Enterprise values and enterprise policy interdependence

References

• Allport, G. W., Vernon, P. E., & Lindzey, G. (1931, 1951, 1960). Study of values: A scale for measuring the dominant interests in personality. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Belak, Ja. (2010). Integralni management: MER model. Maribor: MER Evrocenter.
   Google Scholar
• Belak, Je. (2013). Corporate governance and the practice of business ethics in Slovenia. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 26(6), 527–535. doi: 10.1007/s11213-013-9301-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belak, Je. (2016). Management and governance: Organizational culture in relation to enterprise life cycle. Kybernetes, 45(4), 680–698. doi: 10.1108/K-04-2014-0082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belak, Ja., Belak, Je., & Duh, M. (2014). Integral Management and Governance: Basic Features of MER Model. Saarbrücken: Lambert.
   Google Scholar
• Belak, Ja., & Duh, M. (2012). Integral management: key success factors in the MER Model. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 9(3), 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H., & Drumwright, M. E. (2007). Mainstreaming corporate social responsibility: developing markets for virtue. California Management Review, 49(4), 132–157. doi: 10.2307/41166409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čančer, V., & Šarotar Žižek, S. (2015). A proposed approach to the assessment of psychological well-being in organizations. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 10(2), 217–235. doi: 10.1007/s11482-014-9308-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. doi: 10.5465/amr.1979.4498296
   Google Scholar
• Chhokar, J. S., Brodbeck, F. C., & House, R. J. (2008). Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), vii–xvi. doi: 10.2307/249690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. NY: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Dankova, P., Valeva, M., & Štrukelj, T. (2015). A comparative analysis of international CSR standards as enterprise policy/governance innovation guidelines. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32(2), 152–159. doi: 10.1002/sres.2254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duh, M., & Belak, Je. (Eds.). (2014). Integral management and governance: Empirical findings of MER model. Saarbrücken: Lambert.
   Google Scholar
• Duh, M. (2015). Upravljanje Podjetja in Strateški Management. Ljubljana: GV Založba.
   Google Scholar
• Duh, M., Belak, Je., & Milfelner, B. (2010). Core values, culture and ethical climate as constitutional elements of ethical behaviour: Exploring differences between family and non-family enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 473–489. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0519-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duh, M., Belak, Je., & Milfelner, B. (2016). The importance of culture for enterprise dynamics: The role of type and strength of culture. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 29(1), 263–285. doi: 10.1080/1331677X.2016.1168038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duh, M., & Štrukelj, T. (2011). Integration and requisite holism of the enterprises' governance and management as precondition for coping with global environmental changes. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 8(1), 41–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, M. J., & Rejc Buhovac, A. (2014). Making sustainability work. Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. Second Edition. Sheffield: Greenleaf; San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• EU. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for corporate social responsibility. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/files/csr/new-csr/act_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurements errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi: 10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GEM. (2016). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2015/16 global report. Retrieved from http://www.gemconsortium.org/report.
   Google Scholar
• Graeme, M., Farndale, E., Paauwe, J., & Stiles, P. G. (2016). Corporate governance and strategic human resource management: Four archetypes and proposals for a new approach to corporate sustainability. European Management Journal, 34, 22–35. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2016.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, T., & Guthrie, P. (2008). A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated, and sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(2-3), 73–89. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New Challenges to International Marketing (Advances in International Marketing), 20, 277–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., & Sarsted, M. (2013). Goodness-of-fit indices for partial least squares path modeling. Computational Statistics, 28(2), 565–580. doi: 10.1007/s00180-012-0317-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton, P. R. (2004). Statistics explained: A guide for social science students (2nd ed). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1998). Masculinity and femininity: The Taboo dimension of national cultures. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 5–21. doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd ed). NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Ruiz-Quintanilla, A. S., Dorfman, P. W., Falkus, S., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (1999). Cultural influences on leadership and organizations: Project GLOBE. In W. H. Mobley, J. M. Gessner & V. Arnold (Eds.), Advances in Global Leadership (pp. 171–233). Stamford: Jai.
   Google Scholar
• ISO (2010). ISO 26000, social responsibility. Geneva: ISO. Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/discovering_iso_26000.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kanungo, R. N. (2001). Ethical values of transactional and transformational leaders. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences de L'administration, 18(4), 257–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1936-4490.2001.tb00261.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavčič, K., Meško, M., Meško Štok, Z., & Markič, M. (2015). Corporate policy and the degree of management sophistication in slovenian companies. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 14(1), 70–88. doi: 10.1504/IJMED.2015.069314
   Google Scholar
• Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations. Evanston: Row, Peterson and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lencioni, P. M. (2002). Make your values mean something. Harvard Business Review, 80(7), 113–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malbašić, I., Rey, C., & Potočan, V. (2015). Balanced organizational values: From theory to practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 437–446. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2238-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, F. (2011). Corporate policy and governance. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Meško Štok, Z., Markič, M., & Meško, M. (2009). The process of leadership, innovation and decision making through the influence of values. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 10(1), 38–52.
   Google Scholar
• Minkov, M. (2007). What makes us different and similar: A new interpretation of the world values survey and other cross-cultural data. Sofia, Bulgaria: Klasika i Stil.
   Google Scholar
• Mulej, M., Božičnik, S., Čančer, V., Hrast, A., Jurše, K., Kajzer, Š., … Ženko, Z. (2013). Dialectical systems thinking and the law of requisite holism concerning innovation. Litchfield Park: Emergent Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mulej, M., & Dyck, R. (Eds.). (2014). Social responsibility beyond neoliberalism and charity. Volume 1–4. USA: Bentham Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mulej, M., Hrast, A., & Dyck, R. (Ed.). (2015). Corporate social responsibility. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32(2), 147–264. Special Issue: doi: 10.1002/sres.2253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulej, M., Hrast, A., & Zenko, Z. (Ed.). (2013). Social responsibility – measures and measurement viewpoints. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 26(6), 471. doi: 10.1007/s11213-013-9297-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Stewens, G., & Lechner, C. (2005). Strategisches management. 3. Auflage. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.
   Google Scholar
• Potočan, V., & Mulej, M. (2007). Transition into an innovative enterprise. Maribor: University of Maribor, FEB.
   Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 (M3). Hamburg: University of Hamburg. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.de.
   Google Scholar
• Ritala, P., & Sainio, L.-M. (2014). Coopetition for radical innovation: Technology, market and business-model perspectives. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(2), 155–169. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2013.850476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1979). Understanding human values: Individual and societal. NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, K. W. (Ed.). (2000). Finding the middle ground: Insights and applications of the value orientations method. Yarmouth: Intercultural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Šarotar Žižek, S., & Mulej, M. (2013). Social responsibility: A way of requisite holism of humans and their well-being. Kybernetes, 42(2), 318–335. doi: 10.1108/03684921311310639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 cultures. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25 (pp. 1–65). San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Šebjan, U., & Tominc, P. (2015). Impact of support of teacher and compatibility with needs of study on usefulness of SPSS by students. Computers in Human Behavior, 53(2), 354–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, L. (2006). Overview of corporate governance issues for co-operatives. Manchester, UK: The Co-Operative College. Commissioned by the Global Corporate Governance Forum for the Working Meeting on Corporate Governance and Co-Operatives, London. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6f18/8743cff4fd0257e4e65472f2903497f848fb.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. H. (1998). Social psychology across cultures (2nd ed.). London: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sternad, S., Gradišar, M., & Bobek, S. (2011). The influence of external factors on routine ERP usage. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(9), 1511–1530. doi: 10.1108/02635571111182818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, D. W. (1989). Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 13(2), 147–169. doi: 10.2307/248922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Štrukelj, T. (2015). Dialektični Sistem Vidikov za Inoviranje Upravljanja in Vodenja Tranzicijskega Podjetja: Doktorska Disertacija. Maribor: University of Maribor, FEB.
   Google Scholar
• Štrukelj, T., & Šuligoj, M. (2014). Holism and social responsibility for tourism enterprise governance. Kybernetes, 43(3/4), 394–412. doi: 10.1108/K-07-2013-0159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SURS (2012). International women’s day 2012. Republic of Slovenia: Statistical Office. Retrieved from http://www.stat.si/StatWeb/en/mainnavigation/data/show-first-release-old?IdNovice=4548.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, H. (1990). Unternehmenspolitik. Bern & Stuttgart: Paul Hampt.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelen, T. L., Hunger, D. J., Hoffman, A. N., & Bamford, C. E. (2018). Strategic management and business policy: Globalization, innovation and sustainability. 15th ed. London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wold, H. (1982). Soft modeling: The basic design and some extensions. Systems under Indirect Observations, 2(X), 1–54.
   Google Scholar
• ZGD. (2015). Zakon o gospodarskih družbah. Ljubljana: RS.
   Google Scholar