Comparison of Newton-type and SCE optimisation algorithms for the calibration of conceptual hydrological models

References

• Boyle, D. P., H. V. Gupta, and S. Sorooshian. 2000. “Toward Improved Calibration of Hydrologic Models: Combining the Strengths of Manual and Automatic Methods.” Water Resources Research 36 (12): 3663–3674. doi:10.1029/2000wr900207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiew, F. H. S., and L. Siriwardena. 2005. “Estimation of SIMHYD Parameter Palues for Application in Ungauged Catchments.” In MODSIM 2005 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, edited by A. Zerger and R. M. Argent, 2883–2889. MSS-ANZ, Dec 2005, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M. P., A. G. Slater, D. E. Rupp, R. A. Woods, J. A. Vrugt, H. V. Gupta, T. Wagener, and L. E. Hay. 2008. “Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): A Modular Framework to Diagnose Differences between Hydrological Models.” Water Resources Reseacrh 44 (12): W00B02. doi:10.1029/2007wr006735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, Q. Y., S. Sorooshian, and V. Gupta. 1992. “Effective and Efficient Global Optimization for Conceptual Rainfall-runoff Models.” Water Resources Research 28 (4): 1015–1031. doi:10.1029/91wr02985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, T. Y., and G. F. Biftu. 1996. “Automatic Calibration of Conceptual Rainfall-runoff Models: Optimization Algorithms, Catchment Conditions, and Model Structure.” Water Resources Research 32 (12): 3513–3524. doi:10.1029/95wr02195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, H. V., S. Sorooshian, T. S. Hogue, and D. P. Boyle. 2003. “Advances in automatic calibration of watershed models.” In Calibration of Watershed Models, edited by Q. Duan et al., 9–28. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, J. D., S. Sorooshian, and L. E. Brazil. 1988. “Comparison of Newton-type and Direct Search Algorithms for Calibration of Conceptual Rainfall-runoff Models.” Water Resources Research 24 (5): 691–700. doi:10.1029/WR024i005p00691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M. C., D. Kavetski, M. Clark, M. Ye, M. Arabi, D. Lu, L. Foglia, and S. Mehl. 2015. “Practical Use of Computationally Frugal Model Analysis Methods.” Groundwater 54 (2): 159–170. doi:10.1111/gwat.12330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J. H. 1975. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. R., and D. H. Pilgrim. 1976. “Parameter Optimization for Watershed Models.” Water Resources Research 12 (3): 477–486. doi:10.1029/WR012i003p00477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavetski, D., G. Kuczera, and S. W. Franks. 2006. “Calibration of Conceptual Hydrological Models Revisited: 2 Improving Optimisation and Analysis.” Journal of Hydrology 320 (1–2): 187–201. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavetski, D., and G. Kuczera. 2007. “Model Smoothing Strategies to Remove Microscale Discontinuities and Spurious Secondary Optima in Objective Functions in Hydrological Calibration.” Water Resources Research 43 (3): W03411. doi:10.1029/2006wr005195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavetski, D., and M. P. Clark. 2010. “Ancient Numerical Daemons of Conceptual Hydrological Modeling: 2 Impact of Time Stepping Schemes on Model Analysis and Prediction.” Water Resources Research 46 (10): W10511. doi:10.1029/2009wr008896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavetski, D., G. Kuczera, M. Thyer, and B. Renard. 2007. “Multistart Newton-type Optimisation Methods for the Calibration of Conceptual Hydrological Models.” In MODSIM 2007 Intl Congress on Modelling and Simulation, edited by L. Oxley and D. Kulasiri, 2513–2519. MSSANZ, Dec 2007, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Kitanidis, P. K., and R. W. Lane. 1985. “Maximum Likelihood Parameter Estimation of Hydrologic Spatial Processes by the Gauss–Newton Method.” Journal of Hydrology 79 (1–2): 53–71. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(85)90181-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuczera, G. 1997. “Efficient Subspace Probabilistic Parameter Optimization for Catchment Models.” Water Resource Research 33 (1): 177–185. doi:10.1029/96wr02671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metropolis, N., A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller. 1953. “Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines.” The Journal of Chemical Physics 21 (6): 1087–1092. doi:10.1063/1.1699114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelder, J. A., and R. Mead. 1965. “A Simplex-method for Function Minimization.” Computer Journal 7 (4): 308–313. doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nocedal, J., and S. J. Wright. 2006. Numerical Optimization: New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schnabel, R. B., and E. Eskow. 1999. “A Revised Modified Cholesky Factorization Algorithm.” SIAM J. on Optimization 9 (4): 1135–1148. doi:10.1137/s105262349833266x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thyer, M., G. Kuczera, and B. C. Bates. 1999. “Probabilistic Optimization for Conceptual Rainfall-runoff Models: A Comparison of the Shuffled Complex Evolution and Simulated Annealing Algorithms.” Water Resource Research 35 (3): 767–773. doi:10.1029/1998wr900058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolson, B. A., and C. A. Shoemaker. 2007. “Dynamically Dimensioned Search Algorithm for Computationally Efficient Watershed Model Calibration.” Water Resource Research 43 (1): W01413. doi:10.1029/2005wr004723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q. J. 1991. “The Genetic Algorithm and Its Application to Calibrating Conceptual Rainfall-runoff Models.” Water Resource Research 27 (9): 2467–2471. doi:10.1029/91wr01305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar