Environmental impact assessment based on group decision-making methods in mining projects

References

• Anjaneyulu, Y., & Manickam, V. (2007). Environmental impact assessment methodologies (2nd ed.). Hyderabad: BS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Begičević, N., Divjak, B., & Hunjak, T. (2010). Decision-making on prioritization of projects in higher education institutions using the analytic network process approach. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 18, 341–364.10.1007/s10100-009-0113-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canter, L. (1996). Environmental impact assessment. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, S. Y., Chang, Y. H., & Shen, C. Y. (2008). A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes. European Journal of Operational Research, 189, 132–145.10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. C., Croot, P., Carlsson, J., Colaço, A., Grehan, A., Hyeong, K., … Kennedy, R. (2013). A primer for the environmental impact assessment of mining at seafloor massive sulfide deposits. Marine Policy, 42, 198–209.10.1016/j.marpol.2013.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, S. E., Tsoulfas, G. T., Pappis, C. P., & Rachaniotis, N. P. (2004). Aggregating and evaluating the results of different environmental impact assessment methods. Ecological Indicators, 4, 125–138.10.1016/j.ecolind.2004.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, X., Hu, Y., Deng, Y., & Mahadevan, S. (2014). Environmental impact assessment based on D numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 635–643.10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdoğmus, S., Kapanoglu, M., & Koc, E. (2005). Evaluating high-tech alternatives by using analytic network process with BOCR and multiactors. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28, 391–399.10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2005.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouladgar, M. M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2011). An integrated model for prioritizing strategies of the Iranian mining sector. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 17, 459–483.10.3846/20294913.2011.603173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouladgar, M. M., Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Zavadskas, E. K., & Moini, S. H. H. (2012). A new hybrid model for evaluating the working strategies: Case study of construction company. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18, 164–188.10.3846/20294913.2012.667270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garraín, D., & Lechó, Y. (2014). Exploratory environmental impact assessment of the manufacturing and disposal stages of a new PEM fuel cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39, 1769–1774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haichao, W., Wenling, J., Lahdelma, R., Pinghua, Z., & Shuhui, Z. (2013). Atmospheric environmental impact assessment of a combined district heating system. Building and Environment, 64, 200–212.10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Sedaghat, M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2012). Performance evaluating of rural ICT centers (telecenters), applying fuzzy AHP, SAW-G and TOPSIS Grey, a case study in Iran. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18, 364–387.10.3846/20294913.2012.685110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. New York, NY: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. H., Choi, M. S., Mha, H. S., & Joung, J. Y. (2013). Environmental impact assessment and eco-friendly decision-making in civil structures. Journal of Environmental Management, 126, 105–112.10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, K. F. R., & Lai, J. H. (2009). Decision-support for environmental impact assessment: A hybrid approach using fuzzy logic and fuzzy analytic network process. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 5119–5136.10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, K. F. R., & Yu, C. W. (2009). Integrating case-based and fuzzy reasoning to qualitatively predict risk in an environmental impact assessment review. Environmental Modelling & Software, 24, 1241–1251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, T. K., Sheu, H. Y., & Tseng, C. N. (2013). Environmental impact assessment of seawater desalination plant under the framework of integrated coastal management. Desalination, 326, 10–18.10.1016/j.desal.2013.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance–performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41, 77–79.10.2307/1250495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medineckienė, M., & Björk, F. (2011). Owner preferences regarding renovation measures – The demonstration of using multi-criteria decision making. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 17, 284–295.10.3846/13923730.2011.582380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momtaz, S., & Kabir, S. M. Z. (2013). Evaluating environmental and social impact assessment: Framework for effective EIA system. In Evaluating Environmental and Social Impact Assessment in Developing Countries (pp. 171–187). Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-408129-1.00008-5
   Google Scholar
• Önut, S., Tuzkaya, U. R., & Torun, E. (2011). Selecting container port via a fuzzy ANP-based approach: A case study in the Marmara Region. Turkey, Transport Policy, 18, 182–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palevičius, V., Paliulis, G. M., Venckauskaite, J., & Vengrys, B. (2013). Evaluation of the requirement for passenger car parking spaces using multi-criteria methods. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 19, 49–58.10.3846/13923730.2012.727463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. (2013). The application of a mathematical model of sustainability to the results of a semi-quantitative environmental impact assessment of two iron ore opencast mines in Iran. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 7839–7854.10.1016/j.apm.2013.03.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1996). Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sagar, M. K., Jayaswal, P., & Kushwah, K. (2013). Exploring fuzzy SAW method for maintenance strategy selection problem of material handling equipment. International Journal of Current Engineering and Technology, 3, 600–605.
   Google Scholar
• Salbu, B., Burkitbaev, M., Strømman, G., Shishkov, I., Kayukov, P., Uralbekov, B., & Rosseland, B. O. (2013). Environmental impact assessment of radionuclides and trace elements at the Kurday U mining site, Kazakhstan. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 123, 14–27.10.1016/j.jenvrad.2012.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomons, G. H., Hoberg, G. (2014). Setting boundaries of participation in environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 45, 69–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinding, K. (1999). Environmental impact assessment and management in the mining industry. Natural Resources Forum, 23, 57–63.10.1111/narf.1999.23.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Tamošaitienė, J., Šipalis, J., Banaitis, A., & Gaudutis, E. (2013). Complex model for the assessment of the location of high-rise buildings in the city urban structure. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 17, 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP. (2000). Industry and environment – Mining and sustainable development II; Challenges and perspectives. Vol. 23. Retrieved from http://www.uneptie.org/media/review/vol23si/unep23.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yazdani-Chamzini, A., & Yakhchali, S. H. (2012). Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) selection using fuzzy multicriteria decision making methods. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 30, 194–204.10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353.10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar