Sensitivity Analysis of Yield Estimate of Urban Water Supply Systems

References

• Arnold, J. G., Allen, P. M. & Bernhardt, G. A. 1999, “Comprehensive surface ground water flow model”, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 142, pp. 47–69.
   Google Scholar
• Braddock, R. D. & Schreider, S. Y. 2006, “Application of the Morris Algorithm for Sensitivity Analysis of the REALM Model for the Goulburn Irrigation System”, Environmental Modeling and Assessment, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 297–313.
   Google Scholar
• Burges, S. J. & Lettenmaier, D. P. 1975, “Probabilistic Methods in Stream Quality Management”, Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 115–130.
   Google Scholar
• Campolongo, F. & Braddock, R. D. 1999, “The use of Graph Theory in the Sensitivity Analysis of the Model Output: A Second Order Screening Method”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Campolongo F. & Saltelli, A. 1997, “Sensitivity Analysis of an Environmental Model: An Application of Different Analysis Methods”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 49–69.
   Google Scholar
• Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J. & Saltelli, A. 2007, “An Effective Screening Design for Sensitivity Analysis of Large Models”, Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol. 22, No. 10, pp. 1509–1518.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, D. C. and Avissar, R. 1994, “An evaluation with the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST) of which land-surface parameters are of greatest importance in atmospheric modelling”, Journal of Climate, Vol. 7, pp. 681–703.
   Google Scholar
• Cropp, R. A. & Braddock, R. D. 2002, “The New Morris Method: An Efficient Second-Order Screening Method”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Cukier, R. I., Fortuin, C. M., Shuler, K. E., Petschek, A. G. & Schaibly, J. H. 1973, “Study of the Sensitivity of Coupled Reaction Systems to Uncertainties in Rate Coefficients. Part I: Theory”, Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 59, No. 8, pp. 3873–3878.
   Google Scholar
• Deflandre, A., Williams, R. J., Elorza, F. J., Mira, J. & Boorman, D. B. 2006, “Analysis of the QUESTOR water quality model using a Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST) for two UK rivers”, Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 360, pp. 290–304.
   Google Scholar
• Francos, A., Elorza, F. J., Bouraoui, F., Bidoglio, G. & Galbiati, L. 2003, “Sensitivity Analysis of Distributed Environmental Simulation Models: Understanding the Model Behaviour in Hydrological Studies at the Catchment Scale”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 79, No. 2, pp. 205–218.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C. M., Cropp, R. A., Braddock, R. D., Zerger, A. & Argent, R. M. 2005, “On the Sensitivity Analysis of Two Hydrologic Models”, MODSIM 2005 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, pp. 2491–2497.
   Google Scholar
• Kioutsioukis, I., Tarantola, S., Saltelli, A. & Gatelli, D. 2004, “Uncertainty and Global Sensitivity Analysis of Road Transport Emission Estimates”, Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 38, pp. 6609–6620.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y. & Mohanty, S. 2001, “Sensitivity Analysis of a Complex, Proposed Geologic Waste Disposal System Using the Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test Method”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 275–291.
   Google Scholar
• King, D. M., 2009, “On the Importance of Input Variables and Climate Variability to the Yield of Urban Water Supply Systems”, PhD Thesis, Victoria university, Melbourne, Australia, 282 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M. D. 1991, “Factorial Sampling Plans for Preliminary Computational Experiments”, Technometrics, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 161–174.
   Google Scholar
• Perera, B. J. C. & James B. 2003, “A Generalised Water Supply Simulation Computer Software Package”, Hydrology Journal, Institute of Engineers (India), Vol. 26, No. 1-2, pp. 67–83.
   Google Scholar
• Perera, B. J. C., James, B. & Kularathna, M. D. U. 2005, “Computer software tool REALM for Sustainable Water Allocation and Management”, Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 77, No. 4, pp. 291–300.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S. & Chan, K. P.-S. 1999, “A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output”, Technometrics, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F. & Ratto, M. 2004, Sensitivity Analysis in Practice, Wiley, New York, NY, 219 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D. Saisana, M., & Tarantola, S. 2008, Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley, Chichester, 292 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Tung, Y.-K. & Yen, B.-C. 2005, Hydrosystems Engineering Uncertainty Analysis, ASCE Press and McGraw-Hill, 285 pp.
   Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 1999, Protocol for developing nutrient TMDLs, 1st edition, Office of Water, Rep. EPA 841-B-99-007, Washington, DC, 137 pp.
   Google Scholar
• van Griensven, A., Meixner, T., Grunwald, S., Bishop, T., Diluzio, M. & Srinivasan, R. 2006, “A Global Sensitivity Analysis Tool for the Parameters of MultiVariable Catchment Models”, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 324, No.1, pp. 10–23.
   Google Scholar
• Victoria University & Department of Sustainability and Environment (VU & DSE), 2008, REALM: Getting Started Manual, www.dse.vic.gov.au/vro/water, 40 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, C. & Gertner, G. Z. 2007, “A general First-Order Global Sensitivity Analysis Method”, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 93, No. 7, pp. 1060–1071.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. X. & Yu, S. L. 2004, “Applying the First-Order Error Analysis in Determining the Margin of Safety for Total Maximum Daily Load Computations”, Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 6, pp. 664–673.
   Google Scholar