Substitutes or complements? Relationship between natural resources and physical capital – a few stylised facts

References

• Acemoglu, D. (2009). Introduction to modern economic growth. Princeton: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hemous, D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. The American Economic Review, 102(1), 131–166. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.1.131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apostolakis, B. E. (1990). Energy-capital substitutability/complementarity: The dichotomy. Energy Economics, 12(1), 48–58. doi: 10.1016/0140-9883(90)90007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnberg, S., & Bjorner, T. B. (2007). Substitution between energy, capital and labour within industrial companies: A micro panel data analysis. Resource and Energy Economics, 29(2), 122–136. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2006.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bairam, E. (1991). Functional form and new production functions: Some comments and a new VES function. Applied Economics, 23(7), 1247–1250. doi: 10.1080/00036849100000164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443. doi: 10.2307/2937943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R. J., & Sala-I-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223–251. doi: 10.1086/261816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barro, R. J., & Sala-I-Martin, X. (2003). Economic growth (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgärtner, S. (2004). The Inada conditions for material resource inputs reconsidered. Environmental and Resource Economics, 29, 307–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caselli, F. (2005). Accounting for cross-country income differences. Handbook of Economic Growth, 1, 679–741.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, F., Hepburn, C., & Teytelboym, A. (2017). Can we stop depleting natural capital? A literature review on substituting it with other forms of capital. INET Oxford Working Paper No. 2017-13.
   Google Scholar
• Costantini, V., & Paglialunga, E. (2014). Elasticity of substitution in capital-energy relationships: How central is a sector-based panel estimation approach? (No. 1314). Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza, R., & Daly, H. E. (1992). Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology, 6(1), 37–46. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csereklyei, Z., Rubio-Varas, M., & Stern, D. I. (2016). Energy and Economic Growth: The Stylized Facts. The Energy Journal, 37(2), 223–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, H. E. (1997). Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz. Ecological Economics, 22(3), 261–266. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00080-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, H. E. (1999). How long can neoclassical economists ignore the contributions of Georgescu-Roegen? In Bioeconomics and Sustainability: Essays in Honour of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen (pp. 13–24). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1979). Energy analysis and economic valuation. Southern Economic Journal, 45(4), 1023–1058. doi: 10.2307/1056953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golosov, M., Hassler, J., Krusell, P., & Tsyvinski, A. (2014). Optimal taxes on fossil fuel in general equilibrium. Econometrica, 82(1), 41–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaud, A., & Rougé, L. (2008). Environment, directed technical change and economic policy. Environmental and Resource Economics, 41(4), 439–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaud, A., & Rougé, L. (2014). Carbon sequestration, economic policies and growth. Resource and Energy Economics, 36(2), 307–331. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Growiec, J., & Schumacher, I. (2008). On technical change in the elasticities of resource inputs. Resources Policy, 33(4), 210–221. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2008.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassler, J., Krusell, P., & Olovsson, C. (2012). Energy-saving technical change (No. w18456), National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (2012). Penn World Table Version 7.1, Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania, Nov.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. I. (1995). R & D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 103(4), 759–784. doi: 10.1086/262002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C. I. (1997). On the evolution of the world income distribution. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(3), 19–36. doi: 10.1257/jep.11.3.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koetse, M. J., De Groot, H. L., & Florax, R. J. (2008). Capital-energy substitution and shifts in factor demand: A meta-analysis. Energy Economics, 30(5), 2236–2251. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, R. E. (1987). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42. doi: 10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaczewski, M. (2018). Natural resources as an energy source in a simple economic growth model. Bulletin of Economic Research, 70(4), 362–380. doi: 10.1111/boer.12153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markandya, A., & Pedroso-Galinato, S. (2007). How substitutable is natural capital?. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37(1), 297–312. doi: 10.1007/s10640-007-9117-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehra, R., & Prescott, E. C. (1985). The equity premium: A puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 15(2), 145–161. doi: 10.1016/0304-3932(85)90061-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102. doi: 10.1086/261725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solow, J. L. (1987). The capital-energy complementarity debate revisited. The American Economic Review, 77(4), 605–614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solow, R. M. (1997). Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow-Stiglitz. Ecological Economics, 22(3), 267–268. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00081-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. (1974). Growth with exhaustible resources: Efficient and optimal growth paths. Review of Economic Studies, (symposium volume), 123–137. doi: 10.2307/2296377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. (1997). Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow-Stiglitz. Ecological Economics, 22(3), 269–270. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00092-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szpiro, G. G. (1986). Measuring risk aversion: An alternative approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68(1), 156–159. doi: 10.2307/1924939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar