Empirical evidence of an S-curve in Croatia

References

• Altig, D., Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M., & Linde, J. (2011). Firm-specific capital, nominal rigidities and the business cycle. Review of Economic Dynamics, 14(2), 225–247. doi: 10.1016/j.red.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbostanci, E. (2004). Dynamics of the trade balance: The Turkish J-curve. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 40(5), 57–73. doi: 10.1080/1540496X.2004.11052584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkay, R. C. (2015). S-curve dynamics of trade between Turkey and her trading partners. International Journal of Economics and Administrative Studies, 8(15), 179–192.
   Google Scholar
• Backus, D. K., Kehoe, P. J., & Kydland, F. E. (1994). Dynamics of the trade balance and the terms of trade: The J-curve? American Economic Review, 84(1), 84–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Hegerty, S. W. (2010). The J- and S-curves: A survey of the recent literature. Journal of Economic Studies, 37(6), 580–596. doi: 10.1108/01443581011086639
   Google Scholar
• Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Kutan, A. M. (2009). The J-curve in the emerging economies of Eastern Europe. Applied Economics, 41(20), 2523–2532. doi: 10.1080/00036840701235696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Ratha, A. (2007a). Bilateral S-curve between Japan and her trading partners. Japan and the World Economy, 19(4), 483–489. doi: 10.1016/j.japwor.2006.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Ratha, A. (2007b). The S-curve dynamics of U.S. bilateral trade. Review of International Economics, 15(2), 430–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9396.2007.00640.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Ratha, A. (2008). S-Curve at the industry level: Evidence from US-UK commodity trade. Empirical Economics, 35(1), 141–152. doi: 10.1007/s00181-007-0147-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Ratha, A. (2009). S-curve dynamics of trade: Evidence from US-Canada commodity trade. Economic Issues, 14(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Ratha, A. (2010). S-Curve dynamics of trade between U.S. and China. China Economic Review, 21(2), 212–223. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2009.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahmani-Oskooee, M., & Xi, D. (2015). A note on the S-curve dynamics of commodity trade between Brazil and the United States. Latin American Journal of Economics, 52(2), 307–394. doi: 10.7764/LAJE.52.1.79
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, M. (1995). International trade and business cycle. In G. M. Grossman & K. Rogoff (Eds.), Handbook of international economics (Vol. 3, 1st ed., pp. 1801–1864). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Benazić, M., & Tomić, D. (2014). The evaluation of fiscal and monetary policy in Croatia over a business cycle. Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics: Journal of Economics and Business, 32(1), 75–99.
   Google Scholar
• Cota, B., Erjavec, N., & Botrić, V. (2006). The effect of real exchange rate changes on Croatian bilateral trade balances. Ekonomska Istraživanja, 19(2), 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Corsetti, G., Martin, P., & Pesenti, P. (2007). Productivity, terms of trade and the ‘home market effect’. Journal of International Economics, 73(1), 99–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedola, L., & Neri, S. (2007). What does a technology shock do? A VAR analysis with model-based sign restrictions. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(2), 512–549. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dmitriev, A., & Roberts, I. (2013). The cost of adjustments: On comovement between the trade balance and the terms of trade. Economic Modelling, 35, 689–700. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.08.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, Z., & Müller, G. (2009). On the international transmission of technology shocks. Journal of International Economics, 78(1), 45–59. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2009.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, F. R., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276. doi: 10.2307/1913236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galì, J. (1999). Technology, employment, and the business cycle: Do technology shocks explain aggregate fluctuations? American Economic Review, 89(1), 249–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, A. (2012). Is there an S-curve relationship between U.S. trade balance and terms of trade? An Analysis across Industries and Countries, 32(1), 325–337.
   Google Scholar
• Hsing, Y. (2009). Test of the J-curve for six selected new EU countries. International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, 2(1), 76–85. doi: 10.1504/IJEPEE.2009.022942
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, S. (2002). The interpretation of cointegration coefficients in the cointegrated vector autoregressive model (Reprint No. 14). Reprints of Departments of Theoretical Statistics, University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration – With applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbugwe, H. (2006). The bilateral J-curve hypothesis between Turkey and her 9 trading partners (MPRA Paper No. 4254). Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Kiseľáková, D., Šofranková, B., Čabinová, V., & Onuferová, E. (2018). Competitiveness of sustainable growth analysis of the EU countries with the use of Global Indexes’ methodology. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(3), 581–599. doi: 10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koški, D. (2009). Utjecaj promjene deviznoga tečaja na bilancu roba Republike Hrvatske: Ekonometrijska analiza. Ekonomski Pregled, 60(3–4), 152–167.
   Google Scholar
• Mackevičius, J., Šneidere, R., & Tamulevičienė, D. (2018). The waves of enterprises bankruptcy and the factors that determine them: The case of Latvia and Lithuania. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(1), 100–114. doi: 10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwah, K., & Klein, L. R. (1996). Estimation of J-curve: United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Economics, 9(3), 523–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadenichek, J. (2012). The S-curve revisited: The terms, volume and balance of trade over the business cycle. International Journal of Applied Economics, 9(2), 39–57.
   Google Scholar
• Ono, M., & Baak, S. (2014). Revisiting the J-curve for Japan. Modern Economy, 5(1), 32–47. doi: 10.4236/me.2014.51005
   Google Scholar
• Palić, I., Dumičić, K., & Šprajaček, P. (2014). Measuring real exchange rate misalignment in Croatia: A cointegration approach. Croatian Operational Research Review, 5(2), 135–148. doi: 10.17535/crorr.2014.0003
   Google Scholar
• Parikh, A., & Shibata, M. (2004). Dynamics of the relationship between the terms of trade and the trade balance in developing countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 2(2), 104–121. doi: 10.1007/BF03404611
   Google Scholar
• Rhee, H.-J. (2014). Trade balance between Korea, China and Japan implemented by the S-curve. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 57, 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. A. (1995). The second J-curve and trade account dynamic. Applied Economics Letters, 2(2), 31–33. doi: 10.1080/135048595357645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senhadji, A. S. (1998). Dynamics of the trade balance and the terms of trade in LDCs: The S-curve. Journal of International Economics, 46(1), 105–131. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00043-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorić, P. (2008). On the impact of exchange rate on Croatian foreign trade results: Elasticity approach. Paper presented at the Young economist’s seminar to 14th Dubrovnik Economic Conference, Croatian National Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Stučka, T. (2004). The effects of exchange rate change on the trade balance in Croatia. (IMF Working Paper 04/65), International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Šimáková, J. (2014). The effects of exchange rate change on the trade balance Slovakia. European Financial and Accounting Journal, 9(3), 50–66. doi: 10.18267/j.efaj.124
   Google Scholar
• Škare, M., Šimurina, J., & Tomić, D. (2012). Income terms of trade trend and volatility in Croatia. Economic Research, 25(4), 905–924. doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2012.11517538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tica, J., & Nazifovski, L. (2012). Utjecaj tečajne politike na ekonomsku aktivnost u visoko zaduženoj zemlji. Serija članaka u nastajanju br, 1202. Ekonomski fakultet Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.
   Google Scholar
• Tomić, D. (2016a). An alternative approach to the trade dynamics in Croatia. Proceedings from the 12th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development in Bangkok, Varaždin Development and Entrepreneurship Agency and University North.
   Google Scholar
• Tomić, D. (2016b). A more complex approach to the terms of trade dynamics; the case of Croatia. In M. Benazić, M. Božina Beroš, G. Gimigliano, A. Novak, & D. Učkar (Eds.), The EU economic environment post-crisis: Policies, institutions and mechanisms (pp. 95–108). Pula, Croatia: Juraj Dobrila University of Pula.
   Google Scholar
• Tomić, D. (2014). Peta interfakultetska znanstvena konferencija, Konkurentnost, ekonomski rast i blagostanje. In Može li Hrvatska tražiti izlaz iz ‘gospodarske agonije’ kroz izvoz? Osijek, Croatia: Ekonomski fakultet u Osijeku.
   Google Scholar
• Tomić, D. (2012). Croatian terms of trade: Historical perspective, movements and welfare effect. Economic Research, 25(1), 117–139.
   Google Scholar
• Zemguliene, J., & Valukonis, M. (2018). Structured literature review on business process performance analysis and evaluation. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(1), 226–252. doi: 10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Žižka, M., Hovorková Valentová, V., Pelloneová, N., & Štichhauerová, E. (2018). The effect of clusters on the innovation performance of enterprises: Traditional vs new industries. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(4), 780–794. doi: 10.9770/jesi.2018.5.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar