Strategic R&D risk choices of public and private firms

References

• Anderson, A., & Cabral, L. M. B. (2007). Go for broke or play it safe? Dynamic competition with choice of variance. RAND Journal of Economics, 38(3), 409–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, J. (2001). Intensity of competition and the incentive to innovate. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(5), 705–726. doi:10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00090-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buehler, S., & Wey, S. (2010). Demand-enhancing investment in mixed duopoly. University of St. Gallen Department of Economics Working Paper No. 2010-16.
   Google Scholar
• Buehler, S., & Wey, S. (2014). When do state-owned firms crowd out private investment?. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 14(3), 319–330. doi:10.1007/s10842-013-0164-y
   Google Scholar
• Cabral, L. M. B. (1994). Bias in market R&D portfolios. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 12, 533–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabral, L. M. B. (2003). R&D competition when firms choose variance. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 12(1), 139–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cato, S. (2011). Privatization policy and cost-reducing investment by the private sector. The Manchester School, 79(6), 1157–1178. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.2010.02193.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. H., & Nie, P. Y. (2014). Duopoly innovation under product externalities. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 27(1), 232–243. doi:10.1080/1331677X.2014.952092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. H., Nie, P. Y., & Wang, X. H. (2015). Asymmetric duopoly competition with innovation spillover and input constraint. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(6), 1124–1139. doi:10.3846/16111699.2013.823104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P., & Maskin, E. (1987). The simple economics of research portfolio. Economic Journal, 97(387), 581–595. doi:10.2307/2232925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d’Aspremont, C., & Jacquemin, A. (1988). Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. The American Economic Review, 78, 1133–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlach, H., Rønde, T., & Stahl, K. (2005). Project choice and risk in R&D. Journal of Industrial Economics, 53(1), 53–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Moltó, M., Poyago-Theotoky, J., & Zikos, V. (2011). R&D subsidies, spillovers and privatization in mixed markets. Southern Economic Journal, 78 (1), 233–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godø, H., Nerdrum, L., Rapmund, A., & Nygaard, S. (2003). Innovations in fuel cells and related hydrogen technology in Norway - OECD case study in the energy sector. NIFU skriftserie no. 35.
   Google Scholar
• Han, S. H., Heywood, J. S., & Ye, G. L. (2017). Informative advertising in a mixed oligopoly. Review of Industrial Organization, 51, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, S. E., & Niehaus, G. R. (2003). Risk management and insurance (2nd edition). McGraw-Hill Companies, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, J. S., & Ye, G. L. (2009). Partial privatization in a mixed duopoly with an R&D rivalry. Bulletin of Economic Research, 61(2), 165–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishibashi, I., & Matsumura, T. (2006). R&D competition between public and private sectors. European Economic Review, 50, 1347–1366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishibashi, K., & Kaneko, T. (2008). Partial privatization in mixed duopoly with price and quality competition. Journal of Economics, 95(3), 213–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesavayuth, D., & Zikos, V. (2013). R&D versus output subsidies in mixed markets. Economics Letters, 118(2), 293–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitahara, M., & Matsumura, T. (2013). Mixed duopoly, product differentiation, and competition. The Manchester School, 81(5), 730–744. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9957.2012.02329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klette, D., & de Meza, D. (1986). Is the market biased against risky R&D?. RAND Journal of Economics, 17(1), 133–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D. J., & Choi, K. (2016). Bertrand vs. Cournot competition with upstream firm investment. Bulletin of Economic Research, 68(S1), 56–65. doi:10.1111/boer.12067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. H., & Tomaru, Y. (2017). Output and R&D subsidies in mixed oligopoly. Operations Research Letters, 45(3), 238–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. J. (2007). Prediction model of cumulative risk loss of new and high technology innovation. Journal of Mudanjiang University, 16(6), 70–71.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumura, T., & Matsushima, N. (2004). Endogenous cost differentials between public and private enterprises: A mixed duopoly approach. Economica, 71(284), 671–688. doi:10.1111/j.0013-0427.2004.00394.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumura, T., & Tomaru, Y. (2015). Mixed duopoly, location choice, and shadow cost of public funds. Southern Economic Journal, 82(2), 416–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menezes, F. M., & Pereira, J. (2017). Emissions abatement R&D: Dynamic competition in supply schedules. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 19(4), 841–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nett, L. (1994). Why private firms are more innovative than public firms. European Journal of Political Economy, 10(4), 639–653. doi:10.1016/0176-2680(94)90031-0
   Google Scholar
• Nie, P. Y., & Yang, Y. C. (2015). Cost-reduction innovation under mixed economy. Economics Discussion Papers 2015-68, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Poyago-Theotoky, J. (1998). R&D competition in a mixed duopoly under uncertainty and easy imitation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 26(3), 415–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, L. D. (1997). On the dynamic efficiency of Bertrand and Cournot equilibria. Journal of Economic Theory, 75(1), 213–229. doi:10.1006/jeth.1997.2270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, N., & Vives, X. (1984). Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. RAND Journal of Economics, 15(4), 546–554. doi:10.2307/2555525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symeonidis, G. (2003). Comparing Cournot and Bertrand equilibria in a differentiated duopoly with product R&D. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(1), 39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tishler, A. (2008). How risky should an R&D program be?. Economics Letters, 99, 268–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tondji, J. B. (2015). Comparing welfare under Cournot and Bertrand competition with or without investment in R&D.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaru, Y. (2007). Privatization, productive efficiency and social welfare with a foreign competitor. Research in Economics, 61(4), 224–232. doi:10.1016/j.rie.2007.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, T. H., Wang, C. C., & Chiou, J. R. (2016). Can privatization be a catalyst for environmental R&D and result in a cleaner environment?. Resource and Energy Economics, 43, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalley, A. E. (2011). Optimal R&D investment for a risk-averse entrepreneur. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35, 413–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, M. Q. (2014). On the optimal choices of R&D risk in a market with network externalities. Economic Modelling, 38, 71–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, M. Q. (2017). The optimal risk choice of cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. Bulletin of Economic Research, 69(4), E173–E185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing, M. Q. (2018). The impact of spillovers on strategic R&D under uncertainty. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 428–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L. G., Liu, J. J., & Yang, Y. P. (2010). Implementing national new energy sources automobile independent innovation program based on collecting R&D tax. Scientific Management Research, 28(4), 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Zemlickienė, V., Bublienė, R., & Jakubavičius, A. (2018). A model for assessing the commercial potential of high technologies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 9(1), 29–54. doi:10.24136/oc.2018.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. (2015). Research on R&D investment of mixed oligopoly with foreign penetration and partial privatization. Science and Technology Management Research, 9, 105–109.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. F., Mei, S., & Zhong, W. J. (2013). Should R&D risk always be preferable?. Operations Research Letters, 41, 147–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, L. X. (2011). Analysis of risk cost of enterprise technological innovation. Business Culture, (11 ), 136–136.
   Google Scholar
• Zikos, V. (2007). Equilibrium and optimal R&D roles in a mixed market. Discussion Paper Series 2007-08, Department of Economics, Loughborough University.
   Google Scholar
• Zikos, V. (2010). R&D collaboration networks in mixed oligopoly. Southern Economic Journal, 77(1), 189–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoledowska, E. P. (2016). Innovation in contemporary economies. Oeconomia Copernicana, 7(3), 451–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar