A New Fuzzy Risk Management Model for Production Supply Chain Economic and Social Sustainability

References

• Aqlan, F., & Lam, S. S. (2015). A fuzzy-based integrated framework for supply chain risk assessment. International Journal of Production Economics, 161, 54–63. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azapagic, A., & Perdan, S. (2000). Indicators of sustainable development for industry. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 78(4), 243–261. doi:10.1205/095758200530763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baas, S., & Kwakernaak, H. (1977). Rating and ranking of multiple-aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets. Automatica, 13(1), 47–58. doi:10.1016/0005-1098(77)90008-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badurdeen, F., Shuaib, M., Wijekoon, K., Brown, A., Faulkner, W., Amundson, J., … Boden, B. (2017). Quantitative modeling and analysis of supply chain risks using Bayesian theory. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 25(5), 654. doi:10.1108/JMTM-10-2012-0097
   Google Scholar
• Bounit, A., Irhirane, E., Bourquia, N., & Benmoussa, R. (2016). Design of a fuzzy model that integrates hygiene, safety, and environment systems for the assessment of the overall risk of machines. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 230(4), 378–390. doi:10.1177/1748006X16641791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caputo, A. C., Pelagagge, P. M., & Salini, P. (2013). A multicriteria knapsack approach to economic optimization of industrial safety measures. Safety Science, 51(1), 354–360. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2007). Supply chain management. Strategy, Planning & Operation. Das Summa Summarum Des Management, 95, 265–275.
   Google Scholar
• Christopher, M., & Lee, H. (2004). Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(5), 388–396. doi:10.1108/09600030410545436
   Google Scholar
• Djapan, M. J., Tadic, D. P., Macuzic, I. D., & Dragojovic, P. D. (2015). A new fuzzy model for determining risk level on the workplaces in manufacturing small and medium enterprises. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, 229(5), 456–468. doi:10.1177/1748006X15581219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, D. J., & Prade, H. (1980). Fuzzy sets and systems: Theory and applications (Vol. 144) Cambridge, MA: Academic press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, C., & Gatzert, N. (2017). Modeling operational risk incorporating reputation risk: An integrated analysis for financial firms. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 72, 122–137. doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2016.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannakis, M., & Papadopoulos, T. (2016). Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 455–470. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.032
   Google Scholar
• Heckmann, I., Comes, T., & Nickel, S. (2015). A critical review on supply chain risk-Definition, measure and modelling. Omega, 52, 119–132. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: A literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), 5031–5069. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1030467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, E. (2011). Natural hedging as a risk prophylaxis and supplier financing instrument in automotive supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 16(2), 128–141. doi:10.1108/13598541111115374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., Ertay, T., & Büyüközkan, G. (2006). A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(2), 390–411. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, T., & Kahraman, C. (2011). Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 6577–6585. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabrouki, C., Bentaleb, F., & Mousrij, A. (2014). A decision support methodology for risk management within a port terminal. Safety Science, 63, 124–132. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloni, M. J., & Brown, M. E. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: An application in the food industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 35–52. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9038-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meixell, M. J., & Gargeya, V. B. (2005). Global supply chain design: A literature review and critique. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 41(6), 531–550. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2005.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pamučar, D., & Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3016–3028. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pamučar, D., Petrović, I., & Ćirović, G. (2018). Modification of the best–worst and MABAC methods: A novel approach based on interval-valued fuzzy-rough numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 91, 89–106. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2017.08.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawlak, Z. (1998). Rough set theory and its applications to data analysis. Cybernetics & Systems, 29(7), 661–688. doi:10.1080/019697298125470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, A. (2014). QRAM a Qualitative Occupational Safety Risk Assessment Model for the construction industry that incorporate uncertainties by the use of fuzzy sets. Safety Science, 63, 57–76. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadi-Nezhad, S., & Damghani, K. K. (2010). Application of a fuzzy TOPSIS method base on modified preference ratio and fuzzy distance measurement in assessment of traffic police centers performance. Applied Soft Computing, 10(4), 1028–1039. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, D. (2004). A review of enterprise supply chain risk management. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 13(2), 219–244. doi:10.1007/s11518-006-0162-2
   Google Scholar
• Song, W., Ming, X., & Liu, H. C. (2017). Identifying critical risk factors of sustainable supply chain management: A rough strength-relation analysis method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 100–115. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stulz, R. M. (1996). Rethinking risk management. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 9(3), 8–25. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6622.1996.tb00295.x
   Google Scholar
• Tadic, D., Aleksic, A., Mimovic, P., Puskaric, H., & Misita, M. (2016). A Model for evaluation of customer satisfaction with service quality in an uncertain environment. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 29, 1342-1361. doi:10.1080/14783363.2016.1257905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadic, D., Aleksic, A., Popovic, P., Arsovski, S., Castelli, A., Joksimovic, D., & Stefanovic, M. (2017). The evaluation and enhancement of quality, environmental protection and seaport safety by using FAHP. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 17(2), 261–275. doi:10.5194/nhess-17-261-2017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadić, D., Stefanović, M., & Aleksić, A. (2014). The evaluation and ranking of medical device suppliers by using fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 27(4), 2091–2101. doi:10.1155/2014/418085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, O., & Musa, S. N. (2011). Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), 25–34. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tazelaar, F., & Snijders, C. C. P. (2013). Operational risk assessments by supply chain professionals: Process and performance. Journal of Operations Management, 31(1-2), 37–51. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2012.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W. W., & Lee, Y. T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), 499–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2009). Multi-attribute decision-making model by applying grey numbers. Informatica, 20(2), 305–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer, K., Fröhling, M., Breun, P., & Schultmann, F. (2017). Assessing social risks of global supply chains: A quantitative analytical approach and its application to supplier selection in the German automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 96–109. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, H. J. (2011). Fuzzy set theory—and its applications. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media:.
   Google Scholar