Underlying Uncertainty in the Simulation of Soil Moisture and Runoff from Climate Models

References

• Washington WM, Parkinson CL. An introduction to three-dimensional climate modelling. University Science Books, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson-Sellers A, McGuffie K. A climate modelling primer. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Mintz Y. The sensitivity of numerically simulated climates to land-surface boundary conditions, The Global Climate, Houghton, J.T., (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 1984: 79–105.
   Google Scholar
• Beljaars ACM, Viterbo P, Miller MJ, Betts AK. The anomalous rainfall over the United States during July 1993: Sensitivity to land surface parametrization and soil moisture anomalies. Month Weath Rev 1996; 124: 362–383.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley JF, Polcher, J, Cox, PM, Gedney N, Planton S. Uncertainties linked to land surface processes in climate change simulations. Climate Dynamics 2000; 16: 949–961.
   Google Scholar
• Milly PCD. Sensitivity of greenhouse summer dryness to changes in plant rooting characteristics. Geophys Res Lett, 1997; 24: 269–271.
   Google Scholar
• Ducharne A, Laval K, Polcher J. Sensitivity of the hydrological cycle to the parameterization of soil hydrology in a GCM. Climate Dynamics, 1998; 14: 307–327.
   Google Scholar
• Gedney N, Cox PM, Douville H, Polcher J, Valdes PJ. Characterising GCM land surface schemes to understand their responses to climate change. J. Climate, 2000; 13: 3066–3079.
   Google Scholar
• Avissar R, Verstraete MM. The representation of continental surface processes in atmospheric models. Rev. Geophys. 1990; 28: 51–73.
   Google Scholar
• Viterbo P. The representation of surface processes in general circulation models, ECMWF report series, (thesis, Dr. em Física, University of Lisbon). 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen RD. The global energy cycle, in Global Energy and Water Cycles, (Browning KA and Gurney RJ, eds), Cambridge University Press, 1999: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Oki T. The global water cycle, in Global Energy and Water Cycles, (Browning KA and Gurney RJ, eds), Cambridge University Press, 1999: 10–29.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson-Sellers A, Pitman AJ, Love PK, Irannejad P, Chen T. The project for intercomparison of land surface parameterisaton schemes (PILPS) Phases 2 and 3. Bull Amer Meteorol Soc 1995; 76: 489–503.
   Google Scholar
• Dirmeyer PA, Dolman AJ, Sato N. The pilot phase of the global soil wetness project. Bull. Amer Meteorol Soc 1999; 80: 851–878.
   Google Scholar
• Leese J, Jackson T, Pitman AJ. GEWEX/BAHC International workshop on soil moisture monitoring, analysis and prediction for hydrometeorological and hydroclimatological applications. Bull Amer Meteorol Soc, 2001; 82: 1423–1430.
   Google Scholar
• Chahine MT. Integrated land-atmosphere-ocean hydrology, in Global Energy and Water Cycles, (Browning KA and Gurney RJ, eds), Cambridge University Press, 1999: 282–285.
   Google Scholar
• Manabe S. Climate and the ocean circulation: 1, The atmospheric circulation and the hydrology of the earths’ surface. Mon Wea Rev 1969; 97: 739–805.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers PJ. Biophysical models of land surface processes, In Climate System Modelling, Trenberth KE (Ed), Cambridge University Press. 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff JW. Efficient prediction of ground surface temperature and moisture with inclusion of a layer of vegetation. J Geophys Res 1978; 83: 1889–1903.
   Google Scholar
• Richards LA. Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. Physics, 1931; 1: 318–333.
   Google Scholar
• Robock A, Vinnikov K Ya, Schlosser CA, Speranskaya NA, Xue Y. Use of midlatitude soil moisture and meteorological observations to validate soil moisture simulations with biosphere and bucket models. J Climate 1995; 8: 15–35.
   Google Scholar
• Shao Y, Henderson-Sellers A. Validation of soil moisture in landsurface parameterisation schemes with HAPEX data. Global and Planetary Change 1996; 13: 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Desborough CE. Surface energy balance complexity in GCM land surface models. Climate Dynamics 1999; 15: 389–403.
   Google Scholar
• Deardorff JW. A parameterization of ground-surface moisture content for use in atmosphere prediction models. J Appl Meteor 1977; 16: 1182–1185.
   Google Scholar
• Noilhan J, Planton S. A simple parameterization of land surface processes for meteorological models. Mon Wea Rev 1989; 117: 536–549.
   Google Scholar
• Noilhan J, Mahfouf J-F. The ISBA land surface parameterisation scheme. Global and Planetary Change 1996;13;145–159.
   Google Scholar
• Boone A, Wetzel PJ. Issues related to low resolution modeling of soil moisture: experience with the PLACE model. Global and Planetary Change, 1996; 13: 161–181.
   Google Scholar
• Pitman AJ, Henderson-Sellers A, Yang Z-L et al. Key results and implications from phase 1(c) of the project for intercomparison of land-surface parameterization schemes. Climate Dynamics 1999; 15: 673–684.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser CA, Slater AG, Robock A et al. Simulations of a boreal grassland hydrology at Valdai, Russia: PILPS Phase 2(d). Monthly Weather Review 2000; 128: 301–321.
   Google Scholar
• Viterbo P, Illari L. The impact of changes in the runoff formulation of a general circulation model on the surface and near surface parameters. J Hydrology 1994; 155: 325–336.
   Google Scholar
• Chen TH, Henderson-Sellers A, Milly PCD et al. Cabauw experimental results from the PILPS. J Climate 1997; 10: 1194–1215.
   Google Scholar
• Liang X, Wood EF, Lettenmaier DP et al. PILPS Phase 2(c) Red-Arkansas River basin experiment: 2. Spatial and temporal analysis of energy fluxes. Global Planetary Change 1998; 19: 137–159.
   Google Scholar
• Clapp RB, Hornberger GM. Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic properties. Water Resources Research 1978; 14: 601–604.
   Google Scholar
• Cosby BJ, Hornberger GM, Clapp RB, Ginn TR. A statistical exploration of the relationships of soil moisture characteristics to the physical properties of soils. Water Resources Res 1984; 20: 682–690.
   Google Scholar
• Viterbo P, Beljaars CM. An improved land surface parameterization scheme in the ECMWF model and its validation. J Climate 1995; 8: 2716–2748.
   Google Scholar
• Rowntree PR, Lean, J. Validation of hydrological schemes for climate models against catchment data. J Hydrology 1994; 155: 301–323.
   Google Scholar
• Pitman AJ, Chiew FHS. Testing a GCM land surface scheme against catchment scale runoff data. Climate Dynamics 1996; 12: 685–699.
   Google Scholar
• Chiew FHS, Pitman AJ, McMahon TA. Conceptual catchment scale rainfall-runoff models and land-surface parameterisation schemes. J Hydrol 1996; 179: 137–157.
   Google Scholar
• Wetzel P J, Liang X, Irannejad P et al. Modeling the vadose zone liquid water fluxes: Infiltration, runoff, drainage, interflow. Global and Planetary Change 1996; 13: 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Miller JR, Russell GL, Caliri G. Continental-scale river flow in climate models, J Climate 1994; 7: 914–928.
   Google Scholar
• Sausen R, Schubert S, Dümenil L. A model of the river-runoff for use in coupled atmosphere-ocean models. J Hydrology 1994; 155: 337–352.
   Google Scholar
• Hagemann S, Dümenil L. A parameterization of the lateral water flow for the global scale. Climate Dynamics 1998; 14: 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dümenil L, Hagemann S, Arpe K.Validation of the hydrological cycle in the Arctic using river discharge data. Proc. Workshop on Polar Processes in Global Climate (13–15 November 1996, Cancun, Mexico), AMS, Boston, USA, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Arpe K, Behr H, Dümenil L. Validation of the ECHAM4 climate model and re-analyses data in the Arctic region. Proc. Workshop on the Implementation of the Arctic Precipitation data Archive (APDA) at the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC), Offenbach, Germany, World Climate Research Programme WCRP-98, WMO/TD No.804, 1997: 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Pitman AJ, Slater AG, Desborough CE, Zhao M. Uncertainty in the simulation of runoff due to the parameterization of frozen soil moisture using the GSWP methodology. J Geophysical Research 1999; 104: 16879–16888.
   Google Scholar
• Kattsov VM, Walsh JE, Rinke A, Dethloff K. Atmospheric climate models: simulation of the Arctic Ocean fresh water budget components. In The Freshwater Budget of the Arctic Ocean (EL Lewis, ed.) Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Dümenil L, Todini E. A rainfall-runoff scheme for use in the Hamburg climate model, in JP O’Kane (Ed.), Advances in Theoretical Hydrology, A tribute to James Dooge, European Geophysical Society Series or Hydrological Sciences, 1., Elsevier. 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Stamm JF, Wood EF, Lettenmaier DP. Sensitivity of a GCM simulation of global climate to the representation of land-surface hydrology. J Climate 1994; 7: 1218–1239.
   Google Scholar
• Wood EF, Lettenmaier DP, Zartarian VG. A land-surface hydrology parameterization with subgrid variability for general circulation models. J Geophys Res 1992; 97: 2717–2728.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson KA. Global distributions of total and total-available soil water-holding capacities, M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Geography, Univ. Delaware, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Todini E, Dümenil L. Estimating large-scale runoff, in Global Energy and Water Cycles, (Browning KA and Gurney RJ eds), Cambridge University Press, 1999: 265–281.
   Google Scholar
• Koster RD, Suarez MJ. Modelling the land surface boundary in climate models as a composite of independent vegetation stands. J Geophys Res 1992; 97: 2697–2715
   Google Scholar
• Todini E. The ARNO rainfall-runoff model. J Hydrology 1996; 175: 339–382.
   Google Scholar
• Vorösmarty CJ, Moore III B, Grace AL et al. Continental scale models of water balance and fluvial transport: an application to South America, Global Biogeochemical Cycles 1998; 3: 241–256.
   Google Scholar
• Beven KJ, Kirkby M.J. A physically-based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Sci J 1979; 24: 43–69.
   Google Scholar
• Liston GE, Sud YC, Wood EF. Evaluating GCM land surface hydrology parameterizations by computing river discharges using a runoff routing model: applicati0on to the Mississippi basin. J Appl Meteorol 1994; 33: 394405.
   Google Scholar
• Seth A, Giorgi F, Dickinson RE. Simulating fluxes from heterogeneous land surfaces: Explicit subgrid method employing the biosphere-atmopshere transfer scheme (BATS). J Geophys Res 1994; 99(18): 651–667.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson RE, Henderson-Sellers A, Kennedy PJ. Biosphere-atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS), Version 1e as Coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model. NCAR Technical Note TN-387 + STR, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Entekhabi D, Eagleson PS. Land surface hydrology parameterization for atmospheric general circulation models including subgrid scale spatial variability. J Climate 1989; 2: 816–831.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson RE, Meleshko V, Randall D, Sarachik E, Silva-Dias P, Slingo A. Climate processes, Chapter 4 of Climate Change 1995 The Science of Climate Change, Contribution of Working Group 1 to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenberg A and Maskell K (Eds), Cambridge University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Liang X, Wood EF, Lettenmaier DP. Surface soil moisture parameterization of the VIC-2L model: Evaluation and modifications. Global and Planetary Change 1996; 13: 195–206.
   Google Scholar
• Becker A. Criteria for a hydrologically sound structuring of large scale land surface process models. Advances in theoretical hydrology, JP O’Kanne Ed., Elsevier, 1992: 97–111.
   Google Scholar
• Liang X, Lettenmaier DP, Wood EF, Burges SJ. A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. J Geophys Res 1994; 99: 415–428.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Yapo PO. Towards improved calibration of hydrologic models: multiple and non-commensurable measures of information. Water Resources Res 1998; 34: 751–763.
   Google Scholar
• Sorooshian S, Dracup JA. Stochastic parameter estimation procedures for hydrologic rainfallrunoff models: Correlated and heteroscedastic error cases: Water Resources Res 1980; 16: 430–442.
   Google Scholar
• Sorooshian S, Gupta VK. Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: The question of parameter observability and uniqueness. Water Resources Res 1983; 19: 260–268.
   Google Scholar
• Sorooshian S, Duan Q, Gupta VK. Calibration of rainfall-runoff models : Application of global optimization to the Sacremento soil moisture accounting model. Water Resources Res 1993; 29: 1185–1194.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta VK, Sorooshian S. The calibration of conceptual catchment models using derivative-based optimization algorithms. Water Resources Res. 1983; 19: 269–276.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickson JD, Sorooshian S, Brazil L. Comparison of Newton-type and direct search algorithms for calibration of conceptual rainfallrunoff models. Water Resources Res. 1998; 24: 691–700.
   Google Scholar
• Franks SW, Bevan KJ, Quinn PF, Wright IR. On the sensitivity of soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer (SVAT) schemes: equifinality and the problem of robust calibration. Agricultural and Forest Meteorol 1997; 86: 63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Koster RD, Milly PCM. The interplay between transpiration and runoff formulations in land surface schemes used with atmospheric models. J Climate 1997; 10: 1578–1591
   Google Scholar