Audit reporting for going concern in Spain during the global financial crisis

References

• Abdel, S. M. (1985). Qualified audit opinions in the U.K.: An empirical study of the timeliness of corporate reporting behaviour. Doctoral Thesis, London University, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Alcarria, J. (1997). Estudio sobre los informes de auditoría de empresa cotizadas [Study on the audit reports of listed companies]. Partida Doble, 83, 72–83.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, E. I. (1982). Accounting implications of failure prediction models. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 6, 4–19.
   Google Scholar
• Altman, E. I., & McGough, T. (1974). Evaluation of a company as a going concern. Journal of Accountancy, 138, 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, V., & Fearnley, S. (1995). The importance of audit firm characteristics and the drivers of auditor change in UK listed companies. Accounting and Business Research, 25, 227–239.10.1080/00014788.1995.9729912
   Google Scholar
• Bedingfield, J., & Loeb, S. (1974). Auditor changes-an examination. Journal of Accountancy, 137, 66–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, J., Khurana, I., & Raman, K. (2010). Do the Big 4 and the Second-tier firms provide audits of similar quality? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29, 330–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, C. J., & Roberts, W. (1967). A study of auditor changes. The Journal of Accountancy, 27, 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Caramanis, C., & Spathis, C. (2006). Auditee and audit firm characteristics as determinants of audit qualifications: Evidence from the Athens stock exchange. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21, 905–920.10.1108/02686900610705000
   Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Huss, H. F. (1995). Temporal changes in bankruptcy-related reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 14, 133–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Huss, H. F. (1997). The effect of SAS No. 59: How treatment of the transition period influences results. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 16, 114–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2003). Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following “new” going‐concern reports. The Accounting Review, 78, 95–117.10.2308/accr.2003.78.1.95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, P. J., Geiger, M. A., & O’Connell, B. T. (2008). Costs associated with going-concern-modified audit opinions: An analysis of the Australian audit market. Abacus, 48, 61–81.10.1111/abac.2008.44.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Carson, E., Fargher, N., Geiger, M., Lennox, C., Raghunandan, K., & Willekens, M. (2012). Auditing reporting on going concern uncertainty. A research synthesis. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2000496
   Google Scholar
• Carson, E., Simnett, R., & Tronnes, C. P. (2011). International consistency in audit reporting behaviour: Evidence from going concern modifications, report to international auditing and assurance standards board. Retrieved from http://www.iaaer.org/research_grants/files/IAASB%20Report%20Final%20working%20version%209%20January%202012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Caso, C., García, J., López, A., & Martínez, A. (2003). Estudio de la incidencia de ciertos factores en el informe de auditoría [Study of the incidence of certain factors in the audit report]. Spanish Accounting Review, 6, 57–86.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, K. H., Lin, K. Z., & Mo, P. L. I. (2006). A political–economic analysis of auditor reporting and auditor switches. Review of Accounting Studies, 11, 21–48.10.1007/s11142-006-6394-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheffers, M., Whalen, D., & Sielis, R. (2011). 2010 going concerns: An eleven year review, audit analytics, Sutton, MA, EE.UU. Retrieved from http://media.complianceweek.com/documents/25/auditanalytics_gc_rpt_07-11_6246.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cheffers, M., Whalen, D., & Thrun, M. (2010). 2009 going concerns: A ten year review, audit analytics, Sutton, MA, EE.UU. Retrieved from http://www.complianceweek.com/s/documents/AAAprilGoingConcern.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chen, K. C. W., & Church, B. K. (1992). Default on debt obligations and the issuance of going concern opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 11, 30–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, C. W., & Rice, S. J. (1982). Qualified audit opinions and auditor switching. The Accounting Review, 57, 326–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citron, D., & Taffler, R. (1992). The audit report under going concern uncertainties: An empirical analysis. Accounting and Business Research, 22, 337–345.10.1080/00014788.1992.9729449
   Google Scholar
• Congress House. (2011). Ley 38/2011, de 11 de Octubre, Concursal, Boletín Oficial del Estado núm. 245 de 11 de Octubre de 2011 [Law 38/2011, of October 11, Concursal, Official State Gazette No. 245 of October 11, 2011]. Retrieved from http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2011/10/11/pdfs/BOE-A-2011-15938.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Craswell, A. (1988). The association between qualified opinions and auditor switches. Accounting and Business Research, 19, 23–31.10.1080/00014788.1988.9728832
   Google Scholar
• DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3, 183–199.10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
   Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., Francis, J. R., & Hu, X. (2011). The geography of SEC enforcement and auditor reporting for financially distressed clients ( Working paper). Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1132885
   Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., & Lennox, C. (2011). The effect of SOX on small auditor exits and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52, 21–40.10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., & Subramanyam, K. R. (2002). Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 1247–1274.10.1111/1475-679X.00088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duréndez, A., & Sánchez, J. (2008). La influencia del informe de auditoría en la obtención de financiación bancaria [The relevance of the audit report for obtaining bank credit]. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 37, 255–278.
