Relationship between ambidexterity and entrepreneurial intensity

References

• Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333. doi:10.1002/smj.821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahammad, M. F., Lee, S. M., Malul, M., & Shoham, A. (2015). Behavioral ambidexterity: The impact of incentive schemes on productivity, motivation, and performance of employees in commercial banks. Human Resource Management, 54(S1), S45–S62. doi:10.1002/hrm.21668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambos, T. C., Mäkelä, K., Birkinshaw, J., & D’Este, P. (2008). When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1424–1447. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00804.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 495–527. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00054-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, L. D. (1999). Using LISREL and PLS to measure customer satisfaction. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Sawtooth Software Conference. La Jolla, CA. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/41ae/3afc7ebec994c7cad7dcafa0deeab1f2f261.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling. Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, Special Issue on Research Methodology, 2(2), 285–309.
   Google Scholar
• Brem, A. (2017). Creativity and routine: Conceptual considerations on managing organisational ambidexterity in entrepreneurial ventures. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 21(3), 261–273. doi:10.1504/IJEIM.2017.083472
   Google Scholar
• Burgelman, R. A. (1983). Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: Insights from a process study. Management Science, 29(12), 1349–1364. doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.12.1349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgers, J. H., Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Structural differentiation and corporate venturing: The moderating role of formal and informal integration mechanisms. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3), 206–220. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhan, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781–796. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2006). Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters: A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe, and Asia. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Cassis, Y., & Papelasis, I. (2005). Entrepreneurship in theory and history: State of the art and new perspectives. In Y. Cassis & I. Papelasis (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in theory and history (pp. 3–21). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Castaño-Martínez, M. S., Ruiz-Fuensanta, M. J., & Martínez-Rodríguez, I. M. (2013). The influence of socioeconomic factors on entrepreneurship and innovation. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 23(2), 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Cesinger, B., Hughes, M., Mensching, H., Bouncken, R., Fredrich, V., & Kraus, S. (2016). A socioemotional wealth perspective on how collaboration intensity, trust, and international market knowledge affect family firms’ multinationality. Journal of World Business, 51(4), 586–599. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2016.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, A. C., & Dunkelberg, W. C. (1986). Entrepreneurship and paths to business ownership. Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), 53–68. doi:10.1002/smj.4250070106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87. doi:10.1002/smj.4250100107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Y., Du, K., Byun, G., & Zhu, X. (2017). Ambidexterity in new ventures: The impact of new product development alliances and transactive memory systems. Journal of Business Research, 75, 77–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dakhli, M., & De Clercq, D. (2004). Human capital, social capital and regional innovation: A multi-country study. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16(2), 107–128. doi:10.1080/08985620410001677835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2011). Rotating leadership and collaborative innovation: Recombination processes in symbiotic relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 159–201. doi:10.1177/0001839211428131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Carolis, D. M., & Saparito, P. (2006). Social capital, cognition, and entrepreneurial opportunities: A theoretical framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 41–56. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00109.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management. London: William Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, R., & Miller, N. (1992). A primer for soft modeling. Akron, OH: University of Akron Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C. (1982). A second generation of multivariate analysis: An overview. In C. Fornell (Ed.), A second generation of multivariate analysis (pp. 1–21). New York, NY: I. Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frohman, A. L. (1983). Technology as a competitive weapon. Harvard Business Review, 60(1), 97–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (2000). Social capital and civil society (International Monetary Fund Working Paper, 74). Washington, DC: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Galindo, M. A., & Méndez, M. T. (2014). Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and innovation: Are feedback effects at work? Journal of Business Research, 67 (5), 825–829. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706. doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4279094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. A. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. doi:10.2307/20159573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, A. (1985). Measuring changes in entrepreneurial orientation following industry deregulation: The development of a diagnostic instrument. In G. B. Roberts (Ed.). Proceedings: Discovering entrepreneurship (pp. 50–57). Marietta, GA: U.S. International Council for Small Business.
   Google Scholar
• Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Project (GEM) (2016). APS-Global data 2012. Retrieved from http://www.gemconsortium.org/data/sets. Accessed 25 May 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., & Sytch, M. (2007). Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer’s performance in procurement relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 32–69. doi:10.2189/asqu.52.1.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Heavey, C., & Simsek, Z. (2017). Distributed cognition in top management teams and organizational ambidexterity: The influence of transactive memory systems. Journal of Management, 43(3), 919–945. doi:10.1177/0149206314545652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, M. A., Lee, H., & Yucel, E. (2002). The importance of social capital to the management of multinational enterprises: Relational networks among Asian and Western Firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2/3), 353–372.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: Form liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 50–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G. R., & Butler, J. E. (1992). Managing internal corporate entrepreneurship: An agency theory perspective. Journal of Management, 18(4), 733–749. doi:10.1177/014920639201800408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaasa, A. (2009). Effects of different dimensions of social capital on innovative activity: Evidence from Europe at the regional level. Technovation, 29(3), 218–233. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafouros, M. I., Buckley, P. J., Sharp, J. A., & Wang, C. (2008). The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance. Technovation, 28(1-2), 63–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koryak, O., Lockett, A., Hayton, J., Nicolaou, N., & Mole, K. (2018). Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation. Research Policy, 47(2), 413–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, S. S., & Aulakh, P. S. (2002). Multinationality and firm performance: The moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 79–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, S. I., Frese, M., Friedrich, C., & Unger, J. M. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation: A psychological model of success among southern African small business owners. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14(3), 315–344. doi:10.1080/13594320500170227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuratko, D. F., & Morris, M. H. (2018). Corporate entrepreneurship: A critical challenge for educators and researchers. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 42–60. doi:10.1177/2515127417737291
   Google Scholar
• Kyoon, D. (2014). Substructures of perceived knowledge quality and interactions with knowledge sharing and innovativeness: A sense making perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(3), 523–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laukkanen, S. (2012). Making sense of ambidexterity. A process view of the renewing effects of innovation activities in a multinational enterprise. Helsinki: Hanken School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organisations: A dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 05(03), 377–400. doi:10.1142/S1363919601000427
   Google Scholar
• Liao, J., & Welsch, H. (2003). Social capital and entrepreneurial growth aspiration: A comparison of technology- and non-technology-based nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 149–170. doi:10.1016/S1047-8310(03)00009-9
   Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172. doi:10.2307/258632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. W., Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2000). Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation research: Operationalizing and measuring a key strategic decision making process. Journal of Management, 26(5), 1055–1085. doi:10.1177/014920630002600503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P., & Carayannis, E. G. (2017). On the path towards open innovation: Assessing the role of knowledge management capability and environmental dynamism in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(3), 553–570. doi:10.1108/JKM-09-2016-0403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, J. (2017). Entrepreneurial leadership: A conceptual examination. IUP Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 14(4), 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Meglio, O., King, D. R., & Risberg, A. (2015). Improving acquisition outcomes with contextual ambidexterity. Human Resource Management, 54 (S1), S29–S43. doi:10.1002/hrm.21721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. P., & Arnold, D. R. (1991). The relationship between marketing orientation and entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(4), 49–65. doi:10.1177/104225879101500407
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791. doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. H., & Kuratko, D. F. (2002). Corporate entrepreneurship–entrepreneurial development within organizations. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M. H., & Paul, G. W. (1987). The relationship between entrepreneurship and marketing in established firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), 247–259. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(87)90012-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. H., & Sexton, D. L. (1996). The concept of entrepreneurial intensity: Implications for company performance. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 5–13. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(95)00158-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. doi:10.5465/amr.1998.533225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Onyema, G. (2016). Towards building internal social network architecture that drives innovation: A social exchange theory perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(3), 534–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacios-Marqués, D., Popa, S., & Alguacil-Mari, M. P. (2016). The effect of online social networks and competency-based management on innovation capability. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(3), 499–511. doi:10.1108/JKM-05-2015-0175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, P. C., Messersmith, J. G., & Lepak, D. P. (2013). Walking the tight-rope: An assessment of the relationship between high performance work systems and organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1420–1442. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan, S., Dalgic, T., Li, D., & Sethi, D. (2006). The development of entrepreneurial networks: A necessary condition for international new ventures. Strategic Management Review, 1(1), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Phene, A., Tallman, S., & Almeida, P. (2012). When do acquisitions facilitate technological exploration and exploitation? Journal of Management, 38(3), 753–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinchot, G. (1985). Intrapreneuring. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Pittiglio, R., Sica, E., & Villa, S. (2009). Innovation and internationalization: the case of Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(6), 588–602. doi:10.1007/s10961-009-9107-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezende, J., Torres, A., Correia, A., Nicolini, A., & Bernardes, R. (2016). Integrating enabling contexts and ambidexterity to create intellectual capital faculty’s competencies on undergraduate business management programs. Intangible Capital, 12(4), 1006–1039. Retrieved from http://www.intangiblecapital.org/index.php/ic/article/view/724/569 doi:10.3926/ic.724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roldán-Bravo, M. I., Ruiz-Moreno, A., & Lloréns-Montes, F. J. (2018). Examining desorptive capacity in supply chains: The role of organizational ambidexterity. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(2), 534–553. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-12-2016-0751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothaermel, F. T., & Alexandre, M. T. (2009). Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science, 20(4), 759–780. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothaermel, F. T., & Hess, A. M. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual, firm, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18(6), 898–921. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkees, M., & Hulland, J. (2009). Innovation and efficiency: It is possible to have it all. Business Horizons, 52(1), 45–55. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2008.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheepers, R., Hough, J., & Bloom, J. (2013). Entrepreneurial intensity: A comparative analysis of established companies in South Africa. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 10(2), 238–255. doi:10.4102/sajems.v10i2.585
   Google Scholar
• Schollhammer, H. (1982). Intemal corporate entrepreneurship. In C. A. Kent., D. L. Sexton, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.). Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship (pp. 209–229). Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity’s conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864–894. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto-Acosta, P., & Meroño-Cerdan, A. L. (2008). Analyzing e-business value creation from a resource-based perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 28(1), 49–60. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(5), 17–27.
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463. doi:10.5465/amj.2005.17407911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedberg, R. (2000). Max Weber and the idea of economic sociology. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenhaus, M. (1998). La régression PLS: Théorie et pratique. Paris: Technip.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–478. doi:10.2307/257085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). The ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–23. doi:10.2307/41165852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M., Smith, W. K., Wood, R. C., Westerman, G., & O’Reilly, C. (2010). Organizational designs and innovation streams. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(5), 1331–1366. doi:10.1093/icc/dtq040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. A. (2009). Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2), 221–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesper, K. H. (1984). Three faces of corporate entrepreneurship: A pilot study. In J. A. Homaday, F. Tarpley, Jr., J. A. Timmons, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 294–326). Wellesley. MA: Babson College.
   Google Scholar
• Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Santoro, G., & Papa, A. (2017). Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 374–388. doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9502-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., & Li, J. (2008). Untangling the effects of overexploration and overexploitation on organizational performance: The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Journal of Management, 34(5), 925–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A. M., & Shaw, G. (2011). Internationalization and innovation in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(1), 27–51. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2010.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, K. K. K. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank (2016). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators. Accessed 2 April 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A. (1993). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior: A critique and extension. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(4), 5–21. doi:10.1177/104225879301700401
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(94)00004-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., & Nielsen, A. P. (2002). Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strategic Management Journal, 23(5), 377–398. doi:10.1002/smj.229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zortea-Johnston, E., Darroch, J., & Matear, S. (2012). Business orientations and innovation in small and medium sized enterprises. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(2), 145–164. doi:10.1007/s11365-011-0170-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar