Innovation policy measurement: analysis of Lithuania’s case

References

• Baležentis, A., & Balkienė, K. (2011). Analysis of Lithuanian innovation policy priorities in the context of European Union initiatives. Public Policy and Administration, 10, 212–230.
   Google Scholar
• Brauers, W. K. M., Baležentis, A., & Baležentis, T. (2012). Implementing the EU strategy in Baltic States: A multi-objective evaluation. Actual Problems of Economics, 8, 317–329.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. (2000). Innovation in a knowledge-driven economy. COM(2000) 567 final. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2000:0567:FIN:EN:PDF
   Google Scholar
• Dragan, N., Dzemyda, I., & Karčiauskas, A. (2011). An approach to evaluate influence of European Union innovation policy to increase the economic equality between member states. Intellectual Economics, 1, 22–36.
   Google Scholar
• Dzemyda, I., & Melnikas, B. (2009). Innovations, research and development in European Union: Impact on regional economy. Intellectual Economics 1, 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, T., Delbridge, R., & Munday, M. (2007). A critical assessment of the evaluation of EU interventions for innovation in the SME sector in Wales. Urban Studies, 44, 2429–2448.10.1080/00420980701540960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2002a). The European innovation monitoring system. Retrieved from http://cordis.europa.eu/eims/src/about.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2002b). The beginning: The first community innovation survey. Retrieved from http://cordis.europa.eu/eims/src/cis.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012a). Innobarometer. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/policy/innobarometer/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012b). European TrendChart. Retrieved from http://www.proinno-europe.eu/inno-policy-trendchart/page/about
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012c). Erawatch. Retrieved from http://erawatch.jrc.ec.europa.eu/erawatch/opencms/about/
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012d). Assessment of the 2012 national reform programme and convergence programme for Lithuania. Commission staff working document. SWD(2012) 319 final. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/nd/swd2012_lithuania_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). The innovation union scoreboard 2013. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/facts-figures-analysis/innovation-scoreboard/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Ginevicius, R., & Podviezko, A. (2013). The evaluation of financial stability and soundness of Lithuanian banks. Ekonomska Istrazivanja-Economic Research, 26, 191–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of the Republic of Lithuania. (2010). Lithuanian innovation strategy for 2010–2020. Retrieved from http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter3/dokpaieska.showdoc_l?p_id=365849&p_query=&p_tr2=2
   Google Scholar
• INSEAD, WIPO. (2012). The global innovation index 2012: Stronger innovation linkages for Global growth. Retrieved from http://www.globalinnovationindex.org/userfiles/file/GII-2012-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jakubavičius, A., & Vilys, M. (2007). Innovation policy: Priorities of enterprises in the high-technology oriented sector. Public Administration, 13, 66–73.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman Foundation, ITIF. (2012). The global innovation policy index. Retrieved from http://www2.itif.org/2012-global-innovation-policy-index.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Milbergs, E., & Vonortas, N. (2006). Innovation metrics: Measurement to insight. Retrieved from http://www.innovationtools.com/pdf/Innovation-Metrics-NII.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nauwelaers, C., & Wintjes, R. (2008). Innovation policy in Europe: Measurement and strategy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. (1998). The definition and measurement of innovation. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Schramm, L. L., Nyirfa, W., Grismer, K., & Kramers, J. (2011). Research and development impact assessment for innovation-enabling organizations. Canadian Public Administration, 54, 567–581.10.1111/capa.2011.54.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankevice, I., & Jucevicius, G. (2013). Institutional vs. sectoral dimension of innovation strategies of firms. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19, S360–S382.10.3846/20294913.2013.879752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Council for State Progress. (2011). Lithuania’s progress strategy Lithuania 2030. Retrieved from http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter3/dokpaieska.showdoc_l?p_id=412512&p_query=LIETUVOS%20PA%DEANGOS%20STRATEGIJA&p_tr2=2
   Google Scholar
• Vilys, M. (2011). Improvement of public innovation support effectiveness in European Union economic area ( Summary of doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://dspace.vgtu.lt/bitstream/1/904/1/1954_Vilys_Santrauka_WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum. (2011). The Global competitiveness report 2011–2012. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GCR_Report_2011-12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Yakchali, S. H., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2012). Using a integrated MCDM model for mining method selection in presence of uncertainty. Ekonomska Istrazivanja-Economic Research, 25, 869–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar