The ethical protection of genetic information: procedure analysis for psychologists

References

• Arribas-Ayllon, M. (2015). Genetic testing and human subjectivity. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(6), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspinwall, L. G., Stump, T. K., Taber, J. M., Kohlmann, W., Leaf, S. L., & Leachman, S. A. (2015). Impact of melanoma genetic test reporting on perceived control over melanoma prevention. Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 38(5), 754–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-015-9631-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC). (2003). Essentially yours: The protection of human genetic information in Australia (ALRC Report 96). Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC). (2003) . Guidelines for the development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Australian Government Publishing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Psychological Society (APS). (2007). Code of ethics. The Australian Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, T. (2016). The principle of beneficence in applied ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/principle-beneficence
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D., & Bennett, B. (2001). Genetic secrets and the family. Medical Law Review, 9(1), 130–161. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/9.2.130
   Google Scholar
• Bonow, J. T., & Follette, W. C. (2009). Beyond values clarification: Addressing client values in clinical behaviour analysis. Behavioural Analysis, 32(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botkin, J. R., Belmont, J. W., Berg, J. S., Berkman, B. E., Bombard, Y., Holm, I. A., Levy, H. P., Ormond, K. E., Saal, H. M., Spinner, N. B., Wilfond, B. S., & McInerney, J. D. (2015). Points to consider: Ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. American Journal of Human Genetics, 97(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.05.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, C., & Gamble, N. (2014). Ethical practice in applied psychology. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, R. B., Castéra, J., Gericke, N., Evangelista, N. A. M., & El-Hani, C. N. (2017). Young adults’ belief in genetic determinism, and knowledge and attitudes towards modern genetics and genomics: The PUGGS questionnaire. PloS One, 12(1), e0169808. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chico, V. (2016). Non-disclosure of genetic risks: The case for developing legal wrongs. Medical Law International, 16(1–2), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533216653440
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. E., Wright, A. J., & Marteau, T. M. (2011). Impact of communicating personalized genetic risk information on perceived control over the risk: A systematic review. Genetics in Medicine, 13(4), 273–277. https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f710ca
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, J., O’Cathain, A., & Brazierb, J. (2014). Measuring quality of life in mental health: Are we asking the right questions? Social Science and Medicine, 120, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner, J. M., & Ferguson-Smith, M. A. (1997). Essential medical genetics (5th ed.). Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, S., Robertson, N., & Dale, M. (2015). The psychological impact of predictive genetic testing for Huntington′s disease: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9755-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our post-human future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. Profile Books.
   Google Scholar
• Guraya, S. Y., London, N. J. M., & Guraya, S. S. (2014). Ethics in medical research. Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure, 2(3), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmau.2014.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M. A., & Rich, S. S. (2000). Laws restricting health insurers’ use of genetic information: Impact on genetic discrimination. American Journal of Human Genetics, 66(1), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1086/302714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Records and Information Privacy Act 2002 (NSW)
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, J., & Spriggs, M. (2005). A practical account of autonomy: Why genetic counseling is especially well suited to the facilitation of informed autonomous decision making. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 14(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-005-4067-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffman, S., & Podgurski, A., (2012). Balancing privacy, autonomy, and scientific needs in electronic health records research (Faculty Publications. Paper 5). School of Law, Case Western Reserve University. http://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/5
   Google Scholar
• Investment and Financial Services Association Ltd (IFSA). (2002) . Life insurance and genetic testing in Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Juengst, E., Mcgowan, M. L., Fishman, J. R., & Settersten, R. A. (2016). The ethical and social implications of rhetorical reform in genomic medicine. Hastings Cent Report, 46(5), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koocher, G. P., & Keith-Speigel, P. (1998). Ethics in psychotherapy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koocher, G. P., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2016). Ethics in psychology and the mental health professions: Standards and cases (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lautenbach, D. M., Christensen, K. D., Sparks, J. A., & Green, R. C. (2013). Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 14(1), 491–513. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-092010-110722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewe, L., & Hill, W. G. (2010). The population genetics of mutations: Good, bad and indifferent. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 365(1544), 1153–1167. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, L., Bramanti, S. M., Babore, A., Stuppia, L., Trumello, C., Antonucci, I., & Cavallo, A. (2019). Psychological aspects, risk and protective factors related to BRCA genetic testing: A review of the literature. Supportive Care in Cancer, 27(10), 3647–3656. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04918-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macoveanu, J., Miskowiak, K., Kessing, L. V., Vinberg, M., & Siebner, H. R. (2016). Healthy co-twins of patients with affective disorders show reduced risk-related activation of the insula during a monetary gambling task. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 41(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.140220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, A. L., & Beskow, L. M. (2010). Informed consent in genomics and genetic research. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 11(1), 361–381. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141711
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McPherson, E. (2006). Genetic diagnosis and testing in clinical practice. Clinical Medicine Research, 4(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.4.2.123
   Google Scholar
• Mistry, S., Harrison, J. R., Smith, D. J., Escott-Price, V., & Zammit, S. (2018). The use of polygenic risk scores to identify phenotypes associated with genetic risk of bipolar disorder and depression: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 234, 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, K. I., Hall, W. D., & Carter, L. (2004). Genetic screening for susceptibility to depression: Can we and should we? Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38(1–2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/000486740403800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). (2013a). Discussing direct-to-consumer genetic DNA testing with patients a short guide for health professionals. NHMRC. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/attachments/Discussing%20direct-to-consumer-genetic-dna-testing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). (2013b). Genetic discrimination. NHMRC. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/genetic-discrimination
   Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). (2014). Use and disclosure of genetic information to a patient’s genetic relatives under section 95AA of the privacy act 1988 (Cth). NHMRC. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/guidelines-approved-under-section-95aa-privacy-act-1988-cth
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC). (2019). Chapter 6: APP 6 — Use or disclosure of personal information. OAIC. https://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy/australian-privacy-principles-guidelines/chapter-6-app-6-use-or-disclosure-of-personal-information/
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC). (n.d.) What is personal information? OAIC. https://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy/your-privacy-rights/your-personal-information/what-is-personal-information
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Victorian Health Complaints Commissioner (2018). Removal of ‘Imminent’ from the IPPs and HPPs: Guidance for Victorian public and private sector organisations. Health Complaints Commissioner. https://hcc.vic.gov.au/file/permalink/3464
   Google Scholar
• Otlowski, M., Tiller, J., Barlow-Stewart, K., & Lacaze, P. (2019). Genetic testing and insurance in Australia. Australian Journal of General Practice, 48(3), 96–99. https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-10-18-4722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otlowski, M. F. A. (2015). Disclosing genetic information to at-risk relatives: New Australian privacy principles, but uniformity still elusive. The Medical Journal of Australia, 202(6), 335–337. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja14.00670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parliament of Australia. (2018a). Parliamentary joint committee on corporations and financial services. Inquiry into the life insurance industry. Parliament of Australia. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Corporations_and_Financial_Services/LifeInsurance
   Google Scholar
• Parliament of Australia. (2018b). Australian genetic non-discrimination working group. Submission regarding inquiry into the life insurance industry (Submission no. 60). Parliament of Australia. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Corporations_and_Financial_Services/LifeInsurance/Submissions
   Google Scholar
• Poornima, B., & Ahalya, R. (2016). Ethical issues in counselling and psychotherapy practice: Walking the line. Springer. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789811018060
   Google Scholar
• Psychology Board of Australia, (2020). Code of conduct. https://www.psychologyboard.gov.au/Standards-and-Guidelines/Code-of-conduct.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Savard, J., Terrill, B., Dunlop, K., Samanek, A., & Metcalfe, S. A. (2020). Human genetics society of australasia position statement: Online DNA testing. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 23(4), 256–258. https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2020.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiller, J., Winship, I., Otlowski, M. F., & Lacaze, P. A. (2021). Monitoring the genetic testing and life insurance moratorium in Australia: A national research project. Medical Journal of Australia, 214(4), 157–159. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozzo, P., Caenazzo, L., & Parker, M. J. (2014). Discovering misattributed paternity in genetic counselling: Different ethical perspectives in two countries. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(3), 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-101062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine, Biomedical, & Behavioral Research. (1983). Screening and counseling for genetic conditions: A report on the ethical, social, and legal implications of genetic screening, counseling, and education programs. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research.
   Google Scholar