
  • Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP). 2017a. Our expectations [Online]. https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprisons/our-expectations/ (accessed February 11, 2019).
  • Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP). 2017b. Human rights scoping – Expectations: Criteria for assessing the treatment of prisoners and conditions in prisons [Online], 38–39. https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprisons/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2017/07/Human-rights-scoping-FINAL.pdf.
  • Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons Scotland (HMIPS). 2018 Standards of Inspection and Monitoring [Online]. https://www.prisonsinspectoratescotland.gov.uk/standards (accessed February 11, 2011)
  • Heseltine, K., S. Sarre, and A. Day. 2011. Prison-based correctional rehabilitation: An overview of intensive interventions for moderate to high-risk offenders. Australian Institute of Criminology: Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice 412: 1–6.
  • Huebner, B.M., ed. Oxford Bibliography of Criminology [Online]. www.oxfordbibliographies.com/obo/page/criminology (accessed, August 20, 2018])
  • Liebling, A. 2004. Prisons and their moral performance: A study of values, quality, and prison life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Liebling, A. 2011. Moral performance, inhuman and degrading treatment, and prison pain. Punishment and Society 13, no. 5: 530–50. doi:10.1177/1462474511422159.
  • Mackay, A. 2014. Operationalising human rights law in Australia: Establishing a human rights culture in the new Canberra prison and transforming the culture of Victoria Police 31 Law in Context Federation Press, Annandale, 261–94
  • Mann, R., F.F. Howard, and J. Tew. 2018. What is a rehabilitative prison culture? Prison Service Journal: Rehabilitative Culture 235: 3–9.
  • Martinson, R. 1974. What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest 35: 22–54.
  • Maruna, S. 2011. Judicial rehabilitation and the ‘clean bill of health’ in criminal justice. European Journal of Probation 3, no. 1: 97–117. doi:10.1177/206622031100300108.
  • Murray, R. 2008. National preventive mechanisms under the optional protocol to the torture convention: One size does not fit all. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 26, no. 4: 485–516. doi:10.1177/016934410802600402.
  • New Zealand Human Rights Commission. 2015. Monitoring places of detention: Annual report of activities under the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture (OPCAT). Auckland: Human Rights Commission.
  • Ogloff, J.R.P., and M.R. Davis. 2004. Advances in offender assessment and rehabilitation: Contributions of the risk-needs-responsivity approach. Psychology, Crime & Law 10, no. 3: 229–42.
  • Parliament of Victoria. 2018. Inquiry into youth justice centres in Victoria [Online] Available: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/lsic/inquiries/inquiry/447 [2018, October 7]
  • Penal Reform International (PRI) and Association for the Prevention of Torture (APT), 2015. Institutional culture in detention: A framework for preventive monitoring. 2nd ed. London and Geneva: PRI & APT
  • Ross, M.W., P. Diamond, A. Liebling, and W. Saylor. 2007. Measurement of prison social climate: A comparison of an inmate measure in England and the US. Punishment and Society 10, no. 4: 447–74. doi:10.1177/1462474508095320.
  • Sveaass, N., and V. Madrigal-Borloz. 2017. The preventive approach: OPCAT and the prevention of violence and abuse of persons with mental disabilities by monitoring places of detention. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 53: 15–26. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.06.001.
  • The good lives model of offender rehabilitation: A strengths-based approach for lives in transition [Online]. www.goodlivesmodel.com/ (accessed August 20, 2018)
  • Thomas, C.W. 1997. Comparing the cost and performance of public and private prisons in Arizona. Report for the Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona
  • Ward, T., and S. Maruna. 2007. Rehabilitation: Beyond the risk paradigm. London: Routledge.
  • White, M., and M. Gooda. 2017. Royal commission into the protection and detention of children in the Northern Territory. Final Report. Canberra: AGPS

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.