   Google Scholar
• Dye, R. A. (1991). Informationaly motivated auditor replacement. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14, 347–374.10.1016/0165-4101(91)90008-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). (1984). Eighth Council Directive 84/253/EEC of 10 April 1984 based on Article 54 (3) (g) of the Treaty on the approval of persons responsible for carrying out the statutory audits of accounting documents.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). (2006). Directive 2006/43/EC of de European Parliament and of the Council of May 17, 2006 on statutory audits of annuals accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/CEE and 83/349/CEE and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (EU). (2010). Green Paper Audit Policy: Lessons from the Crisis, Bruselas, 13.10.2010 COM (2010) 561 final.
   Google Scholar
• Fargher, N. L., & Jiang, L. (2008). Changes in the audit environment and auditors’ propensity to issue going-concern opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27, 55–77.10.2308/aud.2008.27.2.55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrugia, K. J., & Baldacchino, P. J. (2005). Qualified audit opinions in Malta. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20, 823–843.10.1108/02686900510619674
   Google Scholar
• Feldmann, D., & Read, W. (2010). Auditor conservatism after enron. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29, 267–278.10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., & Yu, M. (2009). Big 4 office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 84, 1521–1552.10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Benau, M. A., Ruiz-Barbadillo, E., & Vico, A. (1998). Análisis de la estructura del mercado de servicios de auditoría en España [Analysis of the structure of the market for audit services in Spain]. Madrid, Spain: Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas.
   Google Scholar
• García-Benau, M. A., Ruiz-Barbadillo, E., & Vico, A. (2000). Factores que condicionan la elección y cambio de auditor en la empresa española [Factors affeting auditor choice and auditor change in Spanish firms]. Spanish Accounting Review, 3, 49–80.
   Google Scholar
• García-Benau, M. A., Zorio, A., & Novejarque, J. (2013). Políticas europeas sobre auditoría en tiempos de crisis [European policies on auditing in times of crisis]. Revista Galega de Economía, 22, 229–248.
   Google Scholar
• García-Delgado, J. L., & Myro, R. (2011). Lecciones de economía española [Lessons of Spanish economy]. Navarra, Spain: Cívitas.
   Google Scholar
• Garsombke, H. P., & Choi, S. (1992). The association between auditor’s uncertainty opinions and business failures. Advances in Accounting, 10, 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., & Raghunandan, K. (2001). Bankruptcies, audit reports, and the reform act. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20, 187–196.10.2308/aud.2001.20.1.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (1998). A note on going concern modified audit reports and subsequent bankruptcies before and after SAS No. 59. Accounting Enquiries, 8(1), 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., Raghunandan, K., & Rama, Dasaratha V. (2005). Recent changes in the association between bankruptcies and prior audit opinion. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24, 21–35.10.2308/aud.2005.24.1.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Aguilar, N., & Ruiz-Barbadillo, E. (1999). Un estudio descriptivo sobre la naturaleza de la opinión de auditoría en España [A descriptive study of the nature of the audit opinion in Spain]. Revista Técnica del Instituto de Censores Jurados de Cuentas de España, 15, 26–45.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Aguilar, N., & Ruiz-Barbadillo, E. (2000). Un estudio empírico sobre la relación entre el informe de auditoría y cambio de auditor [An empirical study on the relationship between the audit report and auditor switching]. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 29, 705–741.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalo-Angulo, J. A. (1995). Presentación: la auditoría, una profesión en la encrucijada de los noventa [Presentation: Auditing, a profession at the crossroads of the nineties]. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 84, 595–629.
   Google Scholar
• González-Bravo, M., & Martín, D. (1999). Contenido y tipos de opinión de los informes de auditoría depositados por las empresas en los registros mercantiles [Content and type of opinion on the audit reports deposited by companies in business registers]. Técnica Contable, 602, 81–100.
   Google Scholar
• Gosman, M. L. (1973). Characteristics of firms making accounting changes. The Accounting Review, 48, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Haskins, M., & Willians, D. (1990). A Contingent model of intra-big eight auditor changes. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 9, 55–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, J., & Vidal, J. A. (1998). Análisis de los informes de auditoría de las empresas de la región de Murcia [Analysis of audit reports of companies in the region of Murcia]. Gestión. Revista de Economía, 7, 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, W., McKeown, J. C., & Mutchler, J. F. (1989). A test of the incremental explanatory power of opinions qualified for consistency and uncertainty. The Accounting Review, 64, 28–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Lords. (2011). Auditors: Market concentration and their role. Select committee on economic affairs ( 2nd report of session 2010-2011). London: The Stationery Office Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Inquiry, Sharman (2011). Going concern and liquidity risks: Lessons for companies and auditors. Preliminary Report and Recommendations of the Panel of Inquiry. London: UK.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Accounting and Auditing (ICAC). (1991). Resolución de 19 de Enero de 1991, del Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas, por la que se publican las Normas Técnicas de Auditoría [Resolution of January 19, 1991, of the Institute of Accounting and Auditing, which publishes the Spanish Standards of Auditing]. Retrieved from http://www.icac.meh.es/Temp/20140922225824.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Accounting and Auditing (ICAC). (1993). Resolución de 31 de Mayo de 1993, del Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas, por la que se Publica la Norma Técnica de Auditoría sobre la Aplicación del Principio de Empresa en Funcionamiento [Resolution of May 31, 1993, of the Institute of Accounting and Auditing, which publishes the Spanish Standard on Auditing, Going Concern]. Retrieved from http://www.icac.meh.es/Temp/20130204181606.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Accounting and Auditing (ICAC). (2008). Informe de auditoría. primer ejercicio de aplicación del nuevo PGC y adaptación del modelo de informe de auditoría a la modificación de la legislación mercantil por la Ley 16/2007, de 4 de Julio. BOICAC, 75, Consulta No. 1 [Audit report. First exercise of application of the new PGC and adaptation of the model of audit report to the modification of the mercantile legislation by Law 16/2007, of July 4th. BOICAC, 75, Consultation No. 1]. Retrieved from http://www.icac.meh.es/Consultas/Boicac/ficha.aspx?hid=313
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Accounting and Auditing (ICAC). (2010). Resolución de 21 de Diciembre de 2010, del Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas, por la que se publica la modificación de la Sección 3 de las Normas Técnicas de Auditoría, publicadas por Resolución de 19 de Enero de 1991 [Resolution of December 21, 2010, of the Institute of Accounting and Auditing, which publishes the modification of Section 3 of the Spanish Standards of Auditing, published by Resolution of January 19, 1991]. Retrieved from http://www.icac.meh.es/Temp/20130204181520.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2009a). International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 700 – Forming an audit opinion and reporting on financial statements. New York, NY: IAASB.
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2009b). International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 705 – Modifications to the opinion in the independent auditor′s report. New York, NY: IAASB.
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2009c). International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 706 – Emphasis of matter paragraphs and other matter paragraphs in the independent auditor′s report. New York, NY: IAASB.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. E., & Williams, D. D. (2012). The changing relationship between audit firm size and going concern reporting. Accounting Organizations and Society, 27, 322–341.10.1016/j.aos.2012.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keasey, K., Watson, R., & Wynarczyk, P. (1988). The small company audit qualification: A preliminary investigation. Accounting and Business Research, 18, 323–334.10.1080/00014788.1988.9729379
   Google Scholar
• Knechel, W. R., & Vanstraelen, A. (2007). The relationship between auditor tenure and audit quality implied by going concern opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26, 113–131.10.2308/aud.2007.26.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, J. (1994). Auditor switching and conservatism. The Accounting Review, 69, 200–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, J., & Krishnan, J. (1996). The role of economic trade-offs in the audit opinion decision: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 11, 565–586.10.1177/0148558X9601100403
   Google Scholar
• Lennox, C. (1999). The accuracy and incremental information content of audit reports in predicting bankruptcy. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 26, 757–778.10.1111/jbfa.1999.26.issue-5&6
   Google Scholar
• Lennox, C. (2000). Going-concern opinions in failing companies: Auditor dependence and opinion shopping ( SSRN Working Paper Series 08/2000). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228236036_Going-concern_Opinions_in_Failing_Companies_Auditor_Dependence_and_Opinion_Shopping
   Google Scholar
• López-Corrales, F. J. (1997). Los informes de auditoría de cuentas anuales. Un estudio empírico sobre Galicia [The audit reports of financial statements. An empirical study of Galicia]. Doctoral Thesis, University of Vigo, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• López-Díaz, A., Andrés, J., & Rodríguez, E. (2000). Análisis de los informes de auditoría de las empresas del sector de la construcción en Asturias. Periodo 1994/96 [Analysis of the audit reports of companies in the construction industry in Asturias. Period 1994-1996]. In M. Lafuente, A. López-Díaz, & R. Pedreira, (Eds.), Homenaje a Ricardo Pedreira Pérez [Tribute to Ricardo Pedreira Pérez] (pp. 415–433). Spain: University of Oviedo.
   Google Scholar
• López-Díaz, A., Martínez-Arias, A., & García-Díez, J. (1997). Análisis de los informes de auditoría de las empresas asturianas [Analysis of audit reports Asturian companies]. In Instituto de Censores Jurados de Cuentas de España (Ed.), Ensayos sobre auditoría. Homenaje a Manuel Miers [Audit essays. Tribute to Manuel Miers] (pp. 271–290). Madrid: Revista del Instituto de Censores Jurados de Cuentas de España.
   Google Scholar
• Magee, R. P., & Tseng, M. (1990). Audit pricing and independence. The Accounting Review, 65, 315–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mareque, M., López-Corrales, F. J., & De Lima, E. (2012). Cómo reflejan la crisis los informes de auditoría de las cotizadas [How the crisis is reflected in the audit reports of listed companies]. Partida Doble, 239, 56–70.
   Google Scholar
• Mareque, M., López-Corrales, F. J., & Fiestras, G. (2015). Do auditors make mistakes when they write audit reports? An empirical study applied to Spanish non-listed firms. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 28, 204–225.10.1080/1331677X.2015.1028242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mareque, M., López-Corrales, F. J., & Pedrosa, A. (2011). La crisis financiera y su incidencia en los informes de auditoría de las cotizadas [Financial crisis and impact on the audit reports of listed companies]. XVI Congreso AECA, Nuevo Modelo Económico: Empresa, Mercados y Culturas [XVI Congress AECA, New Economic Model: Company, Markets and Cultures], Granada, Spain, September 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, J. C., Mutchler, J. F., & Hopwood, W. (1991). Towards an explanation of auditor failure to modify the audit opinions of bankrupt companies. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 10 ( supplement), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, U., Hernández, M. C., & Hernández, C. A. (1997). Los informes de auditoría a través de una muestra de empresas [The audit reports through a sample of companies]. Partida Doble, 81, 55–63.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, K., & Schwartz, K. (1987). An empirical investigation of audit qualification decisions in the presence of going concern uncertainties. Contemporary Accounting Research, 3, 302–315.10.1111/care.1987.3.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Industry, Energy & Tourism. (2012). Estadísticas PYME. Evolución de Indicadores [SME statistics. Evolution of indicators]. No. 10, April. Retrieved from http://www.ipyme.org/Publicaciones/ESTADISTICAS_PYME_N10_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Minutti-Meza, M. (2011). Does auditor industry specialization improve audit quality? Evidence from comparable clients ( Working Paper). Retrieved from http://raw.rutgers.edu/docs/seminars/spring11/Minutti-Meza.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mutchler, J. F., Hopwood, W., & McKeown, J. (1997). The influence of contrary information and mitigating factors in audit opinion decisions on bankrupt companies. Journal of Accounting Research, 35, 295–310.10.2307/2491367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutchler, J. F., & Williams, D. D. (1990). The relationship between audit technology, client risk profiles and the going concern opinion decision. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 9, 39–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Numan, W., & Willekens, M. (2012). Competitive pressure, audit quality and specialization ( Working paper). Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, E., & Peñalosa, J. (2012). Claves de la crisis económica española y retos para crecer en la UEM [Keys of the Spanish economic crisis and challenges to grow in the economic and monetary union]. Banco de España. Documentos Ocasionales 1201. Retrieved from http://www.bde.es/f/webbde/SES/Secciones/Publicaciones/PublicacionesSeriadas/DocumentosOcasionales/12/Fich/do1201.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, C., & Terza, J. (2002). Are going concern audit opinions a self-fulfilling prophecy? Advances in Quantitative Analysis of Finance and Accounting, 10, 89–116.
   Google Scholar
• Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (1995). Audit reports for companies in financial distress: Before and after SAS No. 59. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 14, 50–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichelt, K., & Wang, D. (2010). National and office-specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 48, 647–686.10.1111/joar.2010.48.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Barbadillo, E., Gómez-Aguilar, N., & Guiral, A. (2002). Una comparación intersectorial y por tamaño de la calidad de la información contable a través del análisis del informe de auditoría [Intersectoral size and quality of accounting information compared by analyzing the audit report]. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 112, 545–581.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Blanco, S., & López-Corrales, F. (2003). La aplicación del principio de empresa en funcionamiento: valoración de la opinión de auditoría [Application of the principle of going concern: Assessment of the audit opinion]. Técnica Contable, 652, 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Segura, A. (2003). Salvedades y cambio de auditor [Qualified opinions and auditor switches]. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 32, 983–1012.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Segura, A., & Sierra, G. (2001). El informe de auditoría y su relación con las características corporativas [The audit report and its corporate characteristics]. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 31, 349–392.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, K., & Menon, K. (1985). Auditor switching by mailing firms. The Accounting Review, 60, 248–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. B. (1986). Auditor ‘Subject-to’ opinions, disclaimers and auditor changes. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 6, 95–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teoh, S. (1992). Auditor independence, dismissal threats and the market reaction to auditor switches. Journal of Accounting Research, 30(1), 1–30.10.2307/2491089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanstraelen, A. (2003). Going-concern opinions, auditor switching, and the self-fulfilling prophecy effect examined in the regulatory context of Belgium. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 18, 231–254.10.1177/0148558X0301800204
   Google Scholar
• Warren, C. S. (1975). Uniformity of auditing standards. Journal of Accounting Research, 13, 162–176.10.2307/2490654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, C. S. (1980). Uniformity of auditing standards: A replication. Journal of Accounting Research, 18, 312–324.10.2307/2490406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. D. (1988). The potencial determinants of auditor change. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 15, 243–261.10.1111/jbfa.1988.15.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Jiang, Alicia Liwei, Fargher, N., & Carson, Elizabeth (2011). Audit reports in Australia during the global financial crisis. Australian Accounting Review, 21, 22–31.10.1111/auar.2010.21.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Carson, E., Fargher, N., & Jiang, A. (2013). Responses by Australian auditors to the global financial crisis. Accounting and Finance, 53, 301–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